Development of a scale for estimating procedural distress in the newborn intensive care unit: the Procedural Load Index

Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Six to nine per cent of all newborn infants require admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) due to either illness or prematurity. During their stay, these infants are often subjected to many painful procedures that can cause negative long-term consequences. To reduce the negative effects of pain exposure and ensure optimal and safe pain treatment, accurate assessment of pain is necessary. To achieve this, clinicians are dependent on the use of reliable, objective, and standardised clinical rating scales of pain, henceforth referred to as 'rating scales'. Numerous rating scales have been published; however, discrepancies in validity limit their overall applicability in clinical practice and research. Such limitations may lead to an over- or underestimation of pain, resulting in unnecessary sedation or inadequately treated pain, potentially jeopardising infant safety through treatment side effects, including withdrawal symptoms or prolonged discomfort. To date, the majority of rating scales have been developed to assess procedural pain, whilst fewer scales for prolonged pain are available. Premature infants further complicate matters, as they often have a reduced ability to display robust pain behaviour due to their immaturity. Research has also shown that the use of rating scales in clinical practice is suboptimal, due to both inadequate and infrequent implementation alongside inappropriate choice of scale for the specific pain, population, or setting under evaluation. Despite numerous studies investigating the burden of pain in newborn infants, little work has been done to summarise the current evidence on the appropriateness of rating scales for specific types of pain or infant conditions. This has likely been limited by the subjectivity of pain assessment and further complication of assessing such a non-verbal and immature patient population. The immense burden of neonatal pain worldwide has also led to the development of numerous rating scales in various languages, further hindering evidence summation.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature to compile and describe the development, content, and measurement properties of clinical rating scales for the assessment of pain in newborn infants.

SEARCH METHODS

An Information Specialist systematically searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. The latest update search is current to July 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all study designs that involved the development or testing of a rating scale for assessing pain in newborn infants. We included preterm (born before week 37) and term (born at week 37 or beyond) infants undergoing pain assessment for any medical indication. We also included studies that included healthcare professionals.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We evaluated clinical rating scales assessing pain in newborn infants using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology evaluating content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing, and cross-cultural validation. We used a modified GRADE approach to assess risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, and indirectness.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 79 studies involving a total of 7197 infants, 326 nurses, and 12 physicians. Twenty-seven clinical rating scales were used in 26 countries, with 14 studies evaluating preterm infants, 11 on term infants, 46 on both preterm and term infants, four solely on medical staff, and four on preterm and/or term infants plus medical staff. Following the COSMIN checklist, we found all rating scales to be of very low-certainty evidence, raising concerns regarding their validity, reliability, and applicability in this vulnerable population across diverse clinical settings.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clinical staff should be vigilant when applying the currently available neonatal rating scales. Further development of rating scale content and testing for structural validity are necessary and should be prioritised. Together, they determine the content and structure of rating scales, underpin further testing, including reliability, and their prioritisation will make the greatest contribution to the evidence base for rating scales to assess neonatal pain. Collaborative efforts between clinicians and methodology experts will prevent methodological pitfalls and contribute to improving the validity and reliability of pain-rating scales in neonatology.

Exposure to clinical stressors during NICU admission in preterm infants

This study aims to quantify stress exposure related to clinical stressors in preterm infants during NICU admission and identify risk factors for high stress exposure. In this national cohort study, preterm infants (gestational age < 29 weeks) were prospectively followed during the first 28 days of their admission to one of the 10 NICUs in the Netherlands. The NeO-stress score, consisting of 38 clinical stressors graded with a severity index, was applied to describe stress exposure. We assessed the impact of infant characteristics at birth and postnatal age on NeO-stress scores using linear mixed modelling. In total, 446 infants were included with a median gestational age of 27+2 weeks (IQR 26+2-28+2). The median NeO-stress score per day was 61 (IQR 39-87) and highest (74, IQR 52-101) on the day of admission. Nasal/oral (37%) and endotracheal (14%) suctioning were key contributors to the cumulative NeO-stress scores. Linear mixed modelling showed that lower gestational age (B = -0.69, 95% CI - 0.94-0.44, p < 0.001), no antenatal administration of corticosteroids (B = 13.2, 95% CI 3.2-23.1, p = 0.010) and lower 5-min Apgar score (B = - 1.6, 95% CI - 3.0-0.25, p = 0.02) were significantly related with higher daily NeO-stress scores. Our model predicts that the NeO-stress score increases over time for the youngest infants.

CONCLUSION

Stress exposure in preterm infants during NICU admission varies over time with infants with the lowest gestational age at risk for experiencing the highest levels of stress throughout NICU admission. This highlights the importance stress reduction and provides opportunities for future interventions aimed at reducing stress exposure.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Preterm birth and admission to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit is very stressful. • High stress exposure in neonatal life is associated with adverse long term outcome.

WHAT IS NEW

• Stress exposure is highest in infants with the youngest gestational ages where it remains high or even increases during the first month of life. • Lower gestational age, no antenatal administration of corticosteroids and lower 5-min Apgar score were significantly related with higher daily NeO-stress scores.

Quantification of stress exposure in very preterm infants: Development of the NeO-stress score

BACKGROUND

Stress during treatment at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) has long-term negative consequences on preterm infants' development.

AIMS

We developed an instrument suited to validly determine the cumulative stress exposure for preterm infants in a NICU.

STUDY DESIGN

This survey study made use of two consecutive questionnaires.

SUBJECTS

NICU nurses and physicians from the nine NICUs in the Netherlands.

OUTCOME MEASURES

First, respondents rated the relevance of 77 items encompassing potentially stressful procedures, commented on their comprehensibility and the comprehensiveness of the list. We calculated the content validity per item (CVI-I) and included only the relevant items in a second questionnaire in which the participants rated the stressfulness from 0 (not stressful) to 10 (extremely stressful). A stressfulness index - representing the median score - was calculated for each included item.

RESULTS

Based on the CVI-I of the 77 items, step 1 resulted in 38 items considered relevant to quantify stress in preterm infants during the first 28 days of life. This list of 38 items exists of 34 items with a CVI-I if 0.78 or higher, one of these items was split into two items, and three items were added to improve comprehensiveness. The stressfulness index ranged from five to nine.

CONCLUSIONS

The NeO-stress score consists of stressful items including their severity index and was developed to determine cumulative stress exposure of preterm infants. Evaluating the cross-cultural validity, correlating it to behavioural and biological stress responses, and evaluating its ability to predict preterm infants at risk for the negative effects following stress might expand the possibilities for this instrument.

Music therapy and retinopathy of prematurity screening: using recorded maternal singing and heartbeat for post exam recovery

OBJECTIVE

Explore a music therapy (MT) intervention to support infant recovery post retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) exam.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, double-masked, randomized, parallel group study of 100 preterm infants exposed to MT (recorded maternal singing/heartbeat) or standard care (SC). Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) measured at: baseline, during the exam, and 1 and 5 min post exam.

RESULTS

Recovery PIPP scores were less with MT vs. SC, but statistical significance not achieved (Mean ± sd: MT 1 min [5.81 ± 2.93] and 5 min [3.91 ± 1.73] vs. SC 1 min [6.40 ± 2.78] and 5 min [4.76 ± 2.07], p = 0.07). Recovery PIPP sores were significantly higher with SC compared to MT when eye exams were longer (p = 0.049) or when exams were more painful (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Recorded maternal singing and heartbeat can support recovery post ROP exam. For longer/more painful ROP exams, MT may be more effective than SC promoting recovery post exam.

Defining Procedural Distress in the NICU and What Can Be Done About It

Procedural distress is a common occurrence in the NICU and is tied to attempts to support the life and development of vulnerable premature infants. We discuss the epidemiology of procedural distress and the potential negative consequences on infant neurodevelopment. We define procedural distress in the NICU and outline three approaches to limit or to reduce its detrimental effects including minimizing the number of procedures, instituting measures for developmentally supportive care, and using preemptively pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic analgesia. Despite the pervasiveness of procedural distress in the NICU, clinical and administrative measures are available to ameliorate possible harmful outcomes.

Development of Accumulated Pain/Stressor Scale (APSS) in NICUs: A National Survey

High-risk neonates experience numerous painful/stressful procedures daily in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Accumulated pain and stress have a detrimental impact on infants' neurodevelopment. Few valid tools are available to measure accumulated pain/stressors among NICU infants. The aim of this study was to obtain nurses' perceptions about severity and acuity levels regarding each painful/stressful procedure that infants may experience in the NICU. The data will support developing a new instrument, the Accumulated Pain/Stressor Scale (APSS) in NICUs. A nationwide online survey was conducted through the U.S. National Association of Neonatal Nurses membership. Respondents were asked to rate the perceived severity of pain/stress associated with 68 procedures using a 5-point Likert scale and to categorize pain/stress as acute or chronic. Modal values were used to determine summary rankings among the procedures. Eighty-four neonatal nurses completed the survey. Among 68 procedures, nearly all were rated as painful/stressful to some degree. Five procedures (7%) had a modal value of five (extremely painful/stressful), nine (14%) had a value of four, 20 (29%) had a value of three, 30 (44%) a value of two, and four (6%) had a value of one (not painful/stressful). Forty-four procedures (65%) were perceived as acute, six (9%) as chronic, and 18 (26%) as both acute and chronic. Nurses' perceptions of pain severity and acuity regarding procedures in NICUs varied somewhat. Further studies are needed in developing and validating the scale. The development of the APSS can quantitatively measure the accumulated neonatal pain/stress.