Non-fatal stimulant overdose among homeless and unstably housed women in San Francisco, California

Housing instability increases for stimulant-involved overdose deaths after linking surveillance data to electronic health records in Kentucky

BACKGROUND

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 10.2 % of fatal overdoses in 2022 were among people experiencing homelessness or housing instability. In the United States, the majority of all drug overdoses now involve stimulants.

METHODS

We linked stimulant-involved fatal overdose records occurring between 2017 and 2021 from Kentucky's Drug Overdose Fatality Surveillance System to the electronic health records (EHR) of the state's largest safety-net hospital network. We used State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS) definitions of homelessness or housing instability to establish baseline estimates before linking decedents to medical records. After linkage, we augmented SUDORS data with structured administrative billing codes, semi-structured address data, and unstructured clinical notes identifying homelessness from the EHR.

RESULTS

There were 313 individuals with stimulant-involved fatal overdoses linked to at least one medical encounter in the EHR (2017-2021). Thirty-three individuals (10.5 %) were identified as having unstable housing according to SUDORS. After linkage, 130 individuals (41.5 %) had evidence of housing instability. For this period, these 313 individuals represent 8.0 % of stimulant-involved overdoses in KY or 38.5 % of stimulant-involved overdoses from residents of the primary and secondary catchment area of our healthcare network.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-site increase in observed housing instability in stimulant-involved fatal overdoses suggests that increased data linkage between state medicolegal death investigation system and EHRs would significantly improve the public health surveillance of overdoses.

Heavy burden of non-fatal overdose among people who inject drugs in San Francisco, 2022

BACKGROUND

Drug overdose deaths increased by 50 % between 2017 and 2021 in San Francisco. Little is known about non-fatal overdose, which heralds future risk for morbidity and overdose death. We assessed non-fatal overdose, access to drug treatment, and overdose prevention service utilization among people who inject drugs (PWID) in San Francisco in 2022.

METHODS

Data were from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS), a cross-sectional survey among PWID recruited by respondent-driven sampling from June-December 2022. Participants self-reported their experience of overall overdose. Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with non-fatal overdose.

RESULTS

Of 521 PWID, 120 (23.0 %) experienced non-fatal overdose; 207 (39.7 %) frequently injected methamphetamine and 175 (33.6 %) frequently injected heroin in the past 12 months. PWID who experienced non-fatal overdose were more likely to reside in the low-income neighborhoods (25.9 % vs. other neighborhoods 16.8 %, p = 0.022) in the past 12 months. Less than half (43.7 %) of PWID who experienced non-fatal overdose received overdose treatment. Compared to those who did not try to access treatment, adjusted odds of non-fatal overdose was 1.89 times higher among PWID who attempted to access drug treatment but were unable to (p = 0.035, 95 % CI 1.05-3.43); and 1.86 times higher among PWID who attempted to obtain medications to treat drug use but were unable to in the past 12 months (p = 0.049, 95 % CI: 1.00-3.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-fatal overdose was highly prevalent among PWID, including those who frequently inject stimulants. Public health surveillance will need to be vigilant in monitoring stimulant use and tracking fentanyl contamination in non-opioid drugs. PWID who were most engaged in harm reduction practices were also the most likely to experience non-fatal overdose. Expansion of substance use and overdose treatment, naloxone, fentanyl test strips, and safe drug use education are needed to reduce risk of overdose deaths among PWID.

Evaluation of methamphetamine assist packs: As-needed antipsychotics for self-management of methamphetamine-associated psychiatric toxicity

BACKGROUND

Methamphetamine frequently causes substance-induced psychosis and related symptoms. There are currently no interventions to prevent or assist in self-management of these symptoms.

METHODS

We evaluated a program providing "Methamphetamine Assist Packs" to patients who were seen in a psychiatric emergency services program for methamphetamine-induced psychosis. Methamphetamine Assist Packs included a small number of tablets of an antipsychotic medication (olanzapine), administration instructions, and referral information. We reviewed medical charts of patients who received Methamphetamine Assist Packs from January 2022 through May 2023 for sociodemographic and emergency visit characteristics. We assessed the changes between the number of psychiatric emergency visits before and after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt at two, six, and 12 months using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients received a Methamphetamine Assist Pack, with a mean age of 40 years; 79 % were male and 49 % Black/African American; 77 % experienced housing instability or homelessness. The most common symptoms were suicidal ideation (54 %), paranoia or delusions (45 %), and hallucinations (40 %); 55 % were on involuntary psychiatric hold, 38 % required medications for agitation, and 18 % required seclusion or physical restraints. The rate of psychiatric emergency visits after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt was 0.68 and 0.87 times the rate prior to receipt at two and six months, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Methamphetamine Assist Packs were associated with fewer psychiatric emergency visits for six months after receipt, and represent a promising intervention to address acute psychiatric toxicity from methamphetamine in need of further research.

Emergency Room Utilization and Methamphetamine Overdose Symptoms Among Syringe Services Program Participants in Washington State

BACKGROUND

Methamphetamine overdose can cause severe psychological and physical health issues including psychosis, heart attack, and death. People who use methamphetamine (PWUM) who experience methamphetamine overdose symptoms (MOS) are advised to seek emergency healthcare; however, factors related to seeking care are not well characterized.

METHODS

This study used data from the 2021 Washington State Syringe Services Program (SSP) Health Survey, a cross-sectional survey administered to participants at 21 SSPs in Washington (N = 955). Participants answered questions related to substance use including emergency department/room (ER) utilization for methamphetamine use and whether they experienced psychological and physical MOS. Using Poisson regression, we assessed the association between ER utilization for methamphetamine use, non-fatal opioid overdose, and other key covariates among PWUM who experienced MOS.

RESULTS

Methamphetamine use in the last three months was reported by 86% of participants. Among PWUM, 31% reported psychological MOS, 19% reported physical MOS, and 37% reported ≥1 MOS in the prior three months. Non-fatal opioid overdose (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.38-3.03), main drug of goofball (heroin and methamphetamine combined) (APR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.34-2.92) and recent blood infection/sepsis (APR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.24-3.46) were associated with ER utilization for MOS.

CONCLUSION

Among people who use SSPs in Washington State, methamphetamine use remains high, and MOS are common. Recent non-fatal opioid overdose was positively associated with ER utilization for methamphetamine use among PWUM who experienced MOS. Patients in the ER for MOS should be screened for opioid use disorder and linked with harm reduction supplies like naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder.

Housing Instability Associated with Return to Stimulant Use among Previously Abstaining Women

Stimulant use among unstably housed individuals is associated with increased risks of psychiatric co-morbidity, violence, HIV transmission, and overdose. Due to a lack of highly effective treatments, evidence-based policies targeting the prevention of stimulant use disorder are of critical importance. However, little empirical evidence exists on risks associated with initiating or returning to stimulant use among at-risk populations. In a longitudinal cohort of unstably housed women in San Francisco (2016-2019), self-reported data on stimulant use, housing status, and mental health were collected monthly for up to 6 months, and factors associated with initiating stimulants after a period of non-use were identified through logistic regression. Among 245 participants, 42 (17.1%) started using cocaine and 46 (18.8%) started using methamphetamine. In analyses adjusting for demographics and socio-structural exposures over the preceding month, experiencing street homelessness was associated with initiating cocaine use (AOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.04, 4.25) and sheltered homelessness with initiating methamphetamine use (AOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.37, 4.79). Other factors-including race, income, unmet subsistence needs, mental health, and treatment adherence-did not reach levels of significance, suggesting the paramount importance of policies directed toward improving access to permanent supportive housing to prevent stimulant use among unstably housed women.

Daily opioid and stimulant co-use and nonfatal overdoses in the context of social disadvantage: Findings on marginalized populations

OBJECTIVE

Opioids and stimulants are increasingly implicated in overdose deaths, particularly among minoritized groups. We examined daily opioid and cocaine co-use, nonfatal overdoses, and naloxone carrying among minoritized people who inject drugs (PWID).

METHODS

The study derived data from 499 PWID in Baltimore City, MD, recruited using street-based outreach between 2016 and 2019. Participants reported overdoses; sociodemographic characteristics; and use of nonmedical prescription opioids, heroin, cocaine, and naloxone.

RESULTS

Among the participants, the mean age was 46, 34 % were female, 64 % self-identified as Black, and 53 % experienced recent homelessness. Black PWID, compared to White PWID, were as likely to use opioids and cocaine daily but were 61 % less likely to have naloxone. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, women (aOR:1.88, 95%CI: 1.14, 3.11), persons experiencing homelessness (aOR:3.07, 95%CI: 1.79, 5.24), and those who experienced a recent overdose (aOR:2.14, 95%CI: 1.29, 3.58) were significantly more likely to use opioids and any form of cocaine every day. In a subanalysis of only female PWID, females engaged in sex work (aOR:2.27, 95%CI: 1.02, 5.07) and females experiencing recent homelessness (aOR:5.82, 95%CI: 2.50, 13.52) were significantly more likely to use opioids and cocaine daily. Furthermore, females (aOR:1.69, 95%CI:1.03, 2.77), persons experiencing homelessness (aOR:1.94, 95%CI:1.16, 3.24), and those with higher educational attainment (aOR:2.06, 95%CI:1.09, 3.91) were more likely to often/always carry naloxone, while Black PWID were less likely to have naloxone (aOR:0.39, 95%CI:0.22, 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need for targeted naloxone distribution and other harm-reduction interventions among minoritized groups in urban areas.

Homelessness and Gender: Differences in Characteristics and Comorbidity of Substance Use Disorders at Admission to Services

Background: Substance use disorders and homelessness are two closely related behavioral health issues. This study examines associations between homelessness and severity of substance use disorder (SUD) characteristics (inclusive of alcohol and other legal and illegal drugs) and presence of mental health comorbidity among individuals entering treatment for SUD. We also examine differences in SUD and mental health comorbidity by gender within a sample of clients experiencing homelessness upon admission to treatment. Methods: Using the 2017 Treatment Episodes Data Set, we used logistic regression models to examine the association between homelessness and indicators of severity (e.g., frequency of use, route of transmission) and the presence of mental health conditions, and to examine the association between gender and these dependent variables among only individuals experiencing homelessness at treatment admission. Results: After controlling for covariates, homelessness is significantly associated with increased odds of cocaine and methamphetamine use compared to all other substances, higher frequency of use, younger age of first use, use of more substances, injection drug use, and co-occurring mental health conditions. Female gender is inversely associated with younger age at first use and highly associated with co-occurring mental health conditions among those experiencing homelessness at admission to treatment. Conclusions: Individuals experiencing homelessness enter substance use services with different characteristics of substance use disorders, different patterns of use, and with higher rates of mental health comorbidity. Within homeless admissions, women have significant differences in substance use and higher likelihood of mental health comorbidity than men. Future research should focus on the specific treatment needs of individuals experiencing homelessness, and how the combination of homelessness and gender affects barriers and challenges to treatment.

Primary care management of Long-Term opioid therapy

The United States underwent massive expansion in opioid prescribing from 1990-2010, followed by opioid stewardship initiatives and reduced prescribing. Opioids are no longer considered first-line therapy for most chronic pain conditions and clinicians should first seek alternatives in most circumstances. Patients who have been treated with opioids long-term should be managed differently, sometimes even continued on opioids due to physiologic changes wrought by long-term opioid therapy and documented risks of discontinuation. When providing long-term opioid therapy, clinicians should document opioid stewardship measures, including assessments, consents, medication reconciliation, and offering naloxone, along with the rationale to continue opioid therapy. Clinicians should screen regularly for opioid use disorder and arrange for or directly provide treatment. In particular, buprenorphine can be highly useful for co-morbid pain and opioid use disorder. Addressing other substance use disorders, as well as preventive health related to substance use, should be a priority in patients with opioid use disorder. Patient-centered practices, such as shared decision-making and attending to related facets of a patient's life that influence health outcomes, should be implemented at all points of care.Key messagesAlthough opioids are no longer considered first-line therapy for most chronic pain, management of patients already taking long-term opioid therapy must be individualised.Documentation of opioid stewardship measures can help to organise opioid prescribing and protect clinicians from regulatory scrutiny.Management of resultant opioid use disorder should include provision of medications, most often buprenorphine, and several additional screening and preventive measures.

A Chronic Condition Disguised as an Acute Event: the Case for Re-thinking Stimulant Overdose Death

Recent reports indicate that stimulant-related deaths are increasing dramatically. People who die from acute stimulant toxicity have high rates of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), much of which is undiagnosed. Moreover, people who use stimulants with CVD often remain asymptomatic until presenting to an emergency department with an acute event. Prior research shows that symptoms of stimulant toxicity may occur on a regular basis, and that people who die from stimulant toxicity are older than those who die of opioid toxicity. Taken collectively, the existing evidence suggests that death from acute stimulant toxicity is often an outcome of long-term, cumulative exposure leading to cardiovascular dysfunction rather than acute intoxication. Strategies tailored to the distinct etiology of stimulant overdose are needed. We propose a three-part approach including (1) implementing stimulant use interventions that promote not only abstinence, but also use reduction, (2) treating ongoing stimulant use as a chronic cardiovascular condition, and (3) making stimulant toxicity interventions relevant to the populations most affected, which includes people outside of the traditional health-care system. In short, to reduce stimulant-related fatality, we need to transform our approach in ways that are tailored to address its natural history.