Perceived impacts of COVID-19 on wellbeing among US working-age adults with ADL difficulty

The Importance of Patient Experience in Obtaining Mental Health Care at HRSA-Funded Health Centers

Timely mental health care prevents more complex and costly psychological problems, particularly for underserved individuals utilizing HRSA-funded health centers. Patient experience with care services and provider interactions may facilitate timely mental health care access. This study explored which elements of patient experience at health centers minimize delayed access to necessary mental health care. We used cross-sectional data on adult patients who needed mental health services from the 2022 Health Center Patient Survey (N = 1039). Multi-variable logistic regression analyses examined the influence of patient experience using measures drawn from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems on delayed mental health care, accounting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors. 82% of patients did not cite delayed mental health care. 60% or more of patients reported always or usually receiving responsive and coordinated care, with over 80% reporting always or usually receiving positive provider interactions. Lower odds of delayed mental health care was associated with always getting timely callback during business hours (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09, 0.76), and that the provider always listened carefully (aOR: 0.33; CI: 0.14, 0.78), provided easy to understand recommendations (aOR: 0.31, CI: 0.12, 0.79), knew the patient's medical history (aOR: 0.33, CI: 0.15, 0.73), was respectful to the patient (aOR: 0.49, CI: 0.27, 0.90), or was easy to understand (aOR: 0.51, CI: 0.29, 0.88). Care responsiveness and positive provider communication are integral to facilitating timely mental health care access for vulnerable populations with mental health needs.

The role of perceived social support in subjective wellbeing among working-age U.S. adults with and without limitations in activities of daily living

BACKGROUND

Perceived social support may enhance subjective wellbeing (SWB) for adults with activities of daily living (ADL) limitations. However, little is known about how social support may mediate (explain) and/or moderate SWB differences among U.S. working-age adults with versus without ADL limitations.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the role of perceived emotional and instrumental support in hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing among adults with and without ADL limitations.

METHODS

Data were from the 2021 National Wellbeing Survey - a national survey of U.S. working-age adults aged 18-64 (N = 3775). We used regression analyses to investigate differences in hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing between individuals with versus without ADL limitations, as well as the roles of emotional and instrumental social support in explaining observed differences. We used interaction terms to examine whether social support moderated the observed associations.

RESULTS

Adults with ADL limitations reported lower SWB than those without limitations across all three dimensions. Depending on the degree of limitations, the associations between ADL limitations and SWB decreased in magnitude or were no longer statistically significant after accounting for emotional and instrumental support. While both types of support were associated with better SWB among the three ADL groups, those with ADL limitations may benefit less from emotional support on both eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing than those without limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower social support may contribute to worse SWB among adults with ADL limitations. Although this subpopulation may benefit from high social support, improving their SWB may require systemic interventions beyond simply enhancing social support.

Understanding structural inequities in Covid-19 vaccine access and uptake among disability, transgender and gender-diverse communities in India

INTRODUCTION

Undervaccination and vaccination-related anxieties among marginalised communities like the transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) and disability communities are underexplored in the Indian context. Our study seeks to understand the role of structural and historical inequities in shaping COVID-19 vaccine access for the two communities in India.

METHODS

Using a participatory qualitative research approach, TGD and disabled individuals were involved in and consulted throughout the research process. We interviewed 45 individuals for our study, hailing from the two communities and other key stakeholders and health system representatives involved in vaccination roll-out in India. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis guided by the socio-ecological model and intersectionality approach.

RESULTS

Despite intent to get vaccinated among most participants, several structural barriers shaped COVID-19 vaccine access for people from the TGD and disability community. This included information and communication gaps with respect to the specific health needs of the two communities, barriers related to vaccine registration, data collection, transport, infrastructure and actual or anticipated mistreatment at vaccine centres. Each emergent structural gap in vaccination had parallels in past health systems experiences, pointing to the longstanding and pervasive inequities within health and allied systems which impact how communities perceive and respond to new health system interventions.

CONCLUSION

This study uncovers the structural inequities within health systems that have permeated the planning, design and outreach of COVID-19 vaccination programs in India. Moving beyond notions of vaccine hesitancy among the TGD and disability community, we underscore the importance of socio-historical contexts of marginalisation and advocate for systems to recognise these contexts and respond equitably to the vaccination and health needs of the two communities. While some challenges among the two communities were distinct, the study explores how a shared experience of exclusion from public systems can provide avenues for cross-movement advocacy and solidarity, and help inform health system reforms.

Disparities in adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic by disability status in metropolitan Texas

BACKGROUND

This article addresses the urgent need for more evidence-based research using primary data to document how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the health and social wellbeing of disabled individuals. Our study sought to determine if adults with disabilities, and with specific types of disability, were more likely to suffer adverse health and social impacts related to COVID-19 than nondisabled adults in metropolitan Texas, during the first 18 months of the pandemic.

METHODS

We collected primary data from randomly selected residents in eight Texas metropolitan areas through a bilingual telephone survey in July 2021. Statistical analysis comprised multivariable generalized estimating equations that control for relevant sociodemographic and COVID-related risk factors, and spatial clustering.

RESULTS

Disabled survey respondents had been more adversely affected by COVID-19 than nondisabled respondents, in terms of mental and physical health, health care access, living conditions and social life. Significant disparities were also found for almost all COVID-19 impacts when the disabled category was disaggregated by disability type. Respondents experiencing cognitive and independent living difficulties were negatively impacted in all five areas of life examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings emphasize the need to consider a wide range of impacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic that negatively affect the health and social wellbeing of disabled persons, as well as develop disability-inclusive policies that provide adequate protections.

Psychosocial Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women with Spinal Cord Injury

This study represents the first known research addressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women with spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States. Women in this population face unique barriers that put them at elevated risk for compromised quality of life, risk that was magnified by physical and social restrictions imposed during the pandemic. This qualitative study examined the perceptions of women with SCI and the effect of the pandemic on their lives. The predominantly White and relatively well-educated sample of 105 women with traumatic SCI was diverse in age, injury characteristics, and geographic representation. Recruited across the USA, participants in an online psychological health intervention trial were asked to respond to the item, "Please tell us how COVID-19 has affected you and your life", administered May-October, 2020. An overall sentiment rating of impact was coded as well as the impact of COVID-19 on eight individual themes: Physical Health, Mental Health, Social Health, Activities of Daily Living, Exercise, Work, Activities Outside the Home, and Activities at Home. Sentiment responses were rated as positive, negative, a mixture of positive and negative impacts, or neutral impact. Participants described the overall impact of COVID-19 as negative (54%), positive (10%), mixed (21%) or neutral (15%). Sentiment ratings to individual themes were also described. Our findings highlight the importance of providing access to disability-sensitive and affordable support, resources, and interventions for women with SCI, especially during a public health crisis.