Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Bioprostheses Early after Implantation

Modes of the bioprosthetic valve failure of the porcine and pericardial valves in the mitral position

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to examine the incidence and modes of the bioprosthetic valve failure of the porcine valve in the mitral position and compare them with those of the pericardial valve.

METHODS

This study included 240 patients (116 men [48.3%]; mean age, 74.87 ± 6.61 years) who underwent mitral valve replacement using the St. Jude Medical Epic bioprosthesis (Epic) (N = 125) or Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) pericardial valve (N = 115) from January 2000 to December 2020.

RESULTS

The median clinical follow-up durations in the Epic and CEP groups were 54.5 months (range, 0-111 months) and 81.5 months (range, 0-194 months), respectively. Structural valve degeneration (SVD) was observed in 9 patients (7.2%) in the Epic group and 11 patients (9.6%) in the CEP group. The rates of freedom from SVD at 3, 5 and 7 years were 97.7%, 90.5% and 75.5% in the Epic group and 100.0%, 96.1% and 90.0% in the CEP group, respectively. SVD reoperation was performed for 7 patients (5.6%) in the Epic group and 6 patients (5.2%) in the CEP group. The rates of freedom from SVD reoperation at 3, 5 and 7 years were 97.7%, 90.5% and 75.5% in the Epic group and 100%, 96.1% and 90.0% in the CEP group, respectively. Epic SVD was predominantly due to leaflet tearing, whereas CEP SVD was predominantly due to leaflet calcification and adhesion to the subvalvular apparatus.

CONCLUSIONS

SVD of the porcine valve was predominantly due to leaflet tearing. The rate of reoperation for SVD was slightly higher for the porcine valve in the mitral position than for the pericardial valve at adjusted survival analysis.

Comparison of porcine versus bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position

BACKGROUND

There are no reports of midterm outcomes after mitral valve replacement with a 25-mm bioprosthesis in a large series of patients. This study aimed to examine perioperative and midterm outcomes of bioprosthetic valve choice, porcine or bovine pericardial, in the mitral position, focusing on 25-mm valves.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2018, 467 patients received a mitral bioprosthesis, with or without concomitant procedures. Of these, 111 (23.8%) were porcine, and 356 (76.2%) were bovine pericardial, and 219 patients (46.9%) received a 25-mm valve. A propensity-matched cohort of 192 patients was used for outcome analyses. The influence of the valve type on midterm survival and incidence of cardiac death was assessed. Similarly, subanalysis stratified by valve size was conducted.

RESULTS

In matched patients, there were no differences in midterm survival and incidence of cardiac death between the two groups (log-rank test; p = .268 and p = .097, respectively). There were no differences in midterm survival and incidence of cardiac death between the 25-mm valve and larger valve (log-rank test; p = .563 and p = .597, respectively). The Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that the valve type and 25-mm valve did not affect midterm survival (p = .487 and p = .375, respectively) and incidence of cardiac death (p = .678 and p = .562, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of a porcine or bovine pericardial bioprosthesis does not affect midterm survival and cardiac death. The 25-mm valves, whether bovine or porcine, could be an appropriate alternative when the patient's body size is small.

One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve

Importance

Bioprosthetic mitral valves are implanted with increasing frequency but inevitably degenerate, leading to heart failure. Reoperation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (MViV) using balloon-expandable transcatheter valves has emerged as an alternative for high-surgical risk patients.

Objective

To assess contemporary outcomes of SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences) MViV replacement.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this registry-based prospective cohort study of SAPIEN 3 MViV, patients entered in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry from June 2015 to July 2019 were analyzed. US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid linkage ensured comprehensive collection of death and stroke data.

Exposures

Mitral valve-in-valve for degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point was 1-year mortality. The primary safety end point was procedural technical success as defined by the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, New York Heart Association-defined heart failure, and mitral valve performance.

Results

A total of 1529 patients (mean [SD] age, 73.3 [11.84] years; 904 women [59.1%]) underwent transseptal or transapical MViV implant at 295 hospitals between June 2015 and July 2019. The mean (SD) Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 11.1% (8.7%). Procedural technical success was achieved for 1480 of 1529 patients (96.8%). All-cause mortality was 5.4% at 30 days and 16.7% at 1 year. Transseptal access was associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality than transapical access (15.8% vs 21.7%; P = .03). Transcatheter MViV led to early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvements in heart failure (class III/IV New York Heart Association heart failure of 87.1% at baseline vs 9.7% at 1 year). The mean (SD) mitral valve gradient at 1 year was 7 (2.89) mm Hg.

Conclusions and Relevance

Transcatheter MViV using the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve is associated with high technical success, low 30-day and 1-year mortality, significant improvement of heart failure symptoms, and sustained valve performance. Transseptal MViV should be considered an option for most patients with failed surgical bioprosthetic valves and favorable anatomy.

Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Mitral Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis

The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement (MVR) remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of PPM after MVR on the late survival using propensity score matching analysis. From 2007 to 2018, 660 consecutive MVRs were performed. Effective orifice areas were obtained from a literature review of in vivo echocardiographic data, and mitral PPM was defined as an effective orifice area index of ≤1.2 cm²/m². Propensity score matching yielded a cohort of 126 patients with PPM and 126 patients without PPM. Mitral PPM was found in 37.8% of the patients. In the whole matched patients, there were no differences in late survival (log-rank test, P = 0.629) between 2 groups. Patients aged ≤70 years and those aged >70 years had no differences in late survival (log-rank test, P = 0.073 and 0.572). The Cox proportional hazards model for the overall survival showed that mitral PPM tended to decrease survival in patients aged ≤70 years (P = 0.084, hazard ratio [HR] 2.647, 95% CI: 0.876-7.994). Mitral PPM did not adversely affect long-term survival. There may be a tendency of adverse impact on late survival in patients aged ≤70 years. Implanting a safe size rather than larger size prosthesis in mitral position may be an appropriate option in older patients.

Functional assessment of bioprosthetic mitral valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: An in vitro validation and comparison to Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive non-invasive evaluation of bioprosthetic mitral valve (BMV) function can be challenging. We describe a novel method to assess BMV effective orifice area (EOA) based on phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data. We compare the performance of this new method to Doppler and in vitro reference standards.

METHODS

Four sizes of normal BMVs (27, 29, 31, 33 mm) and 4 stenotic BMVs (27 mm and 29 mm, with mild or severe leaflet obstruction) were evaluated using a CMR- compatible flow loop. BMVs were evaluated with PC-CMR and Doppler methods under flow conditions of; 70 mL, 90 mL and 110 mL/beat (n = 24). PC-EOA was calculated as PC-CMR flow volume divided by the PC- time velocity integral (TVI).

RESULTS

PC-CMR measurements of the diastolic peak velocity and TVI correlated strongly with Doppler values (r = 0.99, P < 0.001 and r = 0.99, P < 0.001, respectively). Across all conditions tested, the Doppler and PC-CMR measurement of EOA (1.4 ± 0.5 vs 1.5 ± 0.7 cm2, respectively) correlated highly (r = 0.99, P < 0.001), with a minimum bias of 0.13 cm2, and narrow limits of agreement (- 0.2 to 0.5 cm2).

CONCLUSION

We describe a novel method to assess BMV function based on PC measures of transvalvular flow volume and velocity integration. PC-CMR methods can be used to accurately measure EOA for both normal and stenotic BMV's and may provide an important new parameter of BMV function when Doppler methods are unobtainable or unreliable.

One-year outcome with a bovine pericardial valve

Objectives

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel surgical bovine pericardial valve for aortic and mitral valve replacements.

Methods

Between March 2016 and October 2017, 197 patients (mean age, 66.9 ± 4.9 years; 40.6% were women) underwent aortic valve replacement and mitral valve replacement and were implanted with the Cingular bovine pericardial valve (Shanghai Cingular Biotech Corporation, Shanghai, China) in a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial in China. A total of 161 aortic and 49 mitral prostheses were implanted. Patients were followed up to 1 year. The primary end point was the 1-year overall rate of valve-related complications, including thromboembolic event, valve thrombosis, major hemorrhage event, major perivalvular leak, and prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Results

The 1-year overall rate of valve-related complications was 0.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-3.7%). The 1-year survival was 96.4%. The mean gradient and effective orifice area for aortic prostheses at 1 year postoperatively were 12.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg and 1.9 ± 0.3 cm², respectively. Particularly, the mean gradients and effective orifice area for 19 mm and 21 mm sizes of aortic prostheses at 1 year were 17.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg and 1.6 ± 0.2 cm², 13.1 ± 4.0 mm Hg and 1.8 ± 0.1 cm², respectively. Patient–prosthesis mismatch occurred in only 1.3% patients for aortic valve implantation at 1 month. No structural valve deterioration and no endocarditis occurred.

Conclusions

The Cingular bovine pericardial valve was safe and effective for surgical aortic and mitral valve replacement. The 1-year rate of valve-related complications was very low. Early hemodynamic performance was excellent even for the small aortic root.

Multimodality Imaging of Complications of Cardiac Valve Surgeries

Replacement with a prosthetic heart valve (PHV) remains the definitive surgical procedure for management of severe cardiac valve disease. PHV dysfunction is uncommon but can be a life-threatening condition. The broad hemodynamic and pathophysiologic manifestations of PHV dysfunction are stenosis, regurgitation, and a stuck leaflet. Specific structural abnormalities that cause PHV dysfunction include prosthetic valve-patient mismatch, structural failure, valve calcification, dehiscence, paravalvular leak, infective endocarditis, abscess, pseudoaneurysm, abnormal connections, thrombus, hypoattenuating leaflet thickening, and pannus. Multiple imaging modalities are available for evaluating a PHV and its dysfunction. Transthoracic echocardiography is often the first-line imaging modality, with additional modalities such as transesophageal echocardiography, CT, MRI, cine fluoroscopy, and nuclear medicine used for further characterization and establishing a specific cause. The authors review PHVs and the role of imaging modalities in evaluation of PHV dysfunction and illustrate the imaging appearances of different complications. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2019.

Usefulness of Mitral Valve Prosthetic or Bioprosthetic Time Velocity Index Ratio to Detect Prosthetic or Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Dysfunction

This study aimed to investigate the utility of transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) Doppler-derived parameters in detection of mitral prosthetic dysfunction and to define optimal cut-off values for identification of such dysfunction by valve type. In total, 971 TTE studies (647 mechanical prostheses; 324 bioprostheses) were compared with transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of mitral prosthesis function. Among all prostheses, mitral valve prosthesis (MVP) ratio (ratio of time velocity integral of MVP to that of left ventricular outflow tract; odds ratio [OR] 10.34, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 6.43 to 16.61, p<0.001), E velocity (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.61 to 6.47, p<0.001), and mean gradient (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25, p=0.02) provided good discrimination of clinically normal and clinically abnormal prostheses. Optimal cut-off values by receiver operating characteristic analysis for differentiating clinically normal and abnormal prostheses varied by prosthesis type. Combining MVP ratio and E velocity improved specificity (92%) and positive predictive value (65%) compared with either parameter alone, with minimal decline in negative predictive value (92%). Pressure halftime (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00, p=0.04) did not differentiate between clinically normal and clinically abnormal prostheses but was useful in discriminating obstructed from normal and regurgitant prostheses. In conclusion, cut-off values for TTE-derived Doppler parameters of MVP function were specific to prosthesis type and carried high sensitivity and specificity for identifying prosthetic valve dysfunction. MVP ratio was the best predictor of prosthetic dysfunction and, combined with E velocity, provided a useful parameter for determining likelihood of dysfunction and need for further assessment.

Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic heart valves

Valvular heart disease is a global health problem. It is estimated that more than 280,000 prosthetic heart valves are implanted worldwide each year. As the world's population is aging, the incidence of prosthetic heart valve implantation and the prevalence of prosthetic heart valves continue to increase. Assessing heart valve prosthesis function remains challenging, as prosthesis malfunction is unpredictable but not uncommon. Transthoracic two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography is the preferred method for assessing prosthetic valve function. Clinically useful Doppler-derived measures for assessing prosthetic valve hemodynamic profiles have been reported for aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valve prostheses, but echocardiographic data regarding pulmonary valve prostheses remain limited. Complete prosthetic valve evaluation by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is sometimes challenging due to acoustic shadowing and artifacts. In these cases, further imaging with transesophageal echocardiography, fluoroscopy and/or gated CT may be warranted, particularly if prosthetic valve dysfunction is suspected. Being able to differentiate pathologic versus functional obstruction of an individual prosthesis is extremely important, as this distinction affects management decisions. Transprosthetic and periprosthetic regurgitation may be difficult to visualize on TTE, so careful review of Doppler-derived data combined with a high index of suspicion is warranted, particularly in symptomatic patients. A baseline TTE soon after valve implantation is indicated in order to "fingerprint" the prosthesis hemodynamic profile. It remains unclear how frequently serial imaging should be performed in order to assess prosthetic valve function, as this issue has not been systematically studied.

Comprehensive hemodynamic assessment of 368 normal St. Jude Medical mechanical mitral valve prostheses based on early postimplantation echocardiographic studies

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional and Doppler-derived echocardiographic data on normal St. Jude Medical mechanical mitral valve prosthesis function have been reported but remain limited.

METHODS

Comprehensive retrospective two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 368 normal St. Jude Medical mechanical mitral valve prostheses was performed early after implantation. The early postimplantation hemodynamic profiles of 98 patients were compared with profiles obtained by follow-up transthoracic echocardiography performed <13 months after implantation.

RESULTS

Using mean ± 2 SDs to define the normal distribution of values for Doppler-derived hemodynamic variables, the calculated normal ranges of values were as follows: mean gradient, 2 to 7 mm Hg; peak early mitral diastolic velocity (E velocity), 1.1 to 2.4 m/sec; time-velocity integral of the mitral valve prosthesis (TVIMVP) 20 to 50 cm; ratio of the TVIMVP to the time-velocity integral of the left ventricular outflow tract (TVILVOT), 0.9 to 2.5; pressure half-time, 35 to 99 msec; and effective orifice area, 1.12 to 3.24 cm(2). Patients with severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (ie, indexed effective orifice area ≤ 0.9 cm(2)/m(2)) had significantly higher mean gradients, E velocity, TVIMVP, and TVIMVP/TVILVOT. There was a trend for longer pressure half-times for patients with severe prosthesis-patient mismatch than for patients without severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, but none of these patients had pressure half-times > 130 msec. Among the 98 patients with follow-up transthoracic echocardiography <1 year after implantation, no significant differences were observed between early postimplantation findings and follow-up hemodynamic profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes parameters (mean ± 2 SDs) defining the distribution of values for Doppler-derived hemodynamic data with normal St. Jude Medical mechanical mitral valve prostheses. Prostheses with hemodynamic values outside these parameters are likely dysfunctional; however, prosthesis dysfunction may be present even when hemodynamic values are within these ranges.