1
|
Impact of the COVID pandemic on quality measures in a pediatric echocardiography lab. PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY 2022; 67:101549. [PMID: 35813038 PMCID: PMC9250899 DOI: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2022.101549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID pandemic necessitated an altered approach to transthoracic echocardiography, especially in COVID cases. Whether this has effected echocardiography lab quality is unknown. Objectives We sought to determine whether echocardiography lab quality measures during the COVID pandemic were different from those prior to the pandemic and whether quality and comprehensiveness of echocardiograms performed during the pandemic was different between COVID and non-COVID patients. Methods The four quality measures (diagnostic errors, appropriateness of echocardiogram, American College of Cardiology Image Quality metric and Comprehensive Exam metric in structurally normal hearts) reported quarterly in our lab were compared between two quarters during COVID (2020) and pre-COVID (2019). Each component of these metrics was also assessed in randomly selected echocardiograms in COVID patients and compared to non-COVID echocardiograms. Results For non-COVID echocardiograms, the image quality metric did not change between 2019 and 2020 and the comprehensive exam metric improved. Diagnostic error rate did not change, and appropriateness of echocardiogram indications improved. When COVID and non-COVID echocardiograms were compared, the image quality metric and comprehensiveness exam metric were lower for COVID cases (image quality mean 21.3/23 for non-COVID, 18.6/23 for COVID, p < 0.001 and comprehensive exam mean 29.5/30 for non-COVID, 27.7/39 for COVID, p < 0.001). In particular, systemic and pulmonary veins, pulmonary arteries and aortic arch were not adequately imaged in COVID patients. For studies in which a follow-up echocardiogram was available, no new pathology was found. Conclusions At our center, though diagnostic error rate did not change during the pandemic and the proportion of echocardiograms ordered for appropriate indications increased, imaging quality in COVID patients was compromised, especially for systemic and pulmonary veins, pulmonary arteries and arch. Though no new pathology was noted on the small number of patients who had follow-up studies, we are paying careful attention to these structures to avoid diagnostic errors going forward.
Collapse
|
2
|
McPhail E, Jahagirdar N, Walker N, Harris S, Monaghan M, Papachristidis A. The role of expert focus echocardiography during the COVID-19 pandemic. Echocardiography 2022; 39:701-707. [PMID: 35434786 PMCID: PMC9111758 DOI: 10.1111/echo.15351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focus Echocardiography has routinely been used to offer quick diagnosis in critical care environments, predominantly by clinicians with limited training. During the COVID-19 pandemic, international guidance recommended all echocardiography scans were performed as focus studies to limit operator viral exposure in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of eFoCUS, a focus scan performed by fully trained echocardiographers following a minimum dataset plus full interrogation of any pathology found. METHODS All diagnostic echocardiograms, performed by fully trained echocardiographers during an 8-week period during the first UK COVID-19 wave, were included. The number of images acquired was compared in the following categories: admission status, COVID status, image quality, indication, invasive ventilation, pathology found, echocardiographer experience, and whether eFoCUS was deemed adequate to answer the clinical question. RESULTS In 87.4% of the 698 scans included, the operator considered that the eFOCUS echo protocol, with additional images when needed, was sufficient to answer the clinical question on the request. Echocardiographer experience did not affect the number of images acquired. Less images were acquired in COVID-19 positive patients compared to negative/asymptomatic (38 ± 12 vs. 42 ± 12, p = .001), and more images were required when a valve pathology was identified. CONCLUSION eFoCUS echocardiography is an effective protocol for use during the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides sufficient diagnostic information to answer the clinical question but differs from standard focus/limited protocols by enabling the identification and interrogation of significant pathology and incidental findings, preventing unnecessary repeat scans and viral exposure of operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor McPhail
- Department of CardiologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Nishat Jahagirdar
- Department of CardiologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Nicola Walker
- Department of CardiologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Scott Harris
- Department of CardiologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Mark Monaghan
- Department of CardiologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pimentel SLG, Nascimento BR, Franco J, Oliveira KKB, Fraga CL, de Macedo FVB, Raso LADM, de Ávila RE, dos Santos LPA, Rocha RTL, Oliveira RM, Barbosa MDM, Sable C, Ribeiro ALP, Beaton AZ, Nunes MCP. Bedside echocardiography to predict mortality of COVID-19 patients beyond clinical data: Data from the PROVAR-COVID study. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2021; 54:e03822021. [PMID: 34495258 PMCID: PMC8437446 DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0382-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac involvement seems to impact prognosis of COVID-19, being more frequent in critically ill patients. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, evaluated by bedside echocardiography (echo), in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS Patients admitted in 2 reference hospitals in Brazil from Jul to Sept/2020 with confirmed COVID-19 and moderate/severe presentations underwent clinical and laboratory evaluation, and focused bedside echo (GE Vivid-IQ), at the earliest convenience, with remote interpretation. The association between demographics, clinical comorbidities and echo variables with all-cause hospital mortality was assessed, and factors significant at p<0.10 were put into multivariable models. RESULTS Total 163 patients were enrolled, 59% were men, mean age 64±16 years, and 107 (66%) were admitted to intensive care. Comorbidities were present in 144 (88%) patients: hypertension 115 (71%), diabetes 61 (37%) and heart failure 22 (14%). In-hospital mortality was 34% (N=56). In univariate analysis, echo variables significantly associated with death were: LV ejection fraction (LVEF, OR=0.94), RV fractional area change (OR=0.96), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, OR=0.83) and RV dysfunction (OR=5.3). In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for clinical and demographic variables, independent predictors of mortality were age≥63 years (OR=5.53, 95%CI 1.52-20.17), LVEF<64% (OR=7.37, 95%CI 2.10-25.94) and TAPSE<18.5 mm (OR=9.43, 95% CI 2.57-35.03), and the final model had good discrimination, with C-statistic=0.83 (95%CI 0.75-0.91). CONCLUSION Markers of RV and LV dysfunction assessed by bedside echo are independent predictors of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, after adjustment for clinical variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Luis Gomes Pimentel
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Bruno Ramos Nascimento
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Juliane Franco
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Kaciane Krauss Bruno Oliveira
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Clara Leal Fraga
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | - Leonardo Arruda de Moraes Raso
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | | | - Rodrigo Tavares Lanna Rocha
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Renan Mello Oliveira
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Márcia de Melo Barbosa
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Craig Sable
- Cardiology, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Andrea Zawacki Beaton
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - Maria Carmo Pereira Nunes
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Centro de Telessaúde do Hospital das Clínicas, Serviço de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mazal J, Kelly N, Johnson T, Rose G, Phelan D. Impact of COVID-19 on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders for Cardiac Sonographers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2021; 34:570. [PMID: 33422664 PMCID: PMC7833236 DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Mazal
- Atrium Health Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Noreen Kelly
- Atrium Health Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Thomas Johnson
- Atrium Health Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Geoffrey Rose
- Atrium Health Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Dermot Phelan
- Atrium Health Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|