1
|
Li Q, Pan Y, Li Y, Gu R, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Wei L. Factors influencing healthy dietary behavior changes among patients with gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy: A meta-synthesis using the theoretical domains framework. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2025; 51:e16294. [PMID: 40254533 DOI: 10.1111/jog.16294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/22/2025]
Abstract
AIMS To examine factors that facilitate and impede healthy dietary behavior modification in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Additionally, it sought to assess the strength of the evidence for these factors and offer insights into promoting positive behaviors. METHODS This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting standards. We searched seven databases in February 2023 to include qualitative studies related to patients with GDM that explored their perceptions of and changes in healthy eating behaviors. Two researchers independently screened the articles, assessed their quality, extracted data, and coded the factors using the theoretical domain framework. For the factors involved, we performed a meta-synthesis based on their frequency and assigned a confidence level to determine their level of evidence. RESULTS We included 32 of the 536 extracted articles. Barriers identified by high levels of evidence include: "Environmental context and resources," "Social influences," "Knowledge," "Emotion," and "Social/professional roles and Identity." The facilitators identified by high levels of evidence include the following: "Beliefs about consequences," "Social influences," "Environmental context and resources," "Skill," and "Memory, attention, and decision processes." CONCLUSION This meta-synthesis highlights that healthy eating behavior change is influenced by the interaction of factors at different levels of individuals, organizations, and sociocultural environments. Furthermore, we established a framework that displayed the associations between these factors, giving prominence to those with higher levels of evidence. This framework will aid researchers in identifying priority areas for intervention and facilitating the implementation of high-quality strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianqian Li
- Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yueshuai Pan
- Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yi Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Ruting Gu
- Department of Thoracic, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jingyuan Wang
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xinwei Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yuan Zhu
- School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lili Wei
- Office of the Dean, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eng PC, Teo AED, Yew TW, Khoo CM. Implementing care for women with gestational diabetes after delivery-the challenges ahead. Front Glob Womens Health 2024; 5:1391213. [PMID: 39221169 PMCID: PMC11362992 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1391213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Gestational diabetes (GDM), defined as glucose intolerance during pregnancy, affects one in six pregnancies globally and significantly increases a woman's lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Being a relatively young group, women with GDM are also at higher risk of developing diabetes related complications (e.g., cardiovascular disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) later in life. Children of women with GDM are also likely to develop GDM and this perpetuates a cycle of diabetes, escalating our current pandemic of metabolic disease. The global prevalence of GDM has now risen by more than 30% over the last two decades, making it an emerging public health concern. Antepartum management of maternal glucose is unable to fully mitigate the associated lifetime cardiometabolic risk. Thus, efforts may need to focus on improving care for women with GDM during the postpartum period where prevention or therapeutic strategies could be implemented to attenuate progression of GDM to DM and its associated vascular complications. However, strategies to provide care for women in the postpartum period often showed disappointing results. This has led to a missed opportunity to halt the progression of impaired glucose tolerance/impaired fasting glucose to DM in women with GDM. In this review, we examined the challenges in the management of women with GDM after delivery and considered how each of these challenges are defined and could present as a gap in translating evidence to clinical care. We highlighted challenges related to postpartum surveillance, postpartum glucose testing strategies, postpartum risk factor modification, and problems encountered in engagement of patients/providers to implement interventions strategies in women with GDM after delivery. We reasoned that a multisystem approach is needed to address these challenges and to retard progression to DM and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women with GDM pregnancies. This is very much needed to pave way for an improved, precise, culturally sensitive and wholistic care for women with GDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Chia Eng
- Department of Endocrinology, National University Health Systems, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ada Ee Der Teo
- Department of Endocrinology, National University Health Systems, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tong Wei Yew
- Department of Endocrinology, National University Health Systems, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin Meng Khoo
- Department of Endocrinology, National University Health Systems, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simmons D, Gupta Y, Hernandez TL, Levitt N, van Poppel M, Yang X, Zarowsky C, Backman H, Feghali M, Nielsen KK. Call to action for a life course approach. Lancet 2024; 404:193-214. [PMID: 38909623 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Gestational diabetes remains the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, with short-term and long-term consequences for mothers and offspring. New insights into pathophysiology and management suggest that the current gestational diabetes treatment approach should expand from a focus on late gestational diabetes to a personalised, integrated life course approach from preconception to postpartum and beyond. Early pregnancy lifestyle intervention could prevent late gestational diabetes. Early gestational diabetes diagnosis and treatment has been shown to be beneficial, especially when identified before 14 weeks of gestation. Early gestational diabetes screening now requires strategies for integration into routine antenatal care, alongside efforts to reduce variation in gestational diabetes care, across settings that differ between, and within, countries. Following gestational diabetes, an oral glucose tolerance test should be performed 6-12 weeks postpartum to assess the glycaemic state. Subsequent regular screening for both dysglycaemia and cardiometabolic disease is recommended, which can be incorporated alongside other family health activities. Diabetes prevention programmes for women with previous gestational diabetes might be enhanced using shared decision making and precision medicine. At all stages in this life course approach, across both high-resource and low-resource settings, a more systematic process for identifying and overcoming barriers to preventative care and treatment is needed to reduce the current global burden of gestational diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Simmons
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Yashdeep Gupta
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Teri L Hernandez
- College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Children's Hospital Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Naomi Levitt
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mireille van Poppel
- Department of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Xilin Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Christina Zarowsky
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; CReSP Public Health Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Helena Backman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Maisa Feghali
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Karoline Kragelund Nielsen
- Department of Prevention, Health Promotion and Community Care, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mensah GP, van Rooyen D(R, ten Ham-Baloyi W. Screening and nursing management of gestational diabetes in Ghana: Evidence-based recommendations. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15351. [PMID: 37123949 PMCID: PMC10130854 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe the development of evidence-based recommendations for screening and nursing management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Ghana and present the recommendations. Design A qualitative study. Setting Military Health Institutions in Ghana. Measurements Data from qualitative interviews with 7 women with GDM and 8 midwives, and an integrative literature review including available clinical practice guidelines on screening and nursing management of GDM, was used to develop the recommendations. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence' steps guided the recommendations' development. Methodological quality of the recommendations was assessed based on an adapted version of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. Six experts reviewed the recommendations and an infographic in support of the recommendations. Findings Two main recommendations and an infographic were developed, including: 1. Early screening and diagnosis of GDM, and 2. Involvement of women with GDM and their significant others during pregnancy, intrapartum and postpartum management, in a culturally and socio-economically appropriate manner. Key conclusions The recommendations and infographic, once reviewed and pilot tested, may assist midwives managing GDM in Ghana, with support of health institution management. Implications for practice The study highlights the need for recommendations which can be used by midwives to manage GDM in Ghana. The recommendations are the first to be contextualized for the Ghanaian setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn Patience Mensah
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha (formerly Port Elizabeth), South Africa
| | - Dalena (R.M.) van Rooyen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha (formerly Port Elizabeth), South Africa
| | - Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha (formerly Port Elizabeth), South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Phonyiam R. Barriers and Facilitators to Diabetes Self-Management in Pregnant Women with Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review. Curr Diabetes Rev 2023; 19:e270622206400. [PMID: 35761498 DOI: 10.2174/1573399819666220627111430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women with pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at risk of poor maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Previous systematic reviews on pregnant women with T2DM have focused on physical activity, blood glucose monitoring, and insulin injections. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the barriers and facilitators to diabetes self-management in pregnant women with pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria included manuscripts written in English and qualitative studies. Consensus statements were excluded. A metasummary was used to identify patterns in barriers and facilitators across studies. A vote-counting method was used to summarize qualitative findings. RESULTS A total of ten qualitative publications were selected. This review suggests four themes describing barriers, including barriers to diabetes self-management in pregnancy, stress related to pregnancy with diabetes, a barrier to access to health care, and sensing a loss of control. The fifth theme described facilitators of diabetes self-management in pregnancy. CONCLUSION This supports an integrative model of maternity care and culturally relevant practices to overcome critical barriers and optimize key facilitators to enhance diabetes self-management behaviors and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ratchanok Phonyiam
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7460, NC, United States
- Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University 270 Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pham S, Churruca K, Ellis LA, Braithwaite J. A scoping review of gestational diabetes mellitus healthcare: experiences of care reported by pregnant women internationally. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:627. [PMID: 35941555 PMCID: PMC9361509 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04931-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition associated with pregnancy that engenders additional healthcare demand. A growing body of research includes empirical studies focused on pregnant women's GDM healthcare experiences. The aim of this scoping review is to map findings, highlight gaps and investigate the way research has been conducted into the healthcare experiences of women with GDM. METHODS A systematic search of primary research using a number of databases was conducted in September 2021. Studies were included if they had an explicit aim of focusing on GDM and included direct reporting of participants' experiences of healthcare. Key data from each study was extracted into a purposely-designed form and synthesised using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS Fifty-seven articles were included in the analysis. The majority of studies used qualitative methodology, and did not have an explicit theoretical orientation. Most studies were conducted in urban areas of high-income countries and recruitment and research was almost fully conducted in clinical and other healthcare settings. Women found inadequate information a key challenge, and support from healthcare providers a critical factor. Experiences of prescribed diet, medication and monitoring greatly varied across settings. Additional costs associated with managing GDM was cited as a problem in some studies. Overall, women reported significant mental distress in relation to their experience of GDM. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review draws together reported healthcare experiences of pregnant women with GDM from around the world. Commonalities and differences in the global patient experience of GDM healthcare are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Pham
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kate Churruca
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise A Ellis
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ørtenblad L, Høtoft D, Krogh RH, Lynggaard V, Juel Christiansen J, Vinther Nielsen C, Hedeager Momsen AM. Women's perspectives on motivational factors for lifestyle changes after gestational diabetes and implications for diabetes prevention interventions. ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES & METABOLISM 2021; 4:e00248. [PMID: 34277972 PMCID: PMC8279634 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication in pregnancy and constitutes a public health problem due to the risk of developing diabetes and other diseases. Most women face barriers in complying with preventive programs. This study aimed to explore motivational factors for lifestyle changes among women with a history of GDM and their suggestions for preventive programs. Methods This study used a qualitative approach in six focus group interviews with a total of 32 women. The selection criteria were time since onset of GDM, including women diagnosed with GDM, six months and five years after GDM, diagnosed and not diagnosed with diabetes. Inductive analysis was performed. Results The women reacted with anxiety about their GDM diagnosis and experienced persistent concerns about the consequences of GDM. They were highly motivated to take preventive initiatives, but faced major adherence challenges. The demotivating factors were lack of time and resources, too little family involvement, lack of knowledge and social norms that may obstruct healthy eating. A powerful motivational factor for complying with preventive strategies was the well-being of their children and partners. Conclusions Preventive initiatives should be rooted in the women's perception of GDM/diabetes and based on their experiences with barriers and motivational factors. The well-being and the quality of life within the family are dominant motivational factors which offer powerful potentials for supporting the women's coping capability. Further, there is a need to be responsiveness to the women and their families even a long time after the onset of GDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Ørtenblad
- DEFACTUM - Public Health and Rehabilitation Research Central Denmark Region Aarhus Denmark.,Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| | - Diana Høtoft
- DEFACTUM - Public Health and Rehabilitation Research Central Denmark Region Aarhus Denmark
| | - Rubab H Krogh
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Gødstrup Hospital Herning Denmark
| | - Vibeke Lynggaard
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus Health Promotion Research Aarhus Denmark.,Cardiovascular Research Unit Department of Cardiology Gødstrup Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Jens Juel Christiansen
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus Health Promotion Research Aarhus Denmark.,Department of Medicine Gødstrup Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- DEFACTUM - Public Health and Rehabilitation Research Central Denmark Region Aarhus Denmark.,Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark.,Section for Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation Gødstrup Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Anne-Mette Hedeager Momsen
- DEFACTUM - Public Health and Rehabilitation Research Central Denmark Region Aarhus Denmark.,Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
"If I Don't Eat Enough, I Won't Be Healthy". Women's Experiences with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Treatment in Rural and Urban South India. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17093062. [PMID: 32354048 PMCID: PMC7246422 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as increased risk of future type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In India, 10%–35% of pregnant women develop GDM. In this study, we investigated women’s experiences with the dietary and pharmaceutical treatment for GDM in rural and urban Tamil Nadu, India. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 women diagnosed with GDM. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Three overall aspects were discovered with several sub-aspects characterizing women’s experiences: emotional challenges (fear and apprehension for the baby’ health and struggling to accept a treatment seen as counterintuitive to being safe and healthy), interpersonal challenges (managing treatment in the near social relations and social support, and coordinating treatment with work and social life), and health system-related challenges (availability and cost of treatment, interaction with health care providers). Some aspects acted as barriers. However, social support and positive, high-quality interactions with health care providers could mitigate some of these barriers and facilitate the treatment process. Greater efforts at awareness creation in the social environment and systemic adjustments in care delivery targeting the individual, family, community and health system levels are needed in order to ensure that women with GDM have the opportunity to access treatment and are enabled and motivated to follow it as well.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kirkham R, Trap-Jensen N, Boyle JA, Barzi F, Barr ELM, Whitbread C, Van Dokkum P, Kirkwood M, Connors C, Moore E, Zimmet P, Corpus S, Hanley AJ, O'Dea K, Oats J, McIntyre HD, Brown A, Shaw JE, Maple-Brown L. Diabetes care in remote Australia: the antenatal, postpartum and inter-pregnancy period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:389. [PMID: 31660892 PMCID: PMC6819653 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2562-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women experience high rates of diabetes in pregnancy (DIP), contributing to health risks for mother and infant, and the intergenerational cycle of diabetes. By enhancing diabetes management during pregnancy, postpartum and the interval between pregnancies, the DIP Partnership aims to improve health outcomes and reduce risks early in the life-course. We describe a mixed methods formative study of health professional's perspectives of antenatal and post-partum diabetes screening and management, including enablers and barriers to care. METHODS Health professionals involved in providing diabetes care in pregnancy, from a range of health services across the Northern Territory, completed the survey (n = 82) and/or took part in interviews and/or focus groups (n = 62). RESULTS Qualitative findings highlighted factors influencing the delivery of care as reported by health professionals, including: whose responsibility it is, access to care, the baby is the focus and pre-conception care. The main challenges were related to: disjointed systems and confusion around whose role it is to provide follow-up care beyond six weeks post-partum. Quantitative findings indicated that the majority of health professionals reported confidence in their own skills to manage women in the antenatal period (62%, 40/79) and slightly lower rates of confidence in the postpartum interval (57%, 33/58). CONCLUSION These findings regarding whose role it is to provide postpartum care, along with opportunities to improve communication pathways and follow up care have informed the design of a complex health intervention to improve health systems and the provision of DIP related care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kirkham
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
| | - N Trap-Jensen
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - J A Boyle
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F Barzi
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - E L M Barr
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
- Population Health Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - C Whitbread
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
- Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia
| | - P Van Dokkum
- Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Australia
- Population Health Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Alice Springs, Australia
| | - M Kirkwood
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - C Connors
- Northern Territory Department of Health, Darwin, Australia
| | - E Moore
- Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia
| | - P Zimmet
- Department of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Corpus
- Danila Dilba Health Service, Darwin, Australia
| | - A J Hanley
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - K O'Dea
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - J Oats
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H D McIntyre
- Mater Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - A Brown
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - J E Shaw
- Population Health Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L Maple-Brown
- Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
- Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia
| |
Collapse
|