Marketing authorisation of orphan medicines in Europe from 2000 to 2013

Systematic Review of Genetic Substrate Reduction Therapy in Lysosomal Storage Diseases: Opportunities, Challenges and Delivery Systems

BACKGROUND

Genetic substrate reduction therapy (gSRT), which involves the use of nucleic acids to downregulate the genes involved in the biosynthesis of storage substances, has been investigated in the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs).

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the application of gSRT to the treatment of LSDs, identifying the silencing tools and delivery systems used, and the main challenges for its development and clinical translation, highlighting the contribution of nanotechnology to overcome them.

METHODS

A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used for searching terms related to LSDs and gene-silencing strategies and tools.

RESULTS

Fabry, Gaucher, and Pompe diseases and mucopolysaccharidoses I and III are the only LSDs for which gSRT has been studied, siRNA and lipid nanoparticles being the silencing strategy and the delivery system most frequently employed, respectively. Only in one recently published study was CRISPR/Cas9 applied to treat Fabry disease. Specific tissue targeting, availability of relevant cell and animal LSD models, and the rare disease condition are the main challenges with gSRT for the treatment of these diseases. Out of the 11 studies identified, only two gSRT studies were evaluated in animal models.

CONCLUSIONS

Nucleic acid therapies are expanding the clinical tools and therapies currently available for LSDs. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology and the growing impact of nanotechnology are expected to boost the clinical translation of gSRT in the near future, and not only for LSDs.

Advancing rare disease treatment: EMA's decade-long insights into engineered adoptive cell therapy for rare cancers and orphan designation

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT), particularly chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, has emerged as a promising approach for targeting and treating rare oncological conditions. The orphan medicinal product designation by the European Union (EU) plays a crucial role in promoting development of medicines for rare conditions according to the EU Orphan Regulation.This regulatory landscape analysis examines the evolution, regulatory challenges, and clinical outcomes of genetically engineered ACT, with a focus on CAR-T cell therapies, based on the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products review of applications evaluated for orphan designation and maintenance of the status over a 10-year period. In total, 30 of 36 applications were granted an orphan status, and 14 subsequently applied for maintenance of the status at time of marketing authorisation or extension of indication. Most of the products were autologous cell therapies using a lentiviral vector and were developed for the treatment of rare haematological B-cell malignancies. The findings revealed that 80% (29/36) of the submissions for orphan designation were supported by preliminary clinical data showing a potential efficacy of the candidate products and an added clinical benefit over currently authorised medicines for the proposed orphan condition. Notably, in 89% (32/36) of the cases significant benefit of the new products was accepted based on a clinically relevant advantage over existing therapies. Twelve of fourteen submissions reviewed for maintenance of the status at time of marketing authorisation or extension of indication demonstrated significant benefit of the products over existing satisfactory methods of treatment within the approved therapeutic indications, but one of the applications was withdrawn during the regulatory evaluation.This article summarises the key findings related to the use of engineered ACT, primarily CAR-T cell therapies, in targeting and treating rare cancers in the EU. It emphasises the importance of use of clinical data in supporting medical plausibility and significant benefit at the stage of orphan designation and highlights the high success rate for these products in obtaining initial orphan designations and subsequent maintaining the status at the time of marketing authorisation or extension of indication.

Trends from two decades of orphan designations in paediatric rare neuromuscular diseases

Rare diseases are characterized by substantial unmet need mostly because the majority have limited, or no treatment options and a large number also affect children. Since the inception of EU orphan regulation in 2000 the European Medicines Agency Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products has received several applications for paediatric rare neuromuscular diseases (PERAN) however treatment options remain limited. Here we discuss the results form an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study to characterize the currently authorised orphan medicinal products (OMP) and orphan designations (OD) given to products for PERAN in the last two decades. In the EU about half of PERAN diseases have at least one active OD approved since 2000, and about half of these are for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The large majority of PERAN diseases do not have an authorised medicine with only 6 OMP currently authorised for Spinal muscular atrophy (3); DMD (1) and Myasthenia gravis (2). One in five products have inactive or discontinued regulatory development but clinical trials are ongoing for the vast majority of PERAN diseases, and more than half are in the final stage of clinical research with significantly more products with medical plausibility based in clinical data reaching advanced stages in clinical development.

Trends in orphan medicinal products approvals in the European Union between 2010-2022

BACKGROUND

Over the last twenty years of orphan drug regulation in Europe, the regulatory framework has increased its complexity, with different regulatory paths and tools engineered to facilitate the innovation and accelerate approvals. Recently, the proposal of the new Pharmaceutical Legislation for the European Union, which will replace at least three Regulations and one Directive, was released and its new framework is raising many questions. The aim of this study was to present a characterisation of the Orphan Medicinal Products (OMPs) authorised by the European Commission (EC), between 2010 and 2022, looking into eighteen variables, contributing to the ongoing discussion on the proposal and implementation of the new Pharmaceutical Legislation proposed.

METHODS

Data of the OMPs identified and approved between 2010 and 2022 were extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) produced by the European Medicines Agency. Information regarding legal basis of the application, applicant, protocol assistance received, type of authorization, registration status, type of molecule, ATC code, therapeutic area, target age, disease prevalence, number of pivotal clinical trials supporting the application, clinical trial designs, respective efficacy endpoints and number of patients enrolled in the pivotal clinical trials were extracted. A descriptive statistical analysis was applied.

RESULTS

We identified 192 OMPs approved in the period between 2010 and 2022. 89% of the OMPs have legal basis of "full application". 86% of the sponsors received protocol assistance whereas 64% of the MAA benefited from the accelerated assessment. 53% of the active substances are small molecules; about 1 in 5 molecules are repurposed. 40% of the OMPs have oncological therapeutic indications and 56% of the OMPs are intended to treat only adults. 71% of the products were approved based on a single pivotal trial.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of OMPs approved between 2010 and 2022 shows that a shift has occurred in the rare disease medicine development space. Through the period studied we observe an increase of non-small molecules approved, accelerated assessment received and non-standard MA's granted.

Cross-national comparative study of orphan drug policies in Saudi Arabia, the United States, and the European Union

Background

Rare diseases are chronic, serious, and life-threatening conditions that have not received sufficient attention from drug developers due to their rarity. Policies have been implemented to encourage research and incentivize the development of orphan drugs. However, the implementation of these policies has been inconsistent worldwide.

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to compare orphan drug policies in the United States, Europe, and Saudi Arabia (SA) and assess their impact on the number of approved indications.

Method

Lists of all drugs granted orphan designations and authorized for marketing in the United States, European Union, and SA were extracted using orphan drug lists available in regulatory body databases. The availability of these drugs, regarding their approval for orphan indication and designation, was assessed and classified using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes.

Result

A total of 792 orphan drug designations with at least one authorized indication were identified in this study. Of these, 92% were designated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and 27% were designated by the European Medicine Agency (EMA). The FDA, EMA, and Saudi Food and Drug Authority approved 753, 435, and 253 orphan drugs, respectively.

Conclusion

Fewer orphan drug approvals were found in SA than in the United States and Europe. This highlights the need to focus on rare diseases and orphan drugs and for policies to be created in SA to attract pharmaceutical markets and fulfill unmet orphan drug approval needs.

[Evidence-based health care with pharmaceuticals for rare diseases: the role of digitalisation]

Knowledge generation in the field of drug development for people with rare diseases (RDs) faces particular difficulties. This paper will show what improvements are expected from increasing digitalisation from the perspective of three healthcare institutions: the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care and the Federal Joint Committee.First, the potential of digitalisation to increase the efficiency of clinical development and regulatory decision-making through earlier collaboration of all stakeholders is proposed. Subsequently, it is argued that digitalisation should be used to reduce barriers to the implementation of care-associated randomised controlled trials, including those based on registries. High-quality registry studies should not only be started after approval but during the approval process, so that the evidence necessary for therapy decisions is available promptly after approval. Finally, it is stated that improving the evidence base through qualitative improvement of the data sources and their linkages directly benefits patients. Usable evidence that can be generated over a longer period of time - also beyond approval - and contribute to decisions within healthcare system ensures effective drug provision.The institutions agree that high-quality indication registries should be developed as product-independent, standing infrastructures so that high-quality data can be accessed early in the development of medicines for RD.

Orphan Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Lessons Learned From Two Decades of Orphan Designation

Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis and only a few treatment options are available. In the European Union, pancreatic cancer classifies as a rare disease, allowing drug developers to apply for orphan medicinal product (OMP) designation. The aim of this study was to provide more detail on OMPs for pancreatic cancer. All applications for OMP designation submitted to the EMA between 2000 and 2019 were identified. For each medicinal product that received an OMP designation, the mode of drug action, use of protocol assistance, and current life cycle status was determined. Fifty-two medicinal products received an OMP designation. At the time of submission, eighteen OMPs were at the non-clinical and 34 OMPs were at the clinical stage of development. At least fourteen kinds of mode of action were explored in the condition. For eighteen out of 52 OMPs protocol assistance was sought. At the time of data analysis, one OMP received marketing authorisation and 24 OMPs were ongoing in development. Many medicinal products for pancreatic cancer received an OMP designation and the majority of these products was already in the clinical stage of development. Nonetheless, the success rate of OMPs for pancreatic cancer that reach the market is low, and increasing this rate is something to aspire. Fortunately, development is still ongoing for a part of the OMPs, and a few developers are planning to submit a marketing authorisation application in the near future. This however does not guarantee success, as pancreatic cancer remains a difficult disease to treat. Developers are advised to make optimal use of incentives such as protocol assistance, establishing (early) dialogue between regulators and drug developers and to agree on important topics such as clinical trial design.

Pricing and Reimbursement Pathways of New Orphan Drugs in South Korea: A Longitudinal Comparison

This study aimed to analyze four current pathways affecting the listing and post-listing prices of new orphan drugs (ODs) in South Korea. These mechanisms were: (1) essential OD, (2) pharmacoeconomic evaluation (PE) waiver OD, (3) weighted average price OD, and (4) PE OD. We analyzed the ratio of the listing price of 48 new ODs to the average adjusted price (AAP) of seven advanced countries and examined the change in the post-listing price. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the listing and post-listing price changes. The mean and median ratios of the listing price of total new OD to AAP were calculated to be 69.4% and 65.4%, respectively. Essential OD showed the highest mean (93.8%) and median (80.8%) ratios. The mean cumulative price discount rate of the new OD was 7.2% in the third year and 5.7% in the fifth year. The rarity of diseases impacts the listing price of OD, but the political effects of the benefits of OD on the post-listing price of these drugs could not be verified. Further research should be conducted to develop measures that facilitate the practical sharing of budget risks and increase patient access to new ODs.

The translational value of animal models in orphan medicines designations for rare paediatric neurological diseases

Rare diseases are characterized by a substantial unmet need mostly because the majority have limited, or no treatment options and a large number also affect children. Appropriate animal models, based on the knowledge of the molecular pathology of the human disease, are a significant element to support the medical plausibility of an orphan designation during the development of orphan medicines for rare neurological diseases. This observational, retrospective study aims to investigate the clinical or nonclinical nature of data submitted to support medical plausibility of orphan designations in the EU (2001-2019), for a group of rare and paediatric neurological diseases. From our sample of 30 diseases, 70% are rare with paediatric onset and 37% have approved orphan designations. The use of nonclinical data was significantly higher than clinical data (65% vs. 35%, p = 0.013) to support medical plausibility. Examples of diseases, with orphan designations based only in nonclinical data, are also discussed: Aicardi-Goutières syndrome and Centronuclear myopathy animal disease models, potentially used to support medical plausibility of medicines. Nonclinical appropriate models, assessing disease relevant endpoints, may contribute to increase the translational value of animal models, in paediatric and rare neurological area, to accelerate research and the effective development of treatment options.

Patient safety issues associated with the use of compounded medicines as alternatives to approved pharmaceutical products in Europe and how best practice can improve outcomes

BACKGROUND

Pharmaceutical compounding allows individuals with special requirements access to medicines. Compounding can also be used to provide cheaper alternatives to commercially produced medicines which may be less strictly regulated than those commercially produced as they do not require marketing authorisation.

OBJECTIVE

This review describes the issues and potential risks associated with compounded medicines and equally importantly identifies best practices.

METHODS

To establish reports about lack of effectiveness, adverse events and medication errors occurring with compounded pharmaceuticals, a literature search was conducted of PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE databases for relevant cases in European countries which were published between 2003 and 2018. Case reports/series that described instances of successful use of compounded medicines over the same period were also identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 case reports/case series describing problems associated with compounded medicines in Europe have been identified. Sources of patient risk associated with compounded medicines include lack of quality, safety and efficacy data, preparation and labelling errors, and improper storage and handling practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Several case reports/series describing instances of overdose, medication errors and adverse events associated with compounded medications were reviewed. The number of affected patients was relatively small, but many were children and two adult patients experienced permanent sequelae. The number of incidents associated with compounded medicines is unknown, and so these numbers should be interpreted with caution. When licensed medicines are available, the use of compounded medicines can put patients at unnecessary risk which should be avoided. Stricter regulation is necessary to prevent similar cases from occurring in the future as the European market for compounded medications grows. Pharmacists can promote best practices in compounding through professional organisations. Future recommended actions are: 1. Stricter regulation is necessary to prevent similar cases from occurring in the future as the European market for compounded medications grows. 2. A comprehensive pan-European survey to gain a greater understanding of compounding procedures and techniques. This would provide valuable information to the benefit of hospital systems and their patients. 3. The results of the survey can then be used to improve the knowledge and quality control of compounded medicines for the good of patient safety.

Orphan Medicines for Pediatric Use: A Focus on the European Union

PURPOSE

European policy makers have provided a number of incentives for the development of medicines for orphan diseases as early as 1999 through the Orphan Regulation and created obligations for medicines developers to investigate their products in children through the Paediatric Regulation adopted in 2006. This article describes the challenges that developers of orphan medicines are facing with pediatric indications, discusses the interplay between the Orphan Regulation and the Paediatric Regulation, and provides some recommendations on how to optimize drug development under the current European Union regulatory framework.

METHODS

This article discusses the European Union's Orphan Regulation, Paediatric Regulation, and the implications of the intersection of the regulations on the development of orphan medicines for pediatric use.

FINDINGS

Although these regulations have been successful in meeting their objectives separately, different regulatory frameworks entail separate governance, multiple assessments, varying approaches and priorities to unmet medical needs, and joined-up regulatory process coordination. Better integration of regulatory pathways would therefore be helpful in stimulating more global drug development of pediatric orphan medicines, including optimizing the interaction between both regulations, using innovative drug development approaches while considering alternatives to randomized clinical trials, better identification and prioritization of unmet medical needs in pediatrics, and ensuring the alignment of regulatory processes.

IMPLICATIONS

Rare diseases are categorized as "orphan diseases" because their occurrence in a small number of patients means that, regardless of the apparent high unmet medical need, there is limited public and market interest to justify the high development risk and significant investment to develop new treatments. However, unexplored potential within the area, as well as a conducive regulatory environment, can further support the development of medicines to treat rare diseases, including for children.

Survey of Japanese Orphan Drug Program: Factors Related to Successful Marketing Approval

The basic components of regulatory and supporting policies for orphan drug development appear similar between the United States and Japan, but drugs designated as orphan drugs have been different between the 2 countries. The probabilities of development success (ie, marketing approval) in designated orphan drugs have also been significantly different. In this study, we analyzed recent outcomes of development for orphan drugs designated from 1993 to 2017 in Japan, considering their development and approval status in the United States. Our analysis showed that success for orphan drug development in Japan was apparently associated with prior approval status in the United States. Company size, orphan development experience, and patient enrichment were also positively associated with successful marketing approval. Although similar designations and priority review systems for orphan drugs have been enacted, economic incentives and regulatory conditions provided by the systems seem to be different between the 2 countries, which may lead to varied performance in orphan designation and approval. We need to pay close attention to the impact of industrial global development strategies when comparing the outcomes and performance of different orphan drug promotion systems.

Patient-Centered Cancer Drug Development: Clinical Trials, Regulatory Approval, and Value Assessment

Historically, patient experience, including symptomatic toxicities, physical function, and disease-related symptoms during treatment or their perspectives on clinical trials, has played a secondary role in cancer drug development. Regulatory criteria for drug approval require that drugs are safe and effective, and almost all drug approvals have been based only on efficacy endpoints rather than on quality-of-life (QoL) assessments. In contrast to Europe, information regarding the impact of drugs on patients' QoL is rarely included in oncology drug labeling in the United States. Until recently, patient input and preferences have not been incorporated into the design and conduct of clinical trials. In recent years, a more in-depth understanding of cancer biology, as well as regulatory changes focused on expediting cancer drug development and approval, has allowed earlier access to novel therapeutic agents. Understanding the implications of these expedited programs is important for oncologists and patients, given the rapid expansion of these programs. In this article, we provide an overview of the role of QoL in the regulatory drug-approval process, key issues regarding trial participation from the patient perspective, and the implications of key expedited approval programs that are increasingly being used by regulatory bodies for cancer care.

Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare

BACKGROUND

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are beginning to reach European markets, and questions are being asked about their value for patients and how healthcare systems should pay for them.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and discuss potential challenges of ATMPs in view of current health technology assessment (HTA) methodology-specifically economic evaluation methods-in Europe as it relates to ATMPs, and to suggest potential solutions to these challenges.

METHODS

An Expert Panel reviewed current HTA principles and practices in relation to the specific characteristics of ATMPs.

RESULTS

Three key topics were identified and prioritised for discussion-uncertainty, discounting, and health outcomes and value. The panel discussed that evidence challenges linked to increased uncertainty may be mitigated by collection of follow-on data, use of value of information analysis, and/or outcomes-based contracts. For discount rates, an international, multi-disciplinary forum should be established to consider the economic, social and ethical implications of the choice of rate. Finally, consideration of the feasibility of assessing the value of ATMPs beyond health gain may also be key for decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

ATMPs face a challenge in demonstrating their value within current HTA frameworks. Consideration of current HTA principles and practices with regards to the specific characteristics of ATMPs and continued dialogue will be key to ensuring appropriate market access.

CLASSIFICATION CODE

I.

Characteristics of non-randomised studies using comparisons with external controls submitted for regulatory approval in the USA and Europe: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Non-randomised clinical trial designs involving comparisons against external controls or specific standards can be used to support regulatory submissions for indications in diseases that are rare, with high unmet need, without approved therapies and/or where placebo is considered unethical. The objective of this review was to summarise the characteristics of non-randomised trials submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) or Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for indications in haematological cancers, haematological non-malignant conditions, stem cell transplants or rare metabolic diseases.

METHODS

We conducted systematic searches of EMA databases of conditional approvals, exceptional circumstances, or orphan drug designations and FDA inventories of orphan drug designations, accelerated approvals, breakthrough therapy, fast-track and priority approvals. Products were included if reviewed by at least one agency between 2005 and 2017, the primary evidence base was non-randomised trial(s) and the indication was for haematological cancers, stem cell transplantation, haematological conditions or rare metabolic conditions.

RESULTS

We identified 43 eligible indication-specific products using non-randomised study designs involving comparisons with external controls, submitted to the EMA (n=34) and/or FDA (n=41). Of the 43 indication-specific products, 4 involved matching external controls to the population of a non-randomised interventional study using individual patient-level data (IPD), 12 referred to external controls without IPD and 27 did not explicitly reference external controls. The FDA approved 98% of submissions, with 56% accelerated approvals; most required postapproval confirmatory randomised controlled trials (RCT). The EMA approved 79% of submissions, with a quarter of approvals conditional on completion of a postapproval RCT or additional non-randomised trials.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a large increase in submissions to the EMA and FDA using non-randomised study designs involving comparisons with external controls in recent years. This study demonstrated that regulators may be willing to approve such submissions, although approvals are often conditional on further confirmatory evidence from postapproval studies.

Orphan drugs: major development challenges at the clinical stage

Biotechnology has provided powerful tools to assist in research and development (R&D) for rare diseases. However, orphan drug development presents several major challenges and obstacles, such as low disease prevalence, disease severity, small and heterogeneous patient populations, difficulties in patient recruitment, and limited knowledge of the natural history of disease, among others. Several strategies can be used to plan for and overcome these clinical and regulatory challenges, namely improved clinical trial design, improved patient recruitment, and closer collaboration with the regulatory authorities and with patient associations. As growth in the orphan drug market is expected over the next few years, improving its relevance in the global pharmaceutical market, further challenges might present themselves in the development of orphan drugs.

Orphan Drugs and Their Impact on Pharmaceutical Development

High levels of productivity, with an increasing number of approvals for new molecular entities (NMEs) by the FDA during the past decade, have coincided with the emergence of innovative drugs for treatments of rare diseases that have utilized the FDA orphan drug program. Since 2000, NMEs with orphan designation encompass a significant portion of approved drugs and constitute about 80% of the approved drugs that have established novel human genome-encoded products in recent years. Biological approvals are also expanding, with 40% of the approved biological agents having orphan designation. This trend illustrates a pivot within the pharmaceutical industry: from research programs that focus on canonical blockbuster indications and targets, towards the establishment of new treatments for rare and difficult to treat diseases.

Generation of therapeutic antisera for emerging viral infections

The recent Ebola virus outbreak has highlighted the therapeutic potential of antisera and renewed interest in this treatment approach. While human convalescent sera may not be readily available in the early stages of an outbreak, antisera of animal origin can be produced in a short time frame. Here, we compared adjuvanted virus-like particles (VLP) with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), both expressing the Ebola virus antigens. The neutralizing antibody titers of rabbits immunized with adjuvanted VLPs were similar to those immunized with the replication-competent VSV, indicating that presentation of the antigen in its native conformation rather than de novo antigen expression is essential for production of functional antibodies. This approach also yielded high-titer antisera against Nipah virus glycoproteins, illustrating that it is transferable to other virus families. Multiple-step immunoglobulin G purification using a two-step 20–40% ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by protein A affinity chromatography resulted in 90% recovery of functionality and sustained in vivo stability. Adjuvanted VLP-based immunization strategies are thus a promising approach for the rapid generation of therapeutic antisera against emerging infections.

Passive immunity through the transfer of anti-serum represents the earliest clinical application of antibodies and is still widely used to this day in the form of anti-venoms. Veronika von Messling and colleagues at the Paul Ehrlich Institute investigate the potential of generating neutralizing anti-serum to the emerging viruses Ebola and Nipah. The authors compare different vaccination platforms in mice and rabbits and find that following multiple vaccine challenges, neutralizing antibody titers equivalent to that seen in convalescent patients could be obtained. Purification of the IgG fraction and processing into F(ab’)₂ fragments has the potential to significantly reduce xeno-responses yet the authors find that neutralizing capacity is largely retained albeit at the cost of a shorter in vivo half-life. These findings offer the hope of rapidly generating large quantities of neutralizing anti-serum that could be used in a viral outbreak scenario.

Marketing authorisation applications submitted to the European Medicines Agency by small and medium-sized enterprises: an analysis of major objections and their impact on outcomes

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are an important source of innovative medicines. Compared with their larger counterparts, they experience challenges as a result of insufficient human and financial resources that can hamper drug development and regulatory compliance. This analysis reviews the profile of major objections raised in marketing authorisation applications for medicines for human use submitted by SMEs to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2011 and 2015 and their impact on the outcome of applications. It showed that SMEs experience challenges in the quality (e.g. manufacturing process validation and control and/or characterisation data of drug substance or drug product) and clinical sections of marketing authorisation applications (e.g. analysis or robustness of pivotal data or selection of submitted studies, study design issues and marginal or no clinical relevant efficacy), with deficiencies in demonstrating clinical efficacy representing the major eventual hurdles to authorisation.

Lessons learned from IDeAl - 33 recommendations from the IDeAl-net about design and analysis of small population clinical trials

BACKGROUND

IDeAl (Integrated designs and analysis of small population clinical trials) is an EU funded project developing new statistical design and analysis methodologies for clinical trials in small population groups. Here we provide an overview of IDeAl findings and give recommendations to applied researchers.

METHOD

The description of the findings is broken down by the nine scientific IDeAl work packages and summarizes results from the project's more than 60 publications to date in peer reviewed journals. In addition, we applied text mining to evaluate the publications and the IDeAl work packages' output in relation to the design and analysis terms derived from in the IRDiRC task force report on small population clinical trials.

RESULTS

The results are summarized, describing the developments from an applied viewpoint. The main result presented here are 33 practical recommendations drawn from the work, giving researchers a comprehensive guidance to the improved methodology. In particular, the findings will help design and analyse efficient clinical trials in rare diseases with limited number of patients available. We developed a network representation relating the hot topics developed by the IRDiRC task force on small population clinical trials to IDeAl's work as well as relating important methodologies by IDeAl's definition necessary to consider in design and analysis of small-population clinical trials. These network representation establish a new perspective on design and analysis of small-population clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

IDeAl has provided a huge number of options to refine the statistical methodology for small-population clinical trials from various perspectives. A total of 33 recommendations developed and related to the work packages help the researcher to design small population clinical trial. The route to improvements is displayed in IDeAl-network representing important statistical methodological skills necessary to design and analysis of small-population clinical trials. The methods are ready for use.