The Use of Video Recording and Standardized Patient Feedback to Improve Communication Performance in Undergraduate Nursing Students

Nurses' learning about professional interpersonal communication: Findings from an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Effective communication, a cognitive and social skill, is pivotal in quality care delivery. It is important to explore how nurses learn about communication during their program of study, and more importantly the substance of what they have learnt regarding communicating with patients. This is of value given the changing context of health care, society and contemporary nursing.

AIM

To explore learning and teaching practices of professional, interpersonal communication and the associated outcomes for student learning during pre-registration education.

DESIGN

Integrative review.

DATA SOURCES

Four databases, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Proquest and Scopus, were searched January 2000 through to December 2020. A subsequent rapid review of literature 2020 to 2023 was guided by Dobbin's method.

REVIEW METHOD

Whittemore and Knafl's framework guided this review. It included 1. problem identification, 2. literature search, 3. data evaluation, 4. data analysis, and 5.

PRESENTATION

The PRISMA protocol informed screening of literature. The quality of included articles was assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

RESULTS

Of the initial eligible 46 articles critiqued, 26 remained; A rapid review found one further article. Twenty-seven articles were included in the final analysis. We derived a comprehensive understanding of curricula that included conceptual approaches, teaching techniques, student outcomes, and novel innovations. Conceptional approaches described self-efficacy based on Bandura's social learning theory. Teaching techniques to advance social and active learning though varied, were dominantly active experiential learning. Student outcomes were forthcoming across all described modes of learning and teaching that involved good education practices that actively engaged learners. Finally, we specifically identified novel practices that included immersion, repetition of deliberate practice, scaffolding and coaching. The specific unique contribution of these practices was the capacity to acknowledge and embrace existing innate student capacities.

CONCLUSION

Current literature advocates students learning of professional communication is forthcoming from appropriately designed courses. Research and evaluation of student learning remains rudimentary. The contribution of factors such as students' life skills and innate communication ability to their learning of professional interpersonal communication is largely absent. Further research is needed regarding the best focus for learning and teaching of professional interpersonal communication.

Comparison of standardized patient and medium-fidelity simulation practices on nursing students' knowledge, staging, and satisfaction regarding pressure injuries: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effects of education using standardized patients (SP) and medium-fidelity simulation (MFS) on nursing students' knowledge, staging, and satisfaction related to pressure injuries (PI).

DESIGN

A pre- and post-test, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The study included nursing students (n = 79) from a nursing faculty in western Turkey between April and July. Data were collected using the Student Characteristics Form, the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool 2.0 (PUKAT 2.0-T), the Pressure Injury Staging Form, and the Student Satisfaction and Confidence in Learning Scale.

RESULTS

The SP (n = 40) and MFS (n = 39) groups did not demonstrate any significant differences in staging levels (SP: 9.42 ± 3.24, MFS: 10.41 ± 2.96) or PI knowledge (SP: 11.73 ± 3.39, MFS: 12.00 ± 4.52) following the simulation experience. Both groups showed a statistically significant increase in PI knowledge and staging levels after the interventions compared to before (p < .05). The learning satisfaction level of the SP group (23.03 ± 2.37) was significantly higher than that of the MFS group (21.51 ± 4.03) (p < .05). No significant differences were found between the groups regarding self-confidence levels (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Both simulation methods improved students' PI knowledge and staging levels; however, the satisfaction level of students in the SP group was found to be higher. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance the realism of PI education using SPs and to expand the use of simulation practices.

REGISTRATION

The study has been registered with the National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials: NCT05946291.

Sexual History-Taking in a Surgery Clerkship Assessment: A Stubborn Clinical Skills Gap With Reproductive Health Care Implications

PURPOSE

Patients present with sexual and reproductive health needs in various clinical settings, so knowing when and how to elicit a relevant sexual history is critical in any specialty. This work examined whether reinforcing the surgical relevance of sexual health with an integrated training improved third-year medical students' sexual history-taking.

METHOD

Third-year surgery clerkship standardized patient assessments were video coded from a 2021-2022 comparison and 2022-2023 intervention cohort (University of Louisville School of Medicine). The case used for both cohorts involved a 38-year-old patient assigned female at birth presenting with acute right lower abdominal pain. Before the assessment, the intervention cohort received an additional clerkship didactic session focused on evaluation and assessment of the acute abdomen emphasizing the importance of sexual history-taking for surgical patients. The frequency of sexual histories attempted, number of questions, topics discussed, and differential diagnoses were compared.

RESULTS

There was not a significant difference between cohorts' sexual history-taking frequency: 61% (72/119) of students in the comparison cohort, compared to 65% (86/132) in the intervention cohort. On average, students in the intervention group asked 6 questions related to sexual health, compared to 3 questions by students in the comparison group ( P < .001). Across cohorts, 66% (104/158) of students who took a sexual history considered sexual diagnoses on their differential, compared to only 23% (21/93) of students who did not take a sexual history ( P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reinforcing the clinical relevance of sexual history-taking for surgical patients was associated with higher-quality histories and broader differentials but not higher rates of sexual history-taking. Because there is now variability in how reproductive health care can be delivered across the United States, medical educators must refocus on sexual history-taking skills in a variety of settings and work to address barriers preventing students from collecting this information.

Effect of two teaching methods on nursing students' acquisition of patient-centered communication competence in older people care: a cluster randomized trial

Introduction

Patient-centered communication is an essential skill in nursing, particularly in the care of older adult patients. However, generation Z nursing students, who primarily communicate through digital platforms, face unique challenges in adapting to traditional face-to-face communication with older adults. As a result, there is a need for teaching methods that align with this generation's learning style to enhance their communication skills. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two teaching methods-standardized patient simulation and role-play-on nursing students' acquisition of patient-centered communication competence in older people care.

Methods

A controlled cluster-randomized trial was conducted with 124 nursing students, divided into eight teaching groups. Students participated in either a standardized patient simulation or a role-play workshop, each consisting of a 1.5-h online module and a 1.5-h face-to-face session. The three components of patient-centered communication competence-knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy-were assessed using simulated scenarios at pre-test, post-test, and 6-week follow-up. Between-group and within-group differences were measured based on the number of students who achieved competence.

Results

Both interventions significantly improved students' knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy in patient-centered communication between pre- and post-tests, with improvements maintained at follow-up. No significant differences were found between the two methods.

Conclusions

Both standardized patient simulation and role-play are effective in enhancing patient-centered communication competence in older people care. However, neither method was found to be superior in teaching knowledge, skills, or self-efficacy.

Research on doctor-patient communication teaching for oncology residents: a new teaching model

BACKGROUND

At present, there is no specific teaching method for doctor-patient communication for oncology residents. This study combined BOPPPS (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) teaching model and SBAR (situation-background-assessment-recommendation) communication model to try a new teaching and assessment model of doctor-patient communication, aiming to explore and improve the teaching method of doctor-patient communication for oncology residents.

METHODS

Ninety residents were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (n = 45) was trained with the BOPPPS teaching model combined with the SBAR communication model, the routine teaching method was adopted in the control group (n = 45). Indicators of assessment included doctor-patient communication skills, satisfaction with teaching, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The scores for doctor-patient communication ability were significantly better in experimental group than control group (p < 0.05). The degree of satisfaction degree (very satisfied + satisfied) of the experimental group were higher than control group (p < 0.05). The overall teaching satisfaction of the experimental group was 100.00%, the control group was 77.78%, p < 0.001. Patients' satisfaction with the residents in the experimental group (93.3%) was significantly higher than control group (80.0%), p = 0.043.

CONCLUSION

The application of the BOPPPS combined with the SBAR can effectively enhance residents' doctor-patient communication ability and improve teaching satisfaction and patient satisfaction. This new model can effectively improve resident physician‒patient communication ability, which is worth actively promoting in clinical teaching work.

Developing effective communication skills in audiology using anonymous patient feedback

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of anonymous patient feedback for audiology students, examining alignment between student and patient judgments on communication skills and assessing how students utilise the feedback.

DESIGN

This study utilised a mixed methods design, employing a Likert survey to collect patient and student ratings on professionalism, compassion, and listening and talking skills in clinical encounters. Semi-structured interviews investigated the student perspective of receiving patient feedback.

STUDY SAMPLE

13 Audiology students and 31 patients who were placed at, or received care at an Audiology teaching clinic.

RESULTS

Patients' ratings across all measures were higher on average when compared to students' self-ratings, only correlating significantly for the measure concerning students' talking skills. Five themes and one subtheme were identified: Emotional impacts, A worthwhile experience, Contrasting priorities, Patients retake centre stage, and Self-reflective learners (subtheme Self-doubt).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that patient feedback led student Audiologists to report heightened seriousness in their interactions and increased attention on skills vital for patient-centred care. The process boosted students' confidence and reinforced awareness of the patient's perspective. Further research is needed to gauge the extent of these effects and explore the feasibility of implementing a large-scale patient feedback program in audiology training settings.

Using Simulation to Improve Communication Skills

Ineffective communication is implicated in 80% of medical errors, costing the United States approximately $12 billion annually. Teaching communication skills is a component of nursing curricula linked to improved patient outcomes. Simulation-based experience (SBE) is a strategy for healthcare professionals to learn communication skills. Providing nurses with the ability to practice nurse-nurse, nurse-physician, nurse-patient, and team communication skills in a psychologically safe learning environment provides an opportunity for skill development and meaningful self-reflection. The multiple modalities for SBE support needed communication techniques for skill development and acquisition to improve patient outcomes.

Scoping communication training in undergraduate children's nursing programmes: A mixed method study examining delivery methods and content

AIM

The aim of this study was to scope communication curriculum reported as currently being delivered within undergraduate children's nursing programmes across the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND

Communication between a children's nurse and a child/young person influences a child/young person's healthcare experience. Despite an identified need for a comprehensive and effective communication curriculum within undergraduate nursing, there is a notable gap of understanding of the delivery and content of communication training within children's nursing curricula.

DESIGN

A mixed method, online anonymous self-report survey design was adopted.

METHODS

Programme Leads of undergraduate children's nursing programmes in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom were asked to report on how communication training is delivered to students on undergraduate children's nursing programmes. The Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) was used for the reporting of this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-two programme leads completed the survey (51 % response rate). Findings show variability in the delivery and content of communication training across Higher Educational Institutions. Core communication modules featured across all nursing programmes, however, only two programme leads reported delivering standalone child-centred communication modules. Communication training was not always delivered by an educator with professional experience of children and young people in healthcare. Curriculum capacity had an impact on the delivery of communication training, with clinical practice being relied on to supplement child specific communication training. Programme leads highlighted the need for greater inclusion of child voice in shaping and delivering undergraduate children's nurse education.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that while communication is covered as a core part of the undergraduate nursing curriculum across the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom, it generally lacks a focus on children and young people and is not always supported by educators with professional experience of children and young people in healthcare. More work needs to focus on equipping undergraduate children's nurses with the unique skills needed to communicate effectively with children and young people and incorporate learnings into nursing pedagogy.

Training simulated participants for role portrayal and feedback practices in communication skills training: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 86

BACKGROUND

Providing feedback is a key aspect of simulated participants' (SPs) educational work. In teaching contexts, the ability to provide feedback to learners is central to their role. Suboptimal feedback practices may deny learners the valuable feedback they need to learn and improve. This scoping review systematically maps the evidence related to SPs' role as educators and identifies how SPs prepare for their role and feedback practices.

METHODS

The authors conducted a scoping review and included a group of international stakeholders with experience and expertise in SP methodology. Five online databases were systematically searched and ERIC, MedEdPortal and MedEdPublish were hand searched to identify relevant studies. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were developed. Data screening and subsequently data charting were performed in pairs. The results of data charting were thematically analysed including categories relating to the Association of SP Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).

RESULTS

From 8179 articles identified for the title and abstract screening, 98 studies were included. Studies reported the benefit of SPs' authentic role portrayal and feedback interactions for learners and on the reported learning outcomes. Data was heterogeneous with a notable lack of consistency in the detail regarding the scenario formats for communication skills training interventions, SP characteristics, and approaches to training for feedback and role portrayal.

CONCLUSIONS

The published literature has considerable heterogeneity in reporting how SPs are prepared for role portrayal and feedback interactions. Additionally, our work has identified gaps in the implementation of the ASPE SOBP, which promotes effective SP-learner feedback interactions. Further research is required to identify effective applications of SP methodology to prepare SPs for their role as educators.

Evaluating clinical communication skills of medical students, assistants, and professors

BACKGROUND

The skill of communicating with the patient is one of the basic clinical skills and part of the necessary competencies for medical doctors. The present study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and performance (KAP) of medical students, assistants, and professors of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences regarding clinical communication skills with patients.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the hospitals of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences in Iran. The study included a total of 289 participants, consisting of 51 professors, 72 assistants, 90 external staff, and 76 interns who work at these hospitals. The participants were selected through a convenience sampling method. The data-gathering tools used included a questionnaire to collect demographic characteristics, a researcher-made questionnaire to assess knowledge, a communication skills attitude questionnaire, and a communication skills survey questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and frequency, as well as statistical tests that included one-way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation test. The significance level for the study was considered to be 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean scores of knowledge of professors were higher compared to other groups (P = 0.002). All participating groups had a positive attitude toward learning communication skills. There were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the communication performance of the study groups (P < 0.001). There was a positive relationship between positive attitude and communication performance, and a significant negative relationship was observed between negative attitude and communication performance.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate the relatively favorable attitude and performance of the groups and their low knowledge. It is suggested that the doctor-patient communication skills courses be included as one of the necessary courses in the medical education curriculum.

Engaging Premedical Students in Medical Education Research: Benefits of Clinical Skills Observation Studies

PURPOSE

Observations requiring evaluation and critical thinking can be powerful learning experiences. Video-recorded standardized patient encounters are underused resources for evaluation and research. The authors engaged premedical students in medical education research reviewing standardized patient encounters. This study aims to explore participant perceptions of the research experience and how they gained clinical skills.

METHOD

This mixed-method study was completed between 2019 and 2022. Premedical participants coded medical students' clinical skills in video-recorded standardized patient encounters. Each participant also completed their own new patient history in a standardized patient encounter at both the beginning and end of their research project. Participants then completed an end-of-program debrief to discuss their experiences coding the clinical skills encounters. The authors coded communication skills implemented in the pre/postencounters and completed a thematic analysis of the debrief transcripts.

RESULTS

All 21 participants demonstrated significant clinical skills gain after their research project, which included spending more time with the patient (pre-M=5 minutes, post-M=19 minutes, t=13.2, P<.001) and asking more questions (pre-M=13, post-M=40, t=9.3, P<.001). Prior clinical experience did not influence pre- or postoutcomes, but the number of videos coded was associated with asking more questions in the postencounter. Participants described learning actively and reflected that their clinical skills research project gave them greater insight into patient-care aspects of medical school and how medical students learn.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that observational studies in which premedical students evaluate standardized patient encounters gave the students context to medical education while enabling them to develop and transfer their own clinical skills. Studies observing standardized patient encounters provide rich insight into clinical skills development, and this work generates both research outcomes and actionable program evaluation data for medical educators. Purposefully engaging premedical students in such experiential learning opportunities benefits the students and helps cultivate early medical education pathways for these learners.

An exploration of communication skills development for student diagnostic radiographers using simulation-based training with a standardised patient: UK-based focus-group study

INTRODUCTION

Communication is an essential skill for all healthcare professionals but is particularly challenging for diagnostic radiographers since their role involves conveying extensive information within a relatively short amount of time. One method to develop communication skills in radiography is through simulation-based training using high fidelity simulation activities. The use of video recording for reflection and debriefing are also important elements that can be utilised to enhance learning. The aim of this project was to explore student radiographers' experiences of a simulation-based activity utilising a standardised patient designed to aid development of communication skills.

METHODS

Fifty-two undergraduate 3rd year diagnostic radiography students at a single Higher Education Institution undertook a simulation roleplay exercise with an expert by experience (EBE) who acted in an anxious manner in order to challenge the student's communication skills following the simulation, students received a debrief session where detailed feedback was provided from the EBE and an academic. Students were also able to watch their video of the simulation and reflect. Students were invited to participate in a focus group to discuss their experience and the learning they had developed and 12 students participated. Transcribed material from the focus groups was thematically analysed to deduce themes of learning developed and ways to improve for future simulations.

FINDINGS

Six main themes were identified from the thematic analysis of the transcripts from 12 diagnostic radiography students. These were patient care, radiographer's role and responsibilities, personal development, feelings, fidelity, and pedagogy. The themes represented the key learning points expressed by students and also aspects of the simulation which could be improved. Overall, the simulation provided a positive learning experience for the students. Having a video recording of the scenario was regarded as beneficial to enable a depth of reflection on non-verbal communication skills, which would be beneficial in future simulation scenarios. Students were aware that even though they used appropriate language their overall manner affected the interaction with the expert by experience more significantly. Students also considered methods to improve their communication if they encountered a similar patient interaction in their future practice.

CONCLUSION

There is great potential for simulation-based training in developing communication skills for diagnostic radiography students. EBEs are a vital addition to simulation and educational activities in Higher Education Institutions and should be involved with the design of simulation activities also, as they can bring unique patient insight.

Content and characteristics of evidence in the use of standardized patients for advanced practice nurses: A mixed-studies systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The use of Standardized Patients (SPs) as a supplement to traditional clinical experience is of interest in the advanced practice nursing curriculum. Yet, evidence exploring this area is limited. This systematic review aims to consolidate and synthesize findings on the available evidence of using standardized patients (SPs) on advanced practice nurse (APN) students' learning and assessment experiences.

DESIGN

Mixed-studies systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses from the inception of each database to May 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies involving the use of SPs for education and assessments among APN students were included in this review.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. Three themes were identified through thematic synthesis: (1) Benefits associated with standardized patients, (2) Uniqueness of standardized patient experience, and (3) Preference and way forward. Overall, these students benefited from refining knowledge, clinical skills, and communication skills, and perceived a boost in confidence in their nursing competencies through SP simulations. More studies with rigorous methodology are needed to ascertain the causal relationships between SP simulations and APN students. Future studies should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SP, especially in low-income countries. Inter-professional SP simulations and hybrid simulations should be explored further. Considerations for improvements include allocating more sessions for multisource feedback, offering dyadic or group support, and providing assessments that are more formative during simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

SP simulation can complement traditional clinical experience in providing APN students with the knowledge, clinical skills, and communication skills in the real-world context.

Establishing Empathetic Collaborative Care for Survivors of Violence Through Multidisciplinary Simulation

BACKGROUND

Although nurses are introduced to an array of patient populations in nursing school, how to care for and treat survivors of violence typically does not get the same time and attention. Treating survivors of violence not only includes professional competency, but also empathy and the ability to work collaboratively with multidisciplinary professionals. This article describes a multidisciplinary survivors of violence simulation involving nursing, criminal justice, and psychology students that addresses empathetic and collaborative care for victims of violence.

METHOD

Students participated in sexual assault, domestic violence, and human trafficking simulations. A Socratic debriefing technique with the standardized patient present was used.

RESULTS

Students established positive relationships within their groups through respect and effective communication. Discussions during debriefing indicated students understood the importance of competent, empathetic, collaborative care.

CONCLUSION

This educational initiative suggests the potential to improve multidisciplinary care for victims of violence through simulation. [J Nurs Educ. 2022;61(12):716-719.].

The Effect of Two Different Simulation Modalities in Palliative Care Teaching on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Satisfaction, Self-confidence, and Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nursing students from developing countries have limited opportunities to experience palliative care. Standardized patient and low-fidelity simulations can provide realistic palliative care experiences for students. However, limited research is available on simulation-based education in Palestine. Testing and using these two types of simulation methods may be the best solution for developing countries that lack adequate resources. This study aimed to test the effects of low-fidelity simulation compared with standardized patient simulation in palliative care teaching on nursing students' knowledge, satisfaction, confidence, and skills. The study was a randomized controlled trial of 70 nursing students in their sophomore year. Students' knowledge was assessed with the Palliative Care Quiz for Nursing test; satisfaction and confidence with the Learner Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning; and skills rated by two researchers. Students' knowledge improved significantly on the posttest compared with the pretest, without significant differences between both groups. The findings showed that the utilization of the two methods in students' clinical training for scenario has the same effect on the satisfaction and confidence. The skills of the standardized patient group improved significantly more than the low-fidelity group. The study revealed that both simulation modalities are effective for palliative care nursing students.

Effectiveness of a Mobile Technology-Supported Self-Reflective Course in Communication Behaviors for Outpatient Nurses

Background Communication is a core competency for outpatient nurses. This study investigated the effectiveness of a mobile technology-supported self-reflective (MTS) course in communication behaviors among outpatient nurses. Method This quasi-experimental study used a convenience sample of 78 outpatient nurses (experimental group = 39; control group = 39). The experimental group completed the MTS communication course. Communication behaviors were evaluated before, 1 week after, and 1 month after the course. Results There was no significant difference in communication behaviors between the groups before the intervention. One week after the intervention, communication behavior scores significantly increased in both groups without significant between-group differences (p > .05). One month after the intervention, the experimental group showed significantly higher communication behavior scores (p < .05). Both groups demonstrated high learning satisfaction. Conclusion The MTS communication course was successful in promoting effective outpatient nurse-patient communication. Health care facilities may want to incorporate the MTS course into their orientation program. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022;53(6):279-288.].

Immersive virtual reality simulated learning environment versus role-play for empathic clinical communication training

INTRODUCTION

The use of immersive virtual reality simulated learning environments (VR SLEs) for improving clinical communication can offer desirable qualities including repetition and determinism in a safe environment. The aim of this study was to establish whether the mode of delivery, VR SLE versus clinical role-play, could have a measurable effect on clinical empathic communication skills for MRI scenarios.

METHODS

A split-cohort study was performed with trainee practitioners (n = 70) and qualified practitioners (n = 9). Participants were randomly assigned to four groups: clinician VR (CVR), clinician role-play (CRP), trainee VR (TVR), and trainee RP (TRP). Clinical communication skills were assessed using two methods: firstly, a self-reported measure - the SE-12 communication questionnaire and, secondly, a training and assessment tool developed by a panel of experts.

RESULTS

Participants in the VR trainee (TVR) and clinician (CVR) groups reported 11% (P < 0.05) and 7.2% (P < 0.05) improvements in communication confidence post training, whereas trainees assigned to the role-play (TRP) intervention reported a 4.3% (P < 0.05) improvement. Empirical assessment of communication training scores assessing a participant's ability to select empathic statements showed the TVR group performed 5% better on average than their role-play counterparts (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of participant's selection of appropriate empathic responses was shown to differ significantly following the training intervention designed to improve interactions with patients that present for an MRI scan. The results may demonstrate the capacity for immersion into an emotional narrative in a VR environment to increase the user's susceptibility for recalling and selecting empathic terminology.

Effects of Standardized Patient-Based Training on Surgical Nurses' Competencies for Managing Hand Injuries

BACKGROUND

The competence of nurses who care for patients with finger replantation is critical for positive patient outcomes. This study sought to identify the effects of standardized patient (SP)-based training on surgical ward nurses' knowledge, clinical performance, and self-efficacy regarding finger replantation.

METHOD

A wait-list control group with a crossover design was used for this study. Nurses were randomly assigned to group A (n = 10) or to the wait-list control group B (n = 10). Training consisted of a lecture, task training, and SP-based training. Knowledge, clinical performance, and self-efficacy data were collected at baseline, after the first intervention, and after 1 month at group crossover and second intervention. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Nurses demonstrated greater knowledge, better clinical performance, and higher self-efficacy scores after the SP-based training. Following crossover, knowledge, clinical performance, and self-efficacy scores were retained 1 month after the training in group A.

CONCLUSION

SP-based training produced improvement and retention in knowledge, clinical performance, and self-efficacy. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020;51(4):189-196.].

Comparison of the use of manikins and simulated patients in a multidisciplinary in situ medical simulation program for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom

PURPOSE

Simulation training is increasingly popular in healthcare education, and often relies on specially designed manikins. However, it is also possible to work with actors, or simulated patients (SPs), which may provide a greater sense of realism. This study aimed to compare these 2 approaches, to ascertain which makes healthcare professionals feel most comfortable, which leads to the greatest improvement in confidence, and which is most beneficial to learning.

METHODS

This study was embedded in a pre-existing multidisciplinary in situ simulation program. A multidisciplinary group of learners from a range of backgrounds—including nurses, doctors, and other allied health professionals—were asked to complete a questionnaire about their learning preferences. We collected 204 responses from 40 simulation sessions over 4 months, from September to December 2019. Of these 204 responses, 123 described using an SP and 81 described using a manikin.

RESULTS

We found that 58% of respondents believed they would feel more comfortable working with an actor, while 17% would feel more comfortable using a manikin. Learners who used both modalities reported a significant increase in confidence (P<0.0001 for both). Participants felt that both modalities were beneficial to learning, but SPs provided significantly more benefits to learning than manikins (P<0.0001). The most common reason favoring SP-based simulation was the greater realism.

CONCLUSION

In scenarios that could reasonably be provided using either modality, we suggest that educators should give greater consideration to using SP-based simulation.

Senior Nursing Students' Perceptions of Their Readiness for Practice Prior to Final Year Internship: Part 2-A Qualitative Perspective

INTRODUCTION

Preparing nursing students for their role as future registered nurses is an essential and complex endeavor. It is a responsibility that is shared between academic and clinical health care organizations. Arguably, the prevailing economic climate places additional pressures on the fiscal and manpower aspects of health care management. Maintaining a quality practice learning environment for students against this backdrop has become increasingly challenging. Indeed, students themselves have raised these concerns. The authors sought to explore these concerns further with the students, and this article will present the qualitative findings of a study exploring final-year students' perceptions of their readiness for practice in a school of nursing in the Republic of Ireland.

METHODS

Two open-ended questions were included on a quantitative survey, which sought to ascertain students' self-reported level of readiness for oral medication administration. A convenience sample of 24 final-year students undertaking a 4-year BSc (honors) in general nursing program was involved. Content analysis was employed to explore and elicit the key components of participants' written responses to the open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Participants highlighted the constraints that they have witnessed in some practice areas, the consequent impact on the availability of particular learning opportunities, and their level of preparedness for practice. Three key areas of concern emerged including medication management, patient caseload management, and communication. A recurring issue centered on the delegation of the more fundamental nursing tasks to students by qualified nurses, to the detriment of students' experience of the more complex aspects of holistic patient care. This proved quite exasperating for these participants.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that final-year undergraduate nursing students in a school in the Republic of Ireland are concerned about their readiness for practice. Specific areas of concern for students relate to their capacity to develop competence for registered practice. These findings provide both a timely reminder and opportunity for those charged with the responsibility of preparing nurses for registration, in both clinical and academic settings, to raise awareness of factors that can impact on the student experience and learning in practice. They highlight the importance of a collaborative approach to addressing the issues that emerged, if competence and patient safety are to be safeguarded and maintained in the future.

Health care students' perceptions about learning of affective interpersonal communication competence in interprofessional simulations

BACKGROUND

Health professionals need interpersonal communication competence (ICC) in their work with patients and other professionals. Interprofessional simulation provides health care students with an opportunity to practice communication skills in a safe and authentic environment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of health care students of interprofessional simulations in acquiring affective interpersonal communication competence (AICC).

DESIGN

This study was conducted using the quantitative descriptive research method.

SETTINGS

The data were collected from health care students participating in interprofessional simulations at a university of applied sciences in Finland using a questionnaire titled Student questionnaire on a multiprofessional simulation exercise. The health care students included nursing, physical therapy and practical nursing students.

PARTICIPANTS

This study was participated by 149 health care students with a response rate of 41.2%.

METHODS

The quantitative data were analysed using the SPSS 24.0 for Windows statistical software. Frequencies, percentages, averages, and standard deviation were used to describe the data. Two mean sum variables were formed using factor analysis from the variables describing AICC.

RESULTS

The students' perceptions of learning AICC (attitude, motivation, emotions) in interprofessional simulations were largely positive; for example, the simulations reduced prejudice against, and increased appreciation of, other occupational groups. Even though the interprofessional simulations were sometimes perceived as stressful, stress could also be a positive source of learning and effectively fostered personal understanding of others in a team.

CONCLUSION

Interprofessional simulations increased knowledge of the activities of other professional groups for students in different fields of education. This encourages them to work together after completing their education and entering the workforce. Knowledge of the simulation process and the creating a safe learning environment also promoted students' AICC.

Supporting Empathy Training Through Virtual Patients

For the training of interpersonal skills, such as those required in the medical field, virtual agents can provide a safe environment for practice. However, many agent systems are not developed with the ability to understand non-verbal input. Being able to automatically parse such input is essential for the practice of interpersonal skills such as empathy. Currently, it is still an open question which prosodic or visual features would aid automatic classification of empathy and how this knowledge can be used to support the practice of these skills. As a first step towards this goal, we report on 42 second-year nursing students practicing their empathy skills with a virtual patient or through collaborative role playing. We found that across both the role playing and simulation, students assessed their empathy as increasing over time but as higher during the role playing. This work contributes to the continued development of virtual agents for the training of interpersonal skills.

Effect of SEGUE-based communication education on nursing simulation practice: a quasi-experimental design

Background: Effective educational approaches are required to enhance nursing students' communication competency.Objectives: To  evaluate the effectiveness of SEGUE ('set the stage,' 'elicit information,' 'give information,' 'understand the patient's perspective,' and 'end the encounter')-based communication education.Design: A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design.Methods: Students were randomized into the control group (n = 41) and experimental group (n = 57). Communication competency and efficacy were measured via a self-report questionnaire and via ratings of the students from professor and standardized patient.Results: Scores by students (self-evaluations; p < .001), professor (p < .001), and standardized patient (p < .042) showed higher communication competency in the experimental group. Compared with the control group, the pre-post difference in communication efficacy in the experimental group was increased (p = .004).Conclusions: Simulation practice to reflect the various clinical situation is recommended to improve students' communication.Impact statement: SEGUE-based communication education in nursing simulation practice with the standardized patient was an effective strategy for improving nursing students' communication.