Difficulties and possibilities with thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease--proceedings of the first Thiopurine Task Force meeting

Thiopurines: Use them or lose them? International survey on current and future use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of thiopurines in therapeutic algorithms of Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC) is being questioned. This work aimed to investigate current practice and future perspectives of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) physicians regarding the efficacy, safety, and role of precision medicine with thiopurines in IBD.

METHODS

A 29-questions web-based survey was developed and distributed to IBD physicians worldwide.

RESULTS

We collected the complete answers of 408 physicians from 50 countries. Most participants were experienced physicians in IBD; 26.0% met our definition of "IBD expert". Four physicians reported to not use thiopurines in clinical practice. Most respondents used thiopurines in monotherapy and in combination therapy, both in CD and UC. Respondents tended to consider thiopurines as drugs with a good safety profile, with the agreement of 61.5% of the overall cohort. A minority of physicians (~6%) considered that thiopurines will not be used in the future in IBD patients, while 57.8% believed that these drugs will still be used, in mono and combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite the many emerging treatments in IBD, according to the beliefs of most physicians surveyed, thiopurines will still be an important part of the treatment algorithm of both CD and UC.

Thiopurines' Metabolites and Drug Toxicity: A Meta-Analysis

Many questions remain unanswered regarding therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) utility with thiopurines. This study aims to establish a relationship between thiopurines' metabolites and drug toxicity. We performed a systematic review with inclusion of studies evaluating the relationship between thiopurines' metabolites and drug toxicity. Meta-analysis of mean difference (MD), correlations and odds ratio (OR) was performed. We identified 21,240 records, 72 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Levels of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) were higher in patients with leukopenia (MD 127.06 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC) and gastrointestinal intolerance (MD 201.46 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC), and lower in patients with hepatotoxicity (MD -40.6 pmol × 10⁸ RBC). We established a significant correlation between 6-TGN and leukocytes (r = -0.21), neutrophils (r = -0.24) and alanine aminotransferase levels (r = -0.24). OR for leukopenia in patients with elevated 6-TGN was 4.63 (95%CI 2.24; 9.57). An optimal cut-off of 135 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC for leukopenia was calculated (sensitivity 75.4%; specificity 46.4%). 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity (MD 3241.2 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC; OR 4.28; 95%CI 3.20; 5.71). Levels of 6-MMPR measured in the first 8 weeks of treatment were associated with leukopenia. We conclude that TDM could be used to prevent thiopurines' toxicity. As optimal metabolites level may vary according to indication, physicians may adapt posology to decrease toxicity without compromising efficacy.

Limited added value of laboratory monitoring in thiopurine maintenance monotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

To timely detect myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity, laboratory monitoring at 3-month intervals is advised throughout thiopurine maintenance treatment for IBD. However, reported incidence rates of myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in maintenance treatment are low.

AIM

To assess incidence rates and clinical consequences of myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in thiopurine maintenance therapy after at least 1 year of thiopurine treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of therapy adjustment for laboratory toxicity in adult IBD patients after 12 consecutive months of azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine monotherapy (ie baseline) between 2000 and 2016. Incidence rates of laboratory toxicity (ie myelotoxicity [leucocyte count <4.0 × 10e9/L, and/or platelet count <150 × 10e9/L] and/or hepatotoxicity (gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT], alkaline phosphatase [AP], ALT and/or AST above ULN, excluding isolated increased AST/AP]) and associated diagnostic procedures and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 12,391 laboratory assessments were performed on 1132 patients (56% female, AZA 74%) during 3.3 years of median follow-up. Median monitoring frequency was 3.1 assessments/treatment year. Only 83/12,391 (0.7%) assessments resulted in therapy adjustment, dose reduction in 46 patients, cessation in 28 and allopurinol initiation in nine; risk of therapy adjustment was 1.9% per treatment year. Incidence rates of myelotoxicity were 7.1% (5.1% mild/1.8% moderate/0.1% severe) and hepatotoxicity 5.1% (3.8% mild/1.1% moderate/0.2% severe) per treatment year. Treatment-related complications with concurrent laboratory toxicity occurred in 12 patients (1.1%) and would not have been prevented by monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Severe laboratory toxicity is uncommon after 1 year of thiopurine monotherapy at 4-month monitoring intervals. Therapy adjustments are rare after detection of laboratory toxicity. After 1 year of thiopurine monotherapy, laboratory monitoring may be lowered to less than a 4-month interval.

Is there room for immunomodulators in ulcerative colitis?

Introduction: The management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has evolved over the past few decades. While aminosalicylates remain the mainstay of induction and maintenance therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate UC, the advent of biologic agents and novel oral small molecules has substantively changed the treatment landscape for patients with moderate-to-severe disease and confounded the role of traditional immunomodulators (IMMs) such as thiopurines and methotrexate in the UC management algorithm.Areas covered: We summarize the mechanism of action of thiopurines and methotrexate, identify clinical parameters for their use, and appraise the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of IMMs in UC as both monotherapy and in combination with other therapies, emphasizing on prospective, controlled data.Expert opinion: With the advent of several classes of highly effective treatments for UC, emergence of data demonstrating no benefit of IMMs over placebo, and concerns about the relative safety profile of long-term IMM exposure, we propose that the role of thiopurines or methotrexate be restricted to patients with milder disease failing to maintain corticosteroid-free remission on aminosalicylates alone or in combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

According to recent clinical consensus, pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is, or should be, personalized medicine. IBD treatment is complex, with highly different treatment classes and relatively few data on treatment strategy. Although thorough evidence-based international IBD guidelines currently exist, appropriate drug and dose choice remains challenging as many disease (disease type, location of disease, disease activity and course, extraintestinal manifestations, complications) and patient characteristics [(pharmaco-)genetic predisposition, response to previous medications, side-effect profile, necessary onset of response, convenience, concurrent therapy, adherence to (maintenance) therapy] are involved. Detailed pharmacological knowledge of the IBD drug arsenal is essential for choosing the right drug, in the right dose, in the right administration form, at the right time, for each individual patient. In this in-depth review, clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations are provided for tailoring treatment with the most common IBD drugs. Development (with consequent prospective validation) of easy-to-use treatment algorithms based on these considerations and new pharmacological data may facilitate optimal and effective IBD treatment, preferably corroborated by effectiveness and safety registries.

Key insights from therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn's disease patients

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease are increasing causing a significant disease burden. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advocated as a promising tool for personalized or individual-tailored therapy strategies and has been welcomed as a new means to improve current therapy strategies. Nevertheless, pharmacokinetic-based TDM has limitations, and straightforward target concentrations for most therapies are lacking. Areas covered: In the following concise review of literature, key insights of TDM in thiopurine, methotrexate, anti-TNF, vedolizumab and ustekinumab therapy for Crohn's disease are being described. Expert opinion: Therapeutic drug monitoring may, up till now, be helpful to adjust thiopurine and infliximab therapy, primarily in a reactive setting, in case of inefficacy and of occurrence of adverse event. With this restricted application, the goal of individualized therapy based on TDM has not yet been achieved.

Abd Elwahab A. Ameliorative effect of taurine-chloramine in azathioprine-induced testicular damage; a deeper insight into the mechanism of protection

BACKGROUND

The male reproductive system is a sensitive and intricate process that can be distressed following exposure to various toxicants. Therapeutic drugs, especially chemotherapeutics, can also adversely affect male fertility by instigating hormonal changes leading to testicular cells injury. Azathioprine (AZA) is an effective anticancer drug, but some cases of testicular toxicity have been reported. The aim of this work was to investigate the protective effects of taurine chloramine (TAU-Cl), a reported antioxidant and antiinflammtory peptide, against AZA-induced testicular dysfunction in male rats and ascertain the contributing mechanisms.

METHODS

Forty male rats were allocated into four equal groups; (i) normal control rats, (ii) TAU-Cl group (100 mg/kg b.w/day for 10 weeks, (iii) AZA group (5 mg/day for 4 weeks); (iv) TAU-Cl/AZA group.

RESULTS

AZA caused increased DNA damage in the testes, and alterations in sex hormones and sperm quality, including sperm count, viability, and motility. Moreover, testicular tissue from the AZA-treated group had increased levels of oxidative stress indicator, MDA, and decreased activity of the antioxidant enzymes as superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT) levels. These deleterious events were accompanied by upregulated levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and protein expression of iNOS and NFκB-p65, interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), and proapoptotic marker; caspase-9, together with decreased Bcl-2, NrF2 and hemeoxygenase (HO-1) expression. In contrast, TAU-Cl pretreatment significantly abrogated these toxic effects which were confirmed histologically.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with TAU-Cl exerts a protective effect against AZA-induced male reproductive testicular atrophy. This finding could open new avenues for the use of TAU-Cl as a complementary approach to chemotherapy supportive care.

Clinical Value of Mercaptopurine After Failing Azathioprine Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines have been widely accepted as immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients have to discontinue thiopurines due to intolerance or ineffectiveness. A therapeutically beneficial effect of switching from azathioprine (AZA) to mercaptopurine (MP) after developing adverse events (AEs) has been reported. The authors assessed the clinical value of MP therapy after AZA discontinuation due to intolerance and, secondary, due to ineffectiveness.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, the authors analyzed data from patients in whom AZA therapy had failed and who were subsequently treated with MP.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients initiated MP therapy after intolerance to AZA. Intolerance reoccurred in 22 (58%) patients and the remaining 16 (42%) tolerated MP. In 18 out of 48 patients (38%), the AEs that led to discontinuation of MP were similar to those of AZA. A longer duration of prior AZA use was more common in patients who were subsequently tolerant for MP (5.3 versus 1.2 months; P = 0.04). Twenty-two patients discontinued AZA due to ineffectiveness. Eight (36%) patients had clinical benefit from a switch to MP. Six out of these 8 (75%) patients used allopurinol alongside MP, due to ineffectiveness based on a skewed thiopurine metabolism. Patients were more likely to have clinical benefit if the interval between both thiopurines was longer (4.4 versus 0.01 months; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors showed that a noteworthy number of patients benefitted therapeutically from a switch from AZA to MP when failing due to intolerance or ineffectiveness; however, the percentage was lower than previously reported in literature.

Mercaptopurine and inflammatory bowel disease: the other thiopurine

BACKGROUND

Data about use and effectiveness of mercaptopurine in inflammatory bowel disease are relatively limited.

AIMS

To assess the possible therapeutic indications, efficacy and safety of mercaptopurine as an alternative to azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study in patients treated with mercaptopurine in a total cohort of 1,574 patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two patients received mercaptopurine, 15.7% of these patients as an initial thiopurine, 5.3% after azathioprine failure, and 79% after azathioprine intolerance. In 52.6% of patients (n = 80), adverse effects of mercaptopurine occurred, resulting in withdrawal in 49 of them. Mercaptopurine was effective in 39% of cases (95% CI 31-48%). In the remaining patients, failure was due mainly to withdrawal due to side effects (55.1%) and therapeutic step-up (33.7%). The average total time of mercaptopurine exposure was 36 months (IQR: 2-60). Myelotoxicity with mercaptopurine was more common in patients with intermediate TPMT activity than in those with normal activity (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

In our setting, mercaptopurine is primarily used as a rescue therapy in patients with azathioprine adverse effects. This could explain its modest efficacy and the high rate of adverse effects. However, this drug is still an alternative in this group of patients, before a therapeutic step-up to biologics is considered.

American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which involves measurement of drug or active metabolite levels and anti-drug antibodies, is a promising strategy that can be used to optimize inflammatory bowel disease therapeutics. It is based on the premise that there is a relationship between drug exposure and outcomes, and that considerable inter-individual variability exists in how patients metabolize the drug (pharmacokinetics) and the magnitude and duration of response to therapy (pharmacodynamics). Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association has prioritized clinical guidelines on the role of TDM in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. To inform these clinical guidelines, this technical review was developed in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework for interventional and prognostic studies, and focused on the application of TDM for biologic therapy, specifically anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents, and for thiopurines. Focused questions address the benefits and risks of a strategy of reactive TDM (in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease) to guide treatment changes compared with empiric treatment changes, and the benefits and risks of a strategy of routine proactive TDM (during routine clinical care in patients with quiescent disease) compared with no routine TDM. Additionally, the review addresses the benefits and risks of routine measurement of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme activity or genotype before starting thiopurine therapy compared with empiric weight-based dosing and explores the performance of different trough drug concentrations for anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and thiopurines to inform clinical decision making when applying TDM in a reactive setting. Due to a paucity of data, this review does not address the role of TDM for more recently approved biologic agents, such as vedolizumab or ustekinumab.

Use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The two main forms of intestinal bowel disease, namely ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are not curable but can be controlled by various medical therapies. The Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) has prepared clinical practice guidelines to help physicians prescribe corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs for these patients. The guidelines consider therapies that induce remission in patients with active disease as well as treatment regimens that maintain remission. These guidelines complement already existing guidelines from IG-IBD on the use of biological drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Combination treatment with 6-mercaptopurine and allopurinol in HepG2 and HEK293 cells - Effects on gene expression levels and thiopurine metabolism

Combination treatment with low-dose thiopurine and allopurinol (AP) has successfully been used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with a so called skewed thiopurine metabolite profile. In red blood cells in vivo, it reduces the concentration of methylated metabolites and increases the concentration of the phosphorylated ones, which is associated with improved therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the largely unknown mechanism of AP on thiopurine metabolism in cells with an active thiopurine metabolic pathway using HepG2 and HEK293 cells. Cells were treated with 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) and AP or its metabolite oxypurinol. The expression of genes known to be associated with thiopurine metabolism, and the concentration of thiopurine metabolites were analyzed. Gene expression levels were only affected by AP in the presence of 6MP. The addition of AP to 6MP affected the expression of in total 19 genes in the two cell lines. In both cell lines the expression of the transporter SLC29A2 was reduced by the combined treatment. Six regulated genes in HepG2 cells and 8 regulated genes in HEK293 cells were connected to networks with 18 and 35 genes, respectively, present at known susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease, when analyzed using a protein-protein interaction database. The genes identified as regulated as well as the disease associated interacting genes represent new candidates for further investigation in the context of combination therapy with thiopurines and AP. However, no differences in absolute metabolite concentrations were observed between 6MP+AP or 6MP+oxypurinol vs. 6MP alone in either of the two cell lines. In conclusion; the effect of AP on gene expression levels requires the presence of 6MP, at least in vitro. Previously described AP-effects on metabolite concentrations observed in red blood cells in vivo could not be reproduced in our cell lines in vitro. AP’s effects in relation to thiopurine metabolism are complex. The network-identified susceptibility genes represented biological processes mainly associated with purine nucleotide biosynthetic processes, lymphocyte proliferation, NF-KB activation, JAK-STAT signaling, and apoptotic signaling at oxidative stress.

Early prediction of thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal complaints and general malaise are common limiting adverse reactions of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in IBD patients, often related to high steady-state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) metabolite concentrations.

AIM

To determine the predictive value of 6-MMPR concentrations 1 week after treatment initiation (T1) for the development of these adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity, during the first 20 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

The cohort study consisted of the first 270 IBD patients starting thiopurine treatment as part of the Dutch randomised-controlled trial evaluating pre-treatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotype testing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00521950). Blood samples for metabolite assessment were collected at T1. Hepatotoxicity was defined by alanine aminotransaminase elevations >2 times the upper normal limit or a ratio of alanine aminotransaminase/alkaline phosphatase ≥5.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (17%) presented hepatotoxicity during the first 20 weeks of thiopurine treatment. A T1 6-MMPR threshold of 3615 pmol/8 × 10⁸ erythrocytes was defined. Analysis of patients on stable thiopurine dose (n = 174) showed that those exceeding the 6-MMPR threshold were at increased risk of hepatotoxicity: OR = 3.8 (95% CI: 1.8-8.0). Age, male gender and BMI were significant determinants. A predictive algorithm was developed based on these determinants and the 6-MMPR threshold to assess hepatotoxicity risk [AUC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91)]. 6-MMPR concentrations above the threshold also correlated with gastrointestinal complaints: OR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4-4.3), and general malaise: OR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1-3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

In more than 80% of patients, thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity could be explained by elevated T1 6-MMPR concentrations and the independent risk factors age, gender and BMI, allowing personalised thiopurine treatment in IBD to prevent early failure.

Pharmacology and Optimization of Thiopurines and Methotrexate in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Improving the efficacy and reducing the toxicity of thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX) have been areas of intense basic and clinical research. An increased knowledge on pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of these immunomodulators has optimized treatment strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review focuses on the metabolism and mode of action of thiopurines and MTX, and provides an updated overview of individualized treatment strategies in which efficacy in IBD can be increased without compromising safety. The patient-based monitoring instruments adapted into clinical practice include pretreatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase testing, thiopurine metabolite monitoring, and blood count measurements that may help guiding the dosage to improve clinical outcome. Other approaches for optimizing thiopurine therapy in IBD include combination therapy with allopurinol, 5-aminosalicylates, and/or biologics. Similar strategies are yet to be proven effective in improving the outcome of MTX therapy. Important challenges for the management of IBD in the future relate to individualized dosing of immunomodulators for maximal efficacy with minimal risk of side effects. As low-cost conventional immunomodulators still remain a mainstay in pharmacotherapy of IBD, more research remains warranted, especially to substantiate these tailored management strategies in controlled clinical trials.

Efficacy of thioguanine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review

AIM

To critically assess the available literature regarding the efficacy of thioguanine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, irrespective of the (hepato-) toxicity profile.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed using the keywords “thioguanine”, “6-TG”, “thioguanine”, “inflammatory bowel disease”, “IBD”, “Crohn’s disease”, “Ulcerative colitis” and “effectiveness” in order to identify relevant articles published in English starting from 2000. Reference lists of the included articles were cross-checked for missing articles. Reviewed manuscripts concerning the effectiveness of thioguanine treatment in IBD were reviewed by the authors and the data were extracted. Data were subsequently analyzed with descriptive statistics. Due to the lack of standardized outcomes, a formal meta-analysis was not performed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 applicable studies were found that involved the effectiveness of thioguanine therapy in IBD. Eight studies were conducted in a prospective manner, in the remaining three studies, data was collected retrospectively. In total, 353 IBD-patients (225 patients with Crohn’s disease, 119 with ulcerative colitis and nine with unclassified IBD) with prior azathioprine/mercaptopurine resistance and/or intolerance (n = 321) or de novo thioguanine administration (n = 32) were included for analysis, of which 228 (65%) had clinical improvement on thioguanine therapy, based on standard IBD questionnaires, biochemical parameters or global physician assessments. Short-term results were based on 268 treatment years (median follow-up 9 mo, range 3-22 mo) with a median daily dose of 20 mg (range 10-80 mg). Discontinuation, mostly due to adverse events, was reported in 72 patients (20%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of thioguanine therapy in IBD patients intolerant to conventional thiopurine therapy is observed in 65%, with short term adverse events in 20% of patients.

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Low-dose Azathioprine and Allopurinol Cotherapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Large Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose azathioprine with allopurinol (LDAA) has been proposed as a potent therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with the benefit of overcoming side effects regularly associated with thiopurine monotherapy and poor responses. Concerns regarding safety remain, while a layer of complexity has been added by the trend toward treatment directed by red cell thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) profiling. We report on the clinical efficacy and safety of LDAA use in IBD undirected by metabolite profiling.

METHODS

Observational study of clinical practice from a single IBD center. Patient outcomes were defined clinically based on established activity scores and corticosteroid withdrawal. Red cell TGN was monitored only for suspected nonadherence.

RESULTS

Overall, 113/164 (69%) patients with Crohn's disease and 83/136 (61%) patients with ulcerative/unclassified colitis had a clinical response by the end of follow-up (median 19 months), while 85 (52%) patients with Crohn's disease and 74 (54%) patients with ulcerative/unclassified colitis were in clinical remission. Clinical response was seen in 45/57 (79%) patients with Crohn's disease and 34/53 (64%) patients with ulcerative/unclassified colitis who were thiopurine naive, had active IBD, and received LDAA as the first line immunomodulator, while in 35 (61%) and 28 (53%), respectively, remission was achieved. LDAA was stopped in 20/300 (7%) patients because of side effects, all of which resolved on drug cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest cohort supporting the favorable safety profile and high efficacy of LDAA in IBD. It presents 2 advances in therapy: prescribing LDAA for thiopurine-naive patients, and bypassing TGN monitoring in favor of clinical monitoring (blood counts, etc.), which will make it more accessible for clinics without access to TGN assays.

Endoscopy Assessment at 1-Year Identifies Long-Term Responders to Thiopurines Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Crohn's Disease

When treating Crohn disease (CD) with thiopurines, achievement of an objective response is essential. However, the minimal degree of mucosal improvement required to alter disease outcomes of CD is unknown.To determine the endoscopic responses of thiopurine monotherapy and to determine the minimal degree of mucosal improvement required to alter disease outcomes of CD.One hundred thirty CD patients who had evaluable ileocolonoscopy with evident of mucosal ulceration at baseline were included. The endpoints were endoscopic responses at the 2 follow-up endoscopies performed at 12 months (M12) and 36 month (M36) from the initiation of thiopurines.At M12, mucosal healing (MH) and a positive endoscopic response (PR) were documented in 38% and 46% of patients, respectively. At the second follow-up, merely a further 14% (13/93) of patients on monotherapy had a PR and a total of 46% (43/93) presented with MH. In a Cox regression model, both a PR (P < 0.02) and MH (P < 0.001) at M12 were associated with response at M36 in patients continuing thiopurine treatment. MH at M12 was associated with long-term disease outcomes of CD at M36, with an area under the Receiver Operator Characteristic curve of 0.54 for predicting clinical remission, 0.69 for hsCRP normalization, 0.69 for MH, and 0.74 for PR, respectively. A PR at M12, defined as a decrease in endoscopic activity score by ≥2 points from baseline, yielded similar results.Endoscopy at M12 can help to identify responders to thiopurine monotherapy in active CD. A PR could represent the minimal clinically important improvement in endoscopic disease activity.

Successful Mercaptopurine Usage despite Azathioprine-Induced Pancreatitis in Paediatric Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine [AZA] and mercaptopurine [MP] are recommended for maintenance of steroid-free remission in children with Crohn`s disease [CD]. Azathioprine-induced pancreatitis, an idiosyncratic and major side effect, has been considered as an absolute contraindication for the use of a second thiopurine in IBD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe two children with CD in whom MP were successfully trialled after a confirmed azathioprine-induced pancreatitis, being well tolerated in both cases.

RESULTS

Two boys [13 and 10 years old] started exclusive enteral nutrition after diagnosis of moderate (Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index [wPCDAI] = 45) and mild [wPCDAI = 35] CD. Both developed an acute mild to moderate pancreatitis after 2 and 3 weeks, respectively, of AZA treatment but recovered fully in hospital after AZA withdrawal. They started on MP treatment without any adverse effect. They were tested for the presence of polymorphisms 238G>C, 460G>A, and 719A>G in the TPMT gene and 94C>A and 21>C in the ITPase. Both patients were wild-type for all tested polymorphisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine-induced acute pancreatitis should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for the use of MP. Further investigation is required to create a better understanding of the mechanism underlying the adverse events and to allow more possibilities for personalised therapy.

Update on thiopurine pharmacogenetics in inflammatory bowel disease

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine remain pivotal therapies for the maintenance of disease remission in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. While thiopurine S-methyltransferase deficiency was the first pharmacogenetic phenomenon to be recognized to influence thiopurine toxicity and reliably predict leukopenia, it does not predict other adverse effects, nor does it explain most cases of thiopurine resistance. In recent years, a number of other genetic polymorphisms have received increasing attention in the literature. In particular, SNPs in NUDT15 and in the class II HLA locus have been shown to predict thiopurine-related leukopenia and pancreatitis. The aim of this review is to provide a concise update of genetic variability which may influence patient response to azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine.

Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: Safety issues

Thiopurines are widely used for maintenance treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Inter-individual variability in clinical response to thiopurines may be attributed to several factors including genetic polymorphisms, severity and chronicity of disease, comorbidities, duration of administration, compliance issues and use of concomitant medication, environmental factors and clinician and patient preferences. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current evidence on thiopurine safety and toxicity, to describe adverse drug events and emphasise the significance of drug interactions, and to discuss the relative safety of thiopurine use in adults, elderly patients, children and pregnant women. Thiopurines are safe to use and well tolerated, however dose adjustment or discontinuation of treatment must be considered in cases of non-response, poor compliance or toxicity. Drug safety, clinical response to treatment and short to long term risks and benefits must be balanced throughout treatment duration for different categories of patients. Treatment should be individualised and stratified according to patient requirements. Enzymatic testing prior to treatment commencement is advised. Surveillance with regular clinic follow-up and monitoring of laboratory markers is important. Data on long term efficacy, safety of thiopurine use and interaction with other disease modifying drugs are lacking, especially in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease. High quality, collaborative clinical research is required so as to inform clinical practice in the future.

Relationship between azathioprine dosage and thiopurine metabolites in pediatric IBD patients: identification of covariables using multilevel analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported no or only a very poor correlation between 6-methylmercaptopurine/6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-MeMPN/6-TGN) and azathioprine (AZA) dose in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, metabolite levels are often repeatedly measured yielding a hierarchical data structure that requires more appropriate data analysis.

METHODS

This study explored the relationship between the weight-based dosage of AZA and metabolites levels in 86 pediatric IBD patients using multilevel analysis. Other covariates related to patient characteristics and treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

This is the first study to demonstrate positive correlations between AZA dose and 6-TGN and 6-MeMPN levels and 6-MeMPN/6-TGN ratio (P < 0.001) in IBD children. Other novel predictors of metabolites were reported. Younger children exhibited lower 6-TGN and 6-MeMPN levels, probably suggesting age-related differences in metabolism and/or absorption of thiopurines. Coadministration of infliximab resulted in a significant increase in 6-TGN levels (P = 0.023). Moreover, alanine aminotransferase values positively correlated with 6-MeMPN levels (P = 0.032). The duration of AZA therapy, gender, and thiopurine methyltransferase activity were associated with metabolite levels. The wide interindividual variability in metabolite levels that accounted for 67.7%, 48.6%, and 49.4% of variance in the 6-TGN and 6-MeMPN levels and the ratio, respectively, were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliable AZA dose-metabolites relationship is useful for clinicians to guide the dosing regimen to maximize clinical response and minimize side effects or to consider alternative therapies when patients have preferential production of the toxic 6-MeMPN. These results may be of potential interest for optimizing thiopurine therapy to achieve safe and efficacious AZA use in pediatric IBD patients.

The effect of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine combination therapy on the activity of three pivotal thiopurine metabolizing enzymes: results from a prospective pharmacological study

INTRODUCTION

Thiopurine therapy is often discontinued in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor allopurinol has previously shown to enhance thiopurine efficacy and to prevent adverse reactions, the mechanism of this beneficial interaction is not completely clarified. The aim of this study is to observe possible effects of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine combination therapy on the activity of three pivotal thiopurine metabolizing enzymes.

METHODS

A prospective study of IBD patients failing thiopurine therapy due to a skewed thiopurine metabolism was performed. Patients were treated with allopurinol and azathioprine or mercaptopurine. Xanthine oxidase, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT) and thiopurine S-methyl transferase (TPMT) activities, and thiopurine metabolites concentrations were measured during thiopurine monotherapy, and after 4 and 12 weeks of combination therapy.

RESULTS

Of fifteen IBD patients, XO activity decreased from 0.18 (IQR 0.08-0.3) during thiopurine monotherapy to 0.14 (IQR 0.06-0.2) and 0.11 (IQR 0.06-0.2; p=0.008) mU/hour/ml at 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. HGPRT activity increased from 150 (IQR 114-176) to 180 (IQR 135-213) and 204 nmol/(h×mg protein) (IQR 173-213; p=0.013). TPMT activity seemed not to be affected. 6-Thioguanine nucleotide concentrations increased from 138 (IQR 119-188) to 235 (223-304) and to 265 pmol/8×10^8 (IQR 188-344), whereas 6-methyl mercaptopurine ribonucleotides concentrations decreased from 13230 (IQR 7130-17420) to 690 (IQR 378-1325) and 540 (IQR 240-790) pmol/8×10^8 at 4 and 12 weeks of combination therapy (both p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Allopurinol and thiopurine combination-therapy seems to increase HGPRT and decrease XO activity in IBD patients, which at least in part may explain the observed changes in thiopurine metabolite concentrations.

Exploring associations of 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels and other predictive factors with therapeutic response to azathioprine in pediatric patients with IBD using multilevel analysis

BACKGROUND

Metabolite monitoring and response predictors to azathioprine (AZA) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are debatable. In an attempt to optimize thiopurine therapy and understand the mechanism of action of thiopurines, we correlated metabolites and other factors with AZA efficacy in children with IBD.

METHODS

Data from 86 children with IBD with 440 metabolite measurements were retrospectively analyzed using multilevel logistic regression analyses. A therapeutic response was defined as a pediatric Crohn's disease activity index ≤10 for Crohn's disease or a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index ≤10 for ulcerative colitis without any treatment with steroids, antitumor necrosis factor, other immunomodulators, or exclusive enteral nutrition.

RESULTS

The 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels >250 pmol per 8 × 10 red blood cells correlated with a higher response (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-11.46, P = 0.007), whereas 6-methyl-mercaptopurine and 6-methyl-mercaptopurine:6-thioguanine nucleotide ratio showed no correlation. Other novel response predictors in children with IBD were relative leukopenia (odds ratio, 14.01; 95% confidence interval, 3.77-52.10; P < 0.001) and the absence of lymphopenia (odds ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.89; P = 0.017). Lower thiopurine methyltransferase activity (P = 0.015), lower platelet count (P = 0.020), and higher aspartate aminotransferase level (P = 0.009) also predicted therapeutic response. Age, gender, patient adherence, the duration of AZA therapy, IBD type, erythrocyte count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not predict efficacy. The high interindividual variability accounting for 57.7% of variance in therapeutic response was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant 6-thioguanine nucleotide level-response relationship may support metabolite monitoring to improve thiopurine efficacy in pediatric IBD. The reported response predictors may be helpful for treatment optimization in AZA-treated children with IBD, but should be proved in prospective studies.

Usefulness of thiopurine metabolites in predicting azathioprine resistance in pediatric IBD patients

Few data on azathioprine (AZA) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exist for children. We evaluated whether the 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) level predicts AZA refractoriness in children with IBD and whether children benefit an AZA dose escalation. Seventy-eight children with IBD initially treated with an AZA dose of 1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day were retrospectively included. The dose was adjusted based on the clinical status. The receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression were used to determine predictors for AZA resistance. Initially, 18 of 40 (45%) patients receiving a dose of <2 mg/kg/day and 11 of 38 (28.9%) patients receiving a dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg/day achieved remission. The 6-TGN level above 250 pmol/8.10(8) RBCs was associated with a higher remission rate, though non-significant. Among 35 patients with a dose escalation due to treatment failure, 12 (34.3%) achieved remission (the median 6-TGN level increased from 260 to 394 pmol/8.10(8) RBCs [P = .002]), 23 (67.6%) were AZA refractory. A 6-TGN level above 405 pmol/8.10(8) RBCs was the only predictor for AZA resistance (sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 75%, OR 10.8 [95% CI: 2.1-55.7, P = .004]). Serial metabolite monitoring is useful to identify children with IBD resistant to AZA. Children who cannot achieve remission despite a 6-TGN level above 405 pmol/8.10(8) RBCs should receive alternative therapies than dose increase.

A skewed thiopurine metabolism is a common clinical phenomenon that can be successfully managed with a combination of low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A skewed thiopurine metabolism is a phenomenon associated with both poor treatment response and toxicity. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency of this phenomenon and the relationship to thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) function.

METHODS

All thiopurine metabolite measurements in adult patients (n=4033) between January 2006 and April 2012 were assessed to evaluate the occurrence of a skewed metabolism and the relationship to TPMT genotype and activity.

RESULTS

A skewed metabolism was observed in 14% of all patients. It only developed in patients with a normal TPMT genotype, but was observed at all TPMT activity levels within the normal range (9.1-24.2 U/ml RBC). Two cases that illustrate typical clinical scenarios of a skewed metabolism and the effect of combination treatment with low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

A skewed metabolism is a common clinical phenomenon in patients with a normal TPMT function, which can develop at all TPMT activity levels within the normal range. We suggest that metabolite measurements should be considered in patients not responding to treatment and in those with hepatotoxicity or myelotoxicity in order to detect a skewed metabolism, since this phenomenon can be successfully managed by a combination of low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol.

Myelosuppression monitoring after immunomodulator initiation in veterans with inflammatory bowel disease: a national practice audit

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulator medications (IMM) play a vital role in the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD practice guidelines recommend myelosuppression monitoring after initiation of IMM.

AIM

To identify adherence rates and predictors of myelosuppression monitoring after IMM initiation in a large practice setting.

METHODS

We identified a national cohort of VA users with IBD for the fiscal years 2003-2009 using the Veterans Affairs administrative datasets. Subjects with filled prescriptions for IMM were included. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who had a white blood cell (WBC) test completed within 90 days of the IMM index date. Determinants of myelosuppression monitoring were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 6045 unique IBD patients were identified with filled IMM prescriptions. Overall, only 57% of subjects completed a WBC test within 90 days of IMM index date. Monitoring rates increased over time, from 48% in 2003 to 75% in 2009. There was variability of monitoring rates by facility, ranging from 0 to 83%. In multivariate analyses, older age at IMM index date was associated with a lower rate of monitoring. Frequency of VA encounters and IMM index date were associated with increased rates of myelosuppression monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring for myelosuppression among veterans with inflammatory bowel disease after immunomodulator medications initiation is low with wide variability based on facility. This may reflect a low quality of care among veterans with IBD. Provider- and system-wide interventions are needed to improve adherence and reduce variability of immunomodulator medications monitoring across facilities.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma in a Crohn's disease patient taking azathioprine: case report and review of the literature

Thiopurines are widely used for remission maintenance and post-operative recurrence prevention in Crohn's disease. The increased risk of cancer in transplant recipients on azathioprine is well recognized and there are concerns that this may also be true for inflammatory bowel disease patients. We report a case of a 33-year-old Caucasian woman with Crohn's disease treated with azathioprine for 9 years who developed an ulcerated lesion at the right superior retromolar trigone. Biopsy specimen revealed a squamous cell carcinoma.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites in adult thiopurine tolerant IBD patients on maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Therapeutic drug monitoring of active metabolites of thiopurines, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, is relatively new. The proposed therapeutic threshold level of the active 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) is ≥235 pmol/8×10(8) erythrocytes. The aim of this prospective cross-sectional study was to compare 6-TGN levels in adult thiopurine tolerant IBD patients with an exacerbation with those in remission, and to determine the therapeutic 6-TGN cut-off level.

METHODS

Hundred IBD patients were included. Outcome measures were thiopurine metabolite levels, calculated therapeutic 6-TGN cut-off level, CDAI/CAI scores, thiopurine dose and TPMT enzyme activity.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients had an exacerbation, 59 patients were in remission. In 17% of all patients 6-TGN levels were compatible with non-compliance. The median 6-TGN levels were not significantly different between the exacerbation and remission group (227 versus 263 pmol/8×10(8) erythrocytes, p=0.29). The previous reported therapeutic 6-TGN cut-off level of 235 pmol/8×10(8) erythrocytes was confirmed in this study. Twenty-six of the 41 patients (63%) with active disease had 6-TGN levels below this threshold and 24 of 59 IBD patients (41%) in clinical remission (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurine non-compliance occurs frequently both in active and quiescent disease. 6-TGN levels below or above the therapeutic threshold are associated with a significant higher chance of IBD exacerbation and remission, respectively. These data support the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in thiopurine maintenance therapy in IBD to reveal non-compliance or underdosing, and can be used as a practical tool to optimize thiopurine therapy, especially in case of thiopurine non-response.

High prevalence of polymorphism and low activity of thiopurine methyltransferase in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Gene polymorphism of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) correlates with decreased enzyme activity which determines a significant risk of adverse effect reactions (ADR) in patients treated with thiopurines. The aim of this study was to investigate TPMT genotype and phenotype status in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive out-patients with IBD were genotyped for the following allelic variants: rs1800462 (referred as TPMT 2 allele), rs1800460 (referred as TPMT 3B allele), and 1142345 (referred as TPMT 3C allele). Red blood cell TPMT activity was measured using a competitive micro-well immunoassay for the semi-quantitative determination of TPMT activity in red blood cells (RBC) by means of a 6-MP substrate.

RESULTS

Polymorphism of TPMT was found in 5 out of 51 patients (10%; 95% CI 2%-18%), three heterozygous and two homozygous carriers. Six patients (11.8%; 95% CI 2.4%-19.5%) displayed very low, 12 (23.5%; 95% CI 11.4%-34.5%) intermediate, and 33 (64.7%; 95% CI 52%-78%) normal/high TPMT activity. There were no differences between TPMT genotype and phenotype groups according to age, type of disease, smoking, and chronic medications. A 71% (95% CI 61%-81%; κ=0.45) concordance rate was found between genotype and phenotype status. Six out of 27 (22%) current or past users of azathioprine developed ADR, with three (50%) displaying TPMT genotype and/or phenotype alterations.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the general population, IBD patients may have significantly higher prevalence of TPMT polymorphism and, even more, low activity. Phenotypic more than genotypic TPMT analysis could be useful to better manage IBD therapy with thiopurines.