Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability following doxorubicin and docetaxel-based therapy

Opportunities for Precision Dosing of Cytotoxic Drugs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Bridging the Gap in Precision Medicine

Precision dosing of classical cytotoxic drugs in oncology remains underdeveloped, especially in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite advancements in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, classical cytotoxic agents continue to play a critical role in NSCLC treatment. However, the current body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of these agents fails to adequately address interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. By better considering patient characteristics, treatment outcomes can be improved, reducing risks of under-exposure and over-exposure. This narrative review explores opportunities for precision dosing for key cytotoxic agents used in NSCLC treatment: cisplatin, carboplatin, pemetrexed, docetaxel, (nab-)paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine. A comprehensive review of regulatory reports and an extensive literature search were conducted to evaluate current dosing practices, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exposure-response relationships. Our findings highlight promising developments in precision dosing, although the number of directly implementable strategies remains limited. The most compelling evidence supports using the biomarker cystatin C for more precise carboplatin dosing and adopting weekly dosing schedules for docetaxel, paclitaxel, and nab-paclitaxel. Additionally, we recommend direct implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing for paclitaxel. This review stresses the urgent need to reassess conventional dosing paradigms for classical cytotoxic agents to better align with the principles of the precision dosing framework. Our recommendations show the potential of precision dosing to improve NSCLC treatment, addressing gaps in the current dosing of classical cytotoxic drugs. Given the large NSCLC patient population, optimising the dosing of these agents could significantly improve treatment outcomes and reduce toxicity for many patients.

Impact of obesity on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in women with breast cancer

IntroductionExperts suggest doxorubicin clearance is decreased in women with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥35 kg/m2. However, few data support this recommendation.MethodsWomen receiving doxorubicin for breast cancer in three BMI groups were recruited (n = 15). Doxorubicin dosing was determined by body surface area and was administered by 30-min intravenous infusion. Blood samples were obtained at 0 h (pre-dose) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12-24, and 24-72 h following the beginning of infusion. Concentrations of doxorubicin and its metabolite, doxorubicinol, were assayed by LC-MS/MS. Non-compartment analysis was done using PKanalix2021R2 for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses.ResultsThe median [range] BMI and age were 30.3 [23.5-57] kg/m2 and 53 [31-69] years. Thirteen of the 15 women had samples available for analysis. Four of the 13 had a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2. PK parameters ranged from 37.8% (AUC0-inf) to 91.0% (Vd). Doxorubicinol PK parameters ranged from 37.8% (Cmax) to 67.6% (AUC0-inf). The average doxorubicinol:doxorubicin AUClasts ratio was 0.26 (range: 0.04-0.88). A t-test didn't suggest a significant difference in individual PK parameters (BMI < 35 kg/m2 vs. ≥35.0 kg/m2). The two highest clearances (380 L/h and 250 L/h) had a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2; also, the highest clearance (1114 L/h) for doxorubicinol was ≥35.0 kg/m2.ConclusionsLarge interindividual variabilities in doxorubicin PK were observed in women up to a BMI of 57 kg/m2 and a total body weight of 141.5 kg. Women with a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 and breast cancer did not appear to have lower clearances of doxorubicin.ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT01537029.

The Efficacy Research of Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in Preventing Neutropenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens (DBRs) are commonly used in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer (EBC). The prophylactic use of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) has been shown to reduce the incidence of neutropenia induced by DBRs. However, the clinical usage of PEG-rhG-CSF in EBC patients undergoing DBRs in China remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in 137 EBC patients receiving DBRs from September 2022 to February 2024. We compared the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) between patients who was treated with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF or not by complete blood counts, evaluating the effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing CIN. Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF was given at 100 μg/kg body weight (maximum total dosage of 6 mg) once 24-48 h following chemotherapy. Meanwhile, we also collected basic patient information, the area under time-concentration curve of docetaxel, and liver and kidney function indicators. Multivariate logistic regression and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to explore independent factors influencing neutropenia.

FINDINGS

In this study, 87 of 137 EBC patients were administrated with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF, while 50 were not. Compared to patients who did not receive PEG-rhG-CSF, those who received prophylactic injections had a significantly lower incidence of grade 3-4 CIN (20% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.05). Higher body surface area (BSA), lower body mass index (BMI), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and nonprophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF were found to be positively correlated with CIN occurrence. ROC curve analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.756 for predicting CIN in EBC patients when BSA was 1.66 m², BMI was 24.8 kg/m², and ALT was 41 U/L, with a sensitivity of 73.08% and specificity of 73.87%.

IMPLICATIONS

Prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF significantly reduces the incidence of CIN, particularly grades 3 and 4. BSA, BMI, ALT, and PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis are independent influencing factors for the occurrence of neutropenia.

Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In addition to the effect of body weight, a patient's sex can influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anticancer agents, and thereby their activity and safety. The magnitude and relevance of sex differences, however, are currently unclear.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of published studies (clinical, n ≥ 10) on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (on 31 January 2022) anticancer drugs (excluding hormonal agents), aiming to identify significant PK differences between male and female patients. A difference of ≥20% on PK parameters (clearance or trough concentration) was considered significant. The methodological quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA2020 guidelines and a previously published protocol, which was registered in the PROSPERO database (number 291008).

RESULTS

Data on 99 anticancer agents (for a total of 1643 abstracts and European Medicines Agency/FDA documents) were screened. The final dataset included 112 articles and 8 European Medicines Agency/FDA documents. The median size of a study cohort was 445 patients (range: 12-6468 patients). Significant PK differences (>+20% in clearance or apparent clearance in women) were identified for 14 drugs, and potentially significant PK differences (due to conflicting reports) for another 8 drugs. None of the studies included sex-based summaries to assess whether the observed differences in PK may impact the efficacy or safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant sex differences in PK have been identified including commonly used drugs of different classes, such as 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, regorafenib, atezolizumab, and temozolomide. The risk-benefit ratio for such anticancer drugs is likely to be improved by the development of sex-specific dosing strategies. Additional sex-based PK-pharmacodynamic analyses are recommended during dose optimisation and are to be conducted in line with the FDA Project Optimus guidance. They should be reported even if no association between the patients' sex and the activity and/or toxicity of an anticancer drug has been identified.

Optimal exposure to docetaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Drug-induced neutropenia is the main reason for the dose limitation of docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. The area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) of docetaxel is associated with neutropenia. However, the optimal exposure to docetaxel for receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the docetaxel AUC and neutropenia, identify potential influencing factors, and explore the best monitoring target for docetaxel when treating patients with early-stage breast cancer using a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model.

METHODS

Docetaxel plasma concentration, demographics, clinical data, and related laboratory data were collected. PopPK analyses were performed using a nonlinear mixed-effect modelling program. The docetaxel AUC was determined using the maximum a posteriori Bayesian (MAPB) method. The docetaxel exposure-toxicity threshold measured from the AUC for neutropenia was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The correlation between docetaxel exposure and neutropenia was analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 70 participants, 47 (67.1%) developed severe neutropenia. The PopPK analysis showed that the typical drug clearance (CL) rate was 37.4 L/h. Age was a significant covariate of CL rate, and aspartate aminotransferase and albumin levels were covariables of the volume of distribution. The multivariable regression analysis showed that AUC >3.0 mg.h/L (odds ratio [OR], 5.940; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.693-20.843; P = 0.005), platinum use (OR, 0.156; 95% CI, 0.043-0.562; P = 0.005) and baseline haemoglobin level (OR, 0.938; 95% CI, 0.887-0.993; P = 0.027) were significant factors influencing the occurrence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The AUC of first cycle may not predict the occurrence rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia in later cycles.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

We developed a docetaxel PopPK model for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Age and AST and ALB levels were significant covariates. AUC estimated using the MAPB method can predict the toxicity of docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. Docetaxel AUC >3.0 mg.h/L, absence of platinum use and low baseline haemoglobin level were risk factors for docetaxel-induced grade 3/4 neutropenia.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Center Registry (ChiCTR2200056460).

Expression and Functional Contribution of Different Organic Cation Transporters to the Cellular Uptake of Doxorubicin into Human Breast Cancer and Cardiac Tissue

Doxorubicin is a frequently used anticancer drug to treat many types of tumors, such as breast cancer or bronchial carcinoma. The clinical use of doxorubicin is limited by its poorly predictable cardiotoxicity, the reasons of which are so far not fully understood. The drug is a substrate of several efflux transporters such as P-gp or BCRP and was recently reported to be a substrate of cation uptake transporters. To evaluate the potential role of transporter proteins in the accumulation of doxorubicin at its site of action (e.g., mammary carcinoma cells) or adverse effects (e.g., heart muscle cells), we studied the expression of important uptake and efflux transporters in human breast cancer and cardiac tissue, and investigated the affinity of doxorubicin to the identified transporters. The cellular uptake studies on doxorubicin were performed with OATP1A2*1, OATP1A2*2, and OATP1A2*3-overexpressing HEK293 cells, as well as OCT1-, OCT2-, and OCT3- overexpressing MDCKII cells. To assess the contribution of transporters to the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin, we determined the cell viability in the presence and absence of transporter inhibitors in different cell lines. Several transporters, including P-gp, BCRP, OCT1, OCT3, and OATP1A2 were expressed in human heart and/or breast cancer tissue. Doxorubicin could be identified as a substrate of OCT1, OCT2, OCT3, and OATP1A2. The cellular uptake into cells expressing genetic OATP1A2 variants was markedly reduced and correlated well with the increased cellular viability. Inhibition of OATP1A2 (naringin) and OCT transporters (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium) resulted in a significant decrease of doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity in cell lines expressing the respective transporters. Similarly, the excipient Cremophor EL significantly inhibited the OCT1-3- and OATP1A2-mediated cellular uptake and attenuated the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin. In conclusion, genetic and environmental-related variability in the expression and function of these transporters may contribute to the substantial variability seen in terms of doxorubicin efficacy and toxicity.

Is there scope for better individualisation of anthracycline cancer chemotherapy?

Anthracyclines are used to treat solid and haematological cancers, particularly breast cancers, lymphomas and childhood cancers. Myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity are the primary toxicities that limit treatment duration and/or intensity. Cardiotoxicity, particularly heart failure, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Cumulative anthracycline dose is a significant predictor of cardiotoxicity risk, suggesting a role for anthracycline pharmacokinetic variability. Population pharmacokinetic modelling in children has shown that doxorubicin clearance in the very young is significantly lower than in older children, potentially contributing to their higher risk of cardiotoxicity. A model of doxorubicin clearance based on body surface area and age offers a patient-centred dose-adjustment strategy that may replace the current disparate initial-dose selection tools, providing a rational way to compensate for pharmacokinetic variability in children aged <7 years. Population pharmacokinetic models in adults have not adequately addressed older ages, obesity, hepatic and renal dysfunction, and potential drug-drug interactions to enable clinical application. Although candidate gene and genome-wide association studies have investigated relationships between genetic variability and anthracycline pharmacokinetics or clinical outcomes, there have been few clinically significant reproducible associations. Precision-dosing of anthracyclines is currently hindered by lack of clinically useful pharmacokinetic targets and models that predict cumulative anthracycline exposures. Combined with known risk factors for cardiotoxicity, the use of advanced echocardiography and biomarkers, future validated pharmacokinetic targets and predictive models could facilitate anthracycline precision dosing that truly maximises efficacy and provides individualised early intervention with cardioprotective therapies in patients at risk of cardiotoxicity.

An improved LC-MS/MS method for determination of docetaxel and its application to population pharmacokinetic study in Chinese cancer patients

Because of its unpredictable side effects and efficacy, the anticancer drug docetaxel (DTX) requires improved characterisation of its pharmacokinetic profiles through population pharmacokinetic studies. A sensitive and rugged LC-MS/MS method for the detection of DTX in human plasma was developed and optimised using paclitaxel as an internal standard (IS). The plasma samples underwent rapid extraction using hybrid solid-phase extraction-protein precipitation. The analyte and IS were separated with an isocratic system on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C₁₈ column using water containing 0.05% acetic acid along with 20 μM of sodium acetate and methanol (30/70, v/v) as the mobile phase. Quantification was performed using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer through multiple reaction monitoring in positive mode, using the m/z 830.3 → 548.8 and m/z 876.3 → 307.7 transitions for DTX and paclitaxel, respectively. The range of the calibration curve was 1-500 ng/mL for DTX, and the linear correlation coefficient was >0.99. The accuracies ranged from -4.6 to 4.2%, and the precision was no higher than 7.0% for the analytes. No significant matrix effect was observed. Both DTX and the IS showed considerable recovery. This method was finally applied to the establishment of a population pharmacokinetic model to optimise the clinical use of DTX.

Clinical application of the AUC-guided dosage adjustment of docetaxel-based chemotherapy for patients with solid tumours: a single centre, prospective and randomised control study

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel (DTX) is a widely used anti-tumour drug, and its dosage is solely determined by body surface area (BSA). Adverse events, such as neutropenia or unsatisfied efficacy, likely occur because of differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of patients. Thus, a feasible dosage adjustment method is needed.

METHODS

A total of 209 eligible patients who provided consent were enrolled and randomised into two groups to receive the BSA- and PK-guided dosage adjustments of DTX-based chemotherapy (3 weeks per cycle). The AUC of DTX was detected, and the therapeutic window for Chinese patients was determined. The proportion of patients within the therapeutic window was evaluated. Neutropenia was examined in accordance with the toxicity grading standard suggested by the World Health Organisation. Tumour response was assessed in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint was the incidence of neutropenia, and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and 3-year survival rate.

RESULTS

The therapeutic window for Chinese patients was 1.7-2.5 mg·h/L. The proportion of patients within the therapeutic window was 63.89% versus 28.33% (P < 0.0001), and the incidence of neutropenia was 68.33% versus 38.89% (P = 0.001) in the experimental group versus the control group in the sixth cycle, respectively. DCR was 72% versus 85% (P = 0.018) in the control group versus the experimental group. The 3-year survival rate of the PK group was significantly higher than that of the BSA group (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The PK-guided dosage adjustment of DTX could significantly increase the proportion of patients within the therapeutic window, decrease the incidence of neutropenia and increase the DCR and the 3-year survival rate. The PK-guided dosage adjustment based on the dynamic monitoring of AUC could be a useful method for oncologists to improve individualised treatment options, optimise drug efficacy and reduce drug toxicity.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug exposure-toxicity correlation study of docetaxel based chemotherapy in Chinese head and neck cancer patients

Background

Area under time-concentration curve (AUC) of docetaxel is related with its toxicity and efficacy. The aim of this study is to investigate the target range of docetaxel AUC in Chinese head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

Methods

Eligible HNC patients were enrolled and received at least 2 cycles of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. A simplified pharmacokinetic (PK) strategy (2 monitored samples) was developed to simulate docetaxel AUC using the nonlinear mixed-effect modelling program. Preliminary target range of AUC was pre-set as 2.5–3.7 µg·hr/mL according to pooled analysis from 8 previous studies. Fisher exact test was used to analyze the relationship between AUC with neutropenia and efficacy, and to verify the target range.

Results

Thirty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. Grade 3-4 and grade 4 neutropenia rate in 1^st cycle was 64% and 36%, respectively. AUC simulation by simplified PK strategy was acceptable compared to full sampling method from the analysis of archived 300 patients’ data, with −5.67% of mean prediction error (MPE). Median AUC of all patients was 2.58 µg·hr/mL (range from 1.28 to 9.39). A significant correlation (P=0.007) was detected between AUC and body surface area (BSA)-dosage, but BSA contributed only 18.3% of AUC inter-individual variability. Docetaxel AUC was significantly related with the severity (grade 3–4) of neutropenia (correlation of coefficient was 0.452, P=0.004). Fourteen patients (36%) were within the target AUC range. Patients with AUC above the target experienced more severe neutropenia (grade 3–4 rate 100% vs. 56%, P=0.036; grade 4 rate 86% vs. 25%, P=0.005). No significant difference of response rate was found between patients within the target or not.

Conclusions

A simplified samples PK strategy was developed for docetaxel AUC simulation. The target range of docetaxel AUC in Chinese HNC patients was suggested at 2.5–3.7 µg·hr/mL for reduced toxicity without compromising efficacy of docetaxel treatment.

Effect of aprepitant administration on CINV caused by cisplatin multi-day chemotherapy and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy and safety of postponing administration of aprepitant and routine triple-antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients who received docetaxel and cisplatin multi-day chemotherapy treatment, and to evaluate the effect of aprepitant on docetaxel pharmacokinetics in the Chinese population.

METHODS

A total of 24 cancer patients (including 5 females and 19 males, 22-74 years old) received two cycles of high-emetic DP (docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 + cisplatin 25 mg/m² on days 1-3) regimen. A randomized, two-period and cross-over study was applied for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The patients in group A took aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2-3 (administered aprepitant 1 h before chemotherapy). In group B, the patients took aprepitant 125 mg on day 2, 80 mg on days 3-4, which was delayed 1 day than group A. Efficacy and safety in overall phase were evaluated within 5 days after initiation of chemotherapy. Simultaneously, the differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of docetaxel between two different antiemetic treatments are compared.

RESULTS

The CR rate of delayed-phase nausea was compared between the routine triple-antiemetic treatment (group A) and the aprepitant delayed 1-day administration treatment (group B), and the difference was statistically significant (16.7% vs 45.8% P < 0.05), despite there were similar for two groups in the CR rate of acute-phase nausea and vomiting, and delayed-phase vomiting. In two groups, the area under the docetaxel curve (AUC_0-t values) (mean ± SD) of docetaxel was 1134.21 ± 732.55 (ng h/mL) and 1080.94 ± 585.09 (ng h/mL), and the geometric means were 944.82 and 902.10 (ng h/mL), respectively. There was no significant difference in AUC values between the two antiemetic treatments (P > 0.05), as well as C_max, CL_z, T_1/2z, MRT and T_max.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed administration of aprepitant provided superior delayed-phase nausea protection for patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy in comparison with the routine triple-antiemetic treatment. In addition, in the routine triple-antiemetic treatment, aprepitant did not significantly affect the main pharmacokinetic parameters of docetaxel.

Precision Medicine with Imprecise Therapy: Computational Modeling for Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Medical oncology is in need of a mathematical modeling toolkit that can leverage clinically-available measurements to optimize treatment selection and schedules for patients. Just as the therapeutic choice has been optimized to match tumor genetics, the delivery of those therapeutics should be optimized based on patient-specific pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. Under the current approach to treatment response planning and assessment, there does not exist an efficient method to consolidate biomarker changes into a holistic understanding of treatment response. While the majority of research on chemotherapies focus on cellular and genetic mechanisms of resistance, there are numerous patient-specific and tumor-specific measures that contribute to treatment response. New approaches that consolidate multimodal information into actionable data are needed. Mathematical modeling offers a solution to this problem. In this perspective, we first focus on the particular case of breast cancer to highlight how mathematical models have shaped the current approaches to treatment. Then we compare chemotherapy to radiation therapy. Finally, we identify opportunities to improve chemotherapy treatments using the model of radiation therapy. We posit that mathematical models can improve the application of anticancer therapeutics in the era of precision medicine. By highlighting a number of historical examples of the contributions of mathematical models to cancer therapy, we hope that this contribution serves to engage investigators who may not have previously considered how mathematical modeling can provide real insights into breast cancer therapy.

Comparison of the docetaxel concentration in human plasma measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and a nanoparticle immunoassay and clinical applications of that assay

To determine the feasibility of using a nanoparticle immunoassay for clinical therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of docetaxel concentrations, a sensitive and simple method of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was established to measure the docetaxel concentration in human plasma and the results of LC-MS/MS and the immunoassay were compared. Docetaxel and paclitaxel (the internal standard, or IS) in human plasma were extracted through protein precipitation, separated on a Diamonsil C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), ionized with positive ions, and detected with LC-MS/MS in multi-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Plasma samples from 248 cancer patients were assayed with LC-MS/MS and a nanoparticle immunoassay. Data from the samples were analyzed with the statistical software SPSS and the software MedCalc. Results indicated that the calibration curve of the validated method of LC-MS/MS was linear over the range of 10-2,000 ng/mL, with an lowest limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 10 ng/mL, and the intra- and inter- day precision and accuracy were both < ± 15%. Comparison of the two methods indicated that results of the LC-MS/MS were closely related to those of the nanoparticle immunoassay, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.965 and acceptable 95% confidence intervals (CI) of ‒ 231.7-331.1 ng/mL. Overall, the established method of LC-MC/MS and the nanoparticle immunoassay were both suitable for measurement of the docetaxel concentration in human plasma, and the immunoassay was far more cost-effective and better at clinical TDM of docetaxel in clinical practice.

Population pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

AIMS

The aims of the study were: (i) to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of doxorubicin (DOX) and doxorubicinol (DOXol) in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) using a population approach; (ii) to evaluate the influence of various covariates on the PK of DOX; and (iii) to evaluate the role of DOX and DOXol exposure in haematological toxicity.

METHODS

Population PK modelling (using NONMEM) was performed using DOX and DOXol plasma concentration-time data from 45 NHL patients treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone). The influence of drug exposure on haematological toxicity was analysed using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

A five-compartment model, three for DOX and two for DOXol, with first-order distribution and elimination for both entities best described the data. Population estimates for parent drug (CL) and metabolite (CL_m ) clearance were 62 l h^-1 and 27 l h^-1 , respectively. The fraction metabolized to DOXol (F_m ) was estimated at 0.22. While bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase showed an influence on the CL and CL_m , the objective function value decrease was not statistically significant. A trend towards an association between the total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_total ), the area under the concentration-time curve for DOX (AUC) plus the area under the concentration-time curve for DOXol (AUC_m ), and the neutropenia grade (P = 0.068) and the neutrophil counts (P = 0.089) was observed, according to an exponential relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK of DOX and DOXol were well characterized by the model developed, which could be used as a helpful tool to optimize the dosage of this drug. The results suggest that the main active metabolite of DOX, DOXol, is involved in the haematological toxicity of the parent drug.

Significant effect of age on docetaxel pharmacokinetics in Japanese female breast cancer patients by using the population modeling approach

PURPOSE

Docetaxel is frequently used in the treatment of a wide variety of solid tumors, including breast cancer. The aim of this study is to obtain the population pharmacokinetic parameters of docetaxel in Japanese female patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Blood samples from 24 patients were collected sequentially before and after docetaxel infusion. Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood and genotyped for the selected polymorphisms in the candidate genes of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes. The influence of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel was evaluated using the nonlinear-mixed-effect modeling program, NONMEM. As a basis for comparison, the pharmacokinetics of another taxane paclitaxel in 41 separate female patients with breast cancer was calculated.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model adequately described the pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. The population mean estimates of the total body clearance for patients aged 58 years or less and the central volume of distribution for docetaxel were 32.6 L/h and 5.77 L, respectively. In patients over 58 years, the clearance was 24 % higher than that in the younger patients. No influences of the genotypes examined were noted on the clearance of docetaxel. The clearance of paclitaxel was not affected by patient age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients over the age of 58 years showed significantly higher clearance of docetaxel than that in patients aged 58 years or less. Since the clearance of paclitaxel was not affected by the age, it is possible that the pharmacokinetic mechanisms of docetaxel might be specifically affected by age in females.

Are pharmacogenomic biomarkers an effective tool to predict taxane toxicity and outcome in breast cancer patients? Literature review

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, characterized by various molecular phenotypes that correlate with different prognosis and response to treatments. Taxanes are some of the most active chemotherapeutic agents for breast cancer; however, their utilization is limited, due to hematologic and cumulative neurotoxicity on treated patients. To understand why only some patients experience severe adverse effects and why patients respond and develop resistance with different rates to taxane therapy, the metabolic pathways of these drugs should be completely unraveled. The variant forms of several genes, related to taxane pharmacokinetics, can be indicative markers of clinical parameters, such as toxicity or outcome.

METHODS

The search of the data has been conducted through PubMed database, presenting clinical data, clinical trials and basic research restricted to English language until June 2015.

RESULTS

We studied the literature in order to find any possible association between the major pharmacogenomic variants and specific taxane-related toxicity and patient outcome. We found that the data of these studies are sometimes discordant, due to both the small number of enrolled patients and the heterogeneity of the examined population.

CONCLUSIONS

Among all analyzed genes, only CYP1B1 and ABCB1 resulted the strongest candidates to become biomarkers of clinical response to taxane therapy in breast cancer, although their utilization still remains an experimental procedure. In the future, greater studies on genetic polymorphisms should be performed in order to identify differentiating signatures for patients with higher toxicity and with resistant or responsive outcome, before the administration of taxanes.

Inter-patient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics: A review

Docetaxel is a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of solid cancers. Because of the large inter-individual variability (IIV) in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of docetaxel, it is challenging to determine the optimal dose in individual patients in order to achieve optimal efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Despite the established correlation between systemic docetaxel exposure and efficacy, the precise factors influencing docetaxel PK are not yet completely understood. This review article highlights currently known factors that influence docetaxel PK, and focusses on those that are clinically relevant. For example, liver impairment should be taken into account when calculating docetaxel dosages as this may decrease docetaxel clearance. In addition, drug-drug interactions may be of distinct clinical importance when using docetaxel. Particularly, drugs strongly inhibiting CYP3A4 such as ketoconazole should not be concurrently administered without dose modification, as they may decrease the clearance of docetaxel. Gender, castration status, and menopausal status might be of importance as potential factors influencing docetaxel PK. The role of pharmacogenetics in predicting docetaxel PK is still limited, since no polymorphisms of clinical importance have yet been established.

Pharmacokinetics, dynamics and toxicity of docetaxel: Why the Japanese dose differs from the Western dose

Docetaxel (Taxotere®) has been one of the most important chemotherapeutic drugs for cancer treatment since 1996. Although a large number of clinical studies have been conducted in various cancer fields, there is a discrepancy in the standard dose between Japan and Western countries. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicological profiles of docetaxel, and explains why there exists an ethnic difference in dose, and further discusses which direction we should go forward to solve this problem. The original recommended dose was 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks in US and European populations, while a Japanese phase I study suggested the recommended dose as 60 mg/m² every 3 weeks. A prospective population pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel conducted in both the USA/Europe and Japan, indicated an absence of ethnic difference in the pharmacokinetics. Both analyses demonstrated that docetaxel clearance is related to α1-acid glycoprotein level, hepatic function, age and body surface area. The relationship was observed between increasing docetaxel dose and increased tumor response rates across the dose range of 60 to 100 mg/m². The area under the serum concentration time curve (AUC) of docetaxel at the first cycle was significantly related to time to progression. Hematological toxicities were well correlated with the AUC of docetaxel, and severe hematological toxicities were more frequently observed in Japanese patients treated with 60 mg/m², compared to the US/European patients treated with 75–100 mg/m² dose. The Japanese population seems more susceptible to the toxicity of docetaxel. A docetaxel dose of 75 mg/m² is now standard not only in global trials but also in recent Japanese trials. Although the optimal dose of docetaxel is still unclear, we need to continue to seek the appropriate dose of docetaxel depending on patient status and the goals of chemotherapy.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in precision medicine: Unraveling the factors that contribute to individual variability

There are numerous factors in individual variability that make the development and implementation of precision medicine a challenge in the clinic. One of the main goals of precision medicine is to identify the correct dose for each individual in order to maximize therapeutic effect and minimize the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Many promising advances have been made in identifying and understanding how factors such as genetic polymorphisms can influence drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and contribute to variable drug response (VDR), but it is clear that there remain many unidentified variables. Underlying liver diseases such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) alter absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) processes and must be considered in the implementation of precision medicine. There is still a profound need for clinical investigation into how NASH-associated changes in ADME mediators, such as metabolism enzymes and transporters, affect the pharmacokinetics of individual drugs known to rely on these pathways for elimination. This review summarizes the key PK factors in individual variability and VDR and highlights NASH as an essential underlying factor that must be considered as the development of precision medicine advances. A multifactorial approach to precision medicine that considers the combination of two or more risk factors (e.g. genetics and NASH) will be required in our effort to provide a new era of benefit for patients.

Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in pregnant women

PURPOSE

Our objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of doxorubicin during pregnancy compared to previously published data from non-pregnant subjects.

METHODS

During mid- to late-pregnancy, serial blood and urine samples were collected over 72 h from seven women treated with doxorubicin for malignancies. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental techniques. Pregnancy parameters were compared to those previously reported non-pregnant subjects.

RESULTS

During pregnancy, mean (±SD) doxorubicin PK parameters utilizing 72 h sampling were: clearance (CL), 412 ± 80 mL/min/m(2); steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), 1,132 ± 476 L/m(2); and terminal half-life (T1/2), 40.3 ± 8.9 h. The BSA-adjusted CL was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) and T1/2 was not different compared to non-pregnant women. Truncating our data to 48 h, PK parameters were: CL, 499 ± 116 ml/min/m(2); Vss, 843 ± 391 L/m(2); and T1/2, 24.8 ± 5.9 h. The BSA-adjusted CL in pregnancy compared to non-pregnant data was significantly decreased in 2 of 3 non-pregnant studies (p < 0.05, < 0.05, NS). Vss and T1/2 were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnant subjects, we observed significantly lower doxorubicin CL in our 72 h and most of our 48 h sampling comparisons with previously reported non-pregnant subjects. However, the parameters were within the range previously reported in smaller studies. At this time, we cannot recommend alternate dosage strategies for pregnant women. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism of doxorubicin pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy and optimize care for pregnant women.

Pharmacogenetic effects of regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR, CAR, RXRα and HNF4α) on docetaxel disposition in Chinese nasopharyngeal cancer patients

PURPOSE

This exploratory study was aimed at elucidating the pharmacogenetics of regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR, CAR, RXRα and HNF4α) and their implications on docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in local Chinese nasopharyngeal cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 59 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including tag-SNPs and functionally relevant SNPs of the genes encoding these regulatory nuclear receptors (PXR/NR1I2, CAR/NR1I3, RXRα/NR2B1 and HNF4α/NR2A1), were profiled in the patients enrolled in our study by direct sequencing (N = 50). The generalized linear model was employed to estimate the haplotypic effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the patients.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel in these patients were characterized by marked interindividual variability, with approximately four- to sixfold variations observed in Cmax, AUC0-∞ and CL. Individual SNP association tests revealed that polymorphisms in NR2B1 and NR2A1 were significantly correlated with altered docetaxel pharmacokinetics. Subsequent haplotype association analysis identified the NR2B1 LD block 2 AG haplotype [*+4458G>A(rs3132291) and *+4988A>G(rs4842198)] to be significantly associated with altered pharmacokinetics, in which patients carrying two copies of the AG haplotype had approximately a 20 % decreased Cmax and AUC0-∞ and a 21 % increased CL compared to those who carried only one copy or no copies of the haplotype. A number of SNPs in NR1I2, NR1I3, NR2B1 and NR2A1 were also associated with a significant decrease in blood counts from baseline. No haplotype was found to exert any effects on the pharmacodynamics parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The present exploratory study identified several SNPs in the genes encoding regulatory nuclear receptors which may account for the interpatient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. These findings highlight the important role of regulatory nuclear receptors on the disposition of docetaxel.

Meta-analysis of inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of liposomal and non-liposomal anticancer agents

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of liposomal and small molecule (SM) anticancer agents. Inter-patient PK variability of 9 liposomal and SM formulations of the same drug was evaluated. PK variability was measured as coefficient of variance (CV%) of area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and the fold-difference between AUCmax and AUCmin (AUC range). CV% of AUC and AUC ranges were 2.7-fold (P<0.001) and 16.7-fold (P=0.13) greater, respectively, for liposomal compared with SM drugs. There was an inverse linear relationship between the clearance (CL) of liposomal agents and PK variability with a lower CL associated with greater PK variability (R(2)=0.39). PK variability of liposomal agents was greater when evaluated from 0-336 h compared with 0-24h. PK variability of liposomes is significantly greater than SM. The factors associated with the PK variability of liposomal agents need to be evaluated.

FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR

In this meta-analysis, the inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of 9 liposomal and small molecule anti-cancer agents was studied. The authors determined that several parameters are in favor of the liposomal formulation; however, the PK variability of the formulation was higher compared with small molecule agents, the reason for which remains to be determined in future studies.

Chemotherapy dosing in overweight and obese patients with cancer

Retrospective and prospective preclinical and clinical data have demonstrated an association between chemotherapy dose intensity and both clinical efficacy and toxicity. The optimum tolerable and effective dose and schedule of chemotherapeutic agents is based on data from dose-finding studies and early clinical trials. There is considerable evidence that reductions in the recommended dose intensity often occurs in actual clinical practice, particularly among overweight and obese patients with cancer. With increasing rates of obesity, and variation and uncertainty about appropriate dosing of chemotherapy in obese patients, ASCO has generated clinical practice guidelines for appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer. Without evidence of any increase in treatment-related toxicity among obese patients receiving chemotherapy, the guidelines recommend that, after considering any accompanying comorbidities, chemotherapy dosing should be calculated based on body surface area using actual weight, rather than an estimate or idealization of weight. While further research is needed, pharmacokinetic studies support the use of actual body weight to calculate chemotherapy doses for most chemotherapy drugs in obese patients. We highlight the issue of chemotherapy dosing in this population, how a more personalized approach can be achieved, as well as discussing areas for further research.

Genetic variability in the multidrug resistance associated protein-1 (ABCC1/MRP1) predicts hematological toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC)

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on predefined severe adverse events in breast cancer (BC) patients receiving (neo-)adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (FU), epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six SNPs in 16 genes of interest, including the drug transporter gene ABCC1/MRP1, were selected based on a literature survey. An additional 33 SNPs were selected in these genes, as well as in 12 other genes known to be involved in the metabolism of the studied chemotherapeutics. One thousand and twelve female patients treated between 2000 and 2010 with 3-6 cycles of (neo-)adjuvant FEC were genotyped for these SNPs using Sequenom MassARRAY. Severe adverse events were evaluated through an electronic chart review for febrile neutropenia (FN, primary end point), FN first cycle, prolonged grade 4 or deep (<100/µl) neutropenia, anemia grade 3-4, thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 and non-hematological grade 3-4 events (secondary end points).

RESULTS

Carriers of the rs4148350 variant T-allele in ABCC1/MRP1 were associated with FN relative to homozygous carriers of the G-allele [P = 0.0006; false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.026]. Strong correlations with secondary end points such as prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (P = 0.002, FDR = 0.046) were also observed. Additionally, two other SNPs in ABCC1/MRP1 (rs45511401 and rs246221) correlated with FN (P = 0.007 and P = 0.01, respectively; FDR = 0.16 and 0.19), as well as two SNPs in UGT2B7 and FGFR4 (P = 0.024 and P = 0.04; FDR = 0.28 and 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Genetic variability in ABCC1/MRP1 was associated with severe hematological toxicity of FEC.

Taxane therapy for early stage breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer of women in developed countries. Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy has dramatically improved the outcome of patients treated for early stage invasive breast cancer. Among novel chemotherapeutic agents, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful compounds since anthracycline regimens. Two taxanes are available (paclitaxel and docetaxel) and they share some characteristics, while having a number of significant differences, both in terms of preclinical and pharmacokinetic profiles and, most importantly, clinical consequences. In clinical practice, the taxanes are now standard therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Their role as monochemotherapy or in combination with anthracyclines in advanced breast cancer has suggested their potential therapeutic impact in the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. Available results in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting demonstrate that taxanes, used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or trastuzumab, or in sequential therapy, possess the capability to induce significant improvements, in particular in terms of survival, confirming the positive impact of taxanes on the natural history of breast cancer.

Dose banding as an alternative to body surface area-based dosing of chemotherapeutic agents

BACKGROUND

Dose banding is a recently suggested dosing method that uses predefined ranges (bands) of body surface area (BSA) to calculate each patient's dose by using a single BSA-value per band. Thus, drugs with sufficient long-term stability can be prepared in advance. The main advantages of dose banding are to reduce patient waiting time and improve pharmacy capacity planning; additional benefits include reduced medication errors, reduced drug wastage, and prospective quality control. This study compares dose banding with individual BSA dosing and fixed dose according to pharmacokinetic criteria.

METHODS

Three BSA bands were defined: BSA<1.7 m(2), 1.7 m(2)≤ BSA<1.9 m(2), BSA ≥ 1.9 m(2) and each patient dose was calculated based on a unique BSA-value per band (1.55, 1.80, and 2.05 m(2), respectively). By using individual clearance values of six drugs (cisplatin, docetaxel, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, irinotecan, and topotecan) from 1012 adult cancer patients in total, the AUCs corresponding to three dosing methods (BSA dosing, dose banding, and fixed dose) were compared with a target AUC for each drug.

RESULTS

For all six drugs, the per cent variation in individual dose obtained with dose banding compared with BSA dosing ranged between -14% and +22%, and distribution of AUC values was very similar with both dosing methods. In terms of reaching the target AUC, there was no significant difference in precision between dose banding and BSA dosing, except for paclitaxel (32.0% vs 30.7%, respectively; P<0.05). However, precision was significantly better for BSA dosing compared with fixed dose for four out of six drugs.

CONCLUSION

For the studied drugs, implementation of dose banding should be considered as it entails no significant increase in interindividual plasma exposure.

Impact of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination in adults and children

The prevalence of obesity in adults and children is rapidly increasing across the world. Several general (patho)physiological alterations associated with obesity have been described, but the specific impact of these alterations on drug metabolism and elimination and its consequences for drug dosing remains largely unknown. In order to broaden our knowledge of this area, we have reviewed and summarized clinical studies that reported clearance values of drugs in both obese and non-obese patients. Studies were classified according to their most important metabolic or elimination pathway. This resulted in a structured review of the impact of obesity on metabolic and elimination processes, including phase I metabolism, phase II metabolism, liver blood flow, glomerular filtration and tubular processes. This literature study shows that the influence of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination greatly differs per specific metabolic or elimination pathway. Clearance of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrates is lower in obese as compared with non-obese patients. In contrast, clearance of drugs primarily metabolized by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), glomerular filtration and/or tubular-mediated mechanisms, xanthine oxidase, N-acetyltransferase or CYP2E1 appears higher in obese versus non-obese patients. Additionally, in obese patients, trends indicating higher clearance values were seen for drugs metabolized via CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, while studies on high-extraction-ratio drugs showed somewhat inconclusive results. Very limited information is available in obese children, which prevents a direct comparison between data obtained in obese children and obese adults. Future clinical studies, especially in children, adolescents and morbidly obese individuals, are needed to extend our knowledge in this clinically important area of adult and paediatric clinical pharmacology.

Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

To provide recommendations for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Panel of experts in medical and gynecologic oncology, clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics, and biostatistics and a patient representative. MEDLINE searches identified studies published in English between 1996 and 2010, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted. A majority of studies involved breast, ovarian, colon, and lung cancers. This guideline does not address dosing for novel targeted agents.

RESULTS

Practice pattern studies demonstrate that up to 40% of obese patients receive limited chemotherapy doses that are not based on actual body weight. Concerns about toxicity or overdosing in obese patients with cancer, based on the use of actual body weight, are unfounded.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Panel recommends that full weight-based cytotoxic chemotherapy doses be used to treat obese patients with cancer, particularly when the goal of treatment is cure. There is no evidence that short- or long-term toxicity is increased among obese patients receiving full weight-based doses. Most data indicate that myelosuppression is the same or less pronounced among the obese than the non-obese who are administered full weight-based doses. Clinicians should respond to all treatment-related toxicities in obese patients in the same ways they do for non-obese patients. The use of fixed-dose chemotherapy is rarely justified, but the Panel does recommend fixed dosing for a few select agents. The Panel recommends further research into the role of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics to guide appropriate dosing of obese patients with cancer.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer chemotherapy

For a select number of drugs, proper management of patients includes monitoring serum or plasma concentrations of the drugs and adjusting the doses accordingly - this practice is referred to as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The need for TDM arises when pharmacokinetic variability of drugs is not easily accounted for by common clinical parameters. Many chemotherapeutic drugs have large interindividual variability, yet TDM is not commonplace in chemotherapy management. This review will discuss pharmacokinetics in the context of chemotherapeutic drugs, examine the few instances where TDM is currently used in the field of oncology and propose other drugs where TDM might be useful for dose adjustments in the management of chemotherapy.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for the individualization of docetaxel dosing: a randomized pharmacokinetic study

PURPOSE

Docetaxel pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, notably clearance and exposure (AUC), are characterized by large interindividual variability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PK-guided [area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) targeted], individualized docetaxel dosing on interindividual variability in exposure.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A limited sampling strategy in combination with a validated population PK model, Bayesian analysis, and a predefined target AUC was used. Fifteen patients were treated for at least 2 courses with body surface area-based docetaxel and 15 with at least 1 course of PK-guided docetaxel dosing.

RESULTS

Interindividual variability (SD of ln AUC) was decreased by 35% (N = 15) after 1 PK-guided course; when all courses were evaluated, variability was decreased by 39% (P = 0.055). PK-guided dosing also decreased the interindividual variability of percentage decrease in white blood cell and absolute neutrophil counts by approximately 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is required to determine whether the decrease in PK variability can contribute to a reduction in interindividual variability in efficacy and toxicity.

The relationship of body mass index and serum testosterone with disease outcomes in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship of baseline body mass index (BMI) and serum testosterone level with prostate cancer outcomes in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC). BMI and testosterone levels were evaluated for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines in the TAX327 clinical trial, an international phase III randomized trial of one of the two schedules of docetaxel and prednisone compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone. In this study of 1006 men with CRPC, the median serum testosterone level was 14.5 ng per 100 ml (range 0-270), the median BMI was 27 kg m(-2) (range 15.7-46.5), and 26% of men were obese or morbidly obese (BMI>or=30). Obesity was associated with younger age, lower PSA and alkaline phosphatase levels, and higher performance status, primary Gleason sum, testosterone and hemoglobin compared to absence of obesity. In multivariate analysis, neither BMI, presence of obesity, nor baseline testosterone was significantly associated with OS or PSA declines. Higher testosterone levels among obese men suggest incomplete gonadal suppression with current therapies, but these differences may not be clinically relevant in men with CRPC. There was evidence of potential hemodilution of PSA and alkaline phosphatase levels in obese men.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients: a study by the EORTC-PAMM-NDDG

AIMS

To investigate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five female patients with early or advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) over 15 minutes followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) over 15 minutes. The plasma concentration-time data of both drugs were measured, and the relationship between drug pharmacokinetics and neutrophil counts was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling. Relationships were explored between drug exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]), toxicity and tumour response.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients had complete pharmacokinetic and toxicity data. In 50 patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 60%, with complete responses in 6% of patients. Both doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics were associated with neutrophil toxicity. Cyclophosphamide exposure (the AUC) was significantly higher in patients with at least stable disease (n = 44) than in patients with progressive disease (n = 6; 945 micromol . h/L [95% CI 889, 1001] vs 602 micromol . h/L [95% CI 379, 825], p = 0.0002). No such correlation was found for doxorubicin. Body surface area was positively correlated with doxorubicin clearance; AST and patient age were negatively correlated with doxorubicin clearance; creatinine clearance was positively correlated with doxorubicinol clearance; and occasional concurrent use of carbamazepine was positively correlated with cyclophosphamide clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed inhibitory population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model adequately described individual neutrophil counts after administration of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. In this patient population, exposure to cyclophosphamide, as assessed by the AUC, might have been a predictor of the treatment response, whereas exposure to doxorubicin was not. A prospective study should validate cyclophosphamide exposure as a predictive marker for the treatment response and clinical outcome in this patient group.

Flat-fixed dosing versus body surface area based dosing of anticancer drugs in adults: does it make a difference?

The current practice of using body-surface area (BSA) in dosing anticancer agents was implemented in clinical oncology half a century ago. By correcting for BSA, it was generally assumed that cancer patients would receive a dose of a particular cytotoxic drug associated with an acceptable degree of toxicities without reducing the agent's therapeutic effect. More recently, doubt has arisen to this hypothesis, and for many drugs, the effects of BSA on the pharmacokinetics of these agents have therefore been studied retrospectively. In (by far) most cases, use of BSA does not reduce the interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of adults, and thus, a logical rationale for further use of this tool in dosing adults is lacking. As a result, alternative dosing strategies have been proposed in order to replace BSA-based dosing. Flat-fixed dosing regimens have been suggested, thereby avoiding potential dose calculation mistakes. As flat-fixed dosing does not typically lead to greater pharmacokinetic variability, it does not seem worse than using BSA-based dosing. While it provides a simplification, it can, however, be questioned whether to call this an improvement or not. The implementation of so-called genotyping and phenotyping strategies, and therapeutic drug monitoring, may probably be of more clinical value. In the end, the nonscientifically based BSA-based dosing strategy should be replaced by alternative strategies. Despite the lack of basic fundamentals, BSA-based dosing still seems "untouchable" in clinical oncology. Even when alternatives will be shown to be indisputably better, many hurdles will probably have to be overcome before physicians will be willing to ban BSA-based dosing. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Evaluation of Alternate Size Descriptors for Dose Calculation of Anticancer Drugs in the Obese

Purpose

Despite the rising prevalence of obesity, there is paucity of information describing how doses of anticancer drugs should be adjusted in clinical practice. Here, we assessed the pharmacokinetics of eight anticancer drugs in adults and evaluated the potential utility of alternative weight descriptors in dose calculation for the obese.

Patients and Methods

A total of 1,206 adult cancer patients were studied, of whom 162 (13.4%) were obese (body mass index ≥ 30). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis, and compared between lean (body mass index ≤ 25) and obese patients.

Results

The absolute clearance of cisplatin, paclitaxel, and troxacitabine was significantly increased in the obese (P < .023), but this was not observed for carboplatin, docetaxel, irinotecan, or topotecan (P < .17). For doxorubicin, the systemic clearance was statistically significantly reduced in obese women (P = .013), but not in obese men (P = .52). Evaluation of alternate weight descriptors for dose calculation in the obese, including predicted normal weight, lean body mass, (adjusted) ideal body weight, and the mean of ideal and actual body weight, indicated that, for most of the evaluated drugs, weight scalars used to calculate body-surface area should consider actual body weight regardless of size.

Conclusion

The results suggest that a number of widely used empiric strategies for dose adjustments in obese patients, including a priori dose reduction or dose capping, should be discouraged.

Long-Term Health Status Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Does Sex Matter?

Increasing numbers of children diagnosed with cancer will survive their primary malignancy. Within this growing population of long-term survivors, considerable effort has been put forth to identify treatment-related risks for adverse health-related outcomes, such as exposure to alkylating agents, anthracyclines, radiotherapy, and surgery. Patient sex has been identified as a risk factor for numerous long-term adverse outcomes, with female sex more commonly associated with higher risks. In this article, we review the literature, which generally supports associations between female sex and cognitive dysfunction after cranial irradiation, cardiovascular outcomes, obesity, radiation-associated differences in pubertal timing, development of primary hypothyroidism, breast cancer as a second malignant neoplasm and suggests an increased prevalence for the development of osteonecrosis among females. Results of this review support future investigations to further define sex as a risk factor for other common treatment-specific exposures and outcomes. Additionally, research should focus on understanding the underlying biologic and physiological basis of these sex-specific risks. Historically, evidence from both basic science and clinical research has been used to develop risk-stratified therapy, allowing reduction of toxic therapies to low-risk patients without compromising overall survival. With greater knowledge of sex-specific risks, the potential application of sex-specific therapy designed to avoid poor long-term adverse outcomes may become a viable strategy.

Cytotoxic therapy for the elderly with metastatic breast cancer: A review on safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy

As the incidence of invasive breast cancer, mainly developing at older age, is rising, the absolute number of elderly developing metastatic disease is also increasing. In view of improved life expectancy, sociocultural changes and better supportive measures for chemotherapy-induced toxicity, there is an increasing request for the administration of chemotherapy in elderly. At the moment, medical oncologists are still reluctant to use chemotherapy in elderly partly because of concern about increased toxicity and poor tolerability of this patient cohort, and the inability to appropriately select elderly that may benefit from chemotherapy. The question is whether this attitude remains justified. In this review, the current status of clinical research in the area of metastatic breast cancer regarding toxicity and activity of chemotherapy in older breast cancer patients is discussed. Further, data on pharmacokinetics are emphasised as age-related physiologic changes may affect these features with consequences for toxicity and decision-making. Moreover, data on assessment tools trying to characterise the 'functional age' are reviewed. In general, the literature data are scarce and hampered by major limitations, while pharmacokinetic data indicate that a different approach in older breast cancer patients does not always seem justified. To increase our knowledge aiming at optimisation of cancer treatment in elderly, there is a clear necessity for prospective, well-designed studies with emphasis on the particular requirements of older patients and incorporation of pharmacokinetic and -dynamic evaluation of cytotoxic agents used in this specific group. As in other research areas, maximal progress will be achieved by joined efforts of co-operative research groups.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Docetaxel Disposition: from Mouse to Man

PURPOSE

Docetaxel (Taxotere), an important chemotherapeutic agent with shown activity in a broad range of cancers, is being investigated for use in combination therapies and as an antiangiogenic agent. Docetaxel exhibits a complex pharmacologic profile with high interpatient variability. Pharmacokinetic models capable of predicting exposure under various dosing regimens would aid the rational development of clinical protocols.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel at 5 and 20 mg/kg was carried out in female BALB/c mice. Tissues were collected at various time points and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Time course tissue distribution and pharmacokinetic data were used to build and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model in mice. Specific and nonspecific tissue partitioning, metabolism, and elimination data were coupled with mouse physiologic variables to develop a PBPK model that describes docetaxel plasma and tissue pharmacokinetic. The PBPK model was then modified with human model variables to predict the plasma distribution of docetaxel.

RESULTS

Resulting simulation data were compared with actual measured data obtained from our pharmacokinetic study (mouse), or from published data (human), using pharmacokinetic variables calculated using compartmental or noncompartmental analysis to assess model predictability.

CONCLUSIONS

The murine PBPK model developed can accurately predict plasma and tissue levels at the 5 and 20 mg/kg doses. The human PBPK model is capable of estimating plasma levels at 30, 36, and 100 mg/m(2). This will enable us to develop and test various dosing regimens (e.g., metronomic schedules and combination therapies) to achieve specific tissue and plasma concentrations to maximize therapeutic benefit while minimizing toxicity.

Medicinal Cannabis Does Not Influence the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and Docetaxel

OBJECTIVE

To date, data regarding the potential of cannabinoids to modulate cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A (CYP3A) activity are contradictory. Recently, a standardized medicinal cannabis product was introduced in The Netherlands. We anticipated an increased use of medicinal cannabis concurrent with anticancer drugs, and undertook a drug-interaction study to evaluate the effect of concomitant medicinal cannabis on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel, both subject to CYP3A-mediated biotransformation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four cancer patients were treated with i.v. irinotecan (600 mg, n = 12) or docetaxel (180 mg, n = 12), followed 3 weeks later by the same drugs concomitant with medicinal cannabis (200 ml herbal tea, 1 g/l) for 15 consecutive days, starting 12 days before the second treatment. Blood samples were obtained up to 55 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G), respectively, or docetaxel. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed during both treatments. Results are reported as the mean ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the observed pharmacokinetic parameters with and without concomitant medicinal cannabis.

RESULTS

Medicinal cannabis administration did not significantly influence exposure to and clearance of irinotecan (1.04; CI, 0.96-1.11 and 0.97; CI, 0.90-1.05, respectively) or docetaxel (1.11; CI, 0.94-1.28 and 0.95; CI, 0.82-1.08, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of medicinal cannabis, as herbal tea, in cancer patients treated with irinotecan or docetaxel does not significantly influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The evaluated variety of medicinal cannabis can be administered concomitantly with both anticancer agents without dose adjustments.