Aggressive systemic mastocytosis complicated by protein-losing enteropathy

Case Report: Multidisciplinary management of a patient with indolent systemic mastocytosis and refractory symptoms

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare hematologic condition characterized by the proliferation and accumulation in tissue of clonal mast cells in multiple organ systems. The release of mast cell mediators in the indolent disease type and the predominant mast cell infiltration of tissues in advanced disease contribute to the heterogeneous clinical presentation. The disease driver in >90% of adult cases is an activating KIT mutation, with D816V being the most frequent. Here we describe a case of a young adult male presenting with osteoporosis with associated symptoms of reflux and a history of bee sting anaphylaxis. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management was required to minimize morbidities and prevent complications. Current best supportive care was inadequate to control the patient's disease, and a selective KIT D816V inhibitor (avapritinib) was initiated. Conventional, and advanced therapies, including those in the treatment pipeline for SM are discussed.

Clinical challenge for gastroenterologists-Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic mastocytosis: A comprehensive review

Mastocytosis is a rare and heterogeneous disease characterized by various clinical and biological features that affect different prognoses and treatments. The disease is usually divided into 2 principal categories: cutaneous and systemic disease (SM). Clinical features can be related to mast cell (MC) mediator release or pathological MC infiltration. SM is a disease often hard to identify, and the diagnosis is based on clinical, biological, histological, and molecular criteria with different specialists involved in the patient's clinical work-up. Among all manifestations of the disease, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common, being present in 14%-85% of patients, and can significantly impair the quality of life. Here we review the data regarding GI involvement in SM, in terms of clinical presentations, histological and endoscopic features, the pathogenesis of GI symptoms, and their treatment.

A Vanishing Cecal Mass: A Rare Gastrointestinal Manifestation of Systemic Mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous disease that often involves the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Activation and accumulation of mast cells in GI organs can result in symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhea along with organ damage with more aggressive disease. Mast cell degranulation can also result in anaphylactic reactions, which can be life-threatening. Recognition of GI manifestations is important for gastroenterologists to aid in diagnosis and management when GI involvement is suspected. Edema, small nodules, urticarial lesions and occasionally ulceration in the small bowel and colon are the most commonly described endoscopic findings. Here we describe a case of SM presenting as a large colonic mass and provide a brief review of the literature on GI involvement of SM.

Natural history and treatment of cutaneous and systemic mastocytosis

INTRODUCTION

Mastocytosis, a heterogeneous group of disorders, is characterized by an abnormal increase in the number of mast cells that is limited to the skin (cutaneous mastocytosis), involving extracutaneous tissues (systemic mastocytosis), or presenting as solid tumours (mastocytoma and mast cell sarcoma). Recent studies estimate that 1 in 10,000 people are diagnosed with mastocytosis. Although prompt diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial, little is known about the natural history and currently there are no established management guidelines. We have conducted a systematic review to assess the natural history and management of different mastocytosis subtypes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the PubMed and Ovid database of studies published in English and French over the last fifteen years, from January 2001 to December 2016. Keywords 'Cutaneous mastocytosis', 'Systemic mastocytosis', 'pathophysiology', 'clinical course', 'prognosis', 'drug therapy', and 'therapy' were searched. Rate of complete resolution was subjected to pooled analysis for different mastocytosis subtypes. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata version 12.0.

RESULTS

We reviewed 634 papers, of which 5 were included in the analysis of resolution, and 138 were included in the assessment of management. Pooled estimate for rate of complete resolution varied depending on the mastocytosis subtype. In cutaneous mastocytosis, the complete resolution rate for mastocytoma was 10% per year (95% CI: 4.8%, 15.1%) while the rate for urticaria pigmentosa was 1.9% per year (95% CI: -0.5%, 4.3%). Diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis and systemic mastocytosis subtypes did not show evidence of complete resolution in the studies reviewed. Treatment of cutaneous and systemic mastocytosis is purely symptomatic with topical corticosteroids, antihistamines, omalizumab and imatinib being common choices.

CONCLUSION

Rate of resolution of mastocytosis is only shown in urticaria pigmentosa and mastocytoma. Better management guidelines are required to improve the health of these patients.

Eosinophilic gastritis in children: clinicopathological correlation, disease course, and response to therapy

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic gastritis (EG), defined by histological criteria as marked eosinophilia in the stomach, is rare, and large studies in children are lacking. We sought to describe the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological features of EG, assess for any concurrent eosinophilia at other sites of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and evaluate response to dietary and pharmacological therapies.

METHODS

Pathology files at our medical center were searched for histological eosinophilic gastritis (HEG) with ≥70 gastric eosinophils per high-power field in children from 2005 to 2011. Pathology slides were evaluated for concurrent eosinophilia in the esophagus, duodenum, and colon. Medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, symptoms, endoscopic findings, comorbidities, and response to therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty children with severe gastric eosinophilia were identified, median age 7.5 years, 14 of whom had both eosinophilia limited to the stomach and clinical symptoms, fulfilling the clinicopathological definition of EG. Symptoms and endoscopic features were highly variable. History of atopy and food allergies was common. A total of 22% had protein-losing enteropathy (PLE). Gastric eosinophilia was limited to the fundus in two patients. Many patients had associated eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE, 43%) and 21% had eosinophilic enteritis. Response to dietary restriction therapy was high (82% clinical response and 78% histological response). Six out of sixteen patients had persistent EoE despite resolution of their gastric eosinophilia; two children with persistent HEG post therapy developed de novo concurrent EoE.

CONCLUSIONS

HEG in children can be present in the antrum and/or fundus. Symptoms and endoscopic findings vary, highlighting the importance of biopsies for diagnosis. HEG is associated with PLE, and with eosinophilia elsewhere in the GI tract including the esophagus. The disease is highly responsive to dietary restriction therapies in children, implicating an allergic etiology. Associated EoE is more resistant to therapy.

Systemic mastocytosis: a rare case of increased liver stiffness

Assessment of liver stiffness (LS) by transient elastography (Fibroscan) has significantly improved the noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis. We here report on a 55-year-old patient with drastically increased LS due to previously unknown systemic mastocytosis. The patient initially presented with increased weight loss, nocturnal pruritus, increased transaminases, bilirubinemia, and thrombocytopenia. Abdominal ultrasound showed ascites, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly. In addition, LS was 75 kPa (IQR 0 kPa) clearly exceeding the cut-off value for F4 cirrhosis of 12.5 kPa. However, histological analysis of the liver specimen indicated liver involvement by systemic mastocytosis and excluded liver cirrhosis. An additional CT scan detected disseminated bone lesions. After three months of treatment with Midostaurin, LS slightly decreased down to 31.9 kPa (IQR 8.3 kPa). This case illustrates that diffused sinusoidal neoplastic infiltrates are a pitfall in the non-invasive diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. In conclusion, refined clinical algorithms for increased LS should also include mastocytosis in addition to inflammation, congestion, and biliary obstruction.

PTEN deficiency in mast cells causes a mastocytosis-like proliferative disease that heightens allergic responses and vascular permeability

Kit regulation of mast cell proliferation and differentiation has been intimately linked to the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase (PI3K). The activating D816V mutation of Kit, seen in the majority of mastocytosis patients, causes a robust activation of PI3K signals. However, whether increased PI3K signaling in mast cells is a key element for their in vivo hyperplasia remains unknown. Here we report that dysregulation of PI3K signaling in mice by deletion of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (Pten) gene (which regulates the levels of the PI3K product, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate) caused mast cell hyperplasia and increased numbers in various organs. Selective deletion of Pten in the mast cell compartment revealed that the hyperplasia was intrinsic to the mast cell. Enhanced STAT5 phosphorylation and increased expression of survival factors, such as Bcl-XL, were observed in PTEN-deficient mast cells, and these were further enhanced by stem cell factor stimulation. Mice carrying PTEN-deficient mast cells also showed increased hypersensitivity as well as increased vascular permeability. Thus, Pten deletion in the mast cell compartment results in a mast cell proliferative phenotype in mice, demonstrating that dysregulation of PI3K signals is vital to the observed mast cell hyperplasia.

Gastrointestinal involvement and manifestations in systemic mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a rare and heterogeneous disease characterized by various biological and clinical features with different prognosis and treatments. The disease is usually divided into 2 categories: a pure cutaneous and a systemic disease. Clinical features can be related to mast cells' mediators release or to pathological mast cells infiltration. The diagnosis of mastocytosis is based on clinical, biological, histological, and molecular international criteria. Among all manifestations of the disease, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common and can significantly impair the quality of life. The aim of this article is to review the data regarding GI involvement in mastocytosis. Articles dealing with clinical, pathophysiological, and therapeutic aspects of mastocytosis GI tract involvement were searched for using PubMed. GI manifestations in mastocytosis are reviewed. Pathogenesis of GI symptoms in systemic mastocytosis and their treatment are critically discussed. The most frequent GI symptoms are abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. GI lesions may involve all the digestive tract, from the esophagus to the rectum. The histological diagnosis of GI involvement is difficult. The treatment of GI symptoms aims to prevent and limit mast cells degranulation and/or its consequences and more rarely to control tumoral mast cells infiltration. The high prevalence of GI symptoms in mastocytosis and their important functional impact deserves better characterization and treatment in order to improve patients' quality of life. Diagnosis of mastocytosis GI manifestations should be evoked in the case of unexplained severe GI disorders.

Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare disease with abnormal proliferation and infiltration of mast cells in the skin, bone marrow, and viscera including the mucosal surfaces of the digestive tract. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms occur in 14%-85% of patients with systemic mastocytosis. The GI symptoms may be as frequent as the better known pruritus, urticaria pigmentosa, and flushing. In fact most recent studies show that the GI symptoms are especially important clinically due to the severity and chronicity of the effects that they produce. GI symptoms may include abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and bloating. A case of predominantly GI systemic mastocytosis with unique endoscopic images and pathologic confirmation is herein presented, as well as a current review of the GI manifestations of this disease including endoscopic appearances. Issues such as treatment and prognosis will not be discussed for the purposes of this paper.

Systemic mastocytosis involving the gastrointestinal tract: clinicopathologic and molecular study of five cases

Systemic mastocytosis is an uncommon condition characterized by abnormal proliferation of mast cells in one or more organ. The specific D816V KIT mutation is present in most cases. Gastrointestinal symptoms occur commonly but histologic characterization of gastrointestinal involvement is incomplete. The purpose of this study was (1) to describe the clinicopathologic features in five patients with systemic mastocytosis involving the gastrointestinal tract and (2) to determine whether gastrointestinal involvement is associated with the usual D816V mutation or a different mutation. Clinical details were obtained from the hospital of origin or referring pathologist. Histologic features were documented in slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin, mast cell tryptase and CD117. Molecular analysis for the D816V KIT mutation was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. Symptoms included diarrhea/loose stools (n=5), abdominal pain (n=4), vomiting (n=3) and weight loss (n=3). Other findings included cutaneous lesions of mastocytosis (n=4), malabsorption (n=2), hypoalbuminemia (n=2) and constitutional growth delay (n=1). Sites of gastrointestinal involvement included the colon (n=5), duodenum (n=3) and terminal ileum (n=3). Endoscopic/gross findings included mucosal nodularity (n=4), erosions (n=2) and loss of mucosal folds (n=2). In three patients the endoscopic appearance was considered consistent with inflammatory bowel disease. All cases showed increased mast cell infiltration of the lamina propria, confirmed by immunohistochemistry for mast cell tryptase and CD117. In two cases, mast cells had abundant clear cytoplasmic resembling histiocytes. Marked eosinophil infiltrates were present in four patients, in one patient leading to confusion with eosinophilic colitis. Architectural distortion was noted in three cases. The D816V KIT mutation was present in all four cases tested. In conclusion, gastrointestinal involvement by systemic mastocytosis is characterized by a spectrum of morphologic features that can be mistaken for inflammatory bowel disease, eosinophilic colitis or histiocytic infiltrates. Systemic mastocytosis involving the gastrointestinal tract is associated with the usual D816V KIT mutation.