Diabetes medications and cancer: a way out of uncertainty

Diabetology and oncology meet in a network model: union is strength

Diabetes and cancer are increasingly common conditions, and the management of cancer patients with diabetes is often challenging. Diabetes in cancer patients poses several complex clinical issues, including which treatment is suitable to control hyperglycemia, how to better counteract glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia, and how to manage nutritional problems of cachectic patients and glucose variability linked to artificial nutrition. A key aspect to consider is the patients' position on the trajectory of the oncologic disease, both to establish which level of glycemic control should be pursued and to decide the most suitable antidiabetic treatment to recommend. Endocrinologists are rarely involved in the management of patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, lack of guidelines results in a "trial-and-error" approach, often with suboptimal disease management. Lastly, cancer survivors represent a frequently underestimated category of patients at higher cardiometabolic risk. A practical solution for these challenges lies in the implementation of care networks based on a close partnership and ongoing communication between oncologists, endocrinologists, and nutritionists, placing the patient at the center of the care process. At the same time, universities and scientific societies should play a key role in promoting research into areas of intersection of oncology and endocrinology, in raising awareness of common possibilities of primary and secondary prevention of metabolic and oncologic diseases, as well as specific challenges of managing diabetes and cancer, and proper training of health workers, while also supporting the shared implementation of effective management strategies.

Back to the future: inhaled drug products

Inhaled therapeutic aerosols continue to be an important treatment for asthma and pulmonary diseases. A variety of dosage forms are employed for different indications and demographics including pressurized or propellant-driven metered dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers/nebules. Research and development in this field has shown remarkable innovation in the past decade. Important new drug products for the treatment of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, and a range of neurological disorders have been developed. New devices in each of the dosage form categories also have been developed, and new formulation technologies have been adopted. Unlike many other dosage forms, as new inhaled products appeared few of the existing products were converted to generic form. This may be explained by the formulation and device complexity, the implications for degree of difficulty in obtaining regulatory approval, and the prevalence of intellectual property in the field. After the setback of the initial approval and subsequent withdrawal of the Exubera®-inhaled insulin, there appeared to be reluctance to consider the pulmonary route of administration for systemically acting agents, particularly peptides and proteins. However, recent product development activities and approvals suggest that attitudes may be changing in favor of systemic delivery following inhaled aerosol administration. The new inhaled drug technologies seem to be driving reconsideration of therapeutic categories for indications that were of interest at the inception of modern inhaled drug therapy in the past century. We should embrace the opportunity to use new drugs and technologies to go back to the future!

Thyroid safety in patients treated with liraglutide

During the last years, various novel anti-diabetic drugs have considerably enriched the therapeutic armamentarium for subjects with Type 2 diabetes. In the meantime, much interest has recently been focused on the potential cardiovascular and oncological adverse effects of these new therapies. As to glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs, medullary thyroid tumors were reported to be more common in rodent toxicology studies with liraglutide, although the relevance of this finding in humans has been questioned. Analyses of sequential changes in calcitonin levels in several thousands of subjects did not reveal a relationship between liraglutide therapy and plasma calcitonin. Furthermore, no medullary thyroid cancer has been detected in humans taking liraglutide. Nevertheless, the long-term consequences of sustained GLP-1 receptor activation in the human thyroid remain unknown and deserve further investigation.