The regulation project: Tools for engaging the public in the legal regulation of drugs

Choice between food and cocaine or fentanyl reinforcers under fixed and variable schedules in female and male rhesus monkeys

RATIONALE

Illicit drugs may be unpredictable in terms of the time and effort required to obtain them, and this can be modeled with variable- (VR) vs. fixed-ratio (FR) schedules. In a recent experiment (Zamarripa et al. 2023), the potency of cocaine to maintain choice was greatest under a VR (compared with a FR) when food was available under a FR schedule.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the current study was to extend prior choice results with VR vs. FR schedules to a more efficient procedure with cocaine or fentanyl vs. food. Furthermore, the FR schedule of food delivery was manipulated to determine whether increased drug choice under a VR (compared with a FR) schedule depends on the size of the schedule of nondrug reinforcement.

METHODS

Adult female (n = 2) and male (n = 4) monkeys chose between cocaine (0-30 µg/kg/injection) or fentanyl (0-1.0 µg/kg/injection) and food (2 pellets/delivery) under a 5-component procedure. In different conditions, food was available under a FR 25, 50, or 100 and cocaine or fentanyl were available under FR or VR 100 schedules.

RESULTS

Cocaine's potency to maintain choice was greatest under a VR 100 (compared with FR 100) when food was available under a FR 50 or 100, and fentanyl's potency to maintain choice was generally greatest under a VR 100 (compared with FR 100) when food was available under a FR 25 or 100. However, outcomes between FR and VR schedules with fentanyl were less robust compared with cocaine.

CONCLUSION

Variability in the time and effort required to obtain illicit drugs could contribute to excessive allocation of behavior toward drug use at the expense of more predictable nondrug alternatives, supporting treatment or policies aimed at making drug access more predictable through agonist medications or a safe supply. The impact of variable requirements on drug choice may be reduced if nondrug reinforcers are relatively less costly, supporting the use of low-cost reinforcers in behavioral therapies like contingency management.

Environmental Uncertainty and Substance Use Disorders: A Behavior Analytic Perspective

Substance use disorder (SUD) and drug overdose deaths represent major economic, health, and safety issues in the United States. The psychology of uncertainty provides a mechanism for understanding, reducing, and controlling the damage from substance misuse. Illicit drugs (such as heroin or cocaine) are uncertain in their availability, quality, and acquisition (the time and effort required to obtain them) compared with nondrug-related alternatives (such as consumable goods, hobbies, or paychecks). Furthermore, the severity and likelihood of negative outcomes associated with drug use likewise are uncertain. Such uncertainties worsen substance use outcomes. The current review conveys what is known about the impact of uncertainty on substance use: laboratory investigations of uncertain time and effort required to obtain a substance and uncertain drug quality show uncertainty exacerbates harm. Furthermore, uncertain negative outcomes are not likely to deter substance use in individuals with a SUD. Finally, several policy implications include access to agonist medications; creating a safer drug supply; access to clean syringes/needles, naloxone, and safe-injection sites; and ending incarceration for substance use.

Assessing open science and citizen science in addictions and substance use research: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The EU promotes 'Open Science' as a public good. Complementary to its implementation is Citizen Science, which redefines the relationship between the scientific community, civic society and the individual. Open Science and Citizen Science poses challenges for the substance use and addictions research community but may provide positive opportunities for future European addiction research. This paper explores both current barriers and potential facilitators for the implementation of Open Science and Citizen Science in substance use and addictions research.

METHODOLOGY

A scoping review was used to examine barriers and facilitators identified in the substance use and addiction research literature for the adoption of Open Science and Citizen Science.

RESULTS

'Technical' facilitators included the pre-registration of study protocols; publication of open-source datasets; open peer review and online tools. 'Motivational' facilitators included enhanced reputation; embracing co-creation; engaged citizenship and gamification. 'Economic' facilitators included the use of free tools and balanced remuneration of crowdworkers. 'Political' facilitators included better informed debates through the 'triple helix' approach and trust-generating transparency. 'Legal' facilitators included epidemiologically informed law enforcement; better policy surveillance and the validation of other datasets. 'Ethical' facilitators included the 'democratisation of science' and opportunities to explore new concepts of ethics in addiction research.

CONCLUSION

Open Science and Citizen Science in substance use and addictions research may provide a range of benefits in relation to the democratisation of science; transparency; efficiency and the reliability/validity of data. However, its implementation raises a range of research integrity and ethical issues that need be considered. These include issues related to participant recruitment; privacy; confidentiality; security; cost and industry involvement. Progressive journal policies to support Open Science practices; a shift in researcher norms; the use of free tools and the greater availability of methodological and ethical standards are likely to increase adoption in the field.