Amplitude Spectrum Area of ventricular fibrillation to guide defibrillation: a small open-label, pseudo-randomized controlled multicenter trial

The impact of alternate defibrillation strategies on shock-refractory and recurrent ventricular fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the DOSE VF cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The DOSE VF randomized controlled trial (RCT) employed a pragmatic definition of refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF after three successive shocks). However, it remains unclear whether the underlying rhythm during the first three shocks was shock-refractory or recurrent VF.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between alternate defibrillation strategies employed during the DOSE VF RCT and the type of VF, either shock-refractory VF or recurrent VF, on patient outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the DOSE VF RCT. We categorized cases as shock-refractory or recurrent VF based on pre-randomization shocks (shocks 1-3). We then analyzed all subsequent (post-randomization) shocks to assess the impact of standard, vector change (VC) or double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) shocks on clinical outcomes employing logistic regression adjusted for Utstein variables, antiarrhythmics, and epinephrine.

RESULTS

We included 345 patients; 60 (17%) shock-refractory VF, and 285 (83%) recurrent VF. Patients in recurrent VF had greater survival than shock-refractory VF (OR: 2.76 95% CI [1.04, 7.27]). DSED was superior to standard defibrillation for survival overall, and for patients with shock-refractory VF (28.6% vs 0%, p = 0.041) but not for those in recurrent VF. DSED was superior to standard defibrillation for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurologic survival for shock-refractory and recurrent VF. VC defibrillation was not superior for survival or ROSC overall, for shock-refractory, or recurrent VF groups, but was superior for VF termination across all groups.

CONCLUSION

DSED appears to be the superior defibrillation strategy in the DOSE VF trial, irrespective of whether the preceding VF is shock-refractory or recurrent.

Amplitude spectral area of ventricular fibrillation can discriminate survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Evidence of the association between AMplitude Spectral Area (AMSA) of ventricular fibrillation and outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is limited to short-term follow-up. In this study, we assess whether AMSA can stratify the risk of death or poor neurological outcome at 30 days and 1 year after OHCA in patients with an initial shockable rhythm or with an initial non-shockable rhythm converted to a shockable one.

Methods

This is a multicentre retrospective study of prospectively collected data in two European Utstein-based OHCA registries. We included all cases of OHCAs with at least one manual defibrillation. AMSA values were calculated after data extraction from the monitors/defibrillators used in the field by using a 2-s pre-shock electrocardiogram interval. The first detected AMSA value, the maximum value, the average value, and the minimum value were computed, and their outcome prediction accuracy was compared. Multivariable Cox regression models were run for both 30-day and 1-year deaths or poor neurological outcomes. Neurological cerebral performance category 1-2 was considered a good neurological outcome.

Results

Out of the 578 patients included, 494 (85%) died and 10 (2%) had a poor neurological outcome at 30 days. All the AMSA values considered (first value, maximum, average, and minimum) were significantly higher in survivors with good neurological outcome at 30 days. The average AMSA showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.778, 95% CI: 0.7-0.8, p < 0.001). After correction for confounders, the highest tertiles of average AMSA (T3 and T2) were significantly associated with a lower risk of death or poor neurological outcome compared with T1 both at 30 days (T2: HR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9, p = 0.01; T3: HR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9, p = 0.02) and at 1 year (T2: HR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9, p = 0.01; T3: HR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9, p = 0.01). Among survivors at 30 days, a higher AMSA was associated with a lower risk of mortality or poor neurological outcome at 1 year (T3: HR 0.03, 95% CI: 0-0.3, p = 0.02).

Discussion

Lower AMSA values were significantly and independently associated with the risk of death or poor neurological outcome at 30 days and at 1 year in OHCA patients with either an initial shockable rhythm or a conversion rhythm from non-shockable to shockable. The average AMSA value had the strongest association with prognosis.

Amplitude spectral area of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation success at low energy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

The optimal energy for defibrillation has not yet been identified and very often the maximum energy is delivered. We sought to assess whether amplitude spectral area (AMSA) of ventricular fibrillation (VF) could predict low energy level defibrillation success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. This is a multicentre international study based on retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included all OHCAs with at least one manual defibrillation. AMSA values were calculated by analyzing the data collected by the monitors/defibrillators used in the field (Corpuls 3 and Lifepak 12/15) and using a 2-s-pre-shock electrocardiogram interval. We run two different analyses dividing the shocks into three tertiles (T1, T2, T3) based on AMSA values. 629 OHCAs were included and 2095 shocks delivered (energy ranging from 100 to 360 J; median 200 J). Both in the "extremes analysis" and in the "by site analysis", the AMSA values of the effective shocks at low energy were significantly higher than those at high energy (p = 0.01). The likelihood of shock success increased significantly from the lowest to the highest tertile. After correction for age, call to shock time, use of mechanical CPR, presence of bystander CPR, sex and energy level, high AMSA value was directly associated with the probability of shock success [T2 vs T1 OR 3.8 (95% CI 2.5-6) p < 0.001; T3 vs T1 OR 12.7 (95% CI 8.2-19.2), p < 0.001]. AMSA values are associated with the probability of low-energy shock success so that they could guide energy optimization in shockable cardiac arrest patients.

Amplitude spectrum area measured in real-time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - How does this technology work?

Amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) is one of the most accurate predictors of defibrillation outcome. Details on functioning and use of the available technology to measure AMSA during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the real clinical scenario are described. During chest compression (CC) pauses for ventilations, AMSA is promptly calculated and values displayed through a modified defibrillator. In addition, real-time AMSA analysis has the additional promise to monitor CPR quality, being AMSA threshold values contingent on CC depth. Future larger studies employing this new technology are now needed to demonstrate the impact of AMSA on survival of cardiac arrest.

aMplitude spectral area of ventricular fibrillation and amiOdarone Study in patients with out-of-hospital cArdIaC arrest. The MOSAIC study

Objective

Antiarrhythmic drugs are recommended for out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). Amplitude Spectral Area (AMSA) of VF is a quantitative waveform measure that describes the amplitude-weighted mean frequency of VF, it correlates with intramyocardial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration, it is a predictor of shock efficacy and an emerging indicator to guide defibrillation and resuscitation efforts. How AMSA might be influenced by amiodarone administration is unknown.

Methods

In this international multicentre observational study, all OHCAs receiving at least one shock were included. AMSA values were calculated by retrospectively analysing the pre-shock ECG interval of 2 s. Multivariable models were run and a propensity score based on the probability of receiving amiodarone was created to compare two randomly matched samples.

Results

2,077 shocks were included: 1,407 in the amiodarone group and 670 in the non-amiodarone group. AMSA values were lower in the amiodarone group [8.8 (6-12.7) mV·Hz vs. 9.8 (6-14) mV·Hz, p = 0.035]. In two randomly matched propensity score-based groups of 261 shocks, AMSA was lower in the amiodarone group [8.2 (5.8-13.5) mV·Hz vs. 9.6 (5.6-11.6), p = 0.042]. AMSA was a predictor of shock success in both groups but the predictive power was lower in the amiodarone group [Area Under the Curve (AUC) non-amiodarone group 0.812, 95%CI: 0.78-0.841 vs. AUC amiodarone group 0.706, 95%CI: 0.68-0.73; p < 0.001].

Conclusions

Amiodarone administration was independently associated with the probability of recording lower values of AMSA. In patients who have received amiodarone during cardiac arrest the predictive value of AMSA for shock success is significantly lower, but still statistically significant.