Acute kidney injury is associated with low factor XIII in decompensated cirrhosis

Prediction and prevention of post-procedural bleedings in patients with cirrhosis

Although post-procedural bleedings are infrequent in patients with cirrhosis, they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, predicting and preventing such bleedings is important. Established predictors of post-procedural bleeding include high-bleeding risk procedure, severe cirrhosis and high body mass index; prognostic value of anemia, acute kidney injury and bacterial infection is more uncertain. While prothrombin time and international normalized ratio do not predict post-procedural bleeding, some evidence suggests that platelet count, whole blood thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic tests may be helpful in this context. Prevention of postprocedural bleeding involves careful management of antithrombotic drugs during the periprocedural period. Patients with cirrhosis present unique challenges due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antithrombotic drugs, but there is a lack of dedicated studies specifically focused on this patient population. Guidelines for periprocedural management of antithrombotic drugs developed for patients without liver disease are thus applied to those with cirrhosis. Some technical aspects may decrease the risk of post-procedural bleeding, namely ultrasoundguidance, opting for transjugular route rather than percutaneous route, and the level of expertise of the operator. The effectiveness of platelet transfusions or thrombopoietin-receptor agonists remains uncertain. Transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma, of fibrinogen, and administration of tranexamic acid are not recommended for reducing post-procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. In conclusion, prediction of post-procedural requires a global approach taking into account the patients characteristics, the risk of the procedure, and the platelet count. There is little data to support prophylactic correction of hemostasis, and dedicated studies are needed.

Hematological abnormalities in liver cirrhosis

Hematological abnormalities are common in cirrhosis and are associated with various pathophysiological mechanisms. Studies have documented a prevalence of thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia in patients with compensated cirrhosis of 77.9%, 23.5%, and 21.1%, respectively. These abnormalities carry significant clinical implications, including considerations for invasive procedures, infection risk, bleeding risk, and prognosis. Previously, cirrhosis was believed to predispose patients to bleeding due to alterations observed in classical coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, and thrombocytopenia. However, this understanding has evolved, and cirrhosis patients are now also acknowledged as being at a high risk for thrombotic events. Hemostasis in cirrhosis patients presents a complex phenotype, with procoagulant and anticoagulant abnormalities offsetting each other. This multifactorial phenomenon is inadequately reflected by routine laboratory tests. Thrombotic complications are more prevalent in decompensated cirrhosis and may correlate with disease severity. Bleeding is primarily associated with portal hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, mechanical vessel injury, disseminated intravascular coagulation, endotoxemia, and renal injury. This review comprehensively outlines hematologic index abnormalities, mechanisms of hemostasis, coagulation, and fibrinolysis abnormalities, limitations of laboratory testing, and clinical manifestations of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Guidelines for the management of coagulation disorders in patients with cirrhosis

Coagulation management in the patient with cirrhosis has undergone a significant transformation since the beginning of this century, with the concept of a rebalancing between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. The paradigm that patients with cirrhosis have a greater bleeding tendency has changed, as a result of this rebalancing. In addition, it has brought to light the presence of complications related to thrombotic events in this group of patients. These guidelines detail aspects related to pathophysiologic mechanisms that intervene in the maintenance of hemostasis in the patient with cirrhosis, the relevance of portal hypertension, mechanical factors for the development of bleeding, modifications in the hepatic synthesis of coagulation factors, and the changes in the reticuloendothelial system in acute hepatic decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure. They address new aspects related to the hemorrhagic complications in patients with cirrhosis, considering the risk for bleeding during diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, as well as the usefulness of different tools for diagnosing coagulation and recommendations on the pharmacologic treatment and blood-product transfusion in the context of hemorrhage. These guidelines also update the knowledge regarding hypercoagulability in the patient with cirrhosis, as well as the efficacy and safety of treatment with the different anticoagulation regimens. Lastly, they provide recommendations on coagulation management in the context of acute-on-chronic liver failure, acute liver decompensation, and specific aspects related to the patient undergoing liver transplantation.

How to assess hemostasis in patients with severe liver disease

Patients with advanced liver diseases frequently acquire profound alterations in their hemostatic system. Simultaneous changes in procoagulant and anticoagulant systems result in a reset in the hemostatic balance with a relatively neutral net effect, although there are notable hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable features in the hemostatic system in patients with liver disease. Laboratory and clinical studies have demonstrated that patients have a relatively well-preserved hemostatic system even though routine diagnostic tests of hemostasis (prothrombin time, platelet count) suggest a bleeding tendency. Routine diagnostic tests of hemostasis are unsuitable to assess the hemostatic status of patients with liver disease, as these tests are insensitive for the concurrent prohemostatic and antihemostatic changes in these patients. These tests are, however, frequently requested in patients with liver disease, as they are well established indicators of severity of liver disease. This paper will discuss commonly used diagnostic and research-type hemostatic tests and will outline how test results should be interpreted in patients with liver disease.

Procedural-Related Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients With Liver Disease (PROC-BLeeD): An International, Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis frequently undergo multiple procedures. The risk of procedural-related bleeding remains unclear, and management is not standardized. We conducted an international, prospective, multicenter study of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis undergoing nonsurgical procedures to establish the incidence of procedural-related bleeding and to identify bleeding risk factors.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients were prospectively enrolled and monitored until surgery, transplantation, death, or 28 days from admission. The study enrolled 1187 patients undergoing 3006 nonsurgical procedures from 20 centers.

RESULTS

A total of 93 procedural-related bleeding events were identified. Bleeding was reported in 6.9% of patient admissions and in 3.0% of the procedures. Major bleeding was reported in 2.3% of patient admissions and in 0.9% of the procedures. Patients with bleeding were more likely to have nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (43.9% vs 30%) and higher body mass index (BMI; 31.2 vs 29.5). Patients with bleeding had a higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at admission (24.5 vs 18.5). A multivariable analysis controlling for center variation found that high-risk procedures (odds ratio [OR], 4.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-8.84), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.46-3.86), and higher BMI (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.80) independently predicted bleeding. Preprocedure international normalized ratio, platelet level, and antithrombotic use were not predictive of bleeding. Bleeding prophylaxis was used more routinely in patients with bleeding (19.4% vs 7.4%). Patients with bleeding had a significantly higher 28-day risk of death (hazard ratio, 6.91; 95% CI, 4.22-11.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Procedural-related bleeding occurs rarely in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Patients with elevated BMI and decompensated liver disease who undergo high-risk procedures may be at risk to bleed. Bleeding is not associated with conventional hemostasis tests, preprocedure prophylaxis, or recent antithrombotic therapy.

Bleeding and Thrombotic Complications in Patients With Cirrhosis: A State-of-the-Art Appraisal

Much has evolved over the past 25 years regarding our understanding of the coagulopathy of liver disease. Paradoxically, this form of coagulopathy is relatively hypercoagulability despite the common clinical impression of a hemorrhagic tendency. The latter is largely driven by portal-mesenteric venous pressure (ie, portal hypertension) and has little to do with hemostatic pathways. It cannot be emphasized enough that the INR does not offer a meaningful measure in this situation and may lead to interventions such as fresh frozen plasma that can actually worsen portal pressure and hence pressure-driven bleeding. With regard to procedure-related bleeding, we point out substantial differences in the definition of high-risk procedures and propose a new operational definition dependent on the applicability of local hemostatic measures, although this requires further investigation. The common occurrence of venous thrombosis in these patients requires careful consideration of hemostatic pathways and overall risk and benefit of intervention. The decision regarding anticoagulation therapy needs to be driven not only by a global assessment including history of non-portal hypertensive-related bleeding, but also by fall risk which can result in head trauma in patients prone to encephalopathy. This is probably best estimated by frailty but has yet to be adequately investigated. In the background of these concerns, several superimposed and complex conditions including infections and renal dysfunction should be taken into account. Inherited forms of thrombophilia in the setting of cirrhosis perhaps do not outweigh the thrombophilia inherent to liver disease but warrant further consideration.

Haemostasis in cirrhosis: Understanding destabilising factors during acute decompensation

Hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis are in a rebalanced haemostatic state due to a parallel decline in both pro- and anti-haemostatic pathways. However, this rebalanced haemostatic state is highly susceptible to perturbations and may easily tilt towards hypocoagulability and bleeding. Acute kidney injury, bacterial infections and sepsis, and progression from acute decompensation to acute-on-chronic liver failure are associated with additional alterations of specific haemostatic pathways and a higher risk of bleeding. Unfortunately, there is no single laboratory method that can accurately stratify an individual patient's bleeding risk and guide pre-procedural prophylaxis. A better understanding of haemostatic alterations during acute illness would lead to more rational and individualised management of hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis. This review will outline the latest findings on haemostatic alterations driven by acute kidney injury, bacterial infections/sepsis, and acute-on-chronic liver failure in these difficult-to-treat patients and provide evidence supporting more tailored management of bleeding risk.

Coagulopathy and hemostasis management in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Defining a dynamic spectrum across phases of care

Patients with acute and chronic liver disease present with a wide range of disease states and severity that may require liver transplantation (LT). Physiologic alterations occur that are dynamic throughout all phases of perioperative care, creating complex management scenarios that necessitate multidisciplinary clinical care. Specifically, alterations in hemostasis in liver disease can be pronounced and evolve with disease progression over time. Recent studies and society guidance address this emerging paradigm and offer recommendations to assist with hemostatic management in patients with liver disease. However, patients undergoing LT are unique and diverse, often with unstable disease that requires specialized approaches. Our aim is to provide a focused review of hemostatic management of the LT patient, distinguish unique aspects of the three main phases of care (before LT, perioperative, and after LT), and identify knowledge gaps and critical areas of future research.

Global hemostatic profiling in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and bacterial infections

Background & Aims

Bacterial infections in cirrhosis are associated with increased bleeding risk. To assess the factors responsible for bleeding tendency in patients with bacterial infections, we conducted a prospective study comparing all 3 aspects of hemostasis (platelets, coagulation, and fibrinolysis) in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis with vs. without bacterial infections.

Methods

Primary hemostasis assessment included whole blood platelet aggregation and von Willebrand factor (VWF). Coagulation assessment included procoagulant factors (fibrinogen, factor II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII), natural anticoagulants (protein C, protein S, antithrombin) and thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation test. Fibrinolysis assessment included fibrinolytic factors (plasminogen, t-PA, PAI-1, α2-AP, TAFIa/ai) and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP).

Results

Eighty patients with decompensated cirrhosis were included (40 with and 40 without bacterial infections). Severity of cirrhosis and platelet count were comparable between groups. At baseline, patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections had significantly lower whole blood platelet aggregation, without significant differences in VWF. Regarding coagulation, bacterial infections were associated with reduced procoagulant factors VII and XII, and a significant reduction of all natural anticoagulants. However, thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation was comparable between the study groups. Finally, although mixed potentially hypo-fibrinolytic (lower plasminogen) and hyper-fibrinolytic (higher t-PA) changes were present in bacterial infections, a comparable level of PAP was detected in both groups. Upon resolution of infection (n = 29/40), platelet aggregation further deteriorated whereas coagulation and fibrinolysis factors returned to levels observed in patients without bacterial infections.

Conclusion

In hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis, bacterial infections are associated with reduced whole blood platelet aggregation and a significant decrease of all natural anticoagulants, which may unbalance hemostasis and potentially increase the risk of both bleeding and thrombosis.

Lay summary

Bacterial infections are a common issue in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis (i.e. patients hospitalized due to severe complications of advanced chronic liver disease). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis who acquire infections may be at increased risk of bleeding complications following invasive procedures (that is a procedure in which the body is penetrated or entered, for instance by a needle or a tube). As bleeding complications in decompensated cirrhosis are associated with a high risk of further decompensation and death, there is an urgent need to understand the factors responsible for such increased bleeding tendency. Herein, we investigated the alterations of hemostasis (that is the physiological process responsible for clot formation and stability) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and bacterial infections. We found that development of bacterial infections in these patients is associated with alterations of hemostasis (particularly of platelets and clotting cascade) that may increase the risk of both bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Haemostatic alterations and management of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis frequently acquire complex changes in their haemostatic system including a decreased platelet count and decreased levels of various haemostatic proteins. Although historically patients with cirrhosis were thought to have a haemostasis-related bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that the haemostatic system of patients with cirrhosis remains in balance as a result of simultaneous changes in pro- and anti-haemostatic systems. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis has led to changes in clinical management, although firm evidence from well-designed clinical studies is largely lacking. For example, many invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and a prolonged prothrombin time are now performed without prophylaxis with fresh frozen plasma. Conversely, clinicians have become more aware of the need for anti-thrombotic therapy, even in those patients with abnormal routine coagulation tests. This paper will outline recent advances in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis. Among other topics, we will discuss the haemostatic status of acutely ill patients with cirrhosis, the various causes of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, and how best to prevent or treat bleeding. In addition, we will discuss the hypercoagulable features of patients with cirrhosis, new insights into the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis, and how best to prevent or treat thromboses.

Fibrin clot quality in acutely ill cirrhosis patients: Relation with outcome and improvement with coagulation factor concentrates

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with liver disease may acquire substantial changes in their hemostatic system, which are most pronounced in patients who are critically ill. Changes in the quality of the fibrin clot in critically ill patients have not been studied in detail. Here we assessed markers of fibrin clot quality and effects of coagulation factor concentrates in patients with acutely decompensated (AD) cirrhosis and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

We measured plasma levels of fibrinogen, factor XIII, prothrombin and performed thrombin generation assays in 52 AD patients, 58 ACLF patients and 40 controls. In addition, we examined the effects of coagulation factor concentrates on functional assays of fibrin quality.

RESULTS

We found increased thrombin generating capacity in both AD and ACLF in comparison with healthy controls. Plasma levels of prothrombin, fibrinogen, and factor XIII were lower in patients compared to controls, appeared lower in ACLF compared to AD patients, and were related to clinical outcomes. Fibrinogen concentrate, but not factor XIII or prothrombin complex concentrate, improved clot quality in vitro. Prothrombin complex concentrate increased the resistance of the clot to break down.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated elevated thrombin generation but decreased plasma levels of prothrombin, fibrinogen and FXIII in acutely ill patients with cirrhosis. In addition, we showed that fibrinogen concentrate and PCCs, but not factor XIII concentrate, improve clot properties in patient plasma. Whether there is true clinical benefit from coagulation factor concentrates in prevention or treatment of bleeding requires further study.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with liver diseases are at risk of bleeding, but mechanisms involved in this bleeding risk are incompletely understood. We studied components that determine the stability of the blood clot and found that concentrations of certain proteins involved in clot stability are present in low levels in acutely ill patients with liver disease. We furthermore demonstrated that some clinically available drugs improve the stability of blood clots from these patients in a test tube.

Acute kidney injury is associated with increased levels of circulating microvesicles in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Microvesicles (MVs) play a role in inflammation, coagulation, and vascular homeostasis in liver disease.

AIM

To characterize circulating plasma MVs profile in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

We measured the levels of total, endothelial, platelet, tissue factor (TF)+, leukocyte and hepatocyte MVs by new generation flow-cytometry in a prospective cohort of patients with decompensated cirrhosis with and without AKI.

RESULTS

Eighty patients with decompensated cirrhosis were recruited (40 each with and without AKI). Patients with cirrhosis with AKI had significantly higher calcein+ (total), endothelial, and platelet-MVs. Conversely, TF+, leukocyte, and hepatocyte-MVs were comparable between groups. Resolution of AKI was associated with significantly decreased total and endothelial-MVs that became comparable with those in patients without AKI. Platelet MVs significantly decreased but remained higher compared to patients without AKI. TF+MVs significantly decreased and became lower than patients without AKI. Leukocyte and hepatocyte-MVs remained unchanged. Creatinine (OR 4.3 [95%CI 1.8-10.7]), MELD (OR 1.13 [95%CI 1.02-1.27]), any bleeding (OR 9.07 [95%CI 2.02-40.6]), and hepatocyte-MVs (OR 1.04 [95%CI 1.02-1.07]) were independently associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

AKI worsened vascular and cellular homeostasis in patients with cirrhosis, particularly by inducing endothelial dysfunction and platelet activation. AKI did not worsen systemic inflammation and hepatocytes activation.

Treatment of bleeding in patients with liver disease

Patients with cirrhosis frequently have complex alterations in their hemostatic system. Although routine diagnostic tests of hemostasis in cirrhosis (platelet count, prothrombin time, fibrinogen level) are suggestive of a bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that these tests do not reflect hemostatic competence in this population. Rather, patients with cirrhosis appear to have a rebalanced hemostatic system with hypercoagulable elements. Therefore, routine correction of hemostasis laboratory values, for example by fresh frozen plasma or platelet concentrates, with the aim to avoid spontaneous or procedure-related bleeding is not indicated as is outlined in recent clinical guidance documents. However, little guidance on how to manage patients with cirrhosis that are actively bleeding is available. Here we present three common bleeding scenarios, variceal bleeding, post-procedural bleeding and bleeding in a critically ill cirrhosis patient, with specific management suggestions. As patients with cirrhosis generally have adequate hemostatic competence and as bleeding complications may be unrelated to hemostatic failure, prohemostatic therapy is not the first line of management in bleeding patients with cirrhosis, even in the presence of markedly abnormal platelet counts and/or prothrombin times. We provide a rationale for the restrictive approach to prohemostatic therapy in bleeding patients with cirrhosis.

Acute Kidney Injury in Decompensated Cirrhosis Is Associated With Both Hypo-coagulable and Hyper-coagulable Features

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent evidence suggests that acute kidney injury (AKI) is the main predictor of postparacentesis bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. To assess the factors responsible for bleeding tendency in AKI, we performed a prospective study comparing all three aspects of hemostasis (platelets, coagulation, and fibrinolysis) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis with and without AKI.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Primary hemostasis assessment included platelet aggregation and secretion (platelet function markers) and von Willebrand factor. Secondary hemostasis assessment included pro-coagulant (factor VIII and factor XIII) and anti-coagulant (protein C, protein S, and antithrombin) factors and thrombin generation. Tertiary hemostasis assessment included fibrinolytic factors and plasmin-antiplasmin complex. Eighty patients with decompensated cirrhosis were recruited (40 each with and without AKI). Severity of cirrhosis and platelet count were comparable between groups. Median serum creatinine was 1.8 mg/dL and 0.8 mg/dL in patients with and without AKI, respectively. At baseline, patients with cirrhosis and AKI had lower platelet aggregation and secretion, indicative of impaired platelet function (increased bleeding tendency), without differences in von Willebrand factor. Regarding coagulation factors, factor VIII was higher, whereas protein C, protein S, and antithrombin were all lower, which, together with increased thrombin generation, indicate hypercoagulability. In contrast, factor XIII was lower in AKI (increased bleeding tendency). Finally, while both hypofibrinolytic and hyperfibrinolytic changes were present in AKI, a higher plasmin-antiplasmin complex indicated a hyperfibrinolytic state. After AKI resolution (n = 23 of 40), platelet function and coagulation improved to levels observed in patients with cirrhosis patients without AKI; however, fibrinolysis remained hyperactivated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, AKI is associated with both hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable features that can potentially increase the risk of both bleeding and thrombosis.

The Spectrum of Disease Severity in Cirrhosis and Its Implications for Hemostasis

Bleeding and thrombosis are both common complications that patients with advanced liver disease experience. While hemostatic pathways remain largely intact with cirrhosis, this balance can quickly shift in the direction of bleeding or clotting in an unpredictable manner. A growing body of literature is attempting to shed light on difficult scenarios that clinicians often face, ranging from predicting and mitigating bleeding risk in those who need invasive procedures to determining the best strategies to manage both bleeding and thrombotic complications when they occur. Studies examining hemostasis in those with advanced liver disease, however, often include heterogeneous cohorts with varied methodology. While these studies often select a cohort of all types and degrees of cirrhosis, emerging evidence suggests significant differences in underlying systemic inflammation and hemostatic abnormalities among specific phenotypes of liver disease, ranging from compensated cirrhosis to decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure. It is paramount that future studies account for these differing disease severities if we hope to address the many critical knowledge gaps in this field.