Comparison of hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma and non-hepatitis B, non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Assessment of arterial-phase hyperenhancement and late-phase washout of hepatocellular carcinoma-a meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with SonoVue® and Sonazoid®

OBJECTIVES

The recognition of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout during the late phase is key for correct diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). This meta-analysis was conducted to compare SonoVue®-enhanced and Sonazoid®-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of HCC enhancement and diagnosis.

METHODS

Studies were included in the analysis if they reported data for HCC enhancement in the arterial phase and late phase for SonoVue® or in the arterial phase and Kupffer phase (KP) for Sonazoid®. Forty-two studies (7502 patients) with use of SonoVue® and 30 studies (2391 patients) with use of Sonazoid® were identified. In a pooled analysis, the comparison between SonoVue® and Sonazoid® CEUS was performed using chi-square test. An inverse variance weighted random-effect model was used to estimate proportion, sensitivity, and specificity along with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis, the proportion of HCC showing APHE with SonoVue®, 93% (95% CI 91-95%), was significantly higher than the proportion of HCC showing APHE with Sonazoid®, 77% (71-83%) (p < 0.0001); similarly, the proportion of HCC showing washout at late phase/KP was significantly higher with SonoVue®, 86% (83-89%), than with Sonazoid®, 76% (70-82%) (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of APHE plus late-phase/KP washout detection in HCC were also higher with SonoVue® than with Sonazoid® (sensitivity 80% vs 52%; specificity 80% vs 73% in studies within unselected patient populations).

CONCLUSION

APHE and late washout in HCC are more frequently observed with SonoVue® than with Sonazoid®. This may affect the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the diagnosis of HCCs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Meta-analysis data show the presence of key enhancement features for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is different between ultrasound contrast agents, and arterial hyperenhancement and late washout are more frequently observed at contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue® than with Sonazoid®.

KEY POINTS

• Dynamic enhancement features are key for imaging-based diagnosis of HCC. • Arterial hyperenhancement and late washout are more often observed in HCCs using SonoVue®-enhanced US than with Sonazoid®. • The existing evidence for contrast-enhanced US may need to be considered being specific to the individual contrast agent.

Ultrasound contrast agent Sonazoid for the diagnosis of hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a case report

Background

An angiomyolipoma usually occurs in the kidneys and rarely in the liver. Hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma (HEAML), a rare variant of angiomyolipoma, possesses malignant potential and mimics the imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sonazoid® (perfluorobutane microbubbles), a new contrast agent that facilitates hepatic parenchyma-specific Kupffer phase imaging on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), is useful for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

Case presentation

A 30-year-old man with HEAML underwent CEUS using Sonazoid®, in which new concepts for ultrasonography-based differentiation between HEAML and hepatocellular carcinoma were applied.

Conclusions

This case report provides clinicians and radiologists with a reference for distinguishing HEAML from hepatocellular carcinoma based on CEUS using Sonazoid®.

Baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrence or metastasis after surgery had been reported in hepatic epithelioid angiomylipoma (epi-AML). Most hepatic epi-AMLs were misdiagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma or other hepatic tumors before surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of hepatic epi-AMLs and to explore the potential ultrasonic features for prognosis.

METHODS

The retrospective study enrolled 67 patients (56 females, 11 males) with 67 pathologically confirmed hepatic epi-AML lesions. All the lesions were examined by baseline ultrasound and 42 lesions were examined using CEUS with SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) before surgery.

RESULTS

Baseline ultrasound features of hepatic epi-AMLs included heterogeneous echo (86.6%), well-defined border (68.7%), hypoecho (64.2%), regular morphology (62.7%), peripheral-tumor arc-shaped or ring-like vessels (53.7%), and low value of resistive index (0.51±0.08). CEUS features of hepatic epi-AMLs included arterial phase hyper-enhancement with smooth and well-defined margin (100%), peripheral-tumor ring-like vessels (57.1%), and intra-tumor vessels (52.4%). Some CEUS features, including arterial phase heterogeneously tortuous filling, intra-tumor vessels and peripheral-tumor ring-like vessels were more commonly found in hepatic epi-AMLs of uncertain malignant potential/malignant than in benign hepatic epi-AMLs (p <  0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline ultrasound and CEUS features may be useful in diagnosis of hepatic epi-AML, and some CEUS features may be indicative of its malignant potential.