Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in non-cirrhotic non-neoplastic patients with portal vein thrombosis: A single-centre experience

Anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis increases bleeding risk without improving outcomes

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Treatment guidelines on anticoagulation (AC) to treat splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) after acute pancreatitis (AP) are not well-established. This research examines the efficacy and safety of AC in SVT.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the demographics, clinical progression, radiologic findings, interventions, and outcomes of patients with AP between 2018 and 2022 at a single tertiary care center. The primary and secondary outcomes were development of SVT in AP and effects of AC, respectively.

RESULTS

897 patients developed AP (average 50.5 years old, 46% female, 20% moderately severe AP, 4% severe AP), of whom 4.8% developed SVT. SVT was associated with recurrent and chronic pancreatitis (28%, p = 0.021 and 37%, p < 0.001) and malignancy (21%, p < 0.001). SVT was associated with severe pancreatitis courses (12% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and an increase in six-month mortality (14% vs. 4%, p = 0.022). AC was used for 47% of patients with SVT. However, AC did not prevent SVT sequelae, including gastroesophageal varices formation (p = 1), variceal hemorrhage (p = 0.68), or splenic infarction (p = 1), and did not improve survival (p = 0.19). While AC did not improve outcomes, it was associated with bleeding episodes in 50% of patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of patients who develop SVT after AP receive AC despite no reduction in adverse events or mortality. Additionally, half of patients receiving AC experience bleeding complications. The limited evidence presented in this study suggests that the risks of AC for SVT in AP may outweigh its benefits and highlights the need for future studies in larger prospective cohorts.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients Without Cirrhosis: Current Practical Approaches and Treatment Strategies

Portal vein thrombosis in non-cirrhotic individuals, although uncommon, is an increasingly explored condition that affects mainly young people, consequently representing a significant disease burden. Reports primarily including western European populations have recently shed light regarding the pathophysiology, risk factors, natural history, treatment, and prognosis of this entity. Underlying predisposing conditions are documented in ~70% of cases, encompassing local risk factors, inherited and acquired thrombophilia, cancer, and systemic inflammatory conditions. Non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis can cause significant portal hypertension in the acute setting, but, more frequently, significant portal hypertension-related complications arise when the condition becomes chronic and portosystemic collaterals develop, increasing the risk for variceal bleeding and ascites. The diagnostic approach to screen for underlying thrombophilia remains a challenge, and recommendations in this regard, although scarce and backed by scarce evidence, have changed notably in the last years, leaning toward a universal screen in patients who develop this condition without a clear provoking factor. Recently, studies have shown that long-term anticoagulation may be appropriate even in the absence of clear provoking factors or underlying thrombophilia. Future studies should address which patients may benefit from this approach, which patients may not need it, and what the most appropriate strategies are to approach patients who do not recover portal vein patency with anticoagulation to further prevent portal hypertension-related complications.

Clinical spectrum and long-term outcomes of non-cirrhotic portal venous system thrombosis in Hispanic population

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Portal venous system thrombosis (PVT) outside the setting of cirrhosis is uncommon with limited information available about the etiological and clinical characteristics across varied racial and ethnic groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examines the long-term outcomes of non-cirrhotic, Hispanic adults diagnosed with PVT at a single center in Mexico City between January 2000 and August 2023. Patients with conditions predisposing to PVT were excluded.

RESULTS

We included 100 Hispanic adults diagnosed with non-cirrhotic PVT. Thrombophilia was identified in 49 %, with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) being the most prevalent thrombophilia (23 %), followed by JAK2 mutation (18 %). Chronic PVT, observed in 70 % of cases, predominantly affected the portal vein (50 %), followed by porto-mesenteric (41 %) and porto-splenic (9 %) territories. At diagnosis, 55 % had esophageal varices. Anticoagulant therapy was administered to over half of the patients for >12 months. Over a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year risk of re-thrombosis was 24 %, and the 5-year risk of variceal bleeding (VB) was 45 %. The 4-year overall survival (OS) was 97 %. Comparative analysis between thrombophilia-associated and idiopathic PVT did not reveal significant differences in VB, re-thrombosis, and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the unique clinical profile of Hispanic patients with non-cirrhotic PVT, highlighting a high prevalence of APS and substantial risks of VB. These findings contribute to a better understanding of PVT in Hispanics and emphasize the importance of tailored management strategies. The generalizability of our results may be limited by the thrombophilia testing approach, the excluded populations, and its retrospective, single center nature.

Analysis of Related Influencing Factors of Portal Vein Thrombosis After Hepatectomy

Purpose: To analyze the related factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 1029 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2018 to March 2023, including PVT group (n = 24) and non-PVT group (n = 1005). The general and clinical data of the two groups were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the clinical information of the two groups. Result: The proportion of preoperative hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, ascites, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative hemostatic drugs, preoperative prothrombin time, intraoperative portal occlusion time, operation time, international standardized ratio of prothrombin time on the first day after operation, D-dimer on the first day after operation, fibrin degradation products on the first day after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the PVT group were all higher than those in the control group (P < .05). The preoperative platelet and albumin in the PVT group were lower than those in the control group. Intraoperative blood transfusion, liver cirrhosis, ascites, international standardized ratio of postoperative prothrombin time, postoperative fibrin degradation products, hilar occlusion time and albumin were independent risk factors for PVT. Conclusion: There are many influencing factors of PVT after hepatectomy. Clinical intervention should be taken to reduce PVT. Clinical Registration Number: K2023-348.