About geriatric oncology

Prediction of treatment-related toxicity and outcome with geriatric assessment in elderly patients with solid malignancies treated with chemotherapy: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The number of older patients with cancer is increasing. Standard clinical evaluation of these patients may not be sufficient to determine individual treatment strategies and therefore Geriatric Assessment (GA) may be of clinical value. In this review, we summarize current literature that is available on GA in elderly patients with solid malignancies who receive chemotherapy. We focus on prediction of treatment toxicity, mortality and the role of GA in the decision-making process.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed. Studied populations needed to fulfill the following criteria: 65 years or older, diagnosis of solid malignancy, treatment with chemotherapy, submission to GA, either designed to study prediction of treatment toxicity or mortality or to evaluate the role of GA in the decision-making process.

RESULTS

Our search provided 411 publications. Thirteen met the predefined criteria. These studies revealed: (i) up to 64% of elderly patients suffer from severe toxicity caused by polychemotherapy, (ii) Nutritional status, functionality and comorbidity are often associated with worse outcome, (iii) GA reveals (unknown) geriatric problems in more than 50% of elderly patients with cancer and (iv) 21%-53% of chemotherapy regimens are being modified based on GA.

CONCLUSIONS

In geriatric oncology, an accurate predictive test to guide anticancer treatment in order to prevent serious toxicity is needed. The value of GA in predicting toxicity and mortality in older patients with cancer undergoing treatment with chemotherapy has not been proven. It may be valuable in revealing geriatric problems but current evidence for its usefulness to guide treatment decisions in this setting is limited. However, we are convinced that GAs should be carried out to optimize treatment strategies in elderly patients with cancer to improve treatment efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Is advanced age a barrier to effective cancer treatment? The experience of nonagenarians receiving radiation therapy

AIM

Decision-making about elderly patients is difficult due to the absence of clinical experience or evidence-based results to develop optimal treatment plans. This study aims to determine the tolerability and impact of radiation therapy (RT) when delivered to patients aged >89 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all nonagenarian patients (defined as aged 90 years or over) managed with RT between 2005 and 2007. Patients' records were reviewed in regard to their characteristics, the presence of significant medical comorbidities, performance status, management intent, cancer diagnosis and RT modality. Outcome end-points were overall survival and the tolerability of RT (presence of grade 3 or 4 morbidity, hospital admission or treatment interruption).

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2007, 2762 new courses of RT were delivered to patients at the Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, of whom 55, or 2%, were nonagenarians. Median age at treatment was 92 years, with range 90-104 years. A total of 56% were managed with radical intent, 31% had significant comorbidities, 55% had non-skin primary tumors and 78% received linac-based treatment. The mean follow up for survivors was 19.8 months (10.2-41.8 months). RT was well tolerated, with 89% completing planned RT and only 18% requiring interruption. One patient was hospitalized due to RT toxicity. Median survival post-RT was 13.0 months, with 56% of patients alive at 12 months. Survival duration was associated with radical management intent (P= 0.001), cutaneous primary site (P= 0.001) and female gender (P= 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Nonagenarian patients receiving treatment had satisfactory tolerability and achieved expected survival rates post-RT.

Frail old patients as a target population for cancer trials

The recent distinction between co-morbidity and multi-morbidity well stresses the difficulty of managing old patients with cancer whose complexity is not captured by a list of diagnoses or biological burden alone. The most adequate answer found by oncologists and geriatricians was to work together for better evaluating the physiological age and body reserve of the patient. The gold standard tool to assess old patient with cancer is named Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Its systematic application needs geriatric competences and time. In this context, a great number of cancer patients are considered as "frail" because they have reduced available physiological reserves. They might not withstand stress when challenged. Oncologists and geriatricians have imagined an innovative process to change the screening procedure of these patients, determine the prognosis, adapt the treatment strategy, to increase the patient's survival and his/her quality of life. The internet website "www.clinicaltrials.com" only lists 8 studies focused on frail elders with cancer. Six of them are focused on specific cancers or specific treatments, one was applied to all kind of cancers and the last was an opinion overview from oncologists and geriatricians. The selection criteria of frail patients are very diverse and probably include cancer patients who are not comparable. It is now time to try to identify new practical, reliable and accurate tools to facilitate the inclusion of the same kind of patients suffering from the same kind of cancer to be able to give more appropriate care and at the same time to constitute a valuable data base. Existing tools are reviewed and analyzed.