Next- generation sequencing is an effective method for diagnosing patients with different forms of monogenic diabetes

Monogenic diabetes: An evidence-based clinical approach

Monogenic diabetes is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by hyperglycemia arising from defects in a single gene. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is the most common type with 14 subtypes, each linked to specific mutations affecting insulin synthesis, secretion and glucose regulation. Common traits across MODY subtypes include early-onset diabetes, a family history of autosomal dominant diabetes, lack of features of insulin resistance, and absent islet cell autoimmunity. Many cases are misdiagnosed as type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biomarkers and scoring systems can help identify candidates for genetic testing. GCK-MODY, a common subtype, manifests as mild hyperglycemia and doesn’t require treatment except during pregnancy. In contrast, mutations in HNF4A, HNF1A, and HNF1B genes lead to progressive beta-cell failure and similar risks of complications as type 2 diabetes mellitus. Neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) is a rare form of monogenic diabetes that usually presents within the first six months. Half of the cases are lifelong, while others experience transient remission. Permanent NDM is most commonly due to activating mutations in genes encoding the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel (KCNJ11 or ABCC8) and can be transitioned to sulfonylurea after confirmation of diagnosis. Thus, in many cases, monogenic diabetes offers an opportunity to provide precision treatment. The scope has broadened with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, replacing older methods like Sanger sequencing. NGS can be for targeted gene panels, whole-exome sequencing (WES), or whole-genome sequencing. Targeted gene panels offer specific information efficiently, while WES provides comprehensive data but comes with bioinformatic challenges. The surge in testing has also led to an increase in variants of unknown significance (VUS). Deciding whether VUS is disease-causing or benign can be challenging. Computational models, functional studies, and clinical knowledge help to determine pathogenicity. Advances in genetic testing technologies offer hope for improved diagnosis and personalized treatment but also raise concerns about interpretation and ethics.

The Importance of Molecular Genetic Testing for Precision Diagnostics, Management, and Genetic Counseling in MODY Patients

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is part of the heterogeneous group of monogenic diabetes (MD) characterized by the non-immune dysfunction of pancreatic β-cells. The diagnosis of MODY still remains a challenge for clinicians, with many cases being misdiagnosed as type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM/T2DM), and over 80% of cases remaining undiagnosed. With the introduction of modern technologies, important progress has been made in deciphering the molecular mechanisms and heterogeneous etiology of MD, including MODY. The aim of our study was to identify genetic variants associated with MODY in a group of patients with early-onset diabetes/prediabetes in whom a form of MD was clinically suspected. Genetic testing, based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, was carried out either in a targeted manner, using gene panels for monogenic diabetes, or by analyzing the entire exome (whole-exome sequencing). GKC-MODY 2 was the most frequently detected variant, but rare forms of KCNJ11-MODY 13, specifically, HNF4A-MODY 1, were also identified. We have emphasized the importance of genetic testing for early diagnosis, MODY subtype differentiation, and genetic counseling. We presented the genotype-phenotype correlations, especially related to the clinical evolution and personalized therapy, also emphasizing the particularities of each patient in the family context.

Identification of rare variants in candidate genes associated with monogenic diabetes in polish mody-x patients

Purpose

Monogenic diabetes (MD) is caused by a mutation in a single gene and accounts for approximately 2.5-6% of all diabetes cases. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is the most common form of MD. To date, 14 different genes have been identified and associated with the presence of MODY phenotype. However, the number of potential candidate genes with relevance to beta cell function and glucose metabolism is increasing as more research is published. The aim of the study was to identify potentially causative variants in selected candidate genes in patients with a clinical diagnosis of MD.

Methods

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (tNGS) on Illumina NextSeq 550 platform involving Agilent SureSelectQXT Target Enrichment protocol for 994 patients with suspected MD was performed. In the next step, the sequencing data of 617 patients with no pathogenic variants in main MD-related genes were reanalysed for the presence of causative variants in six candidate genes (MTOR, TBC1D4, CACNA1E, MNX1, SLC19A2, KCNH6). The presence of the selected variants was confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

Seven heterozygous possibly damaging variants were identified in four candidate genes (MTOR, TBC1D4, CACNA1E, MNX1). Five changes were assessed as novel variants, not previously described in available databases. None of the described variants were present among patients previously diagnosed with MODY diabetes due to causative, pathogenic variants in known MODY-related genes.

Conclusions

The results obtained seem to confirm the effectiveness of the NGS method in identifying potentially causative variants in novel candidate genes associated with MODY diabetes.

An Italian case series' description of thiamine responsive megaloblastic anemia syndrome: importance of early diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Individuals with thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia (TRMA) mainly manifest macrocytic anemia, sensorineural deafness, ocular complications, and nonautoimmune diabetes. Macrocytic anemia and diabetes may be responsive to high-dosage thiamine treatment, in contrast to sensorineural deafness. Little is known about the efficacy of thiamine treatment on ocular manifestations.

CASES PRESENTATION

Our objective is to report data from four Italian TRMA patients: in Cases 1, 2 and 3, the diagnosis of TRMA was made at 9, 14 and 27 months. In 3 out of 4 subjects, thiamine therapy allowed both normalization of hyperglycemia, with consequent insulin suspension, and macrocytic anemia. In all Cases, thiamine therapy did not resolve the clinical manifestation of deafness. In Cases 2 and 3, follow-up showed no blindness, unlike Case 4, in which treatment was started for megaloblastic anemia at age 7 but was increased to high doses only at age 25, when the genetic diagnosis of TRMA was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Early institution of high-dose thiamine supplementation seems to prevent the development of retinal changes and optic atrophy in TRMA patients. The spectrum of clinical manifestations is broad, and it is important to describe known Cases to gain a better understanding of this rare disease.

Diagnosis, treatment and disclosure: A qualitative exploration of participant challenges in a Monogenic Diabetes Registry

PURPOSE

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) represents a heterogenous group of monogenic diabetes. Despite its autosomal dominant inheritance, many MODY participants in the University of Chicago Monogenic Diabetes Registry have no family members enrolled. We aimed to gather data on the Registry participants' experiences in (1) receipt of an accurate diagnosis, (2) decisions regarding disclosure of their MODY genetic test results with biological relatives, and (3) recommendations toward our Registry's processes and outreach.

METHODS

We conducted 20 one-on-one semistructured interviews with adult Registry participants.

RESULTS

All participants found navigating the health care system challenging because of the providers' unfamiliarity with MODY and dismissal of its importance post diagnosis. All had shared their results with at least 1 relative, however many found their relatives resistant to engaging with their providers. Participants wanted to receive targeted information on their condition and connect with other participants who have faced similar diagnostic and treatment challenges.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that our probands faced resistance to reclassification of their diabetes from both health care providers and relatives. In an effort to improve cascade testing, the Registry is designing a portal to facilitate participant-research team communication and provide additional supports for participants to involve family members in testing.

The Pathogenic Diagnosis in Pediatric Diabetology: Next Generation Sequencing and Precision Therapy

In pediatric diabetology, a precise diagnosis is very important because it allows early and correct clinical management of the patient. Monogenic diabetes (MD), which accounts for 1-6% of all pediatric-adolescent diabetes cases, is the most relevant example of precision medicine. The definitive diagnosis of MD, possible only by genetic testing, allows us to direct patients to more appropriate therapy in relation to the identified mutation. In some cases, MD patients can avoid insulin and be treated with oral hypoglycemic drugs with a perceptible impact on both the quality of life and the healthcare costs. However, the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of MD and the overlapping clinical characteristics between different forms, can complicate the diagnostic process. In recent years, the development of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) methodology, which allows the simultaneous analysis of multiple genes, has revolutionized molecular diagnostics, becoming the cornerstone of MD precision diagnosis. We report two cases of patients with clinical suspects of MD in which a genetic test was carried out, using a NGS multigenic panel, and it clarified the correct pathogenesis of diabetes, allowing us to better manage the disease both in probands and other affected family members.

Monogenic diabetes in New Zealand - An audit based revision of the monogenic diabetes genetic testing pathway in New Zealand

AIMS

To evaluate (a) the diagnostic yield of genetic testing for monogenic diabetes when using single gene and gene panel-based testing approaches in the New Zealand (NZ) population, (b) whether the MODY (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young) pre-test probability calculator can be used to guide referrals for testing in NZ, (c) the number of referrals for testing for Māori/Pacific ethnicities compared to NZ European, and (d) the volume of proband vs cascade tests being requested.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of 495 referrals, from NZ, for testing of monogenic diabetes genes was performed. Referrals sent to LabPlus (Auckland) laboratory for single gene testing or small multi-gene panel testing, or to the Exeter Genomics Laboratory, UK, for a large gene panel, received from January 2014 - December 2021 were included. Detection rates of single gene, small multi-gene and large gene panels (neonatal and non-neonatal), and cascade testing were analysed. Pre-test probability was calculated using the Exeter MODY probability calculator and ethnicity data was also collected.

RESULTS

The diagnostic detection rate varied across genes, from 32% in GCK, to 2% in HNF4A, with single gene or small gene panel testing averaging a 12% detection rate. Detection rate by type of panel was 9% for small gene panel, 23% for non-neonatal monogenic diabetes large gene panel and 40% for neonatal monogenic diabetes large gene panel. 45% (67/147) of patients aged 1-35 years at diabetes diagnosis scored <20% on MODY pre-test probability, of whom 3 had class 4/5 variants in HNF1A, HNF4A or HNF1B. Ethnicity data of those selected for genetic testing correlated with population diabetes prevalence for Māori (15% vs 16%), but Pacific People appeared under-represented (8% vs 14%). Only 1 in 6 probands generated a cascade test.

CONCLUSIONS

A new monogenic diabetes testing algorithm for NZ is proposed, which directs clinicians to choose a large gene panel in patients without syndromic features who score a pre-test MODY probability of above 20%.

Targeted gene panel analysis of Japanese patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young-like diabetes mellitus: Roles of inactivating variants in the ABCC8 and insulin resistance genes

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To investigate the genetic background of Japanese patients with suspected maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On 340 proband patients referred from across Japan, genomic variants were analyzed using a targeted multigene panel analysis combined with the multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) analysis, mitochondrial m.3243A > G analysis and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction of the imprinted 6q24 locus. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were listed according to the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology criteria. Additionally, variants with a population frequency <0.001 and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion score >20 (CS >20) were listed as rare variants of uncertain significance-CS >20.

RESULTS

A total of 157 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and 44 rare variants of uncertain significance-CS >20 were identified. In the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, alterations in the GCK gene were the most common (82, 52.2%) followed by HNF1A (29, 18.5%), HNF4A (13, 8.3%) and HNF1B (13, 8.3%). One patient was a 29.5% mosaic with a truncating INSR variant. In the rare variants of uncertain significance-CS >20, 20 (45.5%) were in the genes coding for the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel, KCNJ11 or ABCC8, and four were in the genes of the insulin-signaling pathway, INSR and PIK3R1. Four variants in ABCC8 were previously reported in patients with congenital hyperinsulinism, suggesting the inactivating nature of these variants, and at least two of our patients had a history of congenital hyperinsulinism evolving into diabetes. In two patients with INSR or PIK3R1 variants, insulin resistance was evident at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Causative genomic variants could be identified in at least 46.2% of clinically suspected MODY patients. ABCC8-MODY with inactivating variants could represent a distinct category of MODY. Genes of insulin resistance should be included in the sequencing panel for MODY.

Co-segregation analysis and functional trial in vivo of candidate genes for monogenic diabetes

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to perform familial co-segregation analysis and functional trial in vivo during mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) of novel variants in diabetes candidate genes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

It is a continuation of the project "Genetic diabetes in Lithuania" with the cohort of 1209 patients with diabetes. Prior screening for autoimmune markers confirmed type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis in 88.1% (n=1065) of patients, and targeted next-generation sequencing identified 3.5% (n=42) pathogenic variants in MODY genes. Subsequently, 102 patients were classified as having diabetes of unknown etiology. 12/102 were found to have novel variants in potential diabetes genes (RFX2, RREB1, SLC5A1 (3 patients with variants in this gene), GCKR, MC4R, CASP10, TMPRSS6, HGFAC, DACH1, ZBED3). Co-segregation analysis and MMTT were carried out in order to study beta-cell function in subjects with specific variants.

RESULTS

MMTT analysis showed that probands with variants in MC4R, CASP10, TMPRSS6, HGFAC, and SLC5A1 (c.1415T>C) had sufficient residual beta-cell function with stimulated C-peptide (CP) >200 pmol/L. Seven individuals with variants in RFX2, RREB1, GCKR, DACH1, ZBED3 and SLC5A1 (c.1415T>C, and c.932A>T) presented with complete beta-cell failure. No statistical differences were found between patients with sufficient CP production and those with complete beta-cell failure when comparing age at the onset and duration of diabetes. Nineteen family members were included in co-segregation analysis; no diabetes cases were reported among them. Only in patient with the variant c.1894G>A in RFX2 gene, none of the family members were affected by proband's variant.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional beta-cell study in vivo allowed to select five most probable genes for monogenic diabetes. Familial co-segregation analysis showed that novel variant in RFX2 gene could be a possible cause of diabetes. Future functional analysis in vitro is necessary to support or rule out the genetic background as a cause of diabetes.

Search for a time- and cost-saving genetic testing strategy for maturity-onset diabetes of the young

AIMS

Correct genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is beneficial for person's diabetes management compared to no genetic testing. Aim of the present study was a search for optimal time- and cost-saving strategies by comparing two approaches of genetic testing of participants with clinical suspicion of MODY.

METHODS

A total of 121 consecutive probands referred for suspicion of MODY (Group A) were screened using targeted NGS (tNGS), while the other 112 consecutive probands (Group B) underwent a single gene test based on phenotype, and in cases of negative findings, tNGS was conducted. The study was performed in two subsequent years. The genetic results, time until reporting of the final results and financial expenses were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

MODY was confirmed in 30.6% and 40.2% probands from Groups A and B, respectively; GCK-MODY was predominant (72.2% in Group A and 77.8% in Group B). The median number of days until results reporting was 184 days (IQR 122-258) in Group A and 91 days (44-174) in Group B (p < 0.00001). Mean costs per person were higher for Group A (639 ± 30 USD) than for Group B (584 ± 296 USD; p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The two-step approach represented a better strategy for genetic investigation of MODY concerning time and costs compared to direct tNGS. Although a single-gene investigation clarified the diabetes aetiology in the majority of cases, tNGS could reveal rare causes of MODY and expose possible limitations of both standard genetic techniques and clinical evaluation.

Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed in Childhood and Adolescence With Negative Autoimmunity: Results of Genetic Investigation

Monogenic diabetes is a rare form of diabetes, accounting for approximately 1% to 6% of pediatric diabetes patients. Some types of monogenic diabetes can be misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes in children or adolescents because of similar clinical features. Identification of the correct etiology of diabetes is crucial for clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic issues. Our main objective was to determine the prevalence of monogenic diabetes in patients with diabetes mellitus, diagnosed in childhood or in adolescence, and negative autoimmunity. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 275 patients diagnosed with insulin-dependent diabetes at age <18yr in the last 10 years. 8.4% of subjects has negative autoimmunity. Their DNA was sequenced by NGS custom panel composed by 45 candidate genes involved in glucose metabolism disorder. Two novel heterozygous pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (10,5% of autoantibody negative subjects) were detected: the frameshift variant c.617_618insA in NEUROD1 exon 2 and the missense change c.116T>C in INS exon 2. Our study corroborates previous results of other reports in literature. NGS assays are useful methods for a correct diagnosis of monogenic diabetes, even of rarest forms, highlighting mechanisms of pediatric diabetes pathogenesis.