The Elderly: Geriatric oncology finally deserving adequate attention

The effect of treatment modifications by an onco-geriatric MDT on one-year mortality, days spent at home and postoperative complications

OBJECTIVES

Decision-making in older patients with cancer can be complex, as benefits of treatment should be weighed against possible side-effects and life-expectancy. A novel care pathway was set up incorporating geriatric assessment into treatment decision-making for older cancer patients. Treatment decisions could be modified following discussion in an onco-geriatric multidisciplinary team (MDT). We assessed the effect of treatment modifications on outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in the surgical department of a University Hospital. Patients of 70 years and older with a solid malignancy were included. All patients underwent a nurse-led geriatric assessment (GA) and were discussed in an onco-geriatric MDT. This could result in a modified or an unchanged treatment advice compared to the regular tumor board. Primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were post-operative complications and days spent in hospital in the first year after inclusion.

RESULTS

For the 184 patients in the analyses, the median age was 77.5 years and 41.8% were female. For 46 patients (25%), the treatment advice was modified by the onco-geriatric MDT. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality between the unchanged and modified group (29.7% versus 26.1%, p = 0.7). There were, however, significantly fewer days spent in hospital (median 5 vs 8.5 days p = 0.02) and fewer grade II or higher postoperative complications (13.3% versus 35.5% p = 0.005) in the modified group.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating geriatric assessment in decision-making did not lead to excess one-year mortality, but did result in fewer complications and days spent in hospital.

Trastuzumab in the treatment of elderly patients with early breast cancer: Results from an observational study in Germany

BACKGROUND

In elderly patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, few data on efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment exists since older patients were in general excluded from large randomized studies. This prospective observational study aimed to confirm the beneficial findings from pivotal trials in age cohorts ≥65 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were no restrictions for recruitment with respect to age or concomitant/sequential adjuvant medication. Long-term relapse/survival status of the patients was assessed once a year.

RESULTS

Among the 3940 evaluable patients enrolled between 2006 and 2012 at 339 institutions, 507 were aged between 65 and 69 years, with another 507 patients ≥70 years. Elderly patients suffered from significantly more advanced primary tumors. Preceding or concomitant chemotherapy showed decreasing aggressiveness with patient's age. Trastuzumab treatment was stopped prematurely in only 11% of the elderly, but more often than in younger patients (p=0.0008). With 453 events hitherto reported, elderly patients did not exhibit an inferior relapse-free survival when adjusted for other relevant prognostic factors (hazard ratio: 1.01 per year; p=0.24). Three-year overall survival was significantly lower in the population older than 64 years than in younger patients (94.2% vs. 96.8%, p=0.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, our population of elderly patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab is the largest analyzed so far. The beneficial long-term results were comparable to those in the younger cohorts. Although the risk of cardiotoxicity increased significantly with age, it also remained manageable in older patients. Thus, chronological age alone should not preclude HER2 antibody treatment.

Is advanced age a barrier to effective cancer treatment? The experience of nonagenarians receiving radiation therapy

AIM

Decision-making about elderly patients is difficult due to the absence of clinical experience or evidence-based results to develop optimal treatment plans. This study aims to determine the tolerability and impact of radiation therapy (RT) when delivered to patients aged >89 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all nonagenarian patients (defined as aged 90 years or over) managed with RT between 2005 and 2007. Patients' records were reviewed in regard to their characteristics, the presence of significant medical comorbidities, performance status, management intent, cancer diagnosis and RT modality. Outcome end-points were overall survival and the tolerability of RT (presence of grade 3 or 4 morbidity, hospital admission or treatment interruption).

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2007, 2762 new courses of RT were delivered to patients at the Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, of whom 55, or 2%, were nonagenarians. Median age at treatment was 92 years, with range 90-104 years. A total of 56% were managed with radical intent, 31% had significant comorbidities, 55% had non-skin primary tumors and 78% received linac-based treatment. The mean follow up for survivors was 19.8 months (10.2-41.8 months). RT was well tolerated, with 89% completing planned RT and only 18% requiring interruption. One patient was hospitalized due to RT toxicity. Median survival post-RT was 13.0 months, with 56% of patients alive at 12 months. Survival duration was associated with radical management intent (P= 0.001), cutaneous primary site (P= 0.001) and female gender (P= 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Nonagenarian patients receiving treatment had satisfactory tolerability and achieved expected survival rates post-RT.

Six independent domains are defined by geriatric assessment in elderly cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Geriatric assessment (GA) must be integrated into treatment concepts for elderly cancer patients. Aim of this study was to assess the coverage of a large battery of GA instruments by determining the number of independent domains measured.

METHODS

Thirteen different GA scores were applied in 78 elderly tumor patients (mean age 72.9 years). Data were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis and substantiated by non-parametric correlation analyses.

RESULTS

Factor analysis yielded a six-factor solution explaining 77.1% of the total variance. The six domains identified may be described as general functioning in everyday life, health-related quality of life, co-morbidities, social support, cognition, and nutritional status. This factor structure was reasonably well confirmed by correlation analyses. Notably, WHO Performance Status, Karnofsky Index, VES-13 and PPT generally revealed high correlations with functional capacities, but only low correlations with comorbidities, social support, cognitive functioning or nutritional status.

CONCLUSIONS

From the six domains described a basis for efficient application of GA instruments in elderly cancer patients is worked out. The classical instruments WHO and KI as well as the screening scores VES-13 and PPT, while capturing physical functioning well, fail to cover several other important GA domains.

Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in the older breast cancer patient

As the world population ages, the incidence of cancer will probably also increase as it is a disease predominantly affecting older people. However, those aged 70 years or more have largely been excluded from clinical trials. This review focuses on breast cancer. Increasingly there is recognition that many older breast cancer patients are being undertreated and could and should be offered the same treatments as younger patients. Comprehensive assessment of the quality of any survival benefit from treatments is also needed to ensure that in the future older patients can make fully informed decisions about their treatment options. The aim of this overview is two-fold: first to describe methods by which to assess quality of life; and second to review the recent surgical, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and other studies that include such assessment with older breast cancer patients. Current studies are also outlined, including quality of life assessments, and recommendations are made for future research in this area.

A systematic review of the use and validation of health-related quality of life instruments in older cancer patients

AIM

The aim of this paper is to systematically review the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in older cancer patients.

METHOD

A systematic review of 5 databases and 3 research registers identified studies reporting the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in cancer patients aged over 65 years from 1995 to mid 2007.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies reported the use of HRQOL measures in older people, using a range of generic and disease-specific instruments. Little work was reported in patients aged over 80 years. All studies exhibited methodological limitations. Fourteen studies were identified with variable evidence on the psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of identified instruments.

CONCLUSION

Our review identified that the development, validation and use of HRQOL instruments often ignore the specific needs of older people. This review highlights the need for a HRQOL instrument specifically designed to capture the issues and concerns most relevant to older cancer patients.

Ethical considerations in conducting clinical trials for elderly cancer patients

Under-representation of the elderly in clinical trials leads to inadequate information on the effect of age with regard to new anticancer treatments. The exclusion of elderly patients from cancer experimentation, often due to limiting medical or psychosocial factors, appears to also stem from misconceptions about aging and frailty. Limited data on elderly cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials suggest that age itself, in the absence of severe concomitant illnesses or psychological, cognitive or functional impairment, is not an independent risk factor for either increased toxicity or lack of treatment efficacy. Prospective benefits of inclusion of the elderly in clinical trials must be weighed against exposing individual patients to potential risks. The medical, ethical and methodological implications of experimentation in the elderly need to be studied in depth. This article reviews ethical issues in cancer clinical trials, focusing on aspects that may deserve special attention when elderly patients are enrolled.