How to support parents and healthcare professionals in the decision-making process of tube feeding in children?

'They don't know what to do with our children': Experiences and views on feeding and swallowing from parents of children who use long-term ventilation

Increasing use of paediatric long-term ventilation (LTV) has been reported around the world over the last two decades and it is anticipated that use of this medical intervention will continue to grow. Research has shown that children who use LTV have risk factors for feeding and swallowing difficulties which result in long-term reliance on non-oral feeding methods. This Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) activity explored experiences of parents of children with LTV on their children's feeding and swallowing journeys. Individual and group interviews with seven parents were conducted. Interview data was then analysed using content analysis. Families discussed a range of themes including impacts on their family, facilitators and barriers to feeding and swallowing journeys, speech and language therapy (SLT) support, their family's healthcare journey in relation to quality of life and future directions for research. This study highlighted potential key areas to explore when identifying ways to improve SLT care and research in feeding and swallowing for children who use LTV.

A natural history of temporary tube feeding care at a children's hospital: A prospective audit of medical records

This chart audit characterized the natural history of temporary tube feeding use at a children's hospital between 1 November 2018 and 30 November 2019. Data were collected from the decision-making phase until tube removal or 4 months post-tube insertion. Children's tube feeding journeys were described, and associations determined between patient and service-related variables and outcomes of tube feeding duration and being discharged with a feeding tube. Four hundred and 94 patients were followed with a median age of 1.0 years (IQR 3.6). Many had respiratory illnesses (n = 213, 43%) and received feeding tubes for inadequate oral intake related to acute illness (n = 279, 57%). Seventy-one new feeding tubes were inserted per month (SD 27.63). Fifty-nine per cent of patients (n = 290) received allied health consults. Although 40% of patients (n = 199) experienced complications, most patients (n = 460, 93%) ceased tube feeding within 4 months. Outcomes were associated with age, medical condition, reflux, primary reason for tube feeding, allied health consult, complication type, tube weaning plans and referral for longer-term feeding devices. Results highlighted a critical need for risk identification from the decision-making stage and standardization of practices during all phases of temporary tube feeding care.