CT is useful for identifying patients with complicated appendicitis

Characteristics of Patients Presented with Complicated Appendicitis in Adama, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Complicated appendicitis (CA) is defined as perforated appendicitis, peritonitis, peri-appendicular abscess, or appendicular mass. One-third of patients who develop appendicitis are diagnosed with CA at presentation. Studies regarding the prevalence of CA are lacking in low-income countries, and the characteristics of patients presented with CA are incoherently identified.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and the significant characteristics associated with CA among patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at Adama Hospital Medical College.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1, 2018, up to December 31, 2019. From a total of 1043 patients during the study period, the charts of 431 patients were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected by a structured checklist. Bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the association of patients' characteristics with CA.

RESULTS

Out of 431 patients, 157 (36.4%) had CA. Characteristics of patients having a significant association with CA were found to be generalized abdominal tenderness (AOR: 27.48, 95% CI: 4.03, 187.24), diagnosis with peritonitis (AOR: 14.87, 95% CI: 4.05, 54.54), right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal mass (AOR: 7.79, 95% CI: 2.02, 29.99), shock (10.37, 95% CI: 3.18, 33.76), white blood cell (WBC) count >11,000 (AOR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.02, 4.61), onset to visit interval of 8-14 days (AOR: 10.45, 95% CI: 2.4, 45.52) and ultrasound report of acute appendicitis (AOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.85), appendiceal abscess (AOR: 5.05, 95% CI: 1.48, 17.31), and appendiceal mass (AOR: 6.04, 95% CI: 1.45, 25.14).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CA was very high. Generalized abdominal tenderness, RLQ abdominal mass, shock, WBC count, onset to visit interval, abdominopelvic ultrasound report, and clinical diagnosis of peritonitis were significantly associated with CA.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CT Features for Differentiating Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis

Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify computed tomographic (CT) features for differentiating complicated appendicitis in patients suspected of having appendicitis and to summarize their diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods Studies on diagnostic accuracy of CT features for differentiating complicated appendicitis (perforated or gangrenous appendicitis) in patients suspected of having appendicitis were searched in Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Overlapping descriptors used in different studies to denote the same image finding were subsumed under a single CT feature. Pooled diagnostic accuracy of the CT features was calculated by using a bivariate random effects model. CT features with pooled diagnostic odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals not including 1 were considered as informative. Results Twenty-three studies were included, and 184 overlapping descriptors for various CT findings were subsumed under 14 features. Of these, 10 features were informative for complicated appendicitis. There was a general tendency for these features to show relatively high specificity but low sensitivity. Extraluminal appendicolith, abscess, appendiceal wall enhancement defect, extraluminal air, ileus, periappendiceal fluid collection, ascites, intraluminal air, and intraluminal appendicolith showed pooled specificity greater than 70% (range, 74%-100%), but sensitivity was limited (range, 14%-59%). Periappendiceal fat stranding was the only feature that showed high sensitivity (94%; 95% confidence interval: 86%, 98%) but low specificity (40%; 95% confidence interval, 23%, 60%). Conclusion Ten informative CT features for differentiating complicated appendicitis were identified in this study, nine of which showed high specificity, but low sensitivity. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in follow-up of inflammatory appendiceal mass: Preliminary results and review of the literature

Objective

We aimed to search the contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in follow-up of patients with acute appendicitis associated inflammatory appendiceal mass (IAM). DWI was used as a monitoring imaging method to assess the response of medical treatment.

Materials and methods

19 patients (mean age, 37+–13.1; age range, 19–69; M/F: 10/9), presented with clinical, laboratory and computed tomography (CT) findings suggestive of IAM were enrolled prospectively in this study. CT and DWI images were evaluated by two radiologists in consensus. b values 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm² were used, and DWI images were analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Laboratory parameters were C-reactive protein value and white blood cell count. During follow-up changes in the diameter of IMA and laboratory parameters were correlated with ADC values. Conservative treatment with interval appendectomy and a total conservative approach without surgery were the treatment options during follow-up.

Results

We found statistically significant correlation between the ADC values, maximum IAM diameter and laboratory parameters. During follow-up five surgical procedures were performed: one patient underwent surgery for cecal adenocarcinoma and four underwent interval appendectomy. One patient developed acute relapse of IAM at the sixth month of follow-up.

Conclusion

DWI may be used with a significant success for follow-up of patients with IAM. As a monitoring imaging method, DWI may also aid in determining of most appropriate timing for interval appendectomy as well as may help in diagnosing alternative diagnoses (e.g. malignancy and inflammatory bowel disease) that can mimic IAM.

International normalized ratio and serum C-reactive protein are feasible markers to predict complicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic approach for complicated appendicitis is still controversial. We planned this study to analyze preoperative laboratory markers that may predict complications of appendicitis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent appendectomy were retrospectively recruited. They were divided into complicated appendicitis and non-complicated appendicitis groups and their preoperative laboratory results were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were included. Elevated international normalized ratio (INR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with complicated appendicitis (p = 0.001). On ROC curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) of CRP and INR were 0.796 and 0.723, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

INR and CRP increased significantly in patients with complicated appendicitis. Further studies evaluating INR and CRP in patients undergoing conservative management for appendicitis are required.

Risk factors for the development of complicated appendicitis in adults

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the patient's history and physical examination information to find out risk factors associated with complicated appendicitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred patients who were admitted with complicated appendicitis (including abscess, phlegmon, and generalized peritonitis) were retrieved from our database. Two hundred patients with non-complicated acute appendicitis were randomly selected from the same period. These two groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, past medical history, and presenting symptoms. We made a multivariate analysis model using binary logistic regression and backward stepwise elimination.

RESULTS

Based on multivariate analysis, risk factors for complicated appendicitis included presenting with epigastric pain (OR=3.44), diarrhea (OR=23.4) or malaise (OR=49.7), history of RLQ pain within the past 6 months (OR=4.93), older age (OR=1.04), being married (OR=2.52), lack of anorexia (OR=4.63) and longer interval between onset of symptoms and admission (OR=1.46). Conversely, higher (academic) education was associated with decreased odds for complicated appendicitis (OR=0.26).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that a surgeon's clinical assessment is more reliable to make a judgment. "Bedside evaluation" is a useful, cheap, quick and readily available method for identifying those at risk for developing complicated acute appendicitis.

Liver Abscess Due to Dropped Appendicolith after Laparoscopic Appendectomy

The lifetime risk of appendicitis is 6 to 7 % [1]. When appendicitis is clinically suspected, an appendicolith can be found in 30% of the patients [2]. An appendicolith may be retained post-operatively (‘dropped appendicolith’) due to previous perforation, non-recognition during surgery or the impossibility to remove it. Abscesses that result from ectopic appendicoliths tend to occur paraceacally in the vicinity of Morrison’s pouch and should be removed to prevent abscess development and possible overt sepsis [3]. As far as we know, we describe the first documented case of an intrahepatic localization of a dropped appendicolith causing a liver abscess.

Important CT findings for prediction of severe appendicitis: involvement of retroperitoneal space

Background

Determination of the severity of appendicitis and differentiation between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis are clinically important. Severe appendicitis frequently affects extraperitoneal spaces. We have investigated CT findings of retroperitoneal space (RPS) in patients with appendicitis to create a model for identification of complicated appendicitis.

Method

CT images of 223 patients with pathologically proven appendicitis were reviewed. The total number of the segments in RPS where inflammatory changes were located (RPS count) was obtained as well as appendiceal diameter, appendicolithiasis, WBC count, and CRP level. Data were analyzed to identify factors indicating complicated appendicitis. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify statistically significant variables. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in order to find independent predictors of complicated appendicitis.

Results

Patients with complicated appendicitis were more likely to have higher RPS count (P < 0.001), appendicolithiasis (P = 0.002), higher CRP level (P < 0.001), and greater appendix diameter (P < 0.001) than patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Statistical analysis showed RPS count was the most helpful predictor of complicated appendicitis.

Conclusion

Radiologists and surgeons should be aware of the importance of CT findings in RPS when treating patients with appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis can be predicted by RPS count, diameter of the appendix, appendicolithiasis, and CRP level.

Inflammatory appendix mass in patients with acute appendicitis: CT diagnosis and clinical relevance

The purpose of our study was to analyze the clinical relevance of computerized tomography (CT) in providing the diagnosis of inflammatory appendix mass (IAM) in patients with acute appendicitis. The CT images of 134 patients were reviewed. Two groups of patients were made according to the presence (group 1; n = 21) or the absence (group 2; n = 113) of IAM. Clinical signs of patients, CT features, complications at surgery, and histological examinations were noted. Inter-observer agreement was assessed by using kappa statistics. Twenty-one patients presenting with CT features of IAM were diagnosed. An excellent inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.94) was assessed for the diagnosis of IAM. No significant statistical difference in the age distribution was observed between patients with IAM (mean age 55) and patients without (mean age 45) (p = 0.2232). No clinical sign showed a statistically significant association with the presence of IAM (p = 0.707) or with complication encountered at surgery (p = 0.180). Delay to CT examination was 5.4 days in patients presenting with CT features of IAM and of 1.7 days for patients presenting without (p = 0.0001). Conversely to acute appendicitis complicated by simple perforation (p = 0.153) or peri-appendicular abscess (p = 0.501), acute appendicitis presenting with IAM showed a statistically significant association with complications encountered at surgery (p = 0.0003) and the need for conversion to open surgery (p = 0.001). Performing CT in complicated acute appendicitis provides the diagnosis of IAM. Distinction of IAM appeared to be of clinical relevance, since immediate surgery in IAM was statistically associated with surgical complications and conversion to open surgery in our study.

Accuracy of computed tomography in predicting appendiceal perforation

BACKGROUND

Some surgeons use nonoperative management with or without interval appendectomy for patients who present with perforated appendicitis. These strategies depend on accurately delineating perforation by computed tomography (CT). Since 2005, our institution has used an evidence-based definition for perforation as a hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen. This has been shown to clearly separate those with a high risk of abscess from those without. To quantify the ability of CT to identify which patients would meet these criteria for perforation, we tested 6 surgeons and 2 radiologists who evaluated blinded CT scans.

METHODS

A junior and senior surgical residents, 2 staff interventional radiologists, and 4 attending pediatric surgeons with 3 to 30 years of experience reviewed 200 CT scans of pediatric patients who had undergone a laparoscopic appendectomy. All CT scans were reviewed electronically, and the reviewers were blinded to the results, outcome, and intraoperative findings. None of the patients had a well-formed abscess on CT. The reviewers were asked to decide only on perforated or nonperforated appendicitis according to our intraoperative definition. Clinical admission data were reviewed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, the reviewers were correct 72% of the time with an overall sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 81%. The overall positive predictive value was 67%, and the negative predictive value was 77%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in the absence of a well-formed abscess, the triage of patient care based on a preoperative diagnosis of perforation from CT may be imprudent and subject a portion of the population to an unnecessarily prolonged course of care.

Laparoscopic drainage of postappendectomy- retained fecalith and intra-abdominal abscess in the pediatric population

Retained fecalith after an appendectomy is an uncommon complication frequently associated with intra-abdominal abscess. Treatment options include percutaneous, open, or laparoscopic drainage of the abscess and retrieval of the fecalith, as antibiotics and drainage alone are usually insufficient. Laparoscopy offers the advantages of enhanced visualization of the abdomen, improved cosmesis, and a quicker return to normal daily activities. The principles of laparoscopic treatment include the careful identification of all anatomic landmarks, as the abscesses are frequently adherent to intra-abdominal structures compromising the safety of the operation. In this paper, we present 2 cases of laparoscopic drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess with retrieval of a fecalith in pediatric patients 1 and 6 weeks after an initial appendectomy and a review the literature.

The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Appendicitis is part of the differential of an acute abdomen and can be a difficult diagnosis to make. Strategies to suggest which patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) should undergo computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm appendicitis have not been addressed. We develop guidelines for CT scanning based on Alvarado clinical scores for patients with suspected and confirmed cases of appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 150 charts of patients aged 7 and older who presented with abdominal pain to the ED of a 392-bed acute care facility over a 6-month period were evaluated by ED physicians and underwent CT to rule out appendicitis. Patient demographics, presenting signs, and symptoms were documented. Using the scoring system for appendicitis, developed by Alvarado, each chart was retrospectively scored. The Alvarado scores were correlated with positive pathology findings, as well as Alvarado scores with a negative CT scan. Equivocal scores, having neither high sensitivity nor specificity for appendicitis were calculated.

RESULTS

Computed tomography scans with Alvarado scores of 3 or lower were performed in 37% (55/150) of patients to rule out appendicitis. The sensitivity of Alvarado scores 3 or lower for not having appendicitis was 96.2% (53/55), and the specificity 67% (2/3). Patients with Alvarado scores 7 or higher had an incidence of acute appendicitis of 77.7% (28/36). The sensitivity of Alvarado scores 7 or higher for appendicitis was 77% (28/36), and the specificity 100% (8/8). The sensitivity of equivocal Alvarado scores, defined as scores of 4 to 6, for acute appendicitis was 35.6% (21/59), and the specificity 94% (36/38). The sensitivity and specificity of CT scans in patients with equivocal Alvarado scores remained high, at 90.4% and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the equivocal clinical presentation of appendicitis as defined by Alvarado scores of 4 to 6, adjunctive CT is recommended to confirm the diagnosis in the ED setting. If clinical presentation suggests acute appendicitis by an Alvarado score of 7 or higher, surgical consultation is recommended. Computed tomography is not indicated in patients with Alvarado scores of 3 or lower to diagnose acute appendicitis.

Clinical analysis of the predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after initial nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to study the clinical symptoms, laboratory data, and the characteristics of computed tomography (CT) imaging of nonoperated perforated appendicitis for predicting the recurrence of appendicitis.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with nonoperated perforated appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed for this study. During a median follow-up period of 1155 days, 7 patients had to receive an appendectomy owing to recurrent appendicitis. Accordingly, the patients were divided into 2 groups: the recurrence and the nonrecurrence group. The clinical characteristics between these 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Both of the 2 patients who had a past history of appendicitis suffered recurrent appendicitis (the recurrence versus the nonrecurrence group, P<.05). The only CT imaging relating to the recurrence of appendicitis is the presence of calcified appendicolith (the recurrence versus the nonrecurrence group, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It is most likely that appendicitis will recur if a calcified appendicolith on CT imaging or a past history of appendicitis is presented. Interval appendectomy may be reserved only for those patients who possess one of these risk factors of recurrent appendicitis.