Non-lesional mesial temporal lobe epilepsy requires bilateral invasive evaluation

Prevalence of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) Subtypes and Response to Resective Surgery in Patients with Presumed TLE Undergoing Limbic and Paralimbic Network Exploration with Stereo-Electrodes

Background/Objectives: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) responds well to surgical treatment, although a considerable percentage of patients experience seizure recurrence after resection. Relapse from the contralateral mesial temporal lobe, extratemporal lobe epilepsy mimicking TLE, or temporal plus epilepsy might account for surgical failures. Methods: We included patients with a pre-implantation hypothesis suggesting TLE, who underwent stereo-EEG (SEEG) evaluation at our institution and had an individual SEEG exploration paradigm with at least twelve stereo-electrodes placed to sixteen brain regions allowing exploration of limbic and paralimbic networks. We analyzed the prevalence of TLE subtypes based on ictal onset localization with SEEG and response to resective surgery. Results: Twenty-four subjects met the inclusion criteria. Seven patients had unilateral mesial temporal epilepsy (UMTE), five had bilateral mesial temporal epilepsy (BMTE), five had unilateral neocortical temporal epilepsy (UNTE), six had temporal-plus epilepsy (TPE), one had extratemporal epilepsy (ETE). The number of patients who underwent destructive surgeries and surgical outcomes are as follows: UMTE-all seven patients, Engel I; BMTE- three out of five, Engel I, III, and IV, respectively; UNTE-three out of five, Engel I; TLE mimic (ETE)-one, Engel I; TPE-all six patients, Engel I-three, Engel III-two, Engel IV-one. Conclusions: In our study, UMTE was the most frequent TLE subtype (29%), and all patients proceeded to resective surgery with good outcomes. TPE comprised a substantial component (25%) of this cohort with initially presumed TLE, who had a notable proportion of unfavorable outcomes. Larger studies are needed to create guidelines for rational counseling of patients with presumed TLE regarding surgical outcomes.

Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring: The Switch from Subdural Electrodes to Stereoelectroencephalography

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has experienced an explosion in use due to a shifting understanding of epileptic networks and wider application of minimally invasive epilepsy surgery techniques. Both subdural electrode (SDE) monitoring and SEEG serve important roles in defining the epileptogenic zone, limiting functional deficits, and formulating the most effective surgical plan. Strengths of SEEG include the ability to sample difficult to reach, deep structures of the brain without a craniotomy and without disrupting the dura. SEEG is complementary to minimally invasive epilepsy treatment options and may reduce the treatment gap in patients who are hesitant about craniotomy and surgical resection. Understanding the strengths and limitations of SDE monitoring and SEEG allows epileptologists to choose the best modality of invasive monitoring for each patient living with drug-resistant seizures.

Stereo-Encephalographic Presurgical Evaluation of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: An Evolving Science

Drug-resistant epilepsy is present in nearly 30% of patients. Resection of the epileptogenic zone has been found to be the most effective in achieving seizure freedom. The study of temporal lobe epilepsy for surgical treatment is extensive and complex. It involves a multidisciplinary team in decision-making with initial non-invasive studies (Phase I), providing 70% of the required information to elaborate a hypothesis and treatment plans. Select cases present more complexity involving bilateral clinical or electrographic manifestations, have contradicting information, or may involve deeper structures as a part of the epileptogenic zone. These cases are discussed by a multidisciplinary team of experts with a hypothesis for invasive methods of study. Subdural electrodes were once the mainstay of invasive presurgical evaluation and in later years most Comprehensive Epilepsy Centers have shifted to intracranial recordings. The intracranial recording follows original concepts since its development by Bancaud and Talairach, but great advances have been made in the field. Stereo-electroencephalography is a growing field of study, treatment, and establishment of seizure pattern complexities. In this comprehensive review, we explore the indications, usefulness, discoveries in interictal and ictal findings, pitfalls, and advances in the science of presurgical stereo-encephalography for temporal lobe epilepsy.

Intracranial recordings for non-lesional mesiotemporal epilepsy? Almost always, but not quite always

•

The majority of patients with non-lesional mesial TLE needs intracranial recordings.

•

This rule should not be rigid and there are some exceptions. Decisions should be individualized.

•

For bilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, chronic ECoG with RNS may be preferable over “traditional” short-term intracranial recording.