1
|
Varnier R, Toullec C, Philonenko S, Dupré A, Artru P, Hafliger E, Drouillard A, Torregrosa C, Pernot S, McLellan P, Lecomte T, Moulin V, Lécaille C, Touchefeu Y, Locher C, Taieb J, Coutzac C. Triplet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO multicenter real-world study. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:1605-1613. [PMID: 38403514 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior trials validated triplet chemotherapy (Tri-CT) with bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but real-world data are scarce and practices remain heterogeneous. AIMS To evaluate Tri-CT +/- bevacizumab efficacy and safety, and to identify factors influencing treatment decisions. METHODS The COLOTRIP retrospective study enrolled mCRC patients treated from 2014 to 2019 in 14 French centers. RESULTS Of 299 patients (81% PS 0-1, 58% RAS-mutated and 19% BRAF-mutated), 51% received Tri-CT and 49% Tri-CT + bevacizumab. Metastatic disease was classified as resectable (6.5%), potentially resectable (40%), and unresectable (54%). Bevacizumab use was associated with primary tumor location, mutational status and number of metastases. Median overall survival was 33.5 months in the Tri-CT group and 23.9 months in the Tri-CT + bevacizumab group, with median progression-free survival being 14.5 and 11.4 months. After adjusting for initial characteristics, no difference in survival was noted. Around 30% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights several factors influencing Tri-CT use +/- bevacizumab decision and confirms the real-world good oncological outcomes and tolerability of these regimens in mCRC patients. Our results suggest that Tri-CT alone may by an appropriate option for specific subgroups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Varnier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE, Inserm U1290), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - C Toullec
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Institut du Cancer Avignon-Provence, Avignon, France
| | - S Philonenko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - A Dupré
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Artru
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - E Hafliger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - A Drouillard
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - C Torregrosa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Pernot
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - P McLellan
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - T Lecomte
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - V Moulin
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
| | - C Lécaille
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France
| | - Y Touchefeu
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - C Locher
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de Meaux, Meaux, France
| | - J Taieb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris-Cité University, SIRIC CARPEM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Paris, France
| | - C Coutzac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Association des Gastro-Entérologues Oncologues (AGEO), France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Unal OU, Akay S, Semiz HS, Keser M, Demir G, Capar ZG, Demirciler E, Yavuzsen T, Degirmencioglu S, Demir B, Oktay E, Gulmez MD, Arayici ME. Survival outcomes according to the tumor location and prognostic factor in metastatic rectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1363305. [PMID: 38947890 PMCID: PMC11211582 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1363305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Prognostic factors of metastatic rectal cancer are not well known. We aim to determine prognostic factors affecting survival for metastatic rectal cancer patients and also to investigate the effect of tumor localization on overall survival. METHODS Metastatic rectal cancer patients who received treatment in 5 different centers between 2012 and 2022 were included. Prognostic factors for survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The statistical methods included Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Log-rank test, and Cox regression model. RESULTS A total of 283 patients with metastatic rectal cancer were included in the study. The median OS was not significantly different among the three groups (upper rectum 30.1 months, middle rectum 28.3 months, and low rectum cancer 24.8 months; log-rank p = 0.25). In univariate analysis, Grade 3, ECOG performance status 2, the presence of multiple metastatic sites, the presence of KRAS mutation, the presence of liver metastases, the presence of nonregional lymph node metastases, and the presence of bone metastases were significant predictors of poor survival. In multivariate analysis, Grade 3, ECOG performance status 2, and the presence of multiple metastatic sites were determined as indicators of worse prognosis. CONCLUSION Our findings, primary tumor location did not affect survival in metastatic rectal cancer. The most important factors affecting survival were multiple metastatic sites, tumor grade, and ECOG performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olcun Umit Unal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Izmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Seval Akay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Huseyin Salih Semiz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Murat Keser
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Gonul Demir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Zeliha Guzeloz Capar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Erkut Demirciler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Tugba Yavuzsen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
| | | | - Bilgin Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ataturk State Hospital, Aydin, Türkiye
| | - Esin Oktay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Türkiye
| | | | - Mehmet Emin Arayici
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|