1
|
Luvuno ZPB, Wiafe E, Mpofana N, Urusla MM, Nxumalo CT. Fast-track interventions for HIV and AIDS epidemic control among key populations: A rapid review. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2024; 16:e1-e12. [PMID: 38708735 PMCID: PMC11079388 DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted interventions for key populations remain critical for realisation of epidemic control for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection because of the causal relationship between HIV infection in the general population and among key population groups. AIM To consolidate evidence on the fast-track interventions towards achieving HIV epidemic control among key populations. METHODS A rapid scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework by Arksey and O' Malley. The Population, Intervention, Context and Outcome (PICO) framework was used to identify relevant studies using key words with Boolean operators in electronic data bases, namely CINHAL, Web of Science, Psych Info and Sabinet. Studies were extracted using a modified data extraction tool, and results were presented narratively. RESULTS A total of 19 articles were included in this review. Most articles were primary studies (n = 17), while another involved the review of existing literature and policies (n = 2) and routinely collected data (n = 1). Most studies were conducted in the United States of America (n = 6), while another were conducted in China, Kenya, Botswana, South Africa and Mozambique. All studies revealed findings on tested interventions to achieve HIV epidemic control among key populations. CONCLUSION Effective interventions for HIV epidemic control were stand-alone behavioural preventive interventions, stand-alone biomedical preventive strategies and combination prevention approaches. Furthermore, the findings suggest that effective activities to achieve HIV epidemic control among key populations should be centred around prevention.Contribution: The findings of this study have policy and practice implications for high HIV burden settings such as South Africa in terms of interventions to facilitate realisation of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 95-95-95 targets, thereby contributing to HIV epidemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zamasomi P B Luvuno
- Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard Campus, Durban.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahid M, Bharali I, Hecht R, Yamey G. Approaches to improving the efficiency of HIV programme investments. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-010127. [PMID: 36113892 PMCID: PMC9486198 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Minahil Shahid
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ipchita Bharali
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert Hecht
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gavin Yamey
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stuart RM, Grobicki L, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Panovska-Griffiths J, Skordis J, Keiser O, Estill J, Baranczuk Z, Kelly SL, Reporter I, Kedziora DJ, Shattock AJ, Petravic J, Hussain SA, Grantham KL, Gray RT, Yap XF, Martin-Hughes R, Benedikt CJ, Fraser-Hurt N, Masaki E, Wilson DJ, Gorgens M, Mziray E, Cheikh N, Shubber Z, Kerr CC, Wilson DP. How should HIV resources be allocated? Lessons learnt from applying Optima HIV in 23 countries. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 21:e25097. [PMID: 29652100 PMCID: PMC5898225 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction With limited funds available, meeting global health targets requires countries to both mobilize and prioritize their health spending. Within this context, countries have recognized the importance of allocating funds for HIV as efficiently as possible to maximize impact. Over the past six years, the governments of 23 countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America have used the Optima HIV tool to estimate the optimal allocation of HIV resources. Methods Each study commenced with a request by the national government for technical assistance in conducting an HIV allocative efficiency study using Optima HIV. Each study team validated the required data, calibrated the Optima HIV epidemic model to produce HIV epidemic projections, agreed on cost functions for interventions, and used the model to calculate the optimal allocation of available funds to best address national strategic plan targets. From a review and analysis of these 23 country studies, we extract common themes around the optimal allocation of HIV funding in different epidemiological contexts. Results and discussion The optimal distribution of HIV resources depends on the amount of funding available and the characteristics of each country's epidemic, response and targets. Universally, the modelling results indicated that scaling up treatment coverage is an efficient use of resources. There is scope for efficiency gains by targeting the HIV response towards the populations and geographical regions where HIV incidence is highest. Across a range of countries, the model results indicate that a more efficient allocation of HIV resources could reduce cumulative new HIV infections by an average of 18% over the years to 2020 and 25% over the years to 2030, along with an approximately 25% reduction in deaths for both timelines. However, in most countries this would still not be sufficient to meet the targets of the national strategic plan, with modelling results indicating that budget increases of up to 185% would be required. Conclusions Greater epidemiological impact would be possible through better targeting of existing resources, but additional resources would still be required to meet targets. Allocative efficiency models have proven valuable in improving the HIV planning and budgeting process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn M Stuart
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura Grobicki
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Clinical Operational Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jolene Skordis
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Keiser
- Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Janne Estill
- Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zofia Baranczuk
- Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Mathematics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sherrie L Kelly
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - David J Kedziora
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Kelsey L Grantham
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard T Gray
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Xiao F Yap
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cliff C Kerr
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David P Wilson
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|