Differences in suppression of regrowth and resistance despite similar initial bacterial killing for meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli

Characterization of sulopenem antimicrobial activity using in vitro time-kill kinetics, synergy, post-antibiotic effect, and sub-inhibitory MIC effect methods against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

Sulopenem is an oral and intravenous penem antibiotic in clinical development for treatment of urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. This study evaluated in vitro antimicrobial activity of sulopenem by post-antibiotic effect (PAE), sub-inhibitory minimal inhibitory concentration PAE effect (PAE-SME), checkerboard testing, and time-kill testing. Testing sulopenem at 1×, 5×, or 10× the baseline MIC resulted in a PAE interval of 0.0-0.7 hours. When exposed to 0.5× the sulopenem MIC following 5× MIC, all isolate/agent combinations had PAE-SME values of >4.8 hours. Checkerboard testing revealed no instances of antagonism between sulopenem and comparator agents-indifference was observed in most sulopenem checkerboard combinations. Sulopenem demonstrated bactericidal activity (≥3 log10 [99.9%] reduction in viable organism counts) in all time-kill assays following 24 hours of incubation at 8× the baseline MIC (6/6), 5/6 displaying this activity within 8 hours. The present antimicrobial parameters seen at concentrations surrounding the MIC support optimization of sulopenem dosing and further development. The oral dosing regimen of sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg/500 mg administered every 12 hours was recently evaluated in two phase 3 clinical trials where sulopenem demonstrated efficacy against amoxicillin-clavulanate in uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) and against ciprofloxacin in fluoroquinolone-resistant uUTI.IMPORTANCESulopenem is an oral and intravenous penem antibiotic in clinical development for treatment of urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. This study evaluated sulopenem via broth microdilution susceptibility testing, PAE, sub-inhibitory MIC PAE effect, checkerboard testing, and time-kill testing. The results of this study-interpreted along with recent pharmacodynamic in vitro one-compartment and hollow-fiber infection model work-provide insight into the in vitro activity of sulopenem.

Effect of Different Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosage Regimens on Synergy of the Combination with Tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the Pharmacokinetics of Critically Ill Patients in a Dynamic Infection Model

We evaluated piperacillin-tazobactam and tobramycin regimens against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from critically ill patients. Static-concentration time-kill studies (SCTK) assessed piperacillin-tazobactam and tobramycin monotherapies and combinations against four isolates over 72 h. A 120 h-dynamic in vitro infection model (IVM) investigated isolates Pa1281 (MICpiperacillin 4 mg/L, MICtobramycin 0.5 mg/L) and CR380 (MICpiperacillin 32 mg/L, MICtobramycin 1 mg/L), simulating the pharmacokinetics of: (A) tobramycin 7 mg/kg q24 h (0.5 h-infusions, t1/2 = 3.1 h); (B) piperacillin 4 g q4 h (0.5 h-infusions, t1/2 = 1.5 h); (C) piperacillin 24 g/day, continuous infusion; A + B; A + C. Total and less-susceptible bacteria were determined. SCTK demonstrated synergy of the combination for all isolates. In the IVM, regimens A and B provided initial killing, followed by extensive regrowth by 72 h for both isolates. C provided >4 log10 CFU/mL killing, followed by regrowth close to initial inoculum by 96 h for Pa1281, and suppressed growth to <4 log10 CFU/mL for CR380. A and A + B initially suppressed counts of both isolates to <1 log10 CFU/mL, before regrowth to control or starting inoculum and resistance emergence by 72 h. Overall, the combination including intermittent piperacillin-tazobactam did not provide a benefit over tobramycin monotherapy. A + C, the combination regimen with continuous infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam, provided synergistic killing (counts <1 log10 CFU/mL) of Pa1281 and CR380, and suppressed regrowth to <2 and <4 log10 CFU/mL, respectively, and resistance emergence over 120 h. The shape of the concentration-time curve was important for synergy of the combination.

Benefits of prolonged infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with sepsis: personal perspectives

INTRODUCTION

In the current era of relatively scarce antibiotic production and significant levels of antimicrobial resistance, optimization of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotic therapy is mandatory. Prolonged infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in comparison to the intermittent infusion has the theoretical advantage of better patient outcomes. Apparently, conflicting data in the literature possibly underestimate the benefits of prolonged infusion of antibiotic treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We provide our perspective on the subject based on our experience and by critically evaluating literature data.

EXPERT OPINION COMMENTARY

In our opinion, the available data are suggestive of the beneficial role of prolonged infusion of beta-lactams in regard to piperacillin/tazobactam and carbapenems after administering a loading dose. While more data from randomized controlled trials are necessary to solidify or negate the evident benefits of prolonged infusion of the aforementioned antibiotics, clinicians should strongly consider this mode of administration of relevant antibiotics, especially in patients with severe infections.

Meropenem-Tobramycin Combination Regimens Combat Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model Simulating Augmented Renal Clearance in Critically Ill Patients

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is common in critically ill patients and is associated with subtherapeutic concentrations of renally eliminated antibiotics. We investigated the impact of ARC on bacterial killing and resistance amplification for meropenem and tobramycin regimens in monotherapy and combination. Two carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were studied in static-concentration time-kill studies. One isolate was examined comprehensively in a 7-day hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Pharmacokinetic profiles representing substantial ARC (creatinine clearance of 250 ml/min) were generated in the HFIM for meropenem (1 g or 2 g administered every 8 h as 30-min infusion and 3 g/day or 6 g/day as continuous infusion [CI]) and tobramycin (7 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h as 30-min infusion) regimens. The time courses of total and less-susceptible bacterial populations and MICs were determined for the monotherapies and all four combination regimens. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling (MBM) was performed. In the HFIM, maximum bacterial killing with any meropenem monotherapy was ∼3 log₁₀ CFU/ml at 7 h, followed by rapid regrowth with increases in resistant populations by 24 h (meropenem MIC of up to 128 mg/liter). Tobramycin monotherapy produced extensive initial killing (∼7 log₁₀ at 4 h) with rapid regrowth by 24 h, including substantial increases in resistant populations (tobramycin MIC of 32 mg/liter). Combination regimens containing meropenem administered intermittently or as a 3-g/day CI suppressed regrowth for ∼1 to 3 days, with rapid regrowth of resistant bacteria. Only a 6-g/day CI of meropenem combined with tobramycin suppressed regrowth and resistance over 7 days. MBM described bacterial killing and regrowth for all regimens well. The mode of meropenem administration was critical for the combination to be maximally effective against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

Infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria: What's new in our arsenal and what's in the pipeline?

The spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria is an ever-growing concern, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria because of their intrinsic resistance and how quickly they acquire and spread new resistance mechanisms. Treating infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria is a challenge for medical practitioners and increases patient mortality and cost of care globally. This vulnerability, along with strategies to tackle antimicrobial resistance development, prompts the development of new antibiotic agents and exploration of alternative treatment options. This article summarises the new antibiotics that have recently been approved for Gram-negative bacterial infections, looks down the pipeline at promising agents currently in phase I, II, or III clinical trials, and introduces new alternative avenues that show potential in combating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.