Harnessing the incretin system beyond glucose control: potential cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes

Liraglutide via Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase-Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α-Heme Oxygenase-1 Signaling Promotes Wound Healing by Preventing Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic Mice

Background/Aims: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present a major challenge in clinical practice, and hyperglycemia-induced angiogenesis disturbance and endothelial dysfunction likely exacerbate DFUs. The long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog liraglutide (Lira) is a potential activator of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) that appears to enhance endothelial function and have substantial pro-angiogenesis and antioxidant stress effects. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate whether the protective role of Lira in diabetic wound healing acts against the mechanisms underlying hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis disturbance. Methods: Accordingly, db/db mice were assessed after receiving subcutaneous Lira injections. We also cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in either normal or high glucose (5.5 or 33 mM glucose, respectively) medium with or without Lira for 72 h. Results: An obvious inhibition of hyperglycemia-triggered endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis disturbance was observed; follow by a promotion of diabetic wound healing under Lira treatment combined with restored hyperglycemia-impaired AMPK signaling pathway activity. AMPKα1/2 siRNA and Compound C (Cpd C), an inhibitor of AMPK, abolished both Lira-mediated endothelial protection and pro-angiogenesis action, as well as the diabetic wound healing promoted by Lira. Furthermore, hypoxia inducible factor-1α (Hif-1α; transcription factors of AMPK substrates) knockdown in HUVECs and db/db mice demonstrated that Lira activated AMPK to prevent hyperglycemia-triggered endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis disturbance, with a subsequent promotion of diabetic wound healing that was Hif-1α-heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) axis-dependent. Taken together, these findings reveal that the promotion of diabetic wound healing by Lira occurs via its AMPK-dependent endothelial protection and pro-angiogenic effects, which are regulated by the Hif-1α-HO-1 axis.

Cardio- and Neurometabolic Adipobiology: Consequences and Implications for Therapy

Studies over the past 30 years have revealed that adipose tissue is the major endocrine and paracrine organ of the human body. Arguably, adiopobiology has taken its reasonable place in studying obesity and related cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs), including Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is viewed herein as a neurometabolic disorder. The pathogenesis and therapy of these diseases are multiplex at basic, clinical and translational levels. Our present goal is to describe new developments in cardiometabolic and neurometabolic adipobiology. Accordingly, we focus on adipose- and/or skeletal muscle-derived signaling proteins (adipsin, adiponectin, nerve growth factor, brain-derived neuroptrophic factor, neurotrophin-3, irisin, sirtuins, Klotho, neprilysin, follistatin-like protein-1, meteorin-like (metrnl), as well as growth differentiation factor 11) as examples of metabotrophic factors (MTFs) implicated in the pathogenesis and therapy of obesity and related CMDs. We argue that these pathologies are MTF-deficient diseases. In 1993 the "vascular hypothesis of AD" was published and in the present review we propose the "vasculometabolic hypothesis of AD." We discuss how MTFs could bridge CMDs and neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD. Greater insights on how to manage the MTF network would provide benefits to the quality of human life.

The role of food intake regulating peptides in cardiovascular regulation

Obesity is a risk factor that worsens cardiovascular events leading to higher morbidity and mortality. However, the exact mechanisms of relation between obesity and cardiovascular events are unclear. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that pharmacological therapy for obesity has great potential to improve some cardiovascular problems. Therefore, it is important to determine the common mechanisms regulating both food intake and blood pressure. Several hormones produced by peripheral tissues work together with neuropeptides involved in the regulation of both food intake and blood pressure. Anorexigenic (food intake lowering) hormones such as leptin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and cholecystokinin cooperate with α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated peptide as well as prolactin-releasing peptide. Curiously their collective actions result in increased sympathetic activity, especially in the kidney, which could be one of the factors responsible for the blood pressure increases seen in obesity. On the other hand, orexigenic (food intake enhancing) peptides, especially ghrelin released from the stomach and acting in the brain, cooperates with orexins, neuropeptide Y, melanin-concentrating hormone and galanin, which leads to decreased sympathetic activity and blood pressure. This paradox should be intensively studied in the future. Moreover, it is important to know that the hypothalamus together with the brainstem seem to be major structures in the regulation of food intake and blood pressure. Thus, the above mentioned regions might be essential brain components in the transmission of peripheral signals to the central effects. In this short review, we summarize the current information on cardiovascular effects of food intake regulating peptides.

Pleiotropic effects of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonists: Potential benefits of the association

The combination of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is an emerging option for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). GLP-1RAs have been shown to improve glycaemic control with a low risk of hypoglycaemia and to promote body weight loss. However, GLP-1 receptors (GLP-1Rs) are widely expressed in extrapancreatic tissues and could sustain pleiotropic actions of GLP-1RAs beyond glycaemic control. The underlying molecular mechanisms maintaining these extrapancreatic actions of GLP-1 are complex, and involve GLP-1R signalling in both the brain and several peripheral tissues. The present review focuses specifically on the role of GLP-1RAs in the cardiovascular system and liver. Preclinical data in rodents and pilot studies in humans suggest that GLP-1RAs may have potential beneficial effects on heart function, blood pressure, postprandial lipaemia, liver steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Long-term studies are now warranted to determine the safety and clinical relevance of the association between insulin and GLP-1RAs in T2D.

Modulation of myocardial injury and collagen deposition following ischaemia-reperfusion by linagliptin and liraglutide, and both together

Studies have indicated that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists reduce infarct size after myocardial ischaemia. Whether these agents modify cardiac remodelling after ischaemia is unclear. Furthermore, it is not known if combination of the two types of drugs is superior to either agent alone. We investigated the modulatory effect of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin alone, the GLP-1 activator liraglutide alone, or the two agents together on myocardial infarct size, left ventricular contractile function and cardiac remodelling signals after a brief period of left coronary artery (LCA) occlusion. C57BL/6 mice were treated with vehicle, the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin, the GLP-1 activator liraglutide, or both agents together for 5 days, and then subjected to LCA occlusion (1 h) and reperfusion (3 h). Ischaemia-reperfusion increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and expression of NADPH oxidase (p47(phox), p22(phox) and gp91(phox) subtypes), collagens, fibronectin and proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor α and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) in the LCA-supplied regions. Pre-treatment with linagliptin or liraglutide reduced infarct size, protected cardiomyocytes from injury and preserved cardiac contractile function in a similar fashion. It is interesting that profibrotic (collagen deposition) signals were expressed soon after ischaemia-reperfusion. Both linagliptin and liraglutide suppressed ROS generation, NADPH oxidase and proinflammatory signals, and reduced collagen deposition. Addition of linagliptin or liraglutide had no significant additive effect above and beyond that of liraglutide and linagliptin given alone. In conclusion, linagliptin and liraglutide can improve cardiac contractile function and indices of cardiac remodelling, which may be related to their role in inhibition of ROS production and proinflammatory cytokines after ischaemia.

Mechanisms for the cardiovascular effects of glucagon-like peptide-1

Over the past three decades, at least 10 hormones secreted by the enteroendocrine cells have been discovered, which directly affect the cardiovascular system through their innate receptors expressed in the heart and blood vessels or through a neural mechanism. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), an important incretin, is perhaps best studied of these gut-derived hormones with important cardiovascular effects. In this review, I have discussed the mechanism of GLP-1 release from the enteroendocrine L-cells and its physiological effects on the cardiovascular system. Current evidence suggests that GLP-1 has positive inotropic and chronotropic effects on the heart and may be important in preserving left ventricular structure and function by direct and indirect mechanisms. The direct effects of GLP-1 in the heart may be mediated through GLP-1R expressed in atria as well as arteries and arterioles in the left ventricle and mainly involve in the activation of multiple pro-survival kinases and enhanced energy utilization. There is also good evidence to support the involvement of a second, yet to be identified, GLP-1 receptor. Further, GLP-1(9-36)amide, which was previously thought to be the inactive metabolite of the active GLP-1(7-36)amide, may also have direct cardioprotective effects. GLP-1's action on GLP-1R expressed in the central nervous system, kidney, vasculature and the pancreas may indirectly contribute to its cardioprotective effects.

LOX-1, a bridge between GLP-1R and mitochondrial ROS generation in human vascular smooth muscle cells

A growing body of evidence indicates that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors play an important role in modulating oxidant stress in vascular beds. However, the underlying mechanism of this process remains unclear. In recent studies, we observed an increase in GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) expression in the aorta of LOX-1 knock-out mice. Since LOX-1 is a pivotal regulator of reactive oxygen species (ROS), we conducted studies to identify relationship between LOX-1, ROS and GLP-1 agonism or DPP-4 antagonism. We observed a sustained decrease in GLP-1R expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) treated with ox-LDL. When VSMCs were treated with different concentration of liraglutide (a GLP-1 agonist) or NVPDPP728 (a DPP-4 inhibitor), expression of ROS decreased compared with ox-LDL alone treatment. To further prove that LOX-1 plays a pivotal role in ROS and GLP-1R expression, we treated VSMCs with LOX-1 antibody or transfected cells with human LOX-1 cDNA. The inhibitory effect of ox-LDL on GLP-1R expression was reversed with anti-LOX-1 antibody treatment, while the inhibitory effect of liraglutide and NVPDPP728 on ROS generation was attenuated when cells were transfected with LOX-1 cDNA. Our results suggest that LOX-1 may play a bridging role in GLP-1 activation and ROS interaction.

GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors: how to guide the clinician?

Pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes has been enriched during recent years, with the launch of incretin therapies targeting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Such medications comprise either GLP-1 receptor agonists, with short (one or two daily injections: exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide) or long duration (one injection once weekly: extended-released exenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, taspoglutide); or oral compounds inhibiting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), the enzyme that inactives GLP-1, also called gliptins (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin). Although both pharmacological approaches target GLP-1, important differences exist concerning the mode of administration (subcutaneous injection versus oral ingestion), the efficacy (better with GLP-1 agonists), the effects on body weight and systolic blood pressure (diminution with agonists versus neutrality with gliptins), the tolerance profile (nausea and possibly vomiting with agonists) and the cost (higher with GLP-1 receptor agonists). Both agents may exert favourable cardiovascular effects. Gliptins may represent a valuable alternative to a sulfonylurea or a glitazone after failure of monotherapy with metformin while GLP-1 receptor agonists may be considered as a good alternative to insulin (especially in obese patients) after failure of a dual oral therapy. However, this scheme is probably too restrictive and modalities of using incretins are numerous, in almost all stages of type 2 diabetes. Physicians may guide the pharmacological choice based on clinical characteristics, therapeutic goals and patient's preference.