Measurement properties of instruments that assess inclusive access to fitness and recreational sports centers: A systematic review

Exploring Health and Premature Mortality of Wheelchair Users from a Medical and a Greek-Orthodox Perspective

Wheelchair users have a lower life expectancy compared to the general population. This project aims to provide a deeper understanding of the interaction between physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors that affect the mortality and health of this target group. The methods used were qualitative. Data from phenomenological interviews, questionnaires, medical reports, and existing literature were composed to develop a grounded theory depicting the overall health of wheelchair users. The research team explored death causes, risk factors of premature death, and contributors that affect risk factors. In the discussion, we explored and analyzed specific patterns of interaction of the factors in the data and other research projects. Moreover, we attempted to analyze these patterns through the viewpoint of the Greek-Orthodox tradition. In general, the project confirmed previous research findings. The most common death causes seemed to be heart attacks and cancer. These seemed to be affected mainly by obesity, physical inactivity, unhealthy lifestyle, and inadequate preventive healthcare. Spiritual practices based on the Greek-Orthodox tradition are suggested as ways of management. The conclusions can be useful not only to health and social care professionals and clerics, but also wheelchair users themselves.

A scoping review of public building accessibility

BACKGROUND

The built environment needs to be designed so that all people can participate in the activities they want and need to do. Yet, accessibility is difficult to put into practice, and accessibility issues tend to be overlooked in the building and planning processes.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this scoping review was to summarize the research front in the area of accessibility to public buildings. Specific aims were to identify knowledge gaps, to identify access activities in relation to environmental features and to link to predominant activities in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Inspec, Embase and Cochrane databases. Articles in English based on original empirical studies investigating accessibility of public buildings for adults aged ≥18 years with functional limitations were considered.

RESULTS

Of the 40 articles included, ten involved study participants, while 30 only examined buildings using instruments to assess accessibility. In addition, the psychometric properties were only tested for a few of them. All articles concerned mobility and several visual limitations, while few addressed cognitive or hearing limitations. Ten main access activities were identified, from using parking/drop-off area to exiting building.

CONCLUSIONS

By using the ICF and theoretically relating the accessibility problems to activities, the results revealed that there are large knowledge gaps about accessibility to public buildings for older people and people with functional limitations and that there is a need for more methodological considerations in this area of research.

Barriers to, and Facilitators of, Exercising in Fitness Centres among Adults with and without Physical Disabilities: A Scoping Review

Fitness centres are an obvious arena for performing physical activity for the general population but representation of adults with physical disabilities (AwPD) is lacking. To increase possibilities for AwPD to exercise in fitness centres together with adults without physical disabilities (AwoPD), the aim of this study was to identify, synthesise, and compare barriers to, and facilitators of, exercising in fitness centres for each group. A scoping review was conducted and data extraction of the barriers and facilitators was performed independently by two researchers on six categories of contextual factors based on the framework of Di Blasi: (1) The fitness centre setting; (2) The fitness centre user characteristics; (3) The fitness instructor/staff characteristics; (4) The fitness centre user-instructor/management relationship; and (5) The fitness/exercise characteristics. An extra category, (6) Other relationships, was added. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was used for reporting. Of the 102 included papers, only 26 (25%) of the papers were on AwPD, which focused mainly on physical barriers (category 1: inaccessible settings). In contrast, the remaining 76 papers involving AwoPD focused primarily on facilitators (category 2: motivational factors and exercising effects). In categories 3-6, the two groups had similar results, as both groups preferred skilled instructors, a welcoming and comfortable fitness centre environment, an ability to exercise at their preferred type and level, and good social connections. Since most data were based on AwoPD, more studies on actual experiences from AwPD are needed, to reveal the facilitators/motivational factors for fitness centre use.

Participation by design: Integrating a social ecological approach with universal design to increase participation and add value for consumers

BACKGROUND

Physical activity is an essential component of a healthy lifestyle. Health clubs encourage sustained healthy lifestyles but are still largely not accessible to people with disabilities. Cost is a barrier for accessibility enhancements.

HYPOTHESIS

We postulate that: (A) universal design coupled with a social ecological approach improves measured accessibility compared with existing fitness facilities constructed since the adoption of the ADA; (B) increased accessibility coupled with an environment friendly to people with disabilities attracts more participants to a YMCA than predicted by traditional industry market research producing a recovery of the cost of increased accessibility; and (C) attitudes of facility members toward people with disabilities may improve if an accessible facility facilitates more personal interactions between people with and without disabilities.

METHODS

Accessibility is measured with the Accessibility Instruments Measuring Fitness and Recreation Environments (AIMFREE). Cost recovery is determined by comparing excess membership revenue to the cost of universal design elements beyond regulatory requirements, and attitudes toward people with disabilities are measured with the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale.

RESULTS

AIMFREE scores were significantly higher than comparison facilities in all areas except for equipment, parking, training, and programs. Excess revenue exceeded the extra cost of accessibility enhancements and attitudes toward people with disabilities did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal design coupled with a social ecological approach improves accessibility in fitness facilities and results in a reasonable payback time. Attitudes toward people with disabilities did not change in a YMCA designed to accommodate people with disabilities.

Public entrance accessibility: Psychometric approach to the development of a new assessment instrument

BACKGROUND

The accessibility of public facilities for all is an issue increasingly gaining focus in policy debates, especially regarding the ageing population.

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes a psychometric approach to the development of a new instrument for assessing the accessibility of public entrances.

METHODS

Items to include were selected by means of literature review and classified according to a typology of person-environment fit that uses the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as theoretical framework. Content validity was assessed by a scientific panel approach and construct validity by using simulation techniques and correlation analysis with a related construct. Reliability was evaluated by inter-rater agreement analysis, where 15 strategically selected public entrances were assessed by five rater pairs.

RESULTS

Content validity was assessed as high (3.6 on a scale from 1 to 4) and correlation indicating convergent validity between instrument scores and a related construct was moderate (r_s = 0.60, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was acceptable to good (kappa 0.42, overall agreement 81%). After an iterative process including review of validity and reliability results, the resulting assessment instrument consisted of 56 items in 7 sections.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated good content validity and acceptable to good inter-rater reliability. Though initial results were promising, user involvement and further testing of construct validity is needed. The goal of the new instrument is a feasible tool for planning, evaluation and accomplishment of policies intended to make public entrances accessible for all. The extent to which the instrument succeeds remains to be tested by practical use.

Systematic Review of the Clinical Disease Severity Indices for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Clinical disease severity indices are increasingly being used in choosing treatment and monitoring the response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinical disease severity indices in IBD and to appraise their measurement properties and methodological quality.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for original articles describing the development and/or evaluation of one or more of the measurement properties of clinical disease severity indices used in IBD. We assessed these properties (e.g., internal consistency, reliability, validity, responsiveness) using a standardized checklist.

RESULTS

We examined the full text of 142 articles that we deemed potentially eligible and identified 22 clinical disease severity indices in IBD. No clinical disease index has met all the required measurement properties. All of the validation studies were not descriptive enough to allow assessment of their methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Although commonly used in multiple clinical trials, none of the clinical disease severity indices in IBD had all the required measurement properties. Further validation studies are required.

Systematic review of health-related quality of life measures for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several measures have been developed to assess the health-related quality of life [HRQoL] of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Our aim is to systematically review the HRQoL measures specific for patients with IBD and to appraise their measurement properties and methodological quality.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for original articles describing the development and/or evaluation of one or more of the measurement properties [e.g. internal consistency, reliability, validity, responsiveness] of HRQoL measures specific for IBD. We assessed the measurement properties and examined the methodological quality of the measurement properties of each instrument using a standardized checklist.

RESULTS

We examined the full text of 75 articles that we deemed potentially eligible and identified 10 disease-specific HRQoL measures in IBD that covered different aspects of patients' lives. Internal consistency, construct validity, and content validity were the commonly evaluated measurement properties. Seven HRQoL measures scored positive for at least four of eight measurement properties. The majority of studies were rated as 'fair' to 'poor' when assessing their methodology quality. The most established HRQoL measure in the literature was the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ].

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the included HRQoL measures did not include all the required measurement properties or had a problem with their methodological quality. The most widely used and validated measure was the IBDQ. Further validation studies are required to support the use of other HRQoL measures.

Measuring Physical Activity in Outdoor Community Recreational Environments: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice

Chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) are major contributors to escalating health care costs in the USA. Physical activity is an important protective factor against CVD, and the National Prevention Strategy recognizes active living (defined as a way of life that integrates physical activity into everyday routines) as a priority for improving the nation's health. This paper focuses on developing more inclusive measures of physical activity in outdoor community recreational environments, specifically parks and trails, to enhance their usability for at-risk populations such as persons with mobility limitations. We develop an integrated conceptual framework for measuring physical activity in outdoor community recreational environments, describe examples of evidence-based tools for measuring physical activity in these settings, and discuss strategies to improve measurement of physical activity for persons with mobility limitations. Addressing these measurement issues is critically important to making progress towards national CVD goals pertaining to active community environments.