Preliminary readings of antimicrobial susceptibility panels: A simple, fast and inexpensive way to detect bacterial resistance and enhance antibiotic treatment of bloodstream infections

Preliminary reading of antibiogram by microdilution for clinical isolates in urine culture

PURPOSE

We evaluated a modification of automated antibiograms in urine cultures designed to facilitate the early interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and accelerate the targeted treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs), METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 309 isolates (219 Enterobacteriaceae, 75 Enterococcus spp., and 15 non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB), and a retrospective study of 9 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates from urine cultures. Colonies grown on conventional isolation plates were inoculated in MicroScan Walkaway system panels and incubated for 7 h, using a MicroScan AutoScan-4 plate reader for preliminary MIC determination by turbidimetry. Resulting antibiograms were compared with definitive antibiograms obtained after incubation for 17 h.

RESULTS

Preliminary and definitive readings were concordant for 86.7% of Gram-positive cocci isolates (65/75), 61.6% of Enterobacteriaceae (135/219), and 53.3% of NFGNB. The agreement rate was greater than 90% for most antimicrobials against Gram-positive cocci (94.7% or more) and Enterobacteriaceae, (97.2% or more for 10 of 17 antibiotics) except with nitrofurantoin (89%). The agreement rate was 86.7% or more for most antibiotics against NFGNB apart from piperacillin/tazobactam, aztreonam, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin. Gram-negative bacilli showed the highest differences in MIC values between preliminary and definitive readings.

CONCLUSIONS

A preliminary antibiogram reading may be useful in urine cultures to reduce the delay before targeted antibiotherapy, especially against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive cocci, but not in cases of carbapenemase-producing NFGNB. Further local studies are warranted to evaluate the usefulness of this approach in relation to resistance rates.

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rod on positive blood cultures using MicroScan panels

Shortening the turnaround time of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria permits a significant reduction of patient morbidity, mortality, and cost. Conventional blood culture methods are the gold standard diagnostic test to guide management of patient with sepsis, but the conventional process requires at least 12 to 24 h after the blood culture has been flagged as positive due to requirement for pure colonies. We describe a simple and inexpensive method to obtain faster AST with MicroScan system (Beckman Coulter) directly from positive blood cultures. Conventional and direct identification and AST were performed simultaneously by both methods in 1070 blood cultures, and 9106 MICs were determinated. About 96.5% were correctly identified with the direct method. Overall, categorical agreement was 92.86%. We found 46 very major errors, but globally the results showed a good correlation with the standard method, particularly favorable for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, except amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam. For P. mirabilis, betalactams antibiotics (except second- and third-generation cephalosporines) showed a good correlation, and also a good correlation was found for ciprofloxacine and gentamicine in P. aeruginosa and amoxicillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacine, gentamicine, and cotrimoxazole in E. cloacae. This method has the main advantage of providing reliable results 1 day earlier, being a simple, fast, and cheap method for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from positive blood cultures.