1
|
Fury MS, Paschos NK, Fabricant PD, Anderson CN, Busch MT, Chambers HG, Christino MA, Cordasco FA, Edmonds EW, Ganley TJ, Green DW, Heyworth BE, Lawrence JTR, Matava MJ, Micheli LJ, Milewski MD, Nepple JJ, Parikh SN, Pennock AT, Perkins CA, Saluan PM, Shea KG, Wall EJ, Willimon SC, Kocher MS. Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Postoperative Growth Disturbance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:1430-1441. [PMID: 33984243 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211008656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Growth disturbance is an uncommon but potentially serious complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. PURPOSE To describe how the pediatric ACL literature has assessed preoperative skeletal maturity and the amount of growth remaining and to comprehensively review the incidence, reporting, and monitoring of postoperative growth disturbance. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS This review included studies reporting original research of clinical outcomes of skeletally immature patients after ACL reconstruction. Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, preoperative assessments of skeletal maturity or growth remaining, and postoperative assessments of growth disturbances were extracted. RESULTS A total of 100 studies met inclusion criteria. All studies reported chronological age, and 28 studies (28%) assessed skeletal age. A total of 44 studies (44%) used Tanner staging, and 12 studies (12%) obtained standing hip-to-ankle radiographs preoperatively. In total, 42 patients (2.1%) demonstrated a leg length discrepancy (LLD) >10 mm postoperatively, including 9 patients (0.5%) with LLD >20 mm; furthermore, 11 patients (0.6%) with LLD underwent growth modulation. Shortening was the most common deformity overall, but overgrowth was reported more frequently in patients who had undergone all-epiphyseal techniques. Most LLDs involved the femur (83%). A total of 26 patients (1.3%) demonstrated a postoperative angular deformity ≥5°, and 9 of these patients underwent growth modulation. The most common deformities were femoral valgus (41%), tibial recurvatum (33%), and tibial varus (22%). Although standing hip-to-ankle radiographs were the most common radiographic assessment of growth disturbance, most studies inadequately reported the clinical and radiographic methods of assessment for growth disturbance. Additionally, only 35% of studies explicitly followed patients to skeletal maturity. CONCLUSION This systematic review described significant variability in the reporting and monitoring of growth-related complications after ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. The incidence of LLD and angular deformity appeared to be low, but the quality of research was not comprehensive enough for accurate assessment. REGISTRATION CRD42019136059 (PROSPERO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Fury
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikolaos K Paschos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter D Fabricant
- Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | -
- Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christian N Anderson
- Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael T Busch
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Children's Orthopaedics of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Henry G Chambers
- Pediatric Orthopedics & Scoliosis Center, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa A Christino
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Frank A Cordasco
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric W Edmonds
- Pediatric Orthopedics & Scoliosis Center, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Theodore J Ganley
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel W Green
- Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benton E Heyworth
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J Todd R Lawrence
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew J Matava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lyle J Micheli
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew D Milewski
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Nepple
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shital N Parikh
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew T Pennock
- Pediatric Orthopedics & Scoliosis Center, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Crystal A Perkins
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Children's Orthopaedics of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul M Saluan
- Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Garfield Heights, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin G Shea
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric J Wall
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samuel C Willimon
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Children's Orthopaedics of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mininder S Kocher
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Investigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Physeal-sparing posteromedial portal approach reduced distance between guide pin and neurovascular structures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29:881-888. [PMID: 32405665 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06043-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare a femoral physeal sparing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique utilizing a posteromedial portal to traditional transphyseal techniques with regards to anatomic tunnel positioning and proximity to important neurovascular structures. METHODS Eight cadaveric knees were obtained for the study. Femoral tunnel guide pins were placed utilizing four different techniques: accessory anterior medial portal, posteromedial portal, trans-tibial, and figure-4 methods. The knees were then dissected and the following measurements taken: distance of each pin to the saphenous and peroneal nerve, popliteus tendon, neurovascular bundle, femoral ACL footprint and articular cartilage, and the angle of the guide pin entering the lateral femoral condyle. Fluoroscopic imaging was taken to determine the disruption of the physeal scar. RESULTS Posteromedial portal guide pin was significantly closer to the neurovascular bundle, popliteal tendon and saphenous nerve when compared to the other 3 techniques, but was further from the peroneal nerve. It also had the smallest distance from the anatomic footprint of the ACL, and the largest angle to the lateral femoral condyle. The posteromedial portal guide pin had similar distance from the articular cartilage as the accessory anterior medial portal and figure-4 guide pin, with the trans-tibial guide pin being the farthest. The posteromedial portal guide pin failed to disrupt the physeal scar in all specimens, while the other three techniques consistently violated the physeal scar. CONCLUSION The posteromedial portal technique offers an appropriate method for anatomic ACL reconstruction while protecting the distal femoral physis from injury. Care needs to be taken with this technique as it comes in closer proximity to some of the important neurovascular structures. This study indicates that posteromedial portal technique is a less technically challenging approach for physeal-sparing ACL repair with special attention required for the protection of neurovascular bundle from potential injury.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gobbi A, Herman K, Grabowski R, Szwedowski D. Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Hyaluronic Scaffold and Autogenous Bone Marrow Aspirate Augmentation in Adolescents With Open Physes. Arthrosc Tech 2019; 8:e1561-e1568. [PMID: 31890538 PMCID: PMC6928459 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
It is well known that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the main stabilizer to the anterior tibial translation in the knee. The current gold standard of treatment for such lesions is ACL reconstruction. However, there are notable disadvantages to ACL reconstruction that include loss of proprioception, donor site morbidity, incomplete return to high-demand sports, and the inability to restore normal kinematics of the knee joint. Additionally, in adolescents who have open physes, there is a risk of potential iatrogenic growth plate injury. Tibial-sided soft-tissue avulsion is a rare subtype of ACL injuries. This Technical Note presents a method for primary anatomic ACL repair with a bioabsorbable scaffold and bone marrow concentrate augmentation for an acute distal ACL injury. Our technique is an alternative to reconstruction as it allows the preservation of the native insertion site and has the potential to reduce the risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Gobbi
- Address correspondence to Alberto Gobbi, OASI Bioresearch Foundation, via amadeo 24, 20133 Milan, Italiy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zebis MK, Warming S, Pedersen MB, Kraft MH, Magnusson SP, Rathcke M, Krogsgaard M, Døssing S, Alkjær T. Outcome Measures After ACL Injury in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7:2325967119861803. [PMID: 31431900 PMCID: PMC6685120 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119861803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children is increasing. However, no standardized core set of outcome measures exists for evaluating pediatric ACL injuries. Purpose To perform a scoping review of the literature to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective outcome measures used to evaluate pediatric patients after ACL injury and to classify these in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods The literature was systematically searched with the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro databases. The inclusion criteria were Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, German, or English language; publication between 2010 and 2018; pediatric ACL injury (patients ≤15 years old); and outcome measures. The selected papers were screened for title, abstract, and full text in accordance with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results A total of 68 papers (4286 patients; mean ± SD age, 12.2 ± 2.3 years) were included. Nineteen PROMs and 11 objective outcome measures were identified. The most frequently reported PROMs were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form (51% of studies), Lysholm scoring scale (46% of studies) and Tegner activity rating scale (37% of studies). Additionally, return to sport was reported in 41% of studies. The most frequent objective measures were knee laxity (76% of studies), growth disturbances (69% of studies), range of motion (41% of studies), and muscle strength (21% of studies). With respect to the ICF domains, the IKDC covered all 3 ICF health domains, the Lysholm score covered the Body Structure and Function and the Activity Limitation domains, while the Tegner score covered the Participation Restriction domain. Objectively measured knee joint laxity, range of motion, and muscle strength covered 1 domain (Body Structure and Function). Conclusion Pediatric patients with ACL injury were mainly evaluated subjectively with the IKDC and objectively by knee joint laxity. No consensus exists in the evaluation of children after ACL injury. The majority of applied outcome measures are developed for adults. To cover the ICF health domains, future research needs to consider reliable and valid outcome measures relevant for pediatric patients with ACL injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette K Zebis
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Technology, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susan Warming
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria B Pedersen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie H Kraft
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Technology, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S Peter Magnusson
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Rathcke
- Section for Sports Traumatology M51, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Krogsgaard
- Section for Sports Traumatology M51, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon Døssing
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine Alkjær
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Troyer S, Anchustegui NG, Richmond CG, Cannamela PC, Dingel A, Stavinoha TJ, Ganley TJ, Anderson AF, Shea KG. Avoiding tibia physeal injury during double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J ISAKOS 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2017-000184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
6
|
Shaw N, Erickson C, Bryant SJ, Ferguson VL, Krebs MD, Hadley-Miller N, Payne KA. Regenerative Medicine Approaches for the Treatment of Pediatric Physeal Injuries. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART B-REVIEWS 2017; 24:85-97. [PMID: 28830302 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2017.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The physis, or growth plate, is a cartilaginous region at the end of children's long bones that serves as the primary center for longitudinal growth and characterizes the immature skeleton. Musculoskeletal injury, including fracture, infection, malignancy, or iatrogenic damage, has risk of physeal damage. Physeal injuries account for 30% of pediatric fractures and may result in impaired bone growth. Once damaged, cartilage tissue within the physis is often replaced by unwanted bony tissue, forming a "bony bar" that can lead to complications such as complete growth arrest, angular or rotational deformities, and altered joint mechanics. Children with a bony bar occupying <50% of the physis usually undergo bony bar resection and insertion of an interpositional material, such as a fat graft, to prevent recurrence and allow the surrounding uninjured physeal tissue to restore longitudinal bone growth. Clinical success for this procedure is <35% and often the bony bar and associated growth impairments return. Children who are not candidates for bony bar resection due to a physeal bar occupying >50% of their physis undergo corrective osteotomy or bone lengthening procedures. These approaches are complex and have variable success rates. As such, there is a critical need for regenerative approaches to not only prevent initial bony bar formation but also regenerate healthy physeal cartilage following injury. This review describes physeal anatomy, mechanisms of physeal injury, and current treatment options with associated limitations. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the current research using cell-based therapies, growth factors, and biomaterials in the different animal models of injury along with strategic directions for modulating intrinsic injury pathways to inhibit bony bar formation and/or promote physeal tissue formation. Pediatric physeal injuries constitute a unique niche within regenerative medicine for which there is a critical need for research to decrease child morbidity related to this injurious process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nichole Shaw
- 1 Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado
| | - Christopher Erickson
- 1 Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado.,2 Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stephanie J Bryant
- 3 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado.,4 BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado.,5 Material Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado
| | - Virginia L Ferguson
- 4 BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado.,5 Material Science and Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado.,6 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado
| | - Melissa D Krebs
- 7 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines , Golden, Colorado.,8 Gates Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado
| | - Nancy Hadley-Miller
- 1 Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karin A Payne
- 1 Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado.,8 Gates Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lane MK, Mutch J, Ratkowiak K, Lemos SE, Kalra K. Proximity of Lateral Critical Structures to the All-Epiphyseal Outside-In Femoral Tunnels in Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2017; 33:1234-1240. [PMID: 28302426 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the proximity of the lateral critical structures (peroneal nerve [PN], popliteus tendon [PT], lateral collateral ligament [LCL], and articular cartilage [AC]) to the femoral tunnel for outside-in all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in reference to knee flexion angle. METHODS All-epiphyseal ACL reconstructions were performed in 12 human cadaveric knees using arthroscopy and outside-in drilling for anatomic femoral tunnel placement that was ensured by identifying the center of the total ACL footprint. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm tunnel position and reconstructions were performed with quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft with Xtendobutton (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) fixation on the femoral side. After reconstruction, the lateral side of the knee was dissected and the LCL, PT, distal and posterior AC, and the PN were identified. The distances of these structures from the center of the exiting femoral tunnel were then measured using a digital caliper at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of knee flexion. Any gross damage to these structures caused by the femoral drilling was also noted. Data were compiled and the mean and standard deviations (SD) of the distances from the pin to the structures of interest were calculated. The normality of the data at each flexion angle was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk tests (P > .05), and the relationship between flexion angle and average distance was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (P < .05). Any significant relationships were then evaluated using paired t-tests (P < .05) with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for each possible pair of flexion angles. Averages, SD, and P values are reported. A post hoc power analysis was performed. RESULTS The violation of the LCL was noted in 3 specimens and that of the PT in 1 specimen as a result of femoral tunnel drilling at flexion angles ranging from 90° to 120°. The distance between the PT and the femoral tunnel also decreased significantly (P < .001) with knee flexion with average distances to the center of 8.07 mm at 0°, 7.75 mm at 30°, 6.33 mm at 60°, 4.12 mm at 90°, and 1.89 mm at 120°. The mean ± SD for distances from the femoral tunnel to the center of the PT at 0° was 8.07 ± 7.15, at 30° 7.75 ± 6.66, at 60° 6.33 ± 6.79, at 90° 4.12 ± 5.71, and at 120° 1.89 ± 5.56. As the knee was progressively flexed, the distance between the LCL and the femoral tunnel decreased significantly (P < .001) with an average distance of 6.52 mm at 0°, 6.26 mm at 30°, 4.23 mm at 60°, 2.38 mm at 90°, and 0.4 mm at 120°. The mean ± SD for distances from the femoral tunnel to the center of the LCL at 0° was 6.52 ± 5.93, at 30° 6.26 ± 7.32, at 60° 4.23 ± 7.82, 90° 2.38 ± 7.31, and at 120° 0.4 ± 7.01. The PN was remote from the femoral tunnel at all flexion angles with a mean distance of 42.83 to 59.22 mm. The PN to guide pin distance increased significantly with progressive knee flexion (P < .001). The AC was not damaged in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS The LCL and PT are at significant risk during percutaneous femoral drilling for all-epiphyseal anatomic ACL reconstruction using an outside-in technique. This risk was maximized at 120° flexion and minimized in full extension. These findings suggest that the optimal position for femoral drilling in all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction is full or near-full extension of the knee that can be accomplished by placing the knee in 30° of flexion (after using fluoroscopic guidance to pass the guide pin past the lateral critical structures) to visualize the footprint of the ACL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Information garnered from this study may help clinicians better understand the risk to the lateral critical structures when an outside-in femoral tunnel is not drilled in the appropriate degree of knee flexion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark K Lane
- Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Division of Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.; Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Jennifer Mutch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Division of Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Kaitlyn Ratkowiak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Division of Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Stephen E Lemos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Division of Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Kunal Kalra
- Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Division of Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The possibility of physeal injury during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the pediatric population is a concern. The purpose of this study was to determine whether drilling at or near the physis could cause a temperature increase that could trigger chondrolysis. METHODS Skeletally immature cadaveric lamb distal femurs were used for this study and randomly placed in 1 of 6 groups (n=10 in each group). We examined the 8 and 10 mm Flipcutter at a distance of 0.5 mm from the physis and an 8 and 10 mm acorn-tipped reamer at a distance of 0.5 and 3.0 mm from the physis. During drilling, temperature change at the distal femoral physis was continuously measured until the temperature decreased to the original value. RESULTS An interreamer comparison yielded a significant difference when drilling 0.5 mm from the physis (P=0.001). Pair-wise Mann-Whitney post hoc tests were performed to further evaluate the differences among the groups. The 8 mm FlipCutter had a significantly higher maximum temperature (39.8±1.4°C) compared with the 10 mm FlipCutter (38.0±0.6°C, P=0.001), 8 mm acorn-tipped reamer (38.1±0.9°C, P=0.007), and 10 mm acorn-tipped reamer (37.5±0.3°C, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The risk of thermal-induced injury to the physis is low with an all epiphyseal drilling technique, when a traditional acorn-tipped reamer over a guidepin is utilized, even if the drilling occurs very close to the physis. In addition, the risk of drilling with a FlipCutter is low, but may be greater than a traditional reamer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Thermal-induced necrosis is a realistic concern, due to the characteristics of the distal femoral physis, and the propensity for this physis to respond poorly to injury. Our study supports that drilling near the physis can be done safely, although smaller reamers and nontraditional designs may generate higher heat. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I-basic science.
Collapse
|
9
|
Cordasco FA, Mayer SW, Green DW. All-Inside, All-Epiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Athletes: Return to Sport, Incidence of Second Surgery, and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45:856-863. [PMID: 28027452 DOI: 10.1177/0363546516677723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in skeletally immature athletes are increasing. PURPOSE To evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes of all-inside, all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature athletes with 3 to 6 years of remaining growth, with a focus on return to sport and the incidence of second surgery. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS Twenty-three skeletally immature athletes were prospectively evaluated after all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction utilizing a hamstring autograft. The athletes' age, sex, sport, mechanism of injury, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were noted. The evaluation included a physical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, isokinetic testing, and validated outcome scores. Standing radiographs and spoiled gradient recalled echo MRI scans were obtained at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. A quality of movement assessment and return-to-sport performance analysis were also performed. RESULTS Of the 23 athletes, 6 were female (mean age, 11.3 years), and 17 were male (mean age, 12.6 years). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years (range, 24-45 months), the mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 94.6 ± 4.9, the mean Lysholm score was 97.9 ± 4.0, the mean Marx activity rating scale score was 13.4 ± 3.6, and the mean Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale score was 23.9 ± 7.0. Lachman and pivot-shift test results were negative in all patients. The mean side-to-side difference on the KT-1000 arthrometer was 0.9 ± 0.5 mm and less tight on the operated side. No significant growth disturbances were noted; however, 6 athletes had a leg-length discrepancy of more than 5 mm (range, 6-18 mm). Two patients had overgrowth in the femur of more than 15 mm (16 mm and 18 mm). Two athletes (8.7%) required second surgery. The mean time to return to unrestricted activity was 13.5 months (range, 8-22 months). CONCLUSION The all-inside, all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction technique using a hamstring autograft demonstrates excellent subjective and objective clinical outcomes in skeletally immature athletes without physeal arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank A Cordasco
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Daniel W Green
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anderson CN, Anderson AF. Management of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Injured Knee in the Skeletally Immature Athlete. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36:35-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
11
|
Severyns M, Lucas G, Jallageas R, Briand S, Odri G, Fraisse B, Marleix S, Rochcongar P, Violas P. ACL reconstruction in 11 children using the Clocheville surgical technique: Objective and subjective evaluation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102:S205-8. [PMID: 27033842 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The over-the-top position of the femoral metaphyseal tunnel during extraphyseal ligament reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) according to Clocheville may be responsible for negative anisometry. Until now, the follow-up of children operated using this pediatric technique was limited to screening for iatrogenic epiphysiodesis and the search for postoperative clinical instability. The objective of this study was to measure residual laxity using objective tests, to quantify muscle recovery, and to evaluate the quality of life of these patients in terms of the sports activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eleven patients with a mean age of 13.5years were seen at a mean 2.1years of follow-up. They underwent objective clinical tests (GNRB(®) arthrometer and CON-TREX(®) dynamometer) as well as subjective questionnaires (IKDC and KOOS). RESULTS No significant difference was found between the healthy knee and the operated knee for either the GNRB(®) at 134N (P=0.79) or at 200N (P=0.98). The CON-TREX(®) system allowed us to measure a median percentage of quadriceps recovery of 80.7% (range, 52.2-114.5) in terms of muscle power (60°/s) and 81.2% (range, 51.6-109.6) for muscle response (180°/s). The median subjective IKDC score was 94.73/100 (range, 73.68-98.93); 72.7% of the patients resumed competitive sports. DISCUSSION This study's lack of statistical power did not show a significant difference in terms of residual laxity at rest of GNRB(®) transplants, while a mean differential of +0.4mm was observed. Although pediatric transphyseal ligament reconstruction techniques are increasingly used, the Clocheville technique remains, in our opinion, an attractive surgical alternative in the youngest subjects, with no major risk of iatrogenic epiphysiodesis even though it is theoretically anisometric. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Severyns
- Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - G Lucas
- Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - R Jallageas
- Département de médecine du sport, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - S Briand
- Clinique chirurgicale d'orthopédie et traumatologie, CHU de Nantes, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - G Odri
- Clinique chirurgicale d'orthopédie et traumatologie, CHU de Nantes, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - B Fraisse
- Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - S Marleix
- Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - P Rochcongar
- Département de médecine du sport, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35200 Rennes, France
| | - P Violas
- Service de chirurgie pédiatrique, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Domzalski M, Karauda A, Grzegorzewski A, Lebiedzinski R, Zabierek S, Synder M. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Transphyseal Technique in Prepubescent Athletes: Midterm, Prospective Evaluation of Results. Arthroscopy 2016; 32:1141-6. [PMID: 26968309 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Revised: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy, results, and complications of transphyseal technique of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in prepubertal patients and to assess a possible influence of children's growth on the outcome. METHODS Between 2005 and 2009, 22 (16 boys and 6 girls) prepubescent patients, Tanner stage 1 and 2, underwent ACL reconstruction and the follow-up 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery and after growth plate closure. The average age of the girls was 11.2 years, and of the boys, 12.3 years. The average follow-up period was 77.2 months. Clinical outcome was evaluated by Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective and subjective knee scores. Standard radiograms were performed for potential axial growing disturbance. RESULTS The average follow-up period was 77.2 months (range, 54 to 102 months), and IKDC subjective scores changed from 58 (range, 44 to 69) before surgery to 87 (range, 86 to 87; P = .00) at 6 months, 93 (range, 88 to 97; P = .00) at 12 months, and 95 (range, 92 to -98; P = .5) at final examination. Lysholm score increased from 58 (range, 53 to 64) before surgery to 89 (range, 85 to 92; P = .00) at 6 months and 96 (range, 94 to 100; P = .00) at 12 months, 24 months (P = .9), and final examination (P = .8). Before injury, all patients were graded 7 on the Tegner scale. Nineteen athletes reached at least grade 7 and returned to the level of activity a mean of 9 months after the surgery. No patient had deformity or growth disturbances observed clinically. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic-assisted transphyseal ACL reconstruction in prepubescent patient is a promising technique, provided that all technical details are respected. It gives excellent subjective and objective knee scores and provides a very good function of the knee joint in the midterm period with no or only minor effect on the leg length. The rate of growth after surgery did not influence the results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Domzalski
- Department of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
| | - Anna Karauda
- Department of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Andrzej Grzegorzewski
- Department of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Radosław Lebiedzinski
- Department of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Sebastian Zabierek
- Department of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Marek Synder
- Department of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|