Twice daily (mid-day and evening) quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection in the United States

Twice-a-day PPI, tetracycline, metronidazole quadruple therapy with Pylera® or Lactobacillus reuteri for treatment naïve or for retreatment of Helicobacter pylori. Two randomized pilot studies

BACKGROUND

Bismuth is no longer available in Europe except as part of combination therapy. Lactobacillus reuteri has also been used as an adjuvant for Helicobacter pylori therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a b.i.d. quadruple therapy containing Pylera® or L reuteri for H pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed two open-label randomized pilot studies. Adult patients positive for H pylori were randomly assigned to b.i.d therapy with quadruple therapy containing bismuth (2 capsules of Pylera® plus 250 mg each of tetracycline and metronidazole for a total of 500 mg of each), or the same dose of antibiotics plus 2 × 10⁸  CFU L reuteri DSM 17 938 plus 2 × 10⁸  CFU L reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 (Gastrus®) once daily and pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. Regimens were given with meals for 10 days. Cure was defined by negative 13C-UBT or stool antigen test.

RESULTS

A total of 99 subjects (29% men) were enrolled; 92 completed the study. In the Pylera® group, H pylori infection was cured in 95.7%; 95% CI = 85%-99% (44/46) PP and 88%; 95% CI = 75%-95% (44/50) ITT vs. 84.8%; 95% CI = 71%-95% (39/46) PP and 79.6%; 95% CI = 65%-89% (39/49) ITT in the Gastrus® group, respectively. Cure rates in naїve patients were 100%; 95% CI = 85%-100% (25/25) PP with Pylera®, and 89.7%; 95% CI = 72%-97% (26/29) with Gastrus®. Compliance was excellent and side effects mild with both regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

B.i.d. bismuth quadruple therapy was highly effective for H pylori eradication in treatment of naïve patients in Sardinia. Replacement of bismuth with Gastrus® might be considered when bismuth is contraindicated or unavailable.

Clinical management of Helicobacter pylori: the Latin American perspective

In most South American countries, Helicobacter pylori infection prevalence is high, affecting over 70% in populations with precarious living conditions. It is worth pointing out that there is initial evidence of a decline in prevalence of H. pylori infection at least in some more privileged fragments of the population. It is estimated that gastric cancer, the main clinical sequela of H. pylori infection, has an average incidence rate of 12.4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (8.4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants for women and 17.3 cases per 100,000 for men) in the region. Classical triple therapy [proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin] is still the most used regimen with eradication rates around 80%. The rates of resistance to clarithromycin range from 2 to 24%. Recurrence rates of the infection are described as 2.9% in Argentina, 4.2% in Chile, 2-7% in Brazil, and 11.5% in a trial involving 7 Latin American countries. After failure of clarithromycin-containing regimens, second- and third-line therapies using PPI, amoxicillin and levofloxacin and quadruple therapy with PPI, colloidal bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline hydrochloride and metronidazole are recommended. Due to the high rates of primary resistance to metronidazole in the Latin American countries, use of the quadruple therapy, replacing metronidazole for furazolidone, is a frequent option. Rescue triple therapy regimens using furazolidone in association with levofloxacin and PPI have also been used. Most recommended rescue therapies reach eradication rates close to 80%.

Greater than 95% success with 14-day bismuth quadruple anti- Helicobacter pylori therapy: a pilot study in US Hispanics

BACKGROUND

A combination capsule of bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline plus omeprazole given as 10-day therapy has an overall effectiveness of 92-93% in per-protocol analysis (Grade B) with eradication of 86-91% of metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori. This study aimed to explore whether extending the duration to 14 days would improve overall effectiveness per protocol to ≥95% (Grade A) in a population in which metronidazole resistance was anticipated to exist.

METHODS

A one-arm, open-label pilot study of H. pylori-infected, asymptomatic/mildly dyspeptic adults, Hispanic residents of El Paso, Texas, received a 14-day course of omeprazole, plus the combination capsule. We cultured and Gram-stained specimens obtained using a minimally invasive orogastric brush. Helicobacter pylori status was determined by (13)C-urea breath test at 4 or more weeks post-therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-seven subjects (7 men and 40 women, average age 42 years) were entered. The per-protocol effectiveness was 97.1% (33/34) (95% mid-P CI: 86.3, 99.9); 100% of metronidazole-resistant strains were eradicated. Side effects were mild and self-limited but contributed to nonadherence. Therapy taken for <10 days was more likely to result in eradication failure (p < .001). Office-based orogastric brushing was well tolerated; positive cultures were obtained in 95%. Gram staining showed H. pylori-like forms in all specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study supports the concept that 14-day OBMT therapy is likely to be more efficacious for H. pylori eradication (Grade A, PP basis) than a 10-day course where metronidazole resistance is suspected. If confirmed, 14 days should be recommended in populations where metronidazole resistance is common.

Twice-a-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized trial of 10 and 14 days

BACKGROUND

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy given twice a day for 14 days has been shown to be an excellent first-line H. pylori eradication therapy.

AIM

  To compare the efficacy and tolerability of twice-a-day bismuth-containing quadruple H. pylori eradication therapy for 10 versus 14 days in a noninferiority trial.

METHODS

Dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection and naïve to H. pylori treatment were randomly assigned to: pantoprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg given b.i.d. (with the midday and evening meals) for 10 or 14 days. Eradication was defined by negative UBT and/or histology 4-6 weeks posttherapy. Efficacy and side effects were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients were randomized (153 men, 264 women; median age 52). Per protocol (PP) treatment success with 14 and 10 days was essentially identical [i.e., 96% (95% CI: 92-98) vs 95% (95% CI: 91-98) for 14 days versus 10 days, respectively. Results with intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis were also similar (92% (95% CI, 87-95) vs 92% (95% CI, 88-96)) for 14 and 10 days, respectively. Compliance was excellent in both groups. Side effects were generally mild and similar between groups. Fatigue, discomfort, and vomiting were more common in those in the 14-day group. The 10-day regimen costs € 17.65 (ie, approximately 25%) less than the 14-day regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy remained highly effective (i.e., ≥95% PP and >90% ITT) despite reducing the duration from 14 to 10 days.

Failure of Helicobacter pylori treatment after regimes containing clarithromycin: new practical therapeutic options

Failure of Helicobacter pylori treatment is a growing problem in daily practice.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of two new regimes as second-line options in a randomized and prospective study.

METHODS

Patients in whom a first eradication regime containing clarithromycin had failed were included. After performing gastroscopy and a 13C-urea breath test (UBT), the patients were randomized to receive a combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of levofloxacin, and 200 mg (two tablets) of furazolidone administered once daily for 10 days (RLF) or the combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 120 mg (two tablets) of bismuth subcitrate, 100 mg of doxycycline, and 200 mg of furazolidone, administered twice daily for 10 days (RBDF). Clinical examinations and new UBT were performed 60 days after therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (mean age, 46 years, 57% females). Two patients were excluded: one because of adverse effects and another as a result of protocol violation. Compliance was similar in both groups (90% took all medications correctly). Side-effects (96% mild) were observed in 87% of the patients and were comparable between groups, except diarrhea, which was more frequent in group RLF (p= .025). Intention-to-treat cure rates were 77% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-93%) in the RLF group and 83% (95% CI: 68-97%) in the RBDF group (p= .750). Per-protocol cure rates were 80% (95% CI: 65-95%) in the RLF group and 82% (95% CI: 67-96%) in the RBDF group (p= 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Both once-daily triple (rabeprazole, levofloxacin, and furazolidone) and twice-daily quadruple therapy (rabeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, doxycycline, and furazolidone) for 10 days achieved encouraging results. Subsequent studies should be performed to evaluate antibiotic resistance, doses, dosing intervals, duration of treatment, and safety of these two regimes.

Meta-analysis: the effect of antibiotic resistance status on the efficacy of triple and quadruple first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the effects of drug resistance on therapies for Helicobacter pylori is limited.

AIMS

To determine the effect of drug resistance on the efficacy of first-line treatment regimens for H. pylori and identify the most efficacious treatments in the presence of drug resistance.

METHODS

We searched for studies using the keywords: 'Helicobacter pylori','resistance' and 'treatment' or 'therapy'. Multilevel meta-regression models were used to determine the effect of drug resistance on treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

We analysed data from 93 studies with 10,178 participants. For triple therapies, clarithromycin resistance had a greater effect on treatment efficacy than nitroimidazole resistance. Metronidazole resistance reduced efficacy by 26% in triple therapies containing a nitroimidazole, tetracycline and bismuth, while efficacy was reduced by only 14% when a gastric acid inhibitor was added to the regimen. Quadruple therapies containing both clarithromycin and metronidazole were the most efficacious; >80% of H. pylori infections were consistently eradicated with these regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug resistance was a strong predictor of efficacy across triple therapies for the eradication of H. pylori in adults. Resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, but not both simultaneously, may be overcome by using quadruple therapies, especially those containing both clarithromycin and metronidazole.

American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) remains a prevalent, worldwide, chronic infection. Though the prevalence of this infection appears to be decreasing in many parts of the world, H. pylori remains an important factor linked to the development of peptic ulcer disease, gastric malignanc and dyspeptic symptoms. Whether to test for H. pylori in patients with functional dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), patients taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, with iron deficiency anemia, or who are at greater risk of developing gastric cancer remains controversial. H. pylori can be diagnosed by endoscopic or nonendoscopic methods. A variety of factors including the need for endoscopy, pretest probability of infection, local availability, and an understanding of the performance characteristics and cost of the individual tests influences choice of evaluation in a given patient. Testing to prove eradication should be performed in patients who receive treatment of H. pylori for peptic ulcer disease, individuals with persistent dyspeptic symptoms despite the test-and-treat strategy, those with H. pylori-associated MALT lymphoma, and individuals who have undergone resection of early gastric cancer. Recent studies suggest that eradication rates achieved by first-line treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin have decreased to 70-85%, in part due to increasing clarithromycin resistance. Eradication rates may also be lower with 7 versus 14-day regimens. Bismuth-containing quadruple regimens for 7-14 days are another first-line treatment option. Sequential therapy for 10 days has shown promise in Europe but requires validation in North America. The most commonly used salvage regimen in patients with persistent H. pylori is bismuth quadruple therapy. Recent data suggest that a PPI, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin for 10 days is more effective and better tolerated than bismuth quadruple therapy for persistent H. pylori infection, though this needs to be validated in the United States.

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either 7-day or 10-day triple therapies, and with a 10-day sequential regimen

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates achieved by standard seven-day triple therapies are decreasing in several countries, while a novel 10-day sequential regimen has achieved a very high success rate. A longer 10-day triple therapy, similar to the sequential regimen, was tested to see whether it could achieve a better infection cure rate.

METHODS

Patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and H pylori infection were randomly assigned to one of the following three therapies: esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1 g for seven days or 10 days, or a 10-day sequential regimen including esomeprazole 20 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g for five days and esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg for the remaining five days. All drugs were given twice daily. H pylori eradication was checked four to six weeks after treatment by using a 13C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

Overall, 213 patients were enrolled. H pylori eradication was achieved in 75.7% and 77.9%, in 81.7% and 84.1%, and in 94.4% and 97.1% of patients following seven-day or 10-day triple therapy and the 10-day sequential regimen, at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. The eradication rate following the sequential regimen was higher than either seven-day (P=0.002) or 10-day triple therapy (P=0.02), while no significant difference emerged between the latter two regimens (P=0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-day sequential regimen was significantly more effective than both triple regimens, while 10-day triple therapy failed to significantly increase the H pylori eradication rate achieved by the standard seven-day regimen.

Second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication after sequential therapy failure: a pilot study

A 64-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for abdominal fullness and constipation. In the pelvic cavity, an abdominal CT scan revealed massive ascites showing malignancy on histological examination. Upper GI endoscopy revealed type 3 gastric cancer from the anglus to the cardia. A barium-enema showed a stenotic lesion at the sigmoid colon due to peritoneal dissemination. An abnormally high CA125(1,400 mg/ml) level was detected in serum. We performed systemic chemotherapy of TS-1, CDDP and peritoneal infusion of docetaxel on the nonresected gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. After 2 cycles, cytology of ascites revealed no malignancy, and the serum CA125 value regained its normal level. After 3 cycles, the killer cell effect was recognized by laparoscopic examination and the stenotic change of sigmoid colon had almost disappeared. The patient clinically achieved good QOL by this method, which was very effective for nonresected gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

The efficacy of established Helicobacter pylori regimes needs to be reviewed. In view of drug resistance, side effects, and compliance and expense of therapy, treatment failure is increasing and second-line treatment strategies need to be developed. A simulation model suggested by the Cochrane review group showed that H. pylori eradication is cost-effective for duodenal and gastric ulcer long-term. The duration of eradication therapy continues to be controversial. In Europe and other parts of the world, 7-day triple regimes are used, whereas guidelines from the United States recommend 10-14 days of therapy. Antibiotic resistance is a major factor affecting the outcome of eradication therapy. New modified eradication regimes involve substitution of antibiotics used in conjunction with other drugs. The newer generation fluoroquinolones have shown some promise as part of an eradication regimen. Quadruple therapy (bismuth, proton pump inhibitor [PPI] and two antibiotics and sequential treatment [PPI with three antibiotics]) are promising first-line treatments. Novel agents have been tried, but with disappointing results. New drugs and administration forms have been reported but their efficacy needs confirmation.

Update on Therapeutic Options for Helicobacter pylori-related Diseases

Triple therapy including clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has been recommended as the treatment of choice for Helicobacter pylori eradication. This regimen is now challenged by an increasing level of clarithromycin resistance that jeopardizes the treatment success. When clarithromycin resistance has been detected, or when its rate is known to be high in the geographic area, this drug cannot be used. It can be replaced by metronidazole, the resistance of which has a limited clinical relevance. Another option is to prescribe tetracycline and metronidazole with a PPI or ranitidine bismuth citrate. New antibiotics such as levofloxacin or rifabutin can also be used in combination with amoxicillin and a PPI. Probiotics can be added to all of these regimens to improve compliance by decreasing adverse events. But some authors advocate a quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment. Solutions to improve the limitations of this last regimen are now being proposed. Clarification of the controversial treatment indications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease or prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastroduodenal symptoms has been made. The question of prevention of gastric carcinoma by H. pylori eradication remains unanswered.

Novel bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline triple-layer tablet for treatment of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Current anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens are costly and because of the increasing antibiotic resistance, are becoming ineffective.

AIM

To evaluate a triple-layer tablet containing 100 mg bismuth subcitrate, 250 mg metronidazole, and 250 mg tetracycline in a single triple-layer tablet.

METHODS

H. pylori-infected adult patients received bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline (two tablets, t.d.s.) and ranitidine (300 mg) once daily for 14 days. Efficacy was determined using 13C-urea breath testing.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of 35 enrolled patients were available for evaluation; using the protocol-specified modified intention-to-treat analysis, five failed treatment, two were lost to follow-up (cure rate per-protocol = 85.7%, intention-to-treat = 78.7%). The cure rate among metronidazole-susceptible strains was 100% (22 of 22) (95% confidence interval 84-100%) compared with 55% (five of nine intention-to-treat) (95% confidence interval 21-86%) among metronidazole-resistant strains. In four cases, therapy was truncated at 4-7 days because of side-effects; yet the treatment was effective in three. The three metronidazole-susceptible but clarithromycin-resistant infections were cured.

CONCLUSION

This novel triple-layer tablet combination therapy was effective in all patients with metronidazole-susceptible H. pylori and many of those with resistant organisms. A greater degree of acid suppression may further improve effectiveness.