Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic collections with dedicated metal stents: A nationwide, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison

Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fluid Collection and Role of Endoscopy: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Postoperative fluid collections (POFCs) after abdominal surgeries, particularly pancreatic surgeries, are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates and were historically managed with surgical re-exploration and drainage. In particular, postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (PPFCs) are the most common complications after pancreatic surgery resulting from pancreatic leaks. They occur in up to 50% of cases, and approximately 10% of them need to be drained to avoid further sequelae. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage of PPFCs represents the first-line treatment nowadays, but many aspects are still debated. Methods: We describe a retrospective case series of patients from multiple Italian centers who underwent EUS-guided drainage (EUS-D) of POFCs, aiming to provide data on the efficacy and safety of this procedure, supported by a review of the existing literature on this topic. The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and the secondary outcomes were the type and rate of adverse events (AEs) and the rate of recurrence. Results: A total of 47 patients were included. The procedure demonstrated a technical success rate of 98% (46/47) and a clinical success rate of 96% (45/47). The rate of AEs was 11% (5/47), represented by bleeding (3/5), stent occlusion (1/5), and buried syndrome (1/5). Conclusions: Management of POFCs has shifted over time towards an endoscopic approach with optimal efficacy and safety.

Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has variable outcomes according to the type of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) used. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data.Online databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS, were searched from inception to 30 January 2024. The outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and the need for endoscopic necrosectomy. Pooled estimates stratified by the type of stent (Axios, Nagi, or Spaxus), severity of bleeding, and type of PFC were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I 2 values.37 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled outcomes (95%CIs) for PFC drainage using the Axios, Nagi, and Spaxus stents, respectively, were: technical success 97.7% (96.4%-98.8%), 96.9% (94.6%-98.5%), 98.2% (94.4%-99.9%); clinical success 90.9% (88.7%-92.8%), 88.5% (79.9%-95.0%), 93.5% (91.0%-95.6%); total AEs 20.4% (16.6%-24.6%), 17.1% (8.3%-28.3%), 7.6% (3.6%-13.0); migration 4.2% (2.9%-5.7%), 7.8% (4.1%-12.4%), 0.9% (0.1%-2.8%); overall bleeding 7.0% (4.9%-9.5%), 4.4% (2.2%-7.4%), 1.8% (0.8%-3.3%); and endoscopic necrosectomy 54.5% (38.9%-69.7%), 16.0% (11.4%-21.3%), 19.9% (6.6%-38.1%). In terms of severity, moderate-severe bleeding was most common with all three stents. AEs were higher in patients with walled-off necrosis compared with pseudocysts. Substantial-to-considerable heterogeneity (I 2 >60%) was present for total AEs for all of the stents.Our study shows good technical and clinical success rates with all three LAMSs for EUS-guided PFC drainage. Total AEs and bleeding were highest with the Axios stent and lowest with the Spaxus. Stent migration was highest with the Nagi stent and lowest with the Spaxus.