Pre-procedural use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists in cirrhosis and severe thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cytopenias in Autoimmune Liver Diseases-A Review

Autoimmune liver diseases (AiLDs), including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), are immune-mediated conditions associated with significant hepatic and systemic manifestations. Among these, cytopenias-defined as reductions in blood cell counts affecting single or multiple lineages-represent a clinically important, though often under-recognized, complication. Cytopenias in AiLDs arise from diverse mechanisms, including immune-mediated destruction, hypersplenism due to portal hypertension, bone marrow suppression, and nutritional deficiencies. These abnormalities can exacerbate bleeding, infections, or fatigue, complicating the disease course and impacting therapeutic strategies. Immune-mediated cytopenias, such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and autoimmune neutropenia (AIN), are more frequently associated with AIH, whereas cytopenias in PBC and PSC are largely attributed to hypersplenism. Diagnostic evaluation involves a systematic approach combining clinical history, laboratory testing (e.g., complete blood counts, Coombs tests, and nutritional assessments), imaging studies, and bone marrow evaluation in complex cases. Treatment strategies aim to address the underlying cause of cytopenias, including immunosuppressive therapy for autoimmune mechanisms, beta-blockers or splenectomy for hypersplenism, and supplementation for nutritional deficiencies. Challenges include distinguishing between immune- and hypersplenism-related cytopenias, managing drug-induced cytopenias, and optimizing care in transplant candidates. The recently recognized IgG4-related disease, often mimicking cholestatic AiLDs, adds another layer of complexity, given its association with autoimmune cytopenias and hypersplenism. This review aims to act as a guide for the clinician dealing with patients with AiLDs with respect to the occurrence of cytopenias, with a specific focus on pathophysiology and management of these cytopenias. Furthermore, there need to be enhanced multidisciplinary discussions about those patients between the hematologists and hepatologists, with a maintenance of a high index of suspicion for the rarer causes of cytopenias in AiLDs on the part of the treating physician, and there is a need for further studies to elucidate the mechanisms behind the occurrence of cytopenias in AiLDs.

Prediction and prevention of post-procedural bleedings in patients with cirrhosis

Although post-procedural bleedings are infrequent in patients with cirrhosis, they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, predicting and preventing such bleedings is important. Established predictors of post-procedural bleeding include high-bleeding risk procedure, severe cirrhosis and high body mass index; prognostic value of anemia, acute kidney injury and bacterial infection is more uncertain. While prothrombin time and international normalized ratio do not predict post-procedural bleeding, some evidence suggests that platelet count, whole blood thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic tests may be helpful in this context. Prevention of postprocedural bleeding involves careful management of antithrombotic drugs during the periprocedural period. Patients with cirrhosis present unique challenges due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antithrombotic drugs, but there is a lack of dedicated studies specifically focused on this patient population. Guidelines for periprocedural management of antithrombotic drugs developed for patients without liver disease are thus applied to those with cirrhosis. Some technical aspects may decrease the risk of post-procedural bleeding, namely ultrasoundguidance, opting for transjugular route rather than percutaneous route, and the level of expertise of the operator. The effectiveness of platelet transfusions or thrombopoietin-receptor agonists remains uncertain. Transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma, of fibrinogen, and administration of tranexamic acid are not recommended for reducing post-procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. In conclusion, prediction of post-procedural requires a global approach taking into account the patients characteristics, the risk of the procedure, and the platelet count. There is little data to support prophylactic correction of hemostasis, and dedicated studies are needed.

Correction of Thrombocytopenia before Elective Surgery / Invasive Procedures in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis (Experts’ Agreement)

Introduction. As a result of portal hypertension (sequestration of platelets in an enlarged spleen) and liver failure (decreased production of thrombopoietin in the liver) in liver cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia develops, which is associated with the risk of periprocedural/perioperative bleeding complications. There are still unresolved questions regarding risk stratification of bleeding complications, the prognostic role of thrombocytopenia, as well as the need for treatment of thrombocytopenia and its methods.

Materials and methods. The Russian Scientific Liver Society selected a panel of experts in the field of therapeutic and surgical hepatology, hematology, transfusion medicine to make reasoned statements and recommendations on the issue of treatment of thrombocytopenia before elective surgery / invasive procedures in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Results. Relevant clinical issues were determined based on the PICO principle (patient or population, intervention, comparison, outcome). The Delphi panel made five questions and gave reasoned answers, framed as ‘clinical practice recommendations and statements’ with evidence-based comments. The questions and statements were based on the results of search and critical analysis of medical literature using keywords in English- and Russian-language databases. The formulated questions could be combined into four categories: bleeding risk stratification, the prognostic value of thrombocytopenia, the necessity and methods of thrombocytopenia drug correction, and bleeding risk reduction.

Conclusions. The results of experts' work are directly related to high-quality management of patients with liver cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia, who have scheduled invasive procedures/surgery. Thus, this recommendations and statements can be used in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist (TPO-RA) in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Context: The TPO-receptor agonist (TPO-RA) has been extensively studied for its use in thrombocytopenia. Objectives: We aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of TPO-RA in chronic liver disease patients. Methods: The study population consisted of adults with chronic liver disease. The intervention was TPO-RA. The primary outcome was the efficacy of TPO-RA (increase in thrombocyte levels and likelihood of avoiding thrombocyte transfusion pre-operatively), while the secondary outcome was the safety of TPO-RA. The demographics of the study and the usage of TPO-RA medications were used to classify the research. Results: This review consisted of 1529 chronic liver disease patients who received TPO-RA and 911 who received a comparator (placebo or thrombocyte transfusion). The TPO-RA significantly increased thrombocyte levels by 34.59 × 109/L (P < 0.00001). The use of TPO-RA pre-procedure reduced the likelihood of pre-operative platelet transfusion and up to seven days following the scheduled procedure by 88% (P < 0.00001). TPO-receptor agonist was not associated with all-cause mortality (P = 0.77) or an increase in thrombosis events, with a pooled OR of 1.36 (P = 0.43). According to a meta-regression analysis, the population may explain the heterogeneity. Subsequent leave-one-out sensitivity analysis of the thrombocyte level change after TPO-RA revealed that no single study was accountable for the heterogeneity of thrombocyte level changes. Conclusions: The use of TPO-RA increases the thrombocyte levels of chronic liver disease patients and reduces the odds of needing thrombocyte transfusion pre-operatively. TPO-receptor agonist is also safe to use, with no increase in mortality risk or thrombosis risk.

The evolving knowledge on primary hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis: A comprehensive review

Patients with cirrhosis develop complex alterations in primary hemostasis that include both hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable features. This includes thrombocytopenia, multiple alterations of platelet function, and increased plasma levels of von Willebrand factor. Contrary to the historical view that platelet dysfunction in cirrhosis might be responsible for an increased bleeding tendency, the current theory posits a rebalanced hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis. Severe thrombocytopenia is not indicative of the bleeding risk in patients undergoing invasive procedures and does not dictate per se the need for pre-procedural prophylaxis. A more comprehensive and individualized risk assessment should combine hemostatic impairment, the severity of decompensation and systemic inflammation, and the presence of additional factors that may impair platelet function, such as acute kidney injury and bacterial infections. Although there are multiple, complex alterations of platelet function in cirrhosis, their net effect is not yet fully understood. More investigations evaluating the association between alterations of platelet function and bleeding/thrombosis may improve risk stratification in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Besides hemostasis, the assessment of von Willebrand factor Ag and ADP-induced, whole-blood platelet aggregation normalized by platelet count (VITRO score and PLT ratio) are promising biomarkers to predict the risk of hepatic decompensation and survival in both compensated and decompensated patients. Further investigations into the in vivo interplay between platelets, circulating blood elements, and endothelial cells may help advance our understanding of cirrhotic coagulopathy. Here, we review the complex changes in platelets and primary hemostasis in cirrhosis and their potential clinical implications.

How to manage hemostasis in patients with liver disease during interventions

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease (CLD) often need procedures to both treat and prevent complications of portal hypertension such as ascites or gastrointestinal bleeding. Abnormal results for hemostatic tests, such as prolonged prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and/or thrombocytopenia, are commonly encountered, raising concerns about increased bleeding risk and leading to transfusion to attempt to correct prior to interventions. However hemostatic markers are poor predictors of bleeding risk in CLD, and routine correction, particularly with fresh frozen plasma and routine platelet transfusions, should be avoided. This narrative review discusses the hemostatic management of patients with CLD using 2 case descriptions.

Real-world use of avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure

The phase 4 observational cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure. Patients with CLD may have thrombocytopenia, increasing the risk of periprocedural bleeding. Prophylactic platelet transfusions used to reduce this risk have limitations including lack of efficacy and transfusion-associated reactions. Prophylactic thrombopoietin receptor agonists have been shown to increase platelet counts and decrease platelet transfusions. Effectiveness was assessed by change from baseline in platelet count and proportion of patients needing a platelet transfusion. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Of 50 patients enrolled, 48 were unique patients and 2 patients were enrolled twice for separate procedures. The mean (standard deviation) change in platelet count from baseline to procedure day was 41.1 × 109/L (33.29 × 109/L, n = 38), returning to near baseline at the post-procedure visit (change from baseline -1.9 × 109/L [15.03 × 109/L], n = 11). The proportion of patients not requiring a platelet transfusion after baseline and up to 7 days following the procedure was 98% (n = 49). Serious AEs were infrequent (n = 2 [4%]). No treatment-emergent AEs were considered related to avatrombopag. There were 2 mild bleeding events, no thromboembolic events or deaths, and no patients received rescue procedures (excluding transfusions). This study found that in a real-world setting, treatment with avatrombopag was well tolerated, increased the mean platelet count by procedure day, and reduced the need for intraoperative platelet transfusions in patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia.

Practice-Changing Updates in Perioperative Medicine Literature 2020-2021: A Systematic Review

Recent literature published in a variety of multidisciplinary journals has significantly influenced perioperative patient care. Distilling and synthesizing the clinically important literature can be challenging. This review summarizes practice-changing articles in perioperative medicine from the years 2020 and 2021. Embase, Ovid, and EBM reviews databases were queried from January 2020 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were original research, systematic review, meta-analysis, and important guidelines. Exclusion criteria were conference abstracts, case reports, letters, protocols, pediatric and obstetric articles, and cardiac surgery literature. Two authors reviewed each reference using the Distiller SR systematic review software (Evidence Partners Inc., Ottawa, Ont., Canada). A modified Delphi technique was used to identify 9 practice-changing articles. We identified another 13 articles for tabular summaries, as they were relevant to an internist's perioperative evaluation of a patient. Articles were selected to highlight the clinical implications of new evidence in each field. We have also pointed out limitations of each study and clinical populations where they are not applicable.

Periprocedural management of abnormal coagulation parameters and thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH

Prolonged prothrombin time and thrombocytopenia are common in patients with cirrhosis. These parameters do not reflect the overall hemostatic rebalance or bleeding risk in the periprocedural setting; however, attempts to correct these parameters remain frequent. We review the literature on periprocedural bleeding risk, bleeding risk factors, and the risk and benefits of hemostatic interventions in patients with cirrhosis. We provide guidance recommendations on evaluating bleeding risk in this patient group and management of hemostatic abnormalities in the periprocedural setting.