Making the most of surveillance studies: summary of the OPTAMA Program

Evaluation of omadacycline regimens for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients infected with Staphylococcus Aureus by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

Omadacycline is an FDA-approved agent for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of omadacycline for treating CABP patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed by utilizing omadacycline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, and in vivo PK/PD targets to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) values for different dose regimens against MRSA and MSSA in CABP patients. A dosage regimen with a PTA or CFR expectation value greater than 90% was considered optimal. For all recommended dose regimens, PTA values for MRSA MIC ≤1 and MSSA MIC ≤4 on days 1, 4, and 7 were greater than 90%. Based on the MIC distribution of Staphylococcus aureus, all dose regimens had CFR values greater than 90% for both MRSA and MSSA. CFR values for different bacterial strains were still greater than 90% within the range of PK/PD target values less than 40, although they gradually decreased with increasing PK/PD target values. PK/PD modeling demonstrated that all recommended dose regimens of omadacycline are highly effective against CABP patients infected with MRSA and MSSA. The study provides theoretical support for the efficacy of omadacycline in different dose regimens.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment of Vancomycin, at Three Reported Infusion Modes, for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: Focus on Novel Infusion Mode

Objective

The study aimed to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) exposure to vancomycin in the novel optimal two-step infusion (OTSI) vs. intermittent infusion (II) vs. continuous infusion (CI) mode, for MRSA bloodstream infections occurring in critical patients.

Methods

With PK/PD modeling and Monte Carlo simulations, the PK/PD exposure of 15 OTSI, 13 II, and 6 CI regimens for vancomycin, at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 g daily dose, was evaluated. Using the Monte Carlo simulations, the vancomycin population PK parameters derived from critical patients, the PD parameter for MRSA isolates [i.e., minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)], and the dosing parameters of these regimens were integrated into a robust mdel of vancomycin PK/PD index, defined as a ratio of the daily area under the curve (AUC0–24) to MIC (i.e., AUC0–24/MIC), to estimate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of these regimens against MRSA isolates with an MIC of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/L in patients with varying renal function. The PTA at an AUC0–24/MIC ratio of >400, 400–600, and >600 was estimated. A regimen with a PTA of ≥90% at an AUC0–24/MIC ratio of 400–600, which is supposed to maximize both efficacy and safety, was considered optimal.

Results

At the same daily dose, almost only the OTSI regimens showed a PTA of ≥90% at an AUC0–24/MIC ratio of 400–600, and this profile seems evident especially in patients with creatinine clearance (CLcr) of ≥60 ml/min and for isolates with an MIC of ≤2 mg/L. However, for patients with CLcr of <60 ml/min and for isolates with an MIC of ≥4 mg/L, the II regimens often displayed a higher or even ≥90% PTA at an AUC0–24/MIC ratio of >400 and of >600. The CI regimens frequently afforded a reduced PTA at an AUC0–24/MIC ratio of >400 and of >600, regardless of CLcr and MIC.

Conclusions

The data indicated that the OTSI regimens allowed preferred PK/PD exposure in terms of both efficacy and safety, and thus should be focused more on, especially in patients with CLcr of ≥60 ml/min and for isolates with an MIC of ≤2 mg/L.

Predicted Vancomycin Dosage Requirement in Patients With Hematological Malignancies and Dosage Dynamic Adjustment

Purpose: The purpose of this study was 1) to predict the requisite vancomycin daily dose (D_van) used in the target patients suffering from both bacterial infection and hematological malignancies and 2) to construct a vancomycin-dose-graphical tool to assist clinicians to develop vancomycin dosing regimens and further 3) to establish a programming process for vancomycin dynamic dosage adjustment to help clinicians to adjust vancomycin dosing regimens according to physiological and pathogenic factors of the target patients.

Methods: The D_van model associated with microbial susceptibility, vancomycin pharmacokinetics, and dosing parameters was established, and the D_van was estimated based on the established D_van model and using Monte Carlo simulations. D_van achieving 90% of probability of target attainment (PTA) for bacterial isolate or cumulative fractions of response (CFR) for the bacterial population at a ratio of daily area under the curve (AUC₂₄) to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [i.e., AUC₂₄/MIC] of 400–600 was considered sufficient to treat infection occurring in the target patients. On the basis of the predicted D_van, the physiological states of patients, and the pathogenic variables of infection, a vancomycin-dose-graphical tool for the target patients and a programming process for vancomycin dynamic dosage adjustment were constructed.

Results: This study predicted the requisite D_van used in patients suffering from both bacterial infection and hematological malignancies and constructed a vancomycin-dose-graphical tool for the target patients, at different physiological states and pathogenic variables, to formulate vancomycin dosing regimens. Also, this study established and expounded the formulation process of vancomycin dosage dynamic adjustment according to fluctuant renal function of the target patients.

Conclusion: With the tools, the required D_van or vancomycin dosing regimens for the target patients, at different physiological states and pathogenic variables, can be readily known, whether or not vancomycin dynamic dosage adjustment is required.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vivo translational biology and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)

This review describes the translational in vivo and non-clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) research that supported clinical trialling and subsequently licensing approval of ceftazidime/avibactam, a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination aimed at the treatment of infections by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The review thematically follows on from the co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac171). Avibactam protected ceftazidime in animal models of infection with ceftazidime-resistant, β-lactamase-producing bacteria. For example, a single subcutaneous dose of ceftazidime at 1024 mg/kg yielded little effect on the growth of ceftazidime-resistant, blaKPC-2-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae in the thighs of neutropenic mice (final counts of 4 × 108 to 8 × 108 cfu/thigh). In contrast, co-administration of avibactam in a 4:1 ratio (ceftazidime:avibactam) was bactericidal in the same model (final counts of 2 × 104 to 3 × 104 cfu/thigh). In a rat abdominal abscess model, therapy with ceftazidime or ceftazidime/avibactam (4:1 w/w) against blaKPC-2-positive K. pneumoniae resulted in 9.3 versus 3.3 log cfu/abscess, respectively, after 52 h. With respect to PK/PD, in Monte Carlo simulations, attainment of unbound drug exposure targets (ceftazidime fT>8 mg/L and avibactam fT>1 mg/L, each for 50% of the dosing interval) for the labelled dose of ceftazidime/avibactam (2 and 0.5 g, respectively, q8h by 2 h IV infusion), including dose adjustments for patients with impaired renal function, ranged between 94.8% and 99.6% of patients, depending on the infection modelled.

Avibactam Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets

Avibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in the United States and Europe for use in combination with ceftazidime. Combinations of avibactam with aztreonam or ceftaroline fosamil have also been clinically evaluated. Until recently, there has been very little precedence of which pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and magnitudes are appropriate to use for β-lactamase inhibitors in population PK modeling for analyzing potential doses and susceptibility breakpoints. For avibactam, several preclinical studies using different in vitro and in vivo models have been conducted to identify the PK/PD index of avibactam and the magnitude of exposure necessary for effect in combination with ceftazidime, aztreonam, or ceftaroline fosamil. The PD driver of avibactam critical for restoring the activity of all three partner β-lactams was found to be time dependent rather than concentration dependent and was defined as the time that the concentration of avibactam exceeded a critical concentration threshold (%fT>C_T). The magnitude of the C_T and the time that this threshold needed to be exceeded to elicit particular PD endpoints varied depending on the model and the partner β-lactam. This review describes the preclinical studies used to determine the avibactam PK/PD target in combination with its β-lactam partners.

Management of antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit

Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are frequently treated with antimicrobials. The appropriate and judicious use of antimicrobial treatment in the ICU setting is a constant clinical challenge for healthcare staff due to the appearance and spread of new multiresistant pathogens and the need to update knowledge of factors involved in the selection of multiresistance and in the patient's clinical response. In order to optimize the efficacy of empirical antibacterial treatments and to reduce the selection of multiresistant pathogens, different strategies have been advocated, including de-escalation therapy and pre-emptive therapy as well as measurement of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (pK/pD) parameters for proper dosing adjustment. Although the theoretical arguments of all these strategies are very attractive, evidence of their effectiveness is scarce. The identification of the concentration-dependent and time-dependent activity pattern of antimicrobials allow the classification of drugs into three groups, each group with its own pK/pD characteristics, which are the basis for the identification of new forms of administration of antimicrobials to optimize their efficacy (single dose, loading dose, continuous infusion) and to decrease toxicity. The appearance of new multiresistant pathogens, such as imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and/or Acinetobacter baumannii, carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria harbouring carbapenemases, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., has determined the use of new antibacterials, the reintroduction of other drugs that have been removed in the past due to toxicity or the use of combinations with in vitro synergy. Finally, pharmacoeconomic aspects should be considered for the choice of appropriate antimicrobials in the care of critically ill patients.

Pharmacodynamic profiling of intravenous antibiotics against prevalent Gram-negative organisms across the globe: the PASSPORT Program-Asia-Pacific Region

Due to escalating antimicrobial resistance amongst Gram-negative organisms, the choice of effective empirical antimicrobial regimens has become challenging. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted for conventional and prolonged infusion regimens of doripenem, imipenem and meropenem using pharmacokinetic data from adult patients with conserved renal function. Minimum inhibitory concentration data against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were incorporated from the COMPACT surveillance programme in the Asia-Pacific region of the world. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was determined for each regimen against each bacterial population. All simulated carbapenem regimens achieved an optimal CFR against E. coli and K. pneumoniae (94.5-100% CFR). Against P. aeruginosa, doripenem achieved 78.7-92.6% CFR, imipenem achieved 60.4-79.0% CFR and meropenem achieved 73.0-85.1% CFR. The only dosing regimen to achieve ≥ 90% CFR against P. aeruginosa was doripenem 1000 mg and 2000 mg every 8 h (4-h infusion). Carbapenem CFRs against A. baumannii were much lower (29.2-54.4% CFR). CFRs for non-fermenting isolates were ca. 10% lower for isolates collected in the Intensive Care Unit. Carbapenem resistance amongst Enterobacteriaceae remains low in the Asia-Pacific region and thus standard carbapenem dosing regimens had a high likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic exposures. However, larger doses combined with prolonged infusion will be required to increase the CFR for these carbapenems against resistant non-fermenting Gram-negatives that are common in these countries. The safety and efficacy of these high dosing regimens will need to be confirmed in the clinical setting.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiling of four antimicrobials against gram-negative bacteria collected from Shenyang, China

Background

To examine common antimicrobial regimens used in eradicating certain nosocomial Gram-negative pathogens and determine which ones are likely to be the most suitable as empirical choices in Shenyang, China.

Methods

A 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to determine the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for meropenem, imipenem, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and levofloxacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in 2006 and 2007 from Shenyang.

Results

Meropenem and imipenem had the highest CFRs against the Enterobacteriaceae (97%-100%), followed by cefepime. No antibiotic simulated regimen achieved optimal CFR against P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Piperacillin/tazobactam dosed at 4.5 g q8h achieved the lowest CFR against all bacteria.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the carbapenems provide the greatest likelihood of clinical success for the Enterobacteriaceae, and combination therapy might be needed when choosing empirical therapy, especially when A. baumannii or P. aeruginosa are suspected.

Vancomycin dosage optimization in patients with malignant haematological disease by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus is currently debated because of the increasing resistance developed by this pathogen. Nevertheless, antibacterial effectiveness is a limited resource that must be protected and restored. Novel dosage strategies based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses are needed to retain effectiveness that could improve drug exposure in patients infected with such pathogens.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess whether standard or higher vancomycin dosages are required to increase the probability of attaining a target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index for several staphylococcal strains and thus to estimate the minimum vancomycin daily dose related to a high probability of effective treatment in patients with malignant haematological disease.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for different vancomycin daily dosages, using a population pharmacokinetic model previously defined in patients with malignant haematological disease and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution for vancomycin against several staphylococcal species (vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA], S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus [CNS] species) obtained from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) in order to predict the dose that would achieve the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index value associated with efficacy (the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours divided by the MIC [AUC(24)/MIC >/=400]).

RESULTS

CFR values showed dependence on the renal function of the patient and the causative pathogen. Only in patients with a creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) <60 mL/min did the standard vancomycin dosage (2000 mg/day) induce CFRs >60% for all staphylococci, except the VISA strains. CFRs for S. aureus of 90.6%, 47.3% and 31.2% for CL(CR) values of <60, 60-120 and >120 mL/min, respectively, were obtained, whereas for the VISA strains, the corresponding values were only 14.0%, 0.3% and 0%. The impact of potential pathogens on CFRs is also significant. According to our pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, in patients with normal renal function (CL(CR) between 60 and 120 mL/min) vancomycin 2000 mg/day leads to a risk of not achieving the recommended AUC(24)/MIC breakpoint of 52.7%, 70.4%, 74.9% and 80.3% for S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, CNS and S. epidermidis, respectively. Application of our results to clinical practice graphically allows us to obtain the recommended dose for any a priori-selected probability of attaining the AUC(24)/MIC ratio of >/=400 and to evaluate the CFRs for any dosing regimen used in this population group, depending on the patients' renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation offers an excellent tool for selecting the therapeutic option with the highest probability of clinical success in patients with malignant haematological disease. Thus, for vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus, if a CFR >/=80 is assumed as clinically acceptable, vancomycin doses of 1500, 3000 and 4000 mg/day for a CL(CR) of <60, 60-120 and >120 mL/min, respectively, will be required.

A pharmacodynamic simulation to assess tigecycline efficacy for hospital-acquired pneumonia compared with other common intravenous antibiotics

A pharmacodynamic model was used to generate supportive data comparing tigecycline with other broad-spectrum agents against pathogens implicated in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). A 5000 patient Monte Carlo simulation determined the probability of target attainment (PTA) of tigecycline (+/- ceftazidime) compared with imipenem, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam (+/- vancomycin). PTA was calculated over MICs of current Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria collected from worldwide surveillance and weighted by the expected prevalence of these pathogens causing HAP. For monotherapy, the weighted PTA was imipenem (78.2%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.3%), tigecycline (62.9%), and levofloxacin (62.5%). By pathogen PTA was greatest for tigecycline against Gram-positives, and ceftazidime or imipenem against Gram-negatives. Combination therapy increased PTA to 88.6%, 85.5%, 80.6%, and 69.8% for tigecycline, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and levofloxacin, respectively. Based on contemporary resistance data, tigecycline plus ceftazidime is predicted to achieve its pharmacodynamic targets similarly to combination therapy with imipenem plus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with HAP.

Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections

Meropenem (Merrem, Meronem) is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent of the carbapenem family, indicated as empirical therapy prior to the identification of causative organisms, or for disease caused by single or multiple susceptible bacteria in both adults and children with a broad range of serious infections. Meropenem is approved for use in complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and bacterial meningitis (in paediatric patients aged > or = 3 months) in the US, and in most other countries for nosocomial pneumonia, cIAI, septicaemia, febrile neutropenia, cSSSI, bacterial meningitis, complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), obstetric and gynaecological infections, in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary exacerbations, and for the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Meropenem has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. It has similar efficacy to comparator antibacterial agents, including: imipenem/cilastatin in cIAI, cSSSI, febrile neutropenia, complicated UTI, obstetric or gynaecological infections and severe CAP; clindamycin plus tobramycin or gentamicin in cIAI or obstetric/gynaecological infections; cefotaxime plus metronidazole in cIAI; cefepime and ceftazidime plus amikacin in septicaemia or febrile neutropenia; and ceftazidime, clarithromycin plus ceftriaxone or amikacin in severe CAP. Meropenem has also shown similar efficacy to cefotaxime in paediatric and adult patients with bacterial meningitis, and to ceftazidime when both agents were administered with or without tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis experiencing acute pulmonary exacerbations. Meropenem showed greater efficacy than ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam in febrile neutropenia, and greater efficacy than ceftazidime plus amikacin or tobramycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Meropenem is well tolerated and has the advantage of being suitable for administration as an intravenous bolus or infusion. Its low propensity for inducing seizures means that it is suitable for treating bacterial meningitis and is the only carbapenem approved in this indication. Thus, meropenem continues to be an important option for the empirical treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients.

Pharmacodynamic comparison of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected from hospitals in Brazil

Pharmacodynamic exposures, measured as the ratio of steady-state total drug area under the curve to MIC (AUC/MIC), were modelled using a 5000-patient Monte-Carlo simulation against 119 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and 82 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) collected from hospitals in Brazil between 2003 and 2005. Pharmacodynamic targets included an AUC/MIC >82.9 for linezolid and >345 for teicoplanin and vancomycin, as well as a free drug AUC/MIC >180 for vancomycin. The cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) against all S. aureus isolates were 96.0%, 30.1%, 71.6%, 48.0% and 65.1% for linezolid 600 mg every 12 h, teicoplanin 400 mg every 24 h and 800 mg every 24 h, and vancomycin 1000 mg every 12 h and every 8 h, respectively. Using a free drug target for vancomycin improved the CFR to 94.6% for the high-dose regimen, but did not substantially alter results for the lower dose. CFRs against all CNS isolates were 97.8%, 13.4%, 34.6%, 10.9% and 31.3%, respectively, for the same antibiotic regimens. The CFR was reduced for all compounds among the methicillin-resistant isolates, except for linezolid against methicillin-resistant CNS. Sensitivity analyses did not alter the final order of pharmacodynamic potency against these isolates. Although higher doses of vancomycin and teicoplanin increased the CFR, the likelihood of achieving bactericidal targets was still lower than with linezolid. The results for the high-dose vancomycin regimen were highly dependent on the pharmacodynamic target utilised. These data suggest that linezolid has a greater probability of attaining its requisite pharmacodynamic target than teicoplanin and vancomycin against these staphylococci.

Antibiotic resistance surveillance over a 4-year period (2000–2003) in Turkey: results of the MYSTIC Program

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program is a global study that provides antimicrobial susceptibility data in centers prescribing meropenem. The activity of meropenem and 7 broad-spectrum antimicrobials have been examined against 5208 bacterial isolates from 9 Turkish centers between 2000 and 2003. Cumulative susceptibility rates against all species of Enterobacteriaceae combined were ranked as follows: meropenem (99.3%), imipenem (97.6%), cefepime (80.0%), piperacillin-tazobactam (73.6%), ceftazidime (70.3%), ciprofloxacin (70.1%), cefotaxime (66.9%), and tobramycin (67.2%). The production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) was detected in 48.7% of Klebsiella pneumoniae and in 19.5% of Escherichia coli isolates. Of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae isolates, 75.7% were resistant to tobramycin, 40.3% to ciprofloxacin, and 48.3% to piperacillin-tazobactam. Only piperacillin/tazobactam and carbapenems were active against more than 50% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards-susceptible breakpoint, and the carbapenems were the most active compounds against Acinetobacter spp. These data confirm the continued potency of meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae in units where it is actively being prescribed.

A pharmacodynamic analysis of resistance trends in pathogens from patients with infection in intensive care units in the United States between 1993 and 2004

Background

Increasing nosocomial pathogen resistance to available antimicrobial agents is of growing concern. While higher MICs can diminish antimicrobial effectiveness, dose adjustments often mitigate this effect. This study's objective was to ascertain whether MICs among major pathogens in the ICU to several commonly used agents have increased enough to significantly impact their ability to achieve bactericidal effect.

Methods

Cefepime, ceftriaxone, imipenem and piperacillin-tazobactam MICs were determined with 74,394 Gram-negative bacilli obtained from ICU patients with various infections in the US between 1993 and 2004. Results were grouped into four 3-year periods. The predicted cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was estimated based on patient-derived pharmacokinetic values and Monte Carlo simulation. Trends in CFR over the four study periods were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. The primary analysis included all organisms combined; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were also evaluated individually.

Results

In the primary analysis, imipenem 500 mg q6h showed CFRs from 87% to 90% across all four study periods, with a trend toward slightly improved bactericidal target attainment (p < 0.01). CFRs for cefepime 2 g q12h and piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g q6h both declined by 2% (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), reflecting upward shifts in the underlying MIC distributions. Ceftriaxone had <52% CFR for all regimens in all periods, with no significant trend. Against P. aeruginosa, significant declines in CFR were seen for (range, p-value): imipenem 1 g q8h (82%–79%, p < 0.01), cefepime 1 g q12h (70%–67%, p < 0.01), cefepime 2 g q12h (84%–82%, p < 0.05), piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h (76%–73%, p < 0.01), piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g q8h (71%–68%, p < 0.01), and piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g q6h (80%–77%, p < .01). Against Acinetobacter spp., all regimens of imipenem, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam showed significant declines in CFR over time (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our observations suggest that as a result of increasing antimicrobial resistance among ICU pathogens in the US, drug effectiveness, assessed as a function of individual agents' ability to attain pharmacodynamic targets, has declined, especially with P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Cefepime 2 g q8h and imipenem were the most potent agents against these species, respectively. More aggressive dosing of all of the agents characterized could preserve their clinical utility, but this must be balanced with safety and tolerability issues by the physician.

Empiric therapy for secondary peritonitis: a pharmacodynamic analysis of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline using Monte Carlo simulation

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibiotic therapy (ie, the selection of an empiric agent without activity against the responsible pathogen) of secondary peritonitis may result in poor patient outcomes. The selection of an appropriate agent can be challenging because of the emerging resistance of target organisms to commonly prescribed antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacodynamic analysis, using recent global surveillance data, of commonly prescribed antibiotic agents and a newer agent, tigecycline, indicated in 2005 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, to determine their probability for achieving microbiologic success against aerobic bacteria associated with secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

A 2-compartment model was constructed using pharmacokinetic data from critically ill patients and global surveillance data on MIC distributions for microorganisms encountered in secondary peritonitis. A Monte Carlo simulation of the modeled data was performed to determine drug-appropriate pharmacodynamic end points, including free-drug time above the MIC, steady-state concentration above the MIC, and AUC/MIC ratios. A cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against aerobic bacteria involved in secondary peritonitis was calculated for cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, levofloxacin, pip eracillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. A CFR > or =90% was considered microbiologic success. The following treatment regimens, administered as 30-minute N infusions, were examined: cefepime 1 and 2 g q12h, ceftazidime 1 and 2 g q8h, ceftriaxone 1 and 2 g q24h, imipenem 500 mg q6h, levofloxacin 750 mg q24h, pip eracillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h, and tigecycline 50 mg q12h, after a loading dose of 100 mg.

RESULTS

A CFR > or =90% against nonenterococcal bacteria was predicted for imipenem 500 mg q6h (96.8%), cefepime 2 and 1 g q12h (95.3% and 92.4%, respectively), ceftazidime 2 g q8h (94.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h (91.2%). A CFR of 84.5% was predicted for tigecycline 50 mg q12h. Ceftriaxone and levofloxacin were predicted to have a CFR <80%. When enterococci were included in the model, the predicted CFRs for imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline were 93.4%, 88.4%, and 86.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

: MIC distribution and pathogen prevalence strongly influence the likelihood of microbiological success in secondary peritonitis; therefore, decisions regarding empiric therapy should consider local epidemiology. Using current global data, the following regimens are adequate choices if Enterococcus is not targeted: Combination therapy (with metronidazole) using cefepime 1 g or 2 g q12h, or ceftazidime 2 g q8h; or monotherapy with imipenem 500 mg q6h or piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h. When Enterococcus is included in the epidemiologic mix, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline all appear to be viable monotherapeutic choices.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment of seven antimicrobials against Gram-negative bacteria collected from China in 2003 and 2004

Using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data derived from a Chinese national surveillance study and pharmacokinetic data collected in Chinese individuals, a 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to determine the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for cefoperazone/sulbactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, imipenem and meropenem against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected during 2003 and 2004. The carbapenems had the highest CFRs against the Enterobacteriaceae (94.7-100%) and A. baumannii (66.0-86.3%). Ceftazidime, meropenem and cefoperazone/sulbactam obtained the greatest CFRs against P. aeruginosa (73.9-86.6% in Southern China and 64.8-82.1% in Northern China). All other cephalosporin and ciprofloxacin regimens achieved < or =50% CFR against all bacterial species. Meropenem 2g every 8h as a 3-h infusion displayed ca. 90% CFR against A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Pharmacodynamic analyses are useful for selecting optimal compounds and dosing regimens as initial empirical therapy against these organisms in China.

Reevaluation of current susceptibility breakpoints for Gram-negative rods based on pharmacodynamic assessment

Although pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling is now being considered for decision support for susceptibility breakpoint determination against Gram-negative bacteria, these PD-derived breakpoints should be verified using a clinically applicable population of organisms. In this analysis, a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine PD breakpoints, the highest 2-fold MIC in which the probability of bactericidal target attainment (PTA) remained > or = 90%. Percent susceptibilities for 639 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 103 Acinetobacter baumannii, 705 Escherichia coli, and 418 Klebsiella spp. collected during the 2004 Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection surveillance study were then defined according to the PD-derived breakpoint (%S(PD)) and compared with the current Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined breakpoints (%S(CLSI)). %S(PD) and %S(CLSI) were compared with the bactericidal PTA for each pathogen population to determine the degree of agreement. Resulting PD breakpoints were drug and dose dependent; moreover, values were commonly 2 to 4 MIC dilutions lower than CLSI breakpoints. Overall, %S(PD) more closely agreed with the PTA for the tested beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone dosing regimens. In contrast, %S(CLSI) overestimated PTA for many dosing regimens, especially against Pseudomonas: piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g qid (+9.7%), ciprofloxacin 0.4 g bid (+13.7%) and 0.4 g tid (+9.3%), and levofloxacin 0.5 g every 24 h (+22.4%) and 0.75 g every 24 h (+9.9%). Differences were most pronounced against the nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria and were not observed among the Enterobacteriaceae. As a result, a new method of breakpoint classification is proposed, which is dosing regimen and pathogen specific, and is designed to denote isolates as susceptible only if target bactericidal exposures are achievable with the dosing regimen selected.

Antibacterial dosage in intensive-care-unit patients based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Selection of the best antibiotic dosage regimen in intensive-care-unit patients is a critical factor for decreasing morbidity and mortality rates. The integration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is essential to establishing an adequate therapy. Many studies on this issue have been published in recent years due to its relevance, some of which are commented upon in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have shown that it is feasible to theoretically forecast pharmacodynamic outcomes and select the most adequate antibiotic therapy with Monte Carlo simulations. Moreover, new strategies such as the use of continuous or extended intravenous beta-lactam infusions may considerably improve therapeutic efficacy.

SUMMARY

Future studies are needed in patients to assess the influence of selecting antibiotic therapy based on the impact of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic on mortality, morbidity, cost, etc. It would be of special interest to evaluate this impact on patients with infections caused by multiresistant pathogens, whose mortality rates are even higher. Moreover, although studies such as this would not be easy, mainly due to the large number of patients required to obtain statistically significant results, they should be strongly encouraged because of the possible clinical and economic benefits.

Cefepime versus ceftazidime: considerations for empirical use in critically ill patients

Sepsis and nosocomial infections continue to be a significant problem in intensive care, contributing heavily to mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Early and appropriate antibiotic therapy is critical for optimising outcomes. However, the emergence of highly resistant bacteria, coupled with reduced development of novel antibiotics, means that there is a real threat of development of untreatable nosocomial infections. Cefepime and ceftazidime are broad-spectrum cephalosporins that are widely used to treat Gram-negative nosocomial infections in critically ill patients. Available data suggest that cefepime may have advantages over ceftazidime owing to a broader spectrum of activity and reduced potential for development of bacterial resistance. However, whether either of these agents is superior can only be determined by a head-to-head study evaluating clinical and bacteriological outcomes. Such a study to determine whether apparent differences translate into clinically relevant differences in outcome is indicated.

Activity of meropenem and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. isolated in the MYSTIC Program, 2002-2004

This study examines the susceptibilities of meropenem and other broad-spectrum antimicrobials tested against bacterial isolates collected from hospitalized patients during 2002-2004 from worldwide medical centers participating in the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program. The in vitro activity of meropenem and 5 comparator antimicrobial agents was assessed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Generally, the susceptibility of Australasian and North American isolates was higher than that of the European and South American isolates. The rank order of activity of the antimicrobial agents tested against a worldwide collection of P. aeruginosa was piperacillin/tazobactam (77.7% susceptible) > meropenem (75.4%) > ceftazidime (70.0%) > imipenem (69.7%) > gentamicin (66.1%) > ciprofloxacin (62.0%). Against a worldwide collection of Acinetobacter spp. meropenem (76.1% susceptible) was the most active compound followed by imipenem (74.7%) > gentamicin (51.9%) > ciprofloxacin (40.5%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (39.8%) > ceftazidime (38.1%). The carbapenems appear to be a valuable option for the treatment of serious nosocomial infections caused by P. aeruginosa or Acinetobacter spp. over a broad geographical region.

An overview of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program: 1997-2004

This overview provides a summary of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program over an 8-year period from 1997 to 2004. The evolution of the MYSTIC Program is described, as well as its design compared with other surveillance programs. In addition, the global MYSTIC Program data, published to date, are summarized, and the empiric use of carbapenems, their current indications, and meropenem usage versus resistance was discussed. From 1997 to 2004, 120 medical centers that were actively prescribing meropenem in 32 countries worldwide participated in the program. The MYSTIC Program results demonstrate the sustained potency and continued effectiveness of meropenem globally against clinically relevant Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens including extended spectrum beta-lactamase- and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing organisms, which may also display resistance to the fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides. Furthermore, in centers actively prescribing meropenem, resistance to meropenem is not increasing despite greater resistance among the comparator antimicrobial agents. Thus, antipseudomonal carbapenems such as meropenem and imipenem remain an effective treatment option.