Help when you need it: Perspectives of adults with T1D on the support and training they would have wanted when starting CGM

Relationships of hypoglycemia awareness, hypoglycemia beliefs, and continuous glucose monitoring glycemic profiles with anxiety and depression symptoms in adults with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring systems

AIMS

To evaluate relationships of hypoglycemia awareness, hypoglycemia beliefs, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glycemic profiles with anxiety and depression symptoms in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who use CGM.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey and data collections were completed with 196 T1D adults who used CGM (59% also used automated insulin delivery devices (AIDs)). We assessed hypoglycemia awareness (Gold instrument), hypoglycemia beliefs (Attitudes to Awareness of Hypoglycemia instrument), CGM glycemic profiles, demographics, and anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Analysis included simple and multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Lower hypoglycemia awareness, weaker "hypoglycemia concerns minimized" beliefs, stronger "hyperglycemia avoidance prioritized" beliefs were independently associated with higher anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05), with similar trends in both subgroups using and not using AIDs. Lower hypoglycemia awareness were independently associated with greater depression symptoms (P < 0.05). In participants not using AIDs, more time in hypoglycemia was related to less anxiety and depression symptoms (P < 0.05). Being female and younger were independently associated with higher anxiety symptoms, while being younger was also independently associated with greater depression symptoms (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed relationships of impaired hypoglycemia awareness, hypoglycemia beliefs, CGM-detected hypoglycemia with anxiety and depression symptoms in T1D adults who use CGMs.

Collaboratively Designing an App for a More Personalized, Community-Endorsed Continuous Glucose Monitoring Onboarding Experience: An Early Study

BACKGROUND

Acclimating to a new technology device, such as a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), can be challenging. Current resources may not sufficiently answer questions patients living with diabetes (PWD) may have. We asked how we might improve the process to onboard a PWD to CGM. Our specific aims were (1) to develop, employing a co-designing approach, a prototype of an app for facilitating onboarding to CGM and (2) to obtain early feedback on its usability.

METHODS

We applied a human-centered design (HCD) approach; this process first seeks to deeply understand the unmet needs and frustrations users face. After wearing a demonstration CGM; observing PWD onboarding with health care professionals (HCPs) in clinic; and interviewing 8 PWD and 2 HCP, we developed, tested, and refined a low-fidelity prototype of a clickable app. With insights from this initial round of feedback, we then created a high-fidelity prototype with 3 key features: (1) individual entry of goals and questions; (2) a daily progress tracker for these goals; and (3) a community portal that facilitates exchange of questions and answers. We used the validated System Usability Scale (SUS) to quantify user feedback.

RESULTS

Focus group participants found our early app to be usable and acceptable. Measurement of usability by the SUS yielded a score of 74, which is above average (68) reported for all applications tested, per usability.gov.

CONCLUSIONS

Our early prototype app is a more personalized, additional tool that could bridge an information and support gap for patients who are new to CGM. This app could also help PWD on an ongoing basis, by evolving with them to enhance ease and engagement with diabetes self-management.

Associations Between Hypoglycemia Awareness, Hypoglycemia Beliefs, and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Glycemic Profiles and Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using Advanced Diabetes Technologies

AIMS

To evaluate relationships between hypoglycemia awareness, hypoglycemia beliefs, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glycemic profiles and anxiety and depression symptoms in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who use CGM or automated insulin delivery devices.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey and data collections were completed with 196 T1D adults who used advanced diabetes technologies. We assessed hypoglycemia awareness (Gold instrument), hypoglycemia beliefs (Attitudes to Awareness of Hypoglycemia instrument), CGM glycemic profiles, demographics, and anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Data were processed via regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

Lower hypoglycemia awareness, weaker "hypoglycemia concerns minimized" beliefs, stronger "hyperglycemia avoidance prioritized" beliefs, female, and younger age were independently associated with higher anxiety symptoms (P<0.05). Lower hypoglycemia awareness, less time in hypoglycemia, and younger age were independently associated with greater depression symptoms (P<0.05). Age of <50 years had 77.8% sensitivity and 48.8% specificity in detecting elevated anxiety symptoms. Spending ≥35% of time with glucose levels >180 mg/dL on CGMs had 85.7% sensitivity and 54.3% specificity in detecting elevated depression symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed relationships between impaired hypoglycemia awareness, hypoglycemia beliefs, CGM-detected hypoglycemia and anxiety and depression symptoms in T1D adults who use advanced diabetes technologies.

Patient experiences of continuous glucose monitoring and sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies

AIMS

Blood glucose control is central to the management of diabetes, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control. We aimed to describe the perspectives of people with diabetes using CGM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of qualitative studies.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies involving 1845 participants were included. Six themes were identified: gaining control and convenience (reducing pain and time, safeguarding against complications, achieving stricter glucose levels, and sharing responsibility with family); motivating self-management (fostering ownership, and increasing awareness of glycemic control); providing reassurance and freedom (attaining peace of mind, and restoring social participation); developing confidence (encouraged by the endorsement of others, gaining operational skills, customizing settings for ease of use, and trust in the device); burdened with device complexities (bewildered by unfamiliar technology, reluctant to rely on algorithms, overwhelmed by data, frustrated with malfunctioning and inaccuracy, distressed by alerts, and bulkiness of machines interfering with lifestyle); and excluded by barriers to access (constrained by cost, lack of suppliers).

CONCLUSIONS

CGM can improve self-management and confidence in patients managing diabetes. However, the technical issues, uncertainty in readings, and cost may limit the uptake. Education and training from the health professionals may help to reduce the practical and psychological burden for better patient outcomes.

Experience with burdens of diabetes device use that affect uptake and optimal use in people with type 1 diabetes

Diabetes technology continues to advance, with more individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) adopting insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems that integrate real-time glucose data with an algorithm to assist with insulin dosing decisions. These technologies are linked with benefits to glycemic outcomes (e.g. increased time in target range), diabetes management behaviors, and quality of life. However, current devices and systems are not without barriers and hassles for the user. The intent of this review is to describe the personal challenges and reactions that users experience when interacting with current diabetes technologies, which can affect their acceptance and motivation to engage with their devices. This review will discuss user experiences and strategies to address three main areas: (i) the emotional burden of utilizing a wearable device; (ii) the perceived and experienced negative social consequences of device use; and (iii) the practical challenges of wearing devices.

The impact of real-time sensor technology on quality of life for adults with type 1 diabetes: A Dutch national survey

AIMS

To examine the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) on quality of life in Dutch adults with type 1 diabetes, inside/outside automated insulin delivery (AID) systems.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional retrospective observational study, RT-CGM users completed an online survey including (adapted) validated questionnaires, study-specific items and open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Of 893 participating adults, 69% used the RT-CGM as part of AID. The overall sample reported improvements in quality of life related to RT-CGM use (irrespective of initial indication), particularly with respect to physical health, emotional wellbeing and energy. Merits for sleep, intimacy and cognitive diabetes load lagged somewhat behind, mostly when RT-CGM was not integrated in AID. Users of AID had significantly larger improvements in overall quality of life, fatigue and diabetes-specific distress than users of sensor-augmented pump or Open Loop treatment. In regression analyses, user evaluations were associated with perceptions of benefit and burden. In qualitative content analysis, benefits (e.g. life 'normalization', increased perceptions of control) outweighed burdens (e.g. technology frustrations, confrontation with diabetes).

CONCLUSIONS

RT-CGM positively impacted the quality of life of adults with type 1 diabetes. This justifies a (re-)consideration of broader access. Increased support to maximize device benefits and minimize burdens is also warranted.

Barriers and Facilitators to Diabetes Device Adoption for People with Type 1 Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes technology (insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring, automated insulin delivery systems) has advanced significantly and provides benefits to the user. This article reviews the current barriers to diabetes device adoption and sustained use, and outlines the known and potential facilitators for increasing and sustaining device adoption.

RECENT FINDINGS

Barriers to diabetes device adoption continue to exist at the system-, provider-, and individual-level. Known facilitators to promote sustained adoption include consistent insurance coverage, support for providers and clinics, structured education and support for technology users, and device user access to support as needed (e.g., through online resources). Systemic barriers to diabetes device adoption persist while growing evidence demonstrates the increasing benefits of newest devices and systems. There are ongoing efforts to develop evidence-based structured education programs to support device adoption and sustained use.