2
|
Fiorino G, Cortes PN, Ellul P, Felice C, Karatzas P, Silva M, Lakatos PL, Bossa F, Ungar B, Sebastian S, Furfaro F, Karmiris K, Katsanos KH, Muscat M, Christodoulou DK, Maconi G, Kopylov U, Magro F, Mantzaris GJ, Armuzzi A, Boscà-Watts MM, Ben-Horin S, Bonovas S, Danese S. Discontinuation of Infliximab in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Is Associated With Increased Risk of Relapse: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:1426-1432.e1. [PMID: 27317850 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Revised: 05/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Infliximab is a safe and effective therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study that included 7 European countries and Israel to examine whether infliximab discontinuation can be considered for patients who achieve sustained remission. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study, collecting medical records from 13 tertiary care referral inflammatory bowel disease centers of all patients with UC treated with infliximab (n = 193). We compared the disease course of patients with at least 12 months of clinical remission who discontinued infliximab (n = 111) with that of patients who continued scheduled treatment (controls, n = 82). We examined the incidence rates of relapse, hospitalization and colectomy, the comparative effectiveness of different therapeutic strategies after discontinuation, and assessed the rates of response, remission, and adverse effects after infliximab re-initiation. Statistical analyses used time-to-event methods. RESULTS In the entire cohort, 67 patients (34.7%) relapsed during the follow-up period. The incidence rate of relapse was significantly higher after discontinuation (23.3 per 100 person-years) compared with the control group (7.2 per 100 person-years) in univariable analysis (log-rank P < .001; hazard ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-6.20) and multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-6.77). Rates of hospitalization and colectomy did not differ between groups. Thiopurines appeared to be the best treatment option after infliximab discontinuation (incidence of relapse: 15.0 per 100 person-years for thiopurines, 27.4 per 100 person-years for thiopurines plus aminosalicylates, and 31.2 per 100 person-years for aminosalicylates alone; log-rank P = .032). Response was regained in 77.1% of patients and remission in 51.4% of patients who re-initiated infliximab. However, 17.1% had infusion reactions and 17.1% reported other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In a multinational retrospective cohort study of patients with UC in sustained clinical remission, we associated discontinuation of infliximab with an increased risk of relapse. Treatment re-initiation is effective and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gionata Fiorino
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pablo Navarro Cortes
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Carla Felice
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Gemelli Hospital Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Pantelis Karatzas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marco Silva
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Semmelweiss University, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fabrizio Bossa
- Unità di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| | - Bella Ungar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Hull and East Yorkshire National Health Service Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Federica Furfaro
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Karmiris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Martina Muscat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | | | - Giovanni Maconi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Fernando Magro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Gemelli Hospital Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Maia Boscà-Watts
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Shomron Ben-Horin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|