Effects of intranasal (S)-ketamine on Veterans with co-morbid treatment-resistant depression and PTSD: A retrospective case series

Impact of Medical Comorbidities on Ketamine and Esketamine Treatment Effectiveness for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression: A Clinical Outcomes Analysis from the VA San Diego Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Ketamine and esketamine are increasingly used to manage treatment-resistant depression and have also been shown to reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Little is known about how common comorbidities in the veteran population, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), may influence ketamine and esketamine treatment outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed clinical outcomes from Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System's ketamine program to assess the relationship between ketamine or esketamine treatment and changes in depression and PTSD symptoms, while also examining how common medical comorbidities influence treatment outcomes. We specifically examined whether a patient's history of TBI or OSA would affect ketamine or esketamine treatment outcomes. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine how TBI and OSA history interacted with ketamine/esketamine treatment to change PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores.

RESULTS

This study included 119 veterans who received eight sessions of ketamine or esketamine treatment at the San Diego VA Medical Center. Using linear effects modeling, we found that repeated ketamine or esketamine sessions were significantly correlated with reductions in both depression (p < 0.005) and PTSD (p < 0.05) symptom scores. However, in veterans with comorbid TBI (n = 38) and severe OSA (n = 9), depression symptoms did not improve over the course of ketamine or esketamine treatment, suggesting this subgroup may require alternative treatments or OSA treatment prior to starting ketamine or esketamine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine and esketamine treatment did not improve symptoms of depression in veterans with comorbid TBI and severe OSA. Thus, our findings generally support ketamine and esketamine as effective interventions for depression and PTSD, while emphasizing the consideration of comorbidities such as OSA and TBI.

Molecular pathways of ketamine: A systematic review of immediate and sustained effects on PTSD

RATIONALE

Existing studies predominantly focus on the molecular and neurobiological mechanisms underlying Ketamine's acute treatment effects on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This emphasis has largely overlooked its sustained therapeutic effects, which hold significant potential for the development of targeted interventions.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of ketamine on PTSD, differentiating between immediate and sustained molecular effects.

METHOD

A comprehensive search across databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health, PubMed) and grey literature yielded 317 articles, where 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies included preclinical models and clinical trials, through neurotransmitter regulation, gene expression, synaptic plasticity, and neural pathways (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024582874).

RESULTS

We found accumulating evidence that the immediate effects of ketamine, which involve changes in GABA, glutamate, and glutamine levels, trigger the re-regulation of BDNF, enhancing synaptic plasticity via pathways such as TrkB and PSD-95. Other molecular influences also include c-Fos, GSK-3, HDAC, HCN1, and the modulation of hormones like CHR and ACTH, alongside immune responses (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α). Sustained effects arise from neurotransmitter remodulations and involve prolonged changes in gene expression. These include mTOR-mediated BDNF expression, alterations in GSK-3β, FkBP5, GFAP, ERK phosphorylation, and epigenetic modifications (DNMT3, MeCP2, H3K27me3, mir-132, mir-206, HDAC).

CONCLUSION

These molecular changes promote long-term synaptic stability and re-regulation in key brain regions, contributing to prolonged therapeutic benefits. Understanding the sustained molecular and epigenetic mechanisms behind ketamine's effects is critical for developing safe and effective personalised treatments, potentially leading to more effective recovery.

Single-dose psilocybin for U.S. military Veterans with severe treatment-resistant depression - A first-in-kind open-label pilot study

BACKGROUND

The enduring and severe depression often suffered by Veterans causes immense suffering and is associated with high rates of suicide and disability. This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of psilocybin in Veterans with severe treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

METHODS

15 Veterans with severe TRD (major depressive episode failing to respond to ≥5 treatments, or lasting >2 years) received 25 mg of psilocybin. Primary outcome was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating scale (MADRS) at 3 weeks posttreatment. Response was defined s ≥ 50 % reduction in MADRS, and remission as ≤10 MADRS score. Psychedelic experience was assessed using the Five-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness scale (5D-ASC). Safety measures included assessment of suicidality and adverse events. Participants on antidepressants were tapered to avoid drug interactions.

RESULTS

Of 15 participants, 60 % met response and 53 % met remission criteria at Week 3. At 12 weeks, 47 % maintained response, and 40 % remission. Co-morbid PTSD did not significantly influence study outcomes. The psychedelic experience reported in 5D-ASC did not correlate with response. Participants judged to need antidepressants were restarted and considered non-responders from that timepoint (n = 4). No unexpected adverse events occurred.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the small sample size, and the uncontrolled and unblinded nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study on psilocybin for Veterans with severe TRD, a surprising response and remission was seen. Many Veterans had PTSD though no moderating impact of response was observed. The degree of psychedelic experience did not correlate with depression changes. Further study is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04433858.

Esketamine Nasal Spray in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Despite being approved by the US FDA and the EU European Medicines Agency, the performance of esketamine nasal spray as an adjunctive therapy with an antidepressant in major depressive disorder is still controversial. Comprehensive retrieval in Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing esketamine nasal spray versus control in major depressive disorder or treatment-resistant depression. The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, from baseline to Day 2 or Day 28 for patients with or without suicidal ideation, respectively. The long-term efficacy outcome was the relapse rate of patients who achieved stable remission. The certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendation. Esketamine nasal spray was superior to placebo in reduction of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline to Day 28 in patients without suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: -0.24, 95% confidence interval: -0.38, -0.09, P = 0.001, I2 = 24%), and on Day 2 in patients with suicidal ideation (standardized mean difference: -0.30, 95% confidence interval: -0.47, -0.12, P = 0.0008, I2 = 0%). The long-term relapse rate was significantly lower in the esketamine nasal spray group than in the placebo/quetiapine group (risk ratio: RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.80, I2 = 0%). The rate of suicidal ideation was similar between the two groups. The certainty of evidence was graded as "moderate" or "high" in the abovementioned results. Esketamine nasal spray in conjunction with an antidepressant effectively controls short-term and long-term depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression, with a manageable trade-off between efficacy and safety.

Compassionate use of esketamine intranasal in patients with severe major depressive disorder resistant to the treatment

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined as the failure of at least two antidepressants in adequate doses and timing during a major depressive episode. Esketamine intranasal (ESK-IN) has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of TRD in combination with other antidepressants.

AIMS

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of a sample of TRD patients who received treatment with ESK-IN as part of the compassionate use program.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was carried out on patients with a diagnosis of TRD enrolled in the early access program of ESK-IN in nine centers. Effectiveness was assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) at four time points: baseline, 28, 90, and 180 days of treatment.

RESULTS

The sample included 71 patients (70% women) with a mean baseline MADRS score of 38.27 ± 5.9 and total or partial work disability rates of 85%. ESK-IN treatment was associated with a statistically and clinically significant reduction in the severity of depressive symptoms at all time points assessed. The presence of side effects was common but the majority were mild in severity and resolved after the observation period. Those patients who received psychotherapy in combination with ESK-IN showed a significantly lower MADRS score at 90 and 180 days than those patients who did not undergo psychotherapy.

CONCLUSION

ESK-IN has proven to be effective and safe in a clinical sample of patients with severe TRD. To optimize clinical outcomes, the pharmacological treatment for TRD should always be integrated into a comprehensive therapeutic plan that encompasses strategies such as psychotherapy, social support, and family interventions.

Memantine Alleviates PTSD-like Symptoms and Improves Dendritic Arborization through Modulation of the HPA Axis and Neuroinflammation in Rats

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) poses significant neurological and psychiatric challenges. Investigations into the glutamatergic system, particularly the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, are crucial for understanding PTSD mechanisms. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist memantine in mitigating PTSD symptoms and to explore its underlying cellular and molecular impacts. Male Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to inescapable foot shock stress (FS-stress) to model PTSD. Following stress exposure, memantine was administered at doses of 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg six hours post-stress. Behavioural assessments, including fear conditioning and sucrose preference tests, were conducted. Golgi-Cox staining was used to assess neuroanatomical changes related to synaptic plasticity. Western blotting was used to analyse molecular markers associated with synaptic plasticity, while immunoassays measured proinflammatory cytokines and cortisol levels. Memantine treatment improved behavioral outcomes, restoring sucrose preference and reducing freezing behavior. Morphological analysis demonstrated that memantine enhanced dendritic spine structure, particularly increasing the proportion of mature mushroom spines, which are critical for synaptic stability. Additionally, memantine normalized cortisol levels, suggesting a regulatory effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Additionally, memantine treatment improved the inflammatory cytokine profile, reducing IL-6 and TNF-α levels. These results suggest that memantine has potential as a therapeutic intervention for PTSD by targeting critical pathways involved in stress responses.The findings indicate that memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, can counteract behavioral and functional disturbances induced by FS-stress.

A novel framework for ketamine-assisted couple therapy

Intimate relationship distress is prevalent and is associated with poorer health, mental health, and mortality outcomes. Evidence-based couple therapies target cognitive, behavioral, and emotional processes that underlie relationship dysfunction. Increasing research and clinical evidence supports the efficacy of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) for addressing clinical mental health concerns, including depression, anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and more. The purported mechanisms of KAP are also likely to improve psychosocial and relational functioning for patients and may be useful for supporting change mechanisms in couple therapy. This paper reviews the current evidence for therapeutic ketamine and KAP and outlines how the mechanisms of ketamine therapy may also augment the cognitive, behavioral, and emotional interventions in the most commonly used evidence-based couple therapies. Key mechanisms include increased neuroplasticity, changes in functional connectivity, adaptive dissociation, decreased inhibition, and reduced avoidance. Given the reciprocal interaction between relationship dysfunction and mental health problems, ketamine may also help alleviate relationship distress by directly treating clinical mental health symptoms. We then outline a proposed framework for ketamine-assisted couple therapy, addressing the application of KAP preparation, dosing, and integration to a dyadic intervention framework in a way that can be applied to different couple therapy modalities. This clinical framework for couples' KAP may be useful for clinicians and researchers working to improve the efficacy of couple therapy, particularly when one or both partners has accompanying mental health concerns.

Ketamine in the effective management of chronic pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder for Veterans: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Introduction

Ketamine has emerged as a promising treatment alternative for the management of chronic pain. Despite encouraging findings in civilian populations, and favourable results from trials examining its efficacy in military populations, there is still a dearth of information pointing to optimal specifications related to ketamine administration for pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in military populations. This meta-analysis and systematic review synthesised available evidence on the effectiveness, tolerability, and feasibility of ketamine in the management of chronic pain and mental health conditions in military populations.

Methods

This review followed the Cochrane's Guide for systematic reviews of interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) as frameworks for data collection and synthesis.

Results

A total of 11 studies and 22 independent samples were retained for data analyses. Across samples, improvements in pain, depression, and PTSD outcomes were evident, with the use of ketamine leading to significant reductions, g = 1.76, SE = 0.19, 95% CI (1.39, 2.13), Z = 9.26, p <.001. These effect sizes were robust with moderate-to-large effects. In addition, the reductions in symptoms were observed in both active-duty and Veteran groups, and for different routes of ketamine administration, frequencies of ketamine administration, duration of ketamine treatments, dosage, study design, and allowance for concurrent treatments.

Discussion

This review provides a preliminary synthesis of available evidence which suggests that ketamine may be a potential option for the treatment of depression, PTSD, and chronic pain in military populations. The viability of ketamine as an alternative treatment may be particularly impactful for those who are treatment resistant, experience chronic symptoms, and/or have exhausted conventional treatments. More research is warranted in order verify the findings presented in this review.

Predicting non-response to ketamine for depression: An exploratory symptom-level analysis of real-world data among military veterans

Ketamine helps some patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), but reliable methods for predicting which patients will, or will not, respond to treatment are lacking. Herein, we aim to inform prediction models of non-response to ketamine/esketamine in adults with TRD. This is a retrospective analysis of PHQ-9 item response data from 120 patients with TRD who received repeated doses of intravenous racemic ketamine or intranasal eskatamine in a real-world clinic. Regression models were fit to patients' symptom trajectories, showing that all symptoms improved on average, but depressed mood improved relatively faster than low energy. Principal component analysis revealed a first principal component (PC) representing overall treatment response, and a second PC that reflects variance across affective versus somatic symptom subdomains. We then trained logistic regression classifiers to predict overall response (improvement on PC1) better than chance using patients' baseline symptoms alone. Finally, by parametrically adjusting the classifier decision thresholds, we identified optimal models for predicting non-response with a negative predictive value of over 96 %, while retaining a specificity of 22 %. Thus, we could identify 22 % of patients who would not respond based purely on their baseline symptoms. This approach could inform rational treatment recommendations to avoid additional treatment failures.

So how special is special K? A systematic review and meta-analysis of ketamine for PTSD RCTs

Background: PTSD is a significant mental health problem worldwide. Current evidence-based interventions suffer various limitations. Ketamine is a novel agent that is hoped to be incrementally better than extant interventions.Objective: Several randomized control trials (RCTs) of ketamine interventions for PTSD have now been published. We sought to systematically review and meta-analyse results from these trials to evaluate preliminary evidence for ketamine's incremental benefit above-and-beyond control interventions in PTSD treatment.Results: Omnibus findings from 52 effect sizes extracted across six studies (n = 221) yielded a small advantage for ketamine over control conditions at reducing PTSD symptoms (g = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.51). However, bias-correction estimates attenuated this effect (adjusted g = 0.20, 95%, CI = -0.08, 0.48). Bias estimates indicated smaller studies reported larger effect sizes favouring ketamine. The only consistent timepoint assessed across RCTs was 24-hours post-initial infusion. Effects at 24-hours post-initial infusion suggest ketamine has a small relative advantage over controls (g = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.64). Post-hoc analyses at 24-hours post-initial infusion indicated that ketamine was significantly better than passive controls (g = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.85), but not active controls (g = 0.24, 95% CI = -0.30, 0.78). Comparisons one-week into intervention suggested no meaningful group differences (g = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.48). No significant differences were evident for RCTs that examined effects two-weeks post initial infusion (g = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.10, 0.44).Conclusions: Altogether, ketamine-for-PTSD RCTs reveal a nominal initial therapeutic advantage relative to controls. However, bias and heterogeneity appear problematic. While rapid acting effects were observed, all control agents (including saline) also evidenced rapid acting effects. We argue blind penetration to be a serious concern, and that placebo is the likely mechanism behind reported therapeutic effects.

The effect of obstructive sleep apnea severity on PTSD symptoms during the course of esketamine treatment: a retrospective clinical study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Intranasal administration of esketamine is Food and Drug Administration-approved for treatment-resistant depression. In a recent retrospective case series, we show that it has promise in reducing symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as well. Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent among veterans with PTSD and has been shown to interfere with other PTSD treatments. In the current study, we examined whether OSA impacts esketamine's effectiveness in reducing symptoms of PTSD or depression.

METHODS

Participants were 60 veterans with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and PTSD who received intranasal esketamine treatment at the San Diego Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center. We used growth-curve modeling to examine changes in depression and PTSD symptoms following esketamine treatments and, in the subset of individuals screened for OSA (n = 24, all prescribed positive airway pressure therapy), examined the impacts of OSA severity on these trajectories.

RESULTS

We first showed that both PTSD and depressive symptoms significantly decreased over the course of esketamine treatment. In the subset of veterans screened for OSA, individuals with lower OSA severity reported the greatest reduction in PTSD symptoms, while veterans with the most severe OSA reported the least reduction in PTSD symptoms. Depression response was not affected by severity of OSA in this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Veterans with PTSD and depression tend to benefit from esketamine treatment, but OSA may interfere with esketamine effectiveness. Comorbid OSA should be assessed for and treated to maximize esketamine's benefits in PTSD.

CITATION

Titone MK, Hunt C, Bismark A, et al. The effect of obstructive sleep apnea severity on PTSD symptoms during the course of esketamine treatment: a retrospective clinical study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2043-2051.

Effect of S-ketamine on the intraoperative Surgical Pleth Index in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-center randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether S-ketamine affects the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to an S-ketamine group (group S) and an equivalent normal saline group (group N). SPI values were recorded; and pain score on a numerical rating scale (NRS), the consumption of opioids, rescue analgesia, and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The SPI and heart rate of the S-ketamine group were significantly lower 30 minutes after the start of surgery and at the end. The NRS score was lower in the S-ketamine group 6 and 12 hours postoperatively, but there were no differences in mean blood pressure or the NRS score 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Rescue analgesia was required less frequently by the S-ketamine group, but the incidence of PONV did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

S-ketamine was associated with lower intraoperative SPI 30 minutes after the start and at the end of surgery. It also reduced opioid use intraoperatively and the NRS scores 6 and 12 hours postoperatively.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000040012), 18/11/2020.

Ketamine for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: State of the Field

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic and debilitating condition. Although several psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments are recommended for PTSD, many individuals do not respond to treatment or respond only partially, highlighting a critical need for additional treatments. Ketamine has the potential to address this therapeutic need. This review discusses how ketamine emerged as a rapid-acting antidepressant and has become a potential treatment for PTSD. A single dose of intravenous (IV) ketamine has been shown to facilitate rapid reduction of PTSD symptoms. Repeated IV ketamine administration significantly improved PTSD symptoms, compared with midazolam, in a predominantly civilian sample of individuals with PTSD. However, in a veteran and military population, repeated IV ketamine did not significantly reduce PTSD symptoms. Further study of ketamine as a treatment for PTSD is necessary, including which populations benefit most from this therapy and the potential benefits of combining psychotherapy and ketamine.

Recommendations for selection and adaptation of rating scales for clinical studies of rapid-acting antidepressants

The novel mechanisms of action (MOA) derived from some recently introduced molecular targets have led to regulatory approvals for rapid acting antidepressants (RAADs) that can generate responses within hours or days, rather than weeks or months. These novel targets include the N-methyl-D-glutamate receptor antagonist ketamine, along with its enantiomers and various derivatives, and the allosteric modulators of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. There has also been a strong resurgence in interest in psychedelic compounds that impact a range of receptor sites including D1, 5-HT7, KOR, 5-HT5A, Sigma-1, NMDA, and BDNF. The RAADs developed from these novel targets have enabled successful treatment for difficult to treat depressed individuals and has generated a new wave of innovation in research and treatment. Despite the advances in the neurobiology and clinical treatment of mood disorders, we are still using rating instruments that were created decades ago for drugs from a different era (e.g., The Hamilton and Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scales, HDRS, and MADRS) continue to be used. These rating instruments were designed to assess mood symptoms over a 7-day time frame. Consequently, the use of these rating instruments often requires modifications to address items that cannot be assessed in short time frames, such as the sleep and appetite items. This review describes the adaptative approaches that have been made with the existing scales to meet this need and examines additional domains such as daily activities, side effects, suicidal ideation and behavior, and role functioning. Recommendations for future studies are described, including the challenges related to implementation of these adapted measures and approaches to mitigation.

Alleviating anxiety and taming trauma: Novel pharmacotherapeutics for anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder

Psychiatric disorders associated with psychological trauma, stress and anxiety are a highly prevalent and increasing cause of morbidity worldwide. Current therapeutic approaches, including medication, are effective in alleviating symptoms of anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), at least in some individuals, but have unwanted side-effects and do not resolve underlying pathophysiology. After a period of stagnation, there is renewed enthusiasm from public, academic and commercial parties in designing and developing drug treatments for these disorders. Here, we aim to provide a snapshot of the current state of this field that is written for neuropharmacologists, but also practicing clinicians and the interested lay-reader. After introducing currently available drug treatments, we summarize recent/ongoing clinical assessment of novel medicines for anxiety and PTSD, grouped according to primary neurochemical targets and their potential to produce acute and/or enduring therapeutic effects. The evaluation of putative treatments targeting monoamine (including psychedelics), GABA, glutamate, cannabinoid, cholinergic and neuropeptide systems, amongst others, are discussed. We emphasize the importance of designing and clinically assessing new medications based on a firm understanding of the underlying neurobiology stemming from the rapid advances being made in neuroscience. This includes harnessing neuroplasticity to bring about lasting beneficial changes in the brain rather than - as many current medications do - produce a transient attenuation of symptoms, as exemplified by combining psychotropic/cognitive enhancing drugs with psychotherapeutic approaches. We conclude by noting some of the other emerging trends in this promising new phase of drug development.

The potential of ketamine for posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of clinical evidence

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a devastating condition, for which there are few pharmacological agents, often with a delayed onset of action and poor efficacy. Trauma-focused psychotherapies are further limited by few trained providers and low patient engagement. This frequently results in disease chronicity as well as psychiatric and medical comorbidity, with considerable negative impact on quality of life. As such, off-label interventions are commonly used for PTSD, particularly in chronic refractory cases. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NDMA) receptor antagonist, has recently been indicated for major depression, exhibiting rapid and robust antidepressant effects. It also shows transdiagnostic potential for an array of psychiatric disorders. Here, we synthesize clinical evidence on ketamine in PTSD, spanning case reports, chart reviews, open-label studies, and randomized trials. Overall, there is high heterogeneity in clinical presentation and pharmacological approach, yet encouraging signals of therapeutic safety, efficacy, and durability. Avenues for future research are discussed.