Efficacy of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Does liver disease etiology have a role?

Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on survival outcomes among cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy

Background

The efficacy of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been studied separately in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in these patients, in relation to baseline values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Methods

We divided 57 atezolizumab-bevacizumab-treated HCC patients according to baseline NLR (>3: NLR-H, ≤3: NLR-L) and studied overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 4 groups: group A, non-cirrhotic/NLR-L; group B, non-cirrhotic/NLR-H; group C, cirrhotic/NLR-L; and group D, cirrhotic/NLR-H.

Results

The 4 groups were comparable except for etiology, ALBI grade, macrovascular invasion, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage and prior therapy. Median OS and PFS were 30, 10, 12 and 5 months, and 14, 4, 8 and 2 months, for groups A, B, C, D, respectively (P<0.001). By Cox regression, cirrhotic/NLR-H patients showed significantly worse OS and PFS. Cirrhotic/NLR-L patients had better OS (12 vs. 5 months, P=0.002) and PFS (8 vs. 2 months, P=0.028) compared to cirrhotic/NLR-H. NLR was significantly correlated with OS (P=0.015). Non-cirrhotic/NLR-L patients had better OS (30 vs. 10 months, P=0.006) and PFS (15 vs. 4 months, P=0.01) compared to non-cirrhotic/NLR-H patients. Prior therapy was significantly correlated with better OS (30 vs. 8 months, P<0.001) and PFS (24 vs. 4 months, P<0.001) in non-cirrhotic patients.

Conclusions

Cirrhotic/NLR-H HCC patients presented the worst survival. NLR is an independent risk factor for worse survival in cirrhotic patients. Prior therapy is the only factor significantly correlated with OS and PFS in non-cirrhotic patients.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Response Rates, Adverse Events, and Predictors of Response

Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines recommend antiangiogenic agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. We present our experience of treating HCC patients with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab, their response rates, adverse events, survival, and response and survival predictors. Methods: This retrospective analysis included HCC patients diagnosed at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India between July 2021 and April 2024 and receiving at least one dose of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), comprising complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), as per mRECIST criteria. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and predictors of response and survival. Results: Sixty-three patients were analyzed {mean age: 56.0 + 12.7 years; 82.5% males}. Forty-three (68.2%) patients had BCLC stage C HCC. Thirty-five (55.5%) patients belonged to Child-Pugh class A and 28 (44.5%) belonged to Child-Pugh class B. At 1 year, OS was 39% and PFS was 27%. Among 43 patients with data for radiological response, ORR was 48.8% (CR-9.3% and PR-39.5%) and DCR was 62.7% with stable disease (SD) in 13.9% of patients. PD occurred in 37.2% of patients. AFP response predicted radiological response, while Child-Pugh class and BCLC stage predicted survival. Adverse events were reported in 49.2% of patients. Conclusions: Our study shows slightly lower survival than previous studies with Child-Pugh class being the most important determinant of survival. AFP response predicts radiological response and not survival.

Isoxazole-based molecules restore NK cell immune surveillance in hepatocarcinogenesis by targeting TM4SF5 and SLAMF7 linkage

Dynamic communication between hepatocytes and the environment is critical in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. Clinical immunotherapy against HCC is currently unsatisfactory and needs more systemic considerations, including the identification of new biomarkers and immune checkpoints. Transmembrane 4 L six family member 5 (TM4SF5) is known to promote HCC, but it remains unclear how cancerous hepatocytes avoid immune surveillance and whether avoidance can be blocked. We investigated how TM4SF5-mediated hepatic tumorigenesis avoids surveillance by natural killer (NK) cells, which are prevalent in the liver, and whether the avoidance can be blocked by anti-TM4SF5 agents. We used comprehensive structure activity relationship analysis to identify TM4SF5-specific isoxazole (TSI)-based small molecules that inhibit TM4SF5-mediated effects. TM4SF5 expressed by hepatocytes reduced NK cell cytotoxicity by downregulating stimulatory ligands/receptors, including signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7). TM4SF5 bound SLAMF7 depending on N-glycosylation and caused intracellular trafficking of SLAMF7 from the plasma membrane to lysosomes for degradation. TSI treatments in cell lines and animal models of HCC blocked this binding, intracellular trafficking, and downregulation, resulting in higher levels of stimulatory NK cell ligands. In mouse xenograft models, TSI treatment abrogated HCC development by increasing the abundance and dispersion of Slamf7-positive cells in liver tissues, recapitulating the phenotype of Tm4sf5-knockout mice and indicating TSI-mediated restoration of NK cell surveillance. These findings suggest that TSIs can inhibit TM4SF5-mediated liver carcinogenesis by increasing NK cell surveillance.

Current Treatment Methods in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent malignant tumour worldwide. Depending on the stage of the tumour and liver function, a variety of treatment options are indicated. Traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy are ineffective against HCC; however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for advanced HCC. On the other hand, liver transplantation is recommended in the early stages of the disease. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like lenvatinib and sorafenib, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy, including pembrolizumab, bevacizumab, tremelimumab, durvalumab, camrelizumab, and atezolizumab, are other treatment options for advanced HCC. Moreover, to maximize outcomes for patients with HCC, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) along with targeted therapies or local ablative therapy is being investigated. This review elaborates on the current status of HCC treatment, outlining the most recent clinical study results and novel approaches.

The load of hepatitis B virus reduces the immune checkpoint inhibitors efficiency in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Introduction

Chronic viral infection may lead to an immunosuppressive microenvironment, whereas the association between virus-related indicators and treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) therapy remains a topic of debate. We aim to investigate the influence of hepatitis virus on the ICI efficiency in HCC patients through a meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science until 14 July 2024 to identify cohort studies involving ICIs treatments in HCC patients. We extracted data from the literature related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, baseline HBV load, and antiviral therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered as the primary endpoints, while objective response rate (ORR) was regarded as a secondary endpoint.

Results

We included 55 cohort studies published between 2019 and 2024, involving a patient population of 7180 individuals. Summarized hazard ratio (HR) comparing HBV infection with non-HBV infection in the context of ICIs therapy revealed no significant association between HBV infection and either mortality risk or progression risk with the pooled HR for OS of 1.04(95%CI: 0.93-1.16, P=0.483) and the pooled HR for PFS of 1.07(95%CI:0.96-1.20, P=0.342). HBV infected patients with HCC may have better tumor response than non-HBV infected patients receiving ICIs with the combined relative risk(RR) for ORR was 1.94 (95%CI: 1.12-3.38, P=0.002). High baseline HBV load is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with HCC who receive ICIs with the pooled HR for OS was 1.74 (95%CI: 1.27-2.37, P=0.001), thereby antiviral therapy has the potential to significantly enhance prognostic outcomes with the pooled HR for OS was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.14-0.42 P<0.001) and the pooled HR for PFS was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.33-0.89 P=0.014).

Conclusion

In individuals with HCC who received ICIs, there was no notable link found between HBV or HCV infection and prognosis. However, HBV infection showed a connection with improved tumor response. A higher initial HBV load is linked to worse survival results in HCC patients undergoing ICIs treatment and antiviral therapy can significantly improve its prognosis.

Overall Survival in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib or Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy: Findings from the National Veterans Health Administration Database

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated comparative overall survival (OS) of United States veterans with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving first-line (1L) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib or lenvatinib, overall and across racial and ethnic groups. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with uHCC who initiated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (post-2020) or sorafenib or lenvatinib (post-2018) were identified from the Veterans Health Administration National Corporate Data Warehouse (1 January 2017-31 December 2022). Patient characteristics were evaluated in the year prior to 1L treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression methods were used to compare OS starting from treatment between cohorts, both overall and by race and ethnicity. Results: Among the 1874 patients included, 405 (21.6%) received 1L atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 1016 (54.2%) received sorafenib, and 453 (24.2%) received lenvatinib, with a median follow-up time of 8.5, 7.6, and 8.2 months, respectively. Overall, patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had longer unadjusted median OS (12.8 [95% CI: 10.6, 17.1] months) than patients receiving sorafenib (8.0 [7.1, 8.6] months) or lenvatinib (9.5 [7.8, 11.4] months; both log-rank p < 0.001). After adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with a reduced risk of death by 30% vs. sorafenib (adjusted HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82]) and by 26% vs. lenvatinib (0.74 [0.62, 0.88]; both p < 0.001). OS trends in the White, Black, and Hispanic patient cohorts were consistent with that of the overall population. Conclusions: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with uHCC, both overall and across racial and ethnic subgroups.

Clinicogenomic predictors of outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations extend overall survival (OS) while anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy is non-inferior to sorafenib in treatment-naïve, patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Clinicogenomic features are posited to influence patient outcomes.

METHODS

The primary objective of this retrospective study was to define the clinical, pathologic, and genomic factors associated with outcomes to ICI therapy in patients with HCC. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced HCC treated with ICI at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2012 to 2022 were included. Association between clinical, pathological, and genomic characteristics were assessed with univariable and multivariable Cox regression model for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and forty-two patients were treated with ICI-based therapy. Patients were predominantly male (82%) with virally mediated HCC (53%) and Child Pugh A score (70%). Median follow-up was 28 months (0.5-78.4). Median PFS for those treated in 1st line, 2nd line and ≥ 3rd line was 4.9 (range: 2.9-6.2), 3.1 (2.3-4.0), and 2.5 (2.1-4.0) months, respectively. Median OS for those treated in 1st line, 2nd line, and ≥ 3rd line was 16 (11-22), 7.5 (6.4-11), and 6.4 (4.6-26) months, respectively. Poor liver function and performance status associated with worse PFS and OS, while viral hepatitis C was associated with favorable outcome. Genetic alterations were not associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathologic factors were the major determinates of outcomes for patients with advanced HCC treated with ICI. Molecular profiling did not aid in stratification of ICI outcomes. Future studies should explore alternative biomarkers such as the level of immune activation or the pretreatment composition of the immune tumor microenvironment.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide with an average five-year survival rate in the US of 19.6%. With the advent of HBV and HCV treatment and prevention, along with the rising rates of obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic syndrome are set to overtake infectious causes as the most common cause of HCC. While surgical resection and transplantation can be curative when amenable, the disease is most commonly unresectable on presentation, and other treatment approaches are the mainstay of therapy. In these patients, locoregional therapies have evolved as a vital tool in both palliation for advanced disease and as a bridge to surgical resection and transplantation. In this review, we will be exploring the primary locoregional therapies for HCC in patients with NAFLD, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), bland transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and percutaneous ablation.

Toripalimab Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

This phase II, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus bevacizumab for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with advanced HCC received toripalimab 240 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints included safety and tolerability and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled between April 17, 2020, and December 11, 2020. As assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, the ORR was 31.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5-45.6] and the lower bound of the 95% CI was above the prespecified boundary of 10%. The independent review committee (IRC) assessed ORR according to the modified RECIST (mRECIST), which was 46.3% (95% CI, 32.6-60.4). The median progression-free survival was 8.5 (95% CI, 5.5-11.0) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 to not evaluable) as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 and IRC according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the 12- and 24-month OS rates were 77.3% and 63.5%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 27 patients (50.0%). The most common TEAEs were proteinuria (59.3%), hypertension (38.9%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (33.3%), increased amylase (29.6%), decreased platelet count (27.8%), and increased bilirubin levels (27.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Toripalimab plus bevacizumab showed a favorable efficacy and safety profile, supporting further studies on this combination regimen as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

Non-small cell lung cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: does non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have an effect?

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy based on the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is one of the standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-alcoholic fatty liver Disease (NAFLD) has demonstrated predictive value for response to immunotherapy in non-lung cancer types. Our study investigated the effect of NAFLD on the efficacy of real-life use of ICIs for patients with stage III / IV NSCLC.

METHODS

The clinical and imaging data of patients with stage III / IV NSCLC who were first admitted to Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from March 2020 to July 2022 were retrospectively collected to ensure that they underwent at least one CT scan before treatment. A total of 479 patients were divided into the NAFLD group (Liver/Spleen density ratio ≤ 1) and the non-NAFLD group (Liver/Spleen density ratio > 1) by measuring the baseline liver and spleen CT value. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the patients were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with NAFLD and 361 patients without NAFLD were included in the study. Patients with NAFLD tended to have higher BMI and higher total bilirubin compared to patients without NAFLD. The median duration of follow-up in the study was 22 m (IQR, 17-29 m). Both of 2 groups had a higher DCR (94% vs. 92%, p = 0.199) and ORR (38.1% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.452) respectively. There was no difference in efficacy between the two groups. In univariate analysis, NAFLD had no significant effect on PFS (p = 0.785) and OS (p = 0.851). Surprisingly, the presence of hypertension was observed to be associated with a higher OS (HR 1.471 95%CI 1.018-2.127, p = 0.040). Besides, based on multivariate analysis, lactic dehydrogenase was associated with PFS (HR 1.001 95%CI 1.000,1.002, p = 0.037) and OS (HR 1.002, 95%CI 1.001-1.003, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with NSCLC, NAFLD did not result in changes in survival or disease progression after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

From Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) to Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Epidemiology, Incidence, Predictions, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects up to a quarter of the adult population in many developed and developing countries. This spectrum of liver disease ranges from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. The incidence of NASH is projected to increase by up to 56% over the next 10 years. There is growing epidemiological evidence that NAFLD has become the fastest-growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in industrialized countries. The annual incidence of HCC varies between patients with NASH cirrhosis and patients with noncirrhotic NAFLD. In this review, NAFLD/NASH-associated HCC will be described, including its epidemiology, risk factors promoting hepatocarcinogenesis, and management of HCC in patients with obesity and associated metabolic comorbidities, including preventive strategies and therapeutic approaches to address this growing problem.