Repair of Rotator Cuff Tear With Delamination: Independent Repairs of the Infraspinatus and Articular Capsule

Rotator cuff tendon strain distribution changes from the superior to the inferior tendon attachments with increasing shoulder abduction

Supraspinatus (SSP), infraspinatus (ISP), and subscapularis (SSC) muscles from the rotator cuff (RC) are comprised of anatomical subregions based on muscle fiber alignment and tendon attachments. Previous studies have shown mechanical interactions between the SSP and ISP tendons, with abduction angle influencing these interactions. However, changes in strain distribution originating from the RC muscle subregions, including the SSC, due to differences in abduction angle have not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the strain distribution in intact RC cadaveric shoulders with loading from the SSP, ISP, and SSC muscles and their subregions at different abduction angles. Surface strains in the bursal side of the SSP, ISP and SSC tendons of eight fresh frozen cadaveric intact shoulders were obtained by applying tension on these muscles and on their subregions at 25° and 45° glenohumeral abduction using an MTS system. When the SSP muscle or anterior region was loaded, no significant strain differences were observed within the footprint regions at 45° abduction. However, when the posterior region was loaded, strains concentrated on the middle facet as the abduction angle increased. Significantly higher strains were also observed in the inferior portion of the footprint with increasing abduction angle when the ISP or SSC muscles, or their subregions, were loaded. The differences in strain distribution patterns observed between the anterior and posterior regions of the SSP muscle highlight the importance of addressing each region and tendon separately when managing RC tears and repairs.

A modified arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair is effective for delaminated rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of delaminated rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and evaluate the clinical outcomes of a modified arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair for delaminated RCTs.

METHODS

Patients with full-thickness RCTs, who underwent arthroscopic suture bridge repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence of delamination. Delaminated RCTs were treated using a modified en masse suture bridge technique, while nondelaminated RCTs received a conventional suture bridge technique. Preoperative and postoperative Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were determined to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out to identify the integrity and retear of the repaired rotator cuff.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were included in our study cohort, in which 67 (39%) delaminated RCTs were confirmed intraoperatively. The prevalence of delamination was significantly higher in large tears (53/102, 52%) compared to medium tears (14/70, 20%) (p < 0.001). No significant differences in age (n.s.) or gender (n.s.) were observed between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in Constant and ASES scores postoperatively (both p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the groups (n.s.). The retear rates were 2/67 (3.0%) in the delamination group and 3/105 (2.9%) in the nondelamination group, showing no significant difference (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified arthroscopic en masse suture bridge technique was effective for repairing delaminated RCTs, yielding favourable clinical outcomes comparable to those of nondelaminated tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Combined All-Inside Fixation for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

The anatomic repair of delaminated rotator cuff tears presents a surgical challenge, necessitating innovative solutions for optimal outcomes. This Technical Note describes the arthroscopic suture bridge combined with all-inside fixation, a novel approach tailored for small yet deep-layer dominant delaminated tears. The method involves addressing the upper-layer tear beneath the acromion and employing all-inside suturing in the glenohumeral joint for the lower-layer tear, decoupling the outer tear size from limiting the treatment of the deeper tear. Accurate tear identification and preoperative planning are critical for success. This technique offers advantages in overcoming the outer tear's impact on lower tear repair, potentially reducing patient costs. Proficiency in tear identification and surgical planning is essential for successful execution. Considerations include reserving sutures as a precaution and inapplicability to posteriorly located delaminated tears. This approach provides a valuable contribution to arthroscopic techniques, especially for smaller delaminated tears.

Comparison of En Masse Repair versus Separate Double-Layer Repair for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Delamination of cuff tendons has a negative impact on outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study is to compare en masse repair (EMR) and separate double-layer repair (SDLR) for delaminated rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on major databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) until 1 June 2023. Comparative studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up of patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR for delaminated tears were included. The outcomes assessed retear rates and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies involving 325 cases were analyzed. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in retear rates between SDLR and EMR for delaminated tears (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.49). However, the meta-analysis demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in favor of the SDLR for the total Constant score (SMD = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.02), SST score (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.71), and postoperative range of abduction (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.64).

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that the SDLR in arthroscopic RCR for delaminated rotator cuff tears leads to improved short-term functional outcomes and range of motion compared to EMR. However, there is no significant difference in retear risk between the two approaches.

Rotator cuff tear patterns: MRI appearance and its surgical relevance

A new perspective on rotator cuff anatomy has allowed a better understanding of the patterns of the different rotator cuff tears. It is essential for radiologists to be aware of these different patterns of tears and to understand how they might influence treatment and surgical approach. Our objective is to review the arthroscopy correlated magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the different types of rotator cuff tears based on current anatomical concepts.Critical relevance statement Knowledge of the characteristics of rotator cuff tears improves our communication with the surgeon and can also make it easier for the radiologist to prepare a report that guides therapeutic conduct and serves as a prognosis for the patient.Key points• There is no universally accepted classification for RC tears.• New patterns such as delamination or myotendinous junction tears have been defined.• The most difficult feature to assess in full thickness tears on MRI is the pattern.• Fatty infiltration of the RC tendons is crucial in the prognosis and outcome.• The radiological report is an effective way of communication with the surgeon.

Delaminated Tears of the Rotator Cuff: MRI Interpretation with Clinical Correlation

(1) Background: A delaminated tear is described as a horizontal split in the tendon substance. This review summarizes the clinical and radiologic characteristics of delaminated tears of the rotator cuff. (2) Methods: Initial radiological characteristics of a delaminated tear include the horizontal component of a partial-thickness tear determined using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. As demonstrated using indirect MR arthrography, the tear gradually progresses to be defined as either horizontal intrasubstantial splitting of the bursal and articular layers or differential retraction of the bursal and articular layers. (3) Results: The existence of delaminated tears is a poor prognostic factor in functional and morphologic outcomes after the repair of rotator cuff tendons and many surgical techniques have been introduced to solve this problem. Although the presence of a delaminated tear does not affect the arthroscopic repair outcome, the presence of medium-to-large, retracted delaminated tears may be an adverse negative prognostic factor after single-row repair. (4) Conclusion: Advances in imaging and surgical techniques have improved the detection of delaminated rotator cuff tears. Preoperative identification of delaminated tears on magnetic resonance imaging is clinically important because tailored surgical repair techniques must be chosen for successful outcomes.

Factors correlated with the optimal tension for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using Grasper Tensioning Attachment

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the optimal tension in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study aimed to identify preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors that correlate with the tension in ARCR and to determine the optimal intraoperative tension using Grasper Tensioning Attachment, a tension meter attached to the common arthroscopic surgical grasper.

METHODS

This study included 63 patients with a mean age at surgery of 65.3 years (range, 45-83 years) who underwent ARCR. The mean follow-up period was 24.1 months (range, 24-28 months). We investigated the patients' demographic data, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, DeOrio and Cofield classification, and Goutallier stage of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. We also evaluated cuff integrity based on the Sugaya classification via magnetic resonance imaging. The free edge of the torn retracted tendon was grasped, and the passive tension to the footprint was then measured with Grasper Tensioning Attachment with the arm at the side. The anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) diameters were also measured.

RESULTS

The preoperative Goutallier stage of the supraspinatus muscle was stage 0 in 7 cases, stage 1 in 34, stage 2 in 20, and stage 3 in 2. The mean intraoperative rotator repair tension was 10.0 ± 2.5 N (range, 7.5-17 N). The mean AP diameter of the rotator cuff tear was 22 ± 10 mm (range, 8-50 mm), and the mean ML diameter was 24 ± 10 mm (range, 10-50 mm). Age, DeOrio and Cofield classification, Goutallier stage, AP diameter, and ML diameter correlated with rotator repair tension. The rotator repair tension in Sugaya classification type III or IV cases (n = 12, 11.4 ± 2.4 N) was significantly larger than that in type I or II cases (n = 51, 9.7 ± 2.4 N; P = .03). Tension ≥ 10 N as a cutoff value from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was a risk factor for poor cuff integrity (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Rotator repair tension ≥ 10 N was a risk factor for poor cuff integrity. Thus, care should be taken when performing intraoperative procedures and administering postoperative regimens.

Comparison of three suture-bridge techniques for large or massive rotator cuff tear with delamination

Introduction: Rotator cuff tear with delamination is considered a risk factor for postoperative retear. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between three repair procedures for large or massive rotator cuff tears with delamination: conventional en masse suture bridge (EMSB), double-layer suture bridge (DLSB), and the combination of DLSB with modified Debyere-Patte (DLSB + DP). Methods: 53 shoulders of 52 patients who had massive rotator cuff tears with delamination were categorized into three groups: EMSB (18 shoulders), DLSB (24 shoulders), and DLSB + DP (11 shoulders). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 34.6 months. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included a range of motion (ROM), Constant scores, global fatty degeneration (GFDI), and tendon integrity according to Sugaya’s classification by magnetic resonance images (MRI). Results: In all groups, ROM significantly improved after the procedures. Mean constant scores significantly improved: from 45.5 to 77.4 after EMSB, from 45.5 to 87.6 after DLSB, and from 46.3 to 88.0 after DLSB + DP. Significant differences were noted in postoperative Constant scores (p = 0.018: DLSB vs. EMSB, and p = 0.045: DLSB + DP vs. EMSB). The Constant pain scores were better for DLSB + DP than for EMSB (p = 0.012). Global fatty degeneration index (GFDI) with DLSB + DP was significantly higher than that for either EMSB or DLSB, indicating significant preoperative fatty degeneration for DLSB + DP. Retear occurred in 27.8% of the EMSB group, 12.5% of the DLSB group, and 9.1% of the DLSB + DP group. Discussion: Comparisons of the three groups demonstrated that DLSB and DLSB + DP achieved better clinical outcomes than EMSB for the repair of large or massive rotator cuff tears. DLSB + DP is useful for massive rotator cuff tears with severe fatty degeneration or for cases where the presence of excessive tension is anticipated when repairing the torn cuff.

Revisiting the rotator cuff footprint

Newer studies challenged the traditionally held belief that the supraspinatus inserts on the entire superior facet and the infraspinatus is attached on the entire middle facet of the greater tuberosity. They showed that the infraspinatus tendon is thicker anteriorly and can be differentiated from the posterior part of the supraspinatus. Hence, the newer studies showed that the supraspinatus attached in a much smaller area than previously thought, and infraspinatus occupied the lateral part of the superior facet of the greater tuberosity. This review aimed to present all the older and current knowledge of the rotator cuff insertion and discuss how this knowledge may affect the surgical repair of the rotator cuff tendons. Our review has synthesized and compared the differences and similarities between the older and the newer knowledge about the footprint anatomy of the cuff tendons and the capsule attachment. We have also highlighted how the newer knowledge impacts the way we treat the tears of the rotator cuff tendons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Review of basic science studies.

Separate double-layer repair versus en masse repair for delaminated rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Delaminated rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder disorder in elderly individuals. Either arthroscopic separate double-layer repair (DR) or en masse repair (ER) is used to treat a delaminated rotator cuff tear. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic ER versus DR intervention.

METHODS

Five studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CNKI, Google, and the Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed with RevMan 5.3. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Five studies, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies, were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from low to high. The pooled results for the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Constant score, and range of motion (ROM) showed that the outcomes were not statistically significant between the two interventions. The difference in retear rate was not statistically significant (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.36-1.33, P = 0.27). The sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results, and publication bias was not apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

Both arthroscopic ER and DR interventions had benefits in delaminated rotator cuff tear treatment. ER and DR treatments were equally effective and had the same retear rate. The arthroscopic DR technique could not be recommended as the optical choice for delaminated rotator cuff tears based on current evidence.

Arthroscopic Knotless Separate Layer Transosseous Equivalent Repair of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

Delamination of rotator cuff tears presents a challenge for surgeons. Recognizing and repairing such a complex tear pattern often require innovative approaches to achieve an anatomic restoration of footprint. In this Technical Note, we described our preferred method that anatomically repairs both layers of delaminated rotator cuff tear separately in a knotless transosseous equivalent technique. Two sutures are placed to the articular layer in a cinch stitch configuration. Then, closed-loop end sutures are passed through both layers while keeping the closed-loop end at the working portal. The free ends of cinch stitches are loaded to anchors with a preloaded fiber tape loop, which is placed to the medial row while approximating the articular layer onto its footprint. Fiber tapes are then shuttled through both layers of tendon with the help of a previously placed closed-loop suture. Finally, the lateral row anchors are placed while fiber tapes are tensioned in a cross-bridge configuration. We believe that this technique may facilitate uneventful healing of delaminated rotator cuffs by providing the biomechanical properties of transosseous equivalent repair.

Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tear: Concurrent Concept and Treatment

Delaminated rotator cuff tear pertains to the horizontal split of the tendon substance. As reported previously, the presence of a delaminated tear and incidence of delaminated rotator cuff tear ranges from 38% to 92%. The different strain intensities applied across the rotator cuff tendon, and the shear stress between the bursal and articular layers seem to play a role in its pathogenesis. In a delaminated rotator cuff tear, the degree and direction of retraction between two layers differ, with accompanying intrasubstance cleavage. A surgeon therefore needs to consider and carefully evaluate the tear characteristics when repairing delaminated rotator cuff tear. Delaminated rotator cuff tear is considered to be a poor prognostic factor after rotator cuff repair, but numerous surgical repair techniques have been introduced and applied to resolve this problem. Recent literature has reported good clinical outcomes after delaminated rotator cuff repair.

Capsular attachment of the subregions of rotator cuff muscles

Purpose

This study aimed to morphologically and histologically investigate the relationship between deep subregions of the rotator cuff muscle and shoulder joint capsule as well as the relationship between the rotator cuff tendon or capsule and bony insertion.

Methods

We examined 13 shoulders of embalmed cadavers and measured the capsular attachments and footprints macroscopically. We also histologically examined the fibres in three shoulders.

Results

Loose attachment, which was less tight with spaced connective tissue, and firm attachment, which was tight with dense connective tissue, were found under the surface of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. The anterior-deep and posterior-deep subregions of the supraspinatus and the middle partition and inferior partition of the infraspinatus formed firm attachments to the capsule. The mean areas of firm attachment for the anterior-deep subregion, posterior-deep subregion and middle partition were 118.8 mm², 267.8 mm² and 399.3 mm², respectively, while the area of the inferior partition was small. The transverse fibres were located just lateral to the medial edge of the firm attachment area. The thick capsule had a substantial footprint. Both tendon fibres and the capsule inserted into the superior and middle facets through the attachment fibrocartilage.

Conclusions

The posterior-deep subregion of the supraspinatus and middle partition of the infraspinatus evenly occupied the capsular attachment area. The transverse fibres were located just lateral to the medial edge of the firm attachment area, and the thick capsule had a substantial footprint. Both tendon fibres and the capsule inserted into the superior and middle facets through the attachment fibrocartilage.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Lamina-Specific Double-Row Repair of Large Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears in Active Patients

Background:

The presence of delamination and a larger rotator cuff tear (RCT) size have been associated with poorer outcomes in rotator cuff repair. Therefore, we developed a new surgical procedure, arthroscopic lamina-specific double-row fixation (ALSDR), for the repair of large delaminated RCTs.

Purpose:

To investigate the clinical outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and satisfaction with several variables after ALSDR for large delaminated RCTs.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 30 active patients (mean age, 59.1 years) undergoing ALSDR were assessed by a numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10) for pain, surgery, work, and exercise as well as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores at a mean of 65.9 months postoperatively. Rotator cuff integrity was determined by magnetic resonance imaging. The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to determine the correlation between clinical and NRS scores.

Results:

Five patients (16.7%) had a retear. Each of the postoperative functional and NRS scores except the NRS work score was significantly better in the healed shoulders than in the shoulders with a retear (P < .001). The NRS pain score showed a significant negative correlation with ASES, Constant, and SST scores (ρ = −0.775, −0.668, and −0.742, respectively; P < .001 for all). The NRS surgery score had a positive correlation with Constant and SST scores (ρ = 0.393 [P = .032] and ρ = 0.456 [P = .011], respectively). The NRS work score had a positive correlation with ASES, Constant, and SST scores (ρ = 0.382 [P = .037], ρ = 0.386 [P = .035], and ρ = 0.414 [P = .023], respectively). The NRS exercise score had a positive correlation with ASES, Constant, and SST scores (ρ = 0.567 [P = .001], ρ = 0.511 [P = .004], and ρ = 0.639 [P < .001], respectively).

Conclusion:

Our results showed that there was a significant correlation between clinical and NRS scores. The results indicate that ALSDR can provide a high degree of functionality and can be a useful alternative treatment for active patients with large delaminated RCTs.

The Effect of Tendon Delamination on Rotator Cuff Healing

BACKGROUND

While patient age, tear size, and muscle fatty infiltration are factors known to affect the rate of tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, the effect of tendon delamination is less known.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of tendon delamination on rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic single-row (SR) repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 117) with chronic full-thickness rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic SR repair with the tension-band cuff repair. The mean ± SD age at the time of surgery was 60 ± 8 years. There were 25 small, 63 medium, and 29 large tears. Tendon delamination was assessed intraoperatively under arthroscopy with the arthroscope placed in the lateral portal. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with nondelaminated (n = 80) and delaminated (n = 37) cuff tears. The 2 groups were comparable for age, sex, body mass index, preoperative pain, strength, and a Constant-Murley score. Repair integrity was evaluated with sonography (mean, 24 months after surgery; range, 6-62 months) and classified into 3 categories: type A, indicating complete, homogeneous, and thick coverage of the footprint; type B, partial coverage with a thin tendon; and type C, no coverage of the footprint.

RESULTS

The prevalence of tendon delamination observed under arthroscopy was 32% (37 of 117), which increased with tear size and retraction: from 15% in small tears to 32% in medium tears and 45% in large tears ( P = .028). Postoperatively, 83 patients had complete coverage of footprint (type A = 71%) and the cuff was considered healed, whereas 26 had partial coverage or a thin tendon (type B = 22%) and 8 had no coverage (type C = 7%). Overall, the rate of complete healing was 78% in nondelaminated cuff tears and 57% in the case of tendon delamination ( P = .029). In large retracted tears, the healing rate dropped from 81% in the absence of delamination to 39% when the tendons were delaminated ( P = .027).

CONCLUSION

Tendon delamination increases with tear size and retraction. Patients with chronic delaminated and retracted rotator cuff tears (stage 2 or 3) are at risk of failure after SR cuff repair, whereas patients with small delaminated rotator cuff tears (stage 1) involving only the supraspinatus can be treated with an SR cuff repair with a high chance of tendon healing. These results suggest that SR cuff repair may be insufficient to treat delaminated chronic cuff tears. To improve the anatomic outcomes of rotator cuff repairs, surgeons should consider treating delaminated tears with a double-row or double-layer repair.

Delamination Does Not Affect Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as Compared With Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears: A Study of 1043 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available regarding the characteristics of delaminated rotator cuff tears as compared with nondelaminated tears. Furthermore, there is conflicting information regarding the effects of delamination on the anatomic healing of repaired cuffs.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the characteristics and anatomic outcomes of delaminated rotator cuff tears in comparison with nondelaminated tears to determine whether delamination is a negative prognostic factor affecting rotator cuff repair outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2014, 1043 patients were enrolled in the study to assess the prevalence of delamination. Among them, the findings from 531 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic arthrography at least 1 year after surgery were included to determine whether delamination was a negative prognostic factor affecting the anatomic outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Delamination was assessed intraoperatively and defined by distinguishable edge cleavage tearing or interstitial horizontal gap between the articular and bursal surfaces of the torn tendon. One of 3 repair techniques (modified Mason Allen, single row, or double row) was used according to tear configuration and tendon mobilization. The authors evaluated visual analog scale scores for pain and satisfaction and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores to quantify clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The incidence of delamination was 42.9% (447 of 1043). As compared with those with nondelaminated tears, patients with delaminated tears were older ( P < .001) and had longer symptom duration ( P = .019), larger tear sizes and retractions ( P < .001 for both), higher grades of fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles (all P < .001), and poorer tendon quality ( P < .001). The overall healing failure rate was 19.0% (101 of 531). In univariate analysis, the rate of healing failure for the repaired cuffs was significantly higher in the delaminated group (delaminated tears, 60 of 238, 25.2%; nondelaminated tears, 41 of 293, 14.0%; P = .001). However, results of subgroup and multivariate analyses showed that the presence of delamination was ultimately not an independent risk factor for the failure of cuff healing. Between the delaminated and nondelaminated groups, there was no significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that delaminated rotator cuff tears might represent chronic degenerative tears of longer symptom duration, with larger tear sizes and higher grades of fatty infiltration in older patients. It appears that delamination could be a confounding factor, not an independent prognostic factor, affecting rotator cuff healing.

Patterns of tendon retraction in full-thickness rotator cuff tear: comparison of delaminated and nondelaminated tendons

OBJECTIVE

To analyze full-thickness rotator cuff tears, compare retraction patterns in delaminated and nondelaminated tendons, and correlate retraction distances with anteroposterior tear lengths.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 483 MR examinations reported as showing full-thickness cuff tear, two musculoskeletal radiologists independently characterized tendons as delaminated or nondelaminated. Tendon delamination was defined as either horizontal intra-substance splitting of bursal and articular layers by an intervening plane of fluid, or differential retraction of bursal and articular layers. In a subset of 144 shoulders with surgically proven full-thickness cuff tears (45 delaminated, 99 nondelaminated tendons), matched cohorts (n = 45) were further analyzed to compare tendon retraction distance, anteroposterior tear length and retraction ratios (retraction distance/anteroposterior length).

RESULTS

Delamination was present in 13% of 483 total tears, and 31% of 144 operated tears (p = 0.001). In nondelamination and delamination cohorts, mean anteroposterior tear length measured 30.0 and 31.5 mm respectively (p = 0.6). Although nondelaminated tendons showed mean retraction 31.5 mm, articular and bursal layers of delaminated tendons showed mean retractions 36.3 mm and 21 mm respectively (p < 0.0001). Anteroposterior tear length and retraction distance were significantly associated in all cuff tears (p < 0.0001). Retraction ratio for nondelaminated tendons (1.05) was significantly different from retraction ratios for articular (1.21) and bursal (0.70) layers of delaminated tendons (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In full-thickness rotator cuff tear, delaminated and nondelaminated tendons show significant differences in retraction distances, despite similarities in anteroposterior dimensions. Delaminated tendons are important to identify and report because they are more likely to fail conservative treatments and undergo operative repairs.

Comparison of En Masse Versus Dual-Layer Suture Bridge Procedures for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes between 2 suturing procedures, conventional en masse suture bridging (EMSB) and dual-layer suture bridging (DLSB), for delaminated rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

From January 2011 through December 2015, 98 consecutive cases with delaminated rotator cuff tears were included in this study (52 with EMSB and 46 with DLSB). The mean age was 65.0 ± 8.9 years (range, 38-85 years). The mean follow-up period was 28.0 ± 6.3 months (range, 24-40 months). The cases included 78 medium tears (1-3 cm) and 20 large tears (3-5 cm). The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) rating scale, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), a visual analog scale for pain, and active range of motion of the shoulder preoperatively and 2 years after surgery were evaluated. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was obtained at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Both the EMSB and DLSB groups showed improved clinical outcomes. Postoperative UCLA and SST scores were higher in the DLSB group than in the EMSB group (UCLA score, 33.2 ± 2.3 vs 32.0 ± 3.3 [P = .027]; SST score, 10.0 ± 1.0 vs 9.5 ± 1.2 [P = .014]). Postoperative abduction and external rotation of the shoulder were greater in the DLSB group than in the EMSB group (abduction, 160.1° ± 9.1° vs 154.8° ± 19.8° [P = .030]; external rotation, 53.7° ± 8.5° vs 46.1° ± 9.4° [P = .023]). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed a retear in 7 of 52 cases in the EMSB group and 3 of 46 cases in the DLSB group, with no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The DLSB and EMSB procedures for delaminated rotator cuff tears improved clinical and radiographic outcomes, and the DLSB group achieved better postoperative range of motion of the shoulder than the EMSB group. The DLSB procedure is useful for repairing delaminated rotator cuff tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective, case-control, comparative study.

Location and thickness of delaminated rotator cuff tears: cross-sectional analysis with surgery record review

Background

To facilitate better treatment, we analyzed morphologic features of delamination from the viewpoint of the location of delamination and the thickness of each layer.

Materials and Methods

Of 270 shoulders that consecutively underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 210 were included. During the operation, the surgeon assessed the size of the rotator cuff tear, determined the presence and location of delamination, and compared the thickness between superficial and deep layers if delamination was present. Immediately after the operation, the surgeon wrote down the data in the record form. The authors retrospectively referred to these surgical records to investigate those items.

Results

Delamination was found in 111 of 210 shoulders. The overall preoperative Constant score did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. In terms of the location, 7.2% cases had delamination in the anterior part, 74.8% in the posterior part, and 18.0% in both parts (Fleiss κ = 0.9). The larger the rotator cuff tear, the more frequently the delamination was limited to the posterior part (trend P = .001). As for layer thickness comparison, 40.0% of the shoulders with small tears, 38.8% with medium tears, 66.0% with large tears, and 80.0% with massive tears had a thicker deep layer than superficial layer (Fleiss κ = 0.9). The larger the size of the rotator cuff tear, the more frequently the deep layer was thicker than the superficial layer (trend P = .001).

Conclusions

The larger the rotator cuff tear, the more carefully shoulder surgeons should observe and treat the posterior and deep part of delamination.