Endoscopic treatment for pill bezoars after continent ileostomy

Endoscopic Treatment of Postoperative Bleeding, Bezoars, and Foreign Bodies

Altered gastrointestinal anatomy is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, particularly in those who underwent bowel surgery. Commonly performed surgeries are bowel resection and anastomosis and strictureplasty for Crohn's disease; and restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. The area of anastomosis and suture line is at the greatest risk for the development of postoperative bleeding. Altered bowel anatomy, especially the presence of strictures, strictureplasty, or structural or functional pouch outlet obstruction, puts these patients at risk for bezoar formation and foreign body retention, including video endoscopy capsule. This article will focus on postoperative bleeding, bezoar formation, and video capsule retention in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopic management of these conditions is useful and is becoming an increasingly popular alternative to surgery.

Interventional IBD: The Role of Endoscopist in the Multidisciplinary Team Management of IBD

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been traditionally managed by IBD medical doctors or IBDologists and colorectal surgeons. Complications related to IBD and IBD surgery, such as stricture, fistula, and abscess, are common. For the past decade, endoscopic therapy has emerged as a valid treatment option for those complications. Endoscopic therapy provides more effective therapy for those structural complications than medical treatment, while being a less invasive approach than surgery. Endoscopic therapy plays a growing role in bridging medical and surgical therapies and is becoming an important component in the multidisciplinary approach to complex IBD. In fact, endoscopic therapy has become the treatment of choice for anastomotic stricture and anastomotic sinus. The role of endoscopic resection of colitis-associated neoplasia is currently being explored. Interventional IBD is intellectually and technically challenging. We are calling for proper teaching and training of our next generation of IBD interventionists.

Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Complications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has grown over the last decade in both diagnostic and therapeutic realms. It aids in the initial diagnosis of the disease and also in the assessment of the extent and severity of disease. IBD is associated with development of multiple complications such as strictures, fistulae, and colon cancers. Endoscopy plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of colon cancer in patients with IBD through incorporation of chromoendoscopy for surveillance. In addition, endoscopic resection with surveillance is recommended in the management of polypoid dysplastic lesions without flat dysplasia. IBD-associated benign strictures with obstructive symptoms amenable to endoscopic intervention can be managed with endoscopic balloon dilation both in the colon and small intestine. In addition, endoscopy plays a major role in assessing the neoterminal ileum after surgery to risk-stratify patients after ileocolonic resection and assessment of a patient with ileoanal pouch anastomosis surgery and management of postsurgical complications. Our article summarizes the current evidence in the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of complications of IBD.

Endoscopic evaluation of surgically altered bowel in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases often undergo surgical procedures for medically refractory disease or colitis associated dysplasia. Endoscopic evaluation of the surgically altered bowel is often needed to assess for disease recurrence, its severity, and for therapy. It is important to obtain and review the operative report and abdominal imaging before performing the endoscopy. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy can be safely performed in most patients with inflammatory bowel disease with altered bowel anatomy under conscious sedation without fluoroscopy. Carefully planned stricture therapy with balloon dilation or needle knife stricturotomy can be performed for simple, short, and fibrotic strictures. A multidisciplinary approach involving a team of endoscopist, endoscopy nurse, colorectal surgeon, gastrointestinal pathologist, and gastrointestinal radiologist is important for a safe and effective endoscopy. We attempt to review the aspects that need consideration before the endoscopy, the technique of endoscopy, and briefly the therapies that can be performed during endoscopy of the bowel through an ileostomy, a colostomy, in the diverted large bowel or ileal pouch, and small bowel after stricturoplasty and bowel bypass surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Frequency, manifestations and management of bezoars in ileal pouches

Background and Aim To evaluate the frequency, diagnosis and management of ileal pouch bezoars. Methods Patients diagnosed with ileal pouch bezoars at the P ouch C enter at Cleveland Clinic from 2002 to 2013 were included. Demographic, clinical and endoscopic features, management and outcomes were evaluated. Results Twelve patients with ileal pouch bezoars were enrolled, including five (0.4%) of 1390 patients with J ‐pouch and seven (13.0%) of 54 with continent ileostomy (P  < 0.001). Males accounted for 25% (n  = 3) of the cohort. Mean age at time of detection was 61.5 ± 10.3 years. Of the 12 patients, six (50.0%) had phytobezoars, four (33.3%) had lithobezoars, one (8.3%) had pharmacobezoar and one (8.3%) had a retained‐J ackson‐P ratt drain. Median number of harvested bezoars was one (range: 1–224), and mean diameter was 4.0 ± 2.4 cm. Bezoars were located at the pouch body in eight (66.7%) patients, pouch inlet in two (16.7%), pouch‐anal anastomosis in one (8.3%) and efferent limb in one (8.3%). Ten patients (83.3%) were symptomatic, including seven (58.3%) with partial bowel obstructive symptoms. Eleven patients (91.7%) were initially managed with endoscopic treatment including basket, R othN et® , mechanical lithotripsy T ripod and snares. After a median of one (1–3) endoscopic therapy, bezoars were successfully removed in seven patients (58.3%). Surgical intervention was required in the remaining five patients (41.7%). Conclusions Ileal pouch bezoars appeared to be more frequently encountered in patients with continent ileostomies than in those with J ‐pouches. Endoscopic management seemed to be effective in some patients, whereas surgical intervention was needed in others.

Endoscopic therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases (with videos)

Endoscopic therapies are important modalities in the treatment of IBD, adjunct to medical and surgical approaches. These therapeutic techniques are particularly useful in the management of IBD-associated or IBD surgery–associated strictures, fistulas, and sinuses and colitis-associated neoplasia. Although the main focus of endoscopic therapies in IBD has been on balloon stricture dilation and ablation of adenoma-like lesions, new endoscopic approaches are emerging, including needle-knife stricturotomy, needle-knife sinusotomy, endoscopic stent placement, and fistula tract injection. Risk management of endoscopy-associated adverse events is also evolving. The application of endoscopic techniques in novel ways in the treatment of IBD is just beginning and will likely expand rapidly in the near future.

T-pouch: results of the first 10 years with a nonintussuscepting continent ileostomy

BACKGROUND

Continent ileostomy is an alternative for patients who are either not candidates for an ileo-anal pullthrough or in whom an ileo-anal pullthrough failed. We previously described a new type of continent ileostomy (T-pouch) with a nonintussuscepting valve.

OBJECTIVE

This study performed an outcomes analysis of the first 10 years with 40 patients.

DESIGN

A prospective database of patients with a T-pouch from 2000 to 2010 was retrospectively analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were demographics and surgical recovery information and the functional data obtained via questionnaire: incontinence, difficulty of pouch intubation, restrictions (work, social, diet, and sexual), quality of health and life, and level of satisfaction with surgery, which were rated on a scale of 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Twenty-three women and 17 men (mean age, 51.2) received a T-pouch. Median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0.8-11 years). Five patients (12.5%) experience a leak; 3 leaks were managed conservatively and/or with drain placement. Pouch intubations were done 4 times per day in a mean of 6.8 minutes; the insertion difficulty was rated as 2.5 of 10. Ninety-two percent achieved good continence. All quality-of-life and dysfunction/restriction scores showed significant improvement. Major abdominal surgeries for pouch-related reasons were needed in 30%; minor service operations of the skin-level stoma were needed in 25% of the patients. Of the patients, 87.5% would do the surgery again; 90% would recommend it to others with the same diagnosis.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the cohort size and the lack of long-term data.

CONCLUSION

Ten years with 40 patients confirmed that creation of a T-pouch is complex but could be performed with an acceptable rate of complications. It dramatically improved functional outcomes; most notably, it improved fecal control and decreased social, sexual, and work restrictions.