Improving the quality of diabetes care in a Sri Lankan diabetes clinic through a diabetes nurse educator

Quality of diabetes care in low- and middle-income Asian and Middle Eastern countries (1993-2012): 20-year systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent to which people with diabetes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) of Asia and the Middle East met evidence-based care recommendations through a systematic review of published literature.

METHODS

Electronic searches of Medline and Embase were carried out for studies assessing quality of care among people with diabetes in Asia and the Middle East between 1993 and 2012. Benchmarking against American Diabetes Association guidelines, we reported level and proportions meeting recommended risk factor control (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], blood pressure, and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL]) and preventive care processes across different settings.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen publications met eligibility for inclusion (91 reported risk factor control, 7 reported preventive processes, and 17 reported both). Only China, Thailand, Malaysia and Philippines had nationally representative data. Mean HbA1c (6.5-11% or 48-97 mmol/mol), SBP (120-152 mm Hg), and LDL (2.4-3.8 mmol/l) varied greatly. Despite variation in availability of data, studies consistently showed that recommended care goals were not being achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of auditing and benchmarking against evidence-based guidelines appears to be uncommon in Asia and the Middle East and there was heterogeneity of reporting across studies, populations, and methods used. The available data showed inadequate care.

The impact of a decision support tool linked to an electronic medical record on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

We retrospectively compared glycemic control and glycemic burden in type 2 diabetes patients treated by general physicians with access to decision support with those treated by general physicians without access to decision support.

METHODS

A total of 875 patients [471 (53.8%) males] aged 54.3 [standard deviation (SD) 13.1] years followed up over 84 months. A total of 342 patients (39%) were managed with decision support, and effects on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were assessed.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups in starting HbA1c [7.6 (SD 1.8) versus 7.5 (SD 1.5); p = not significant] at baseline. Patients treated with decision support were more likely to have planned review of HbA1c, adjustment of medication, prescription of statins, dietetic and nurse educator inputs (71.3% versus 58.5%; Chi squared = 14.7; p = .001). The mean HbA1c in the group treated with decision support was not significantly reduced within the first year [7.5% (SD 1.8) versus 7.6% (SD 1.5); p = not significant; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.33 to 0.17], but statistically significant differences were apparent at year 2 [7.2% (SD 2.0) versus 8% (SD 3.4); p = .0001; 95% CI -1.3 to -0.5] and sustained through year 3 [7.2% (SD 2.0) versus 8.0% (SD 2.0); p = .0001; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.6], year 4 [7.2% (SD 2.3) versus 8.2% (SD 2.5); p = .0001; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.6], year 5 [7.0% (SD 2.3) versus 8.3% (SD 2.6); p = .001; 95% CI -1.5 to -0.8], year 6 [7.0% (SD 2.0) versus 8.2% (SD 2.4); p = .001; 95% CI -1.5 to -0.9], and year 7 [6.9% (SD 1.2) versus 8% (SD 1.8); p = .001; 95% CI -1.4 to -1.0].

CONCLUSION

Use of a decision support system showed benefits in adherence to clinical care pathways and achieving significant improvements in glycemic control.