1
|
Fonseca GM, Braghiroli MIFM, Pirola Kruger JA, Coelho FF, Herman P. Is There a Role for Locoregional Therapies for Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Malignancies? Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2025; 39:125-141. [PMID: 39510669 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
The liver is the most common site of metastases from solid gastrointestinal tract tumors. Over the past few decades, the role of locoregional therapies, resection and thermal ablation, for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases has been widely studied. However, for liver metastases originating from other gastrointestinal organs, the role of locoregional treatment remains unclear. This review summarizes and discusses the available evidence regarding benefits, risks, and indications for locoregional therapies for non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine gastrointestinal liver metastases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilton Marques Fonseca
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), University of Sao Paulo, and Rede D'Or Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251 - São Paulo, SP, Brazil. CEP: 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Capdevila J, Grande E, García-Carbonero R, Simó M, del Olmo-García MI, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Pubul V. Position Statement on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Response Evaluation to Systemic Therapies of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, With a Special Focus on Radioligand Therapy. Oncologist 2022; 27:e328-e339. [PMID: 35380724 PMCID: PMC8982404 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to provide a guidance for the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS Nominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of 8 experts reviewed the current management of NETs, identified controversies and gaps, critically analyzed the available evidence, and formulated several guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a panel of 26 experts, was selected to test agreement with the statements through 2 Delphi rounds. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = totally agree to 4 = totally disagree. The agreement was considered if ≥75% of answers pertained to Categories 1 and 2 (consensus with the agreement) or Categories 3 and 4 (consensus with the disagreement). RESULTS Overall, 132 statements were proposed, which incorporated the following areas: (1) overarching principles; (2) progression and treatment response criteria; (3) advanced gastro-enteric NETs; (4) advanced pancreatic NETs; (5) advanced NETs in other locations; (6) re-treatment with radioligand therapy (RLT); (7) neoadjuvant therapy. After 2 Delphi rounds, only 4 statements lacked a clear consensus. RLT was not only recommended in the sequencing of different NETs but also as neoadjuvant treatment, while several indications for retreatment with RLT were also established. CONCLUSION This document sought to pull together the experts' attitudes when dealing with different clinical scenarios of patients suffering from NETs, with RLT having a specific role where evidence-based data are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron-Teknon Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marc Simó
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mª Isabel del Olmo-García
- Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Jiménez-Fonseca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, IMIB, CP13/00126, PI17/0050 (ISCIII & FEDER) and Fundación Séneca (04515/GERM/06), Murcia, Spain
| | - Virginia Pubul
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Department and Molecular Imaging Research Group, University Hospital and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Papamichail M, Pizanias M, Heaton ND, M P, M P, Nd H. Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:113-133. [PMID: 34961675 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). DATA SOURCES This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS. RESULTS Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS. CONCLUSIONS With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Papamichail
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Papamichail M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Pizanias M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Heaton Nd
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gómez-Caminero-López F, González-Santiago J, Cañadas-Salazar J, García-Alonso J, Velasco-Pelayo L, García-Talavera-San Miguel P. Radioembolisation with 90Y radiolabelled microspheres of hepatic tumour lesion with double aberrant vascular supply. Safe and easy treatment in the same operation. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:110-112. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
5
|
Lee L, Ramos-Alvarez I, Jensen RT. Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1250. [PMID: 35267558 PMCID: PMC8909561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- National Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan
| | - Irene Ramos-Alvarez
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wagemans ME, Braat AJ, Smits ML, Bruijnen RC, Lam MG. Nuclear medicine therapy of liver metastasis with radiolabelled spheres. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00178-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
7
|
Torres-Jiménez J, Esteban-Villarrubia J, Ferreiro-Monteagudo R, Carrato A. Local Treatments in the Unresectable Patient with Colorectal Cancer Metastasis: A Review from the Point of View of the Medical Oncologist. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5938. [PMID: 34885047 PMCID: PMC8656541 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients with isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer who are not candidates for potentially curative resections, non-surgical local treatments may be useful. Non-surgical local treatments are classified according to how the treatment is administered. Local treatments are applied directly on hepatic parenchyma, such as radiofrequency, microwave hyperthermia and cryotherapy. Locoregional therapies are delivered through the hepatic artery, such as chemoinfusion, chemoembolization or selective internal radiation with Yttrium 90 radioembolization. The purpose of this review is to describe the different interventional therapies that are available for these patients in routine clinical practice, the most important clinical trials that have tried to demonstrate the effectiveness of each therapy and recommendations from principal medical oncologic societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Torres-Jiménez
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.-V.); (R.F.-M.)
| | - Jorge Esteban-Villarrubia
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.-V.); (R.F.-M.)
| | - Reyes Ferreiro-Monteagudo
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain; (J.E.-V.); (R.F.-M.)
| | - Alfredo Carrato
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute (IRYCIS), CIBERONC, Alcalá University, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Manchec B, Kokabi N, Narayanan G, Niekamp A, Peña C, Powell A, Schiro B, Gandhi R. Radioembolization of Secondary Hepatic Malignancies. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:445-452. [PMID: 34629712 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Cancer has become the leading cause of mortality in America, and the majority of patients eventually develop hepatic metastasis. As liver metastases are frequently unresectable, the value of liver-directed therapies, such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE), has become increasingly recognized as an integral component of patient management. Outcomes after radioembolization of hepatic malignancies vary not only by location of primary malignancy but also by tumor histopathology. This article reviews the outcomes of TARE for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic breast cancer, and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, as well as special considerations when treating metastatic disease with TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Manchec
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Govindarajan Narayanan
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Andrew Niekamp
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Constantino Peña
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Alex Powell
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Brian Schiro
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Ripal Gandhi
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.,Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Cancer to the Liver: The Central Role of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Treatment. Ochsner J 2021; 21:224-229. [PMID: 34239388 PMCID: PMC8238104 DOI: 10.31486/toj.20.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is comprised of papillary and follicular subtypes, and both have an overall excellent long-term prognosis. Patients with localized DTC that is successfully treated, usually with surgery, exhibit long-term survival well above 90%. In contrast, patients who develop distant metastatic disease have a significantly worse overall prognosis and outcome, often with disease that is refractory to conventional therapy such as surgery, radioactive iodine, and hormone suppression. For patients who recur with distant metastatic disease, limited effective treatment options are available, and most die of their disease within 5 years of recurrence. Case Report: We report the case of a 26-year-old female who presented with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer and a metastatic lesion isolated to the liver. Because of the extremely large size of the metastatic liver mass upon initial presentation, we took a neoadjuvant, multifaceted approach to treatment that included selective internal radioembolization therapy, an oral multikinase inhibitor, and surgical resection of the tumor mass after maximal reduction in tumor size. However, the patient died of metastatic DTC after 39 months of treatment. Conclusion: A multimodal, comprehensive approach to managing such complex patients is essential to optimize both the sequence and therapeutic approach to treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gómez-Caminero-López F, González-Santiago JM, Cañadas-Salazar JC, García-Alonso J, Velasco-Pelayo L, García-Talavera-San Miguel P. Radioembolisation with 90Y radiolabelled microspheres of hepatic tumour lesion with double aberrant vascular supply. Safe and easy treatment in the same operation. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021; 41:S2253-654X(20)30214-6. [PMID: 33478933 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F Gómez-Caminero-López
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear. Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA), Salamanca, España.
| | - J M González-Santiago
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo. Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA), Salamanca, España
| | - J C Cañadas-Salazar
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear. Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA), Salamanca, España
| | - J García-Alonso
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Radiología Vascular. Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA), Salamanca, España
| | - L Velasco-Pelayo
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Radiología Vascular. Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca (CAUSA), Salamanca, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Masthoff M, Schindler P, Harders F, Heindel W, Wilms C, Schmidt HH, Pascher A, Stegger L, Rahbar K, Köhler M, Wildgruber M. Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:1537-1545. [PMID: 33156407 PMCID: PMC8021531 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) evaluation. Methods In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either “TARE” or “no TARE” group. Patients’ characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. Results 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23–88) years] with 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in “no TARE” compared to “TARE” group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of 99mTc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). Conclusion A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following 99mTc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Masthoff
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany.
| | - Philipp Schindler
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany
| | - Fabian Harders
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany
| | - Walter Heindel
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany
| | - Christian Wilms
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Hartmut H Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Lars Stegger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Köhler
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum Der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Masthoff M, Schindler P, Harders F, Heindel W, Wilms C, Schmidt HH, Pascher A, Stegger L, Rahbar K, Wildgruber M, Köhler M. Repeated radioembolization in advanced liver cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1055. [PMID: 33145274 PMCID: PMC7575953 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-2658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background To evaluate safety and clinical outcome of repeated transarterial 90Y (yttrium) radioembolization (TARE) in primary and metastatic liver cancer. Methods Between 2009 and 2018, n=288 patients underwent TARE for treatment of malignant liver disease in a tertiary care hospital. This retrospective single center study analyzed the safety and outcome of patients (n=11/288) undergoing repeated resin microsphere TARE. Included patients suffered from hepatocellular carcinoma (n=3), colorectal cancer (n=2), breast cancer (n=2), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=3), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=1). All patients had shown either partial response (n=9) or stable disease (n=2) after first TARE. Lab parameters, response assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST/RECIST) at 3 months and overall survival was analyzed. Additionally, patients with repeated TARE were compared to a matched control group (n=56) with single TARE therapy. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to analyze survival. Results Patients after repeated TARE showed similar increase in lab parameters as compared to their first TARE. No case of radioembolization induced liver disease was observed. While n=5/11 patients showed a partial response and n=4/11 patients a stable disease after repeated TARE, only n=2/11 patients suffered from progressive disease. Median overall survival was 20.9±11.9 months for the repeated TARE group while it was 5.9±16.2 months for the control group. Conclusions Repeated 90Y TARE is safe and can be of benefit for patients yielding a comparable degree of local disease control compared to patients with singular TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Masthoff
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Philipp Schindler
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Fabian Harders
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Walter Heindel
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Wilms
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Hartmut H Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Lars Stegger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Köhler
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ranieri G, Laface C, Laforgia M, De Summa S, Porcelli M, Macina F, Ammendola M, Molinari P, Lauletta G, Di Palo A, Rubini G, Ferrari C, Gadaleta CD. Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX-4 Combined With Deep Electro-Hyperthermia as First-line Therapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Pilot Study. Front Oncol 2020; 10:590707. [PMID: 33224885 PMCID: PMC7670056 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX-4 regimen represents the first-line therapy in patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Hyperthermia has been considered an effective ancillary treatment for cancer therapy through several anti-tumor mechanisms, sharing with Bevacizumab the inhibition of angiogenesis. Up to now, scientific literature offers very few clinical data on the combination of bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with deep electro-hyperthermia (DEHY) for metastatic colon cancer (mCC) patients. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy of this combination based on the possible interaction between the DEHY and bevacizumab anti-tumor mechanisms. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 40 patients affected by mCC treated with the combination of bevacizumab plus FOLFOX-4 (fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin) and DEHY (EHY2000), between January 2017 and May 2020. DEHY treatment was performed weekly, with capacitive electrodes at 80-110 W for 50 min, during and between subsequent bevacizumab administrations, on abdomen for liver or abdominal lymph nodes metastases and thorax for lung metastases. Treatment response assessment was performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST). The primary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). DCR, counted as the percentage of patients who had the best response rating [complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD)], was assessed at 90 days (timepoint-1) and at 180 days (timepoint-2). DCR was 95% and 89.5% at timepoint-1 and timepoint-2, respectively. The median PFS was 12.1 months, whereas the median OS was 21.4 months. No major toxicity related to DEHY was registered; overall, this combination regimen was safe. Our results suggest that the combined treatment of DEHY with bevacizumab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy in mCC is feasible and effective with a favorable disease control, prolonging PFS of 2.7 months with respect to standard treatment without DEHY for mCC patients. Further studies will be required to prove its merit and explore its potentiality, especially if compared to conventional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girolamo Ranieri
- Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “G. Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Carmelo Laface
- Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “G. Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Simona De Summa
- Molecular Diagnostics and Pharmacogenetics Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Mariangela Porcelli
- Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “G. Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Macina
- Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “G. Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Ammendola
- Department of Health Science, Digestive Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” Medical School, Germaneto, Italy
| | - Pasquale Molinari
- Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “G. Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Lauletta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of Internal Medicine “G. Baccelli”, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Di Palo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, D.I.M., University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, D.I.M., University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Cristina Ferrari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, D.I.M., University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Cosmo Damiano Gadaleta
- Interventional and Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “G. Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fonseca GM, Braghiroli MIFM, Pirola Kruger JA, Coelho FF, Herman P. Is There a Role for Locoregional Therapies for Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Malignancies? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2020; 30:125-142. [PMID: 33220801 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The liver is the most common site of metastases from solid gastrointestinal tract tumors. Over the past few decades, the role of locoregional therapies, resection and thermal ablation, for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases has been widely studied. However, for liver metastases originating from other gastrointestinal organs, the role of locoregional treatment remains unclear. This review summarizes and discusses the available evidence regarding benefits, risks, and indications for locoregional therapies for non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine gastrointestinal liver metastases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilton Marques Fonseca
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Maria Ignez Freitas Melro Braghiroli
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), University of Sao Paulo, and Rede D'Or Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251 - São Paulo, SP, Brazil. CEP: 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Digestive Surgery Division, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Doutor Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Instituto Central, 9° andar, Sala 9074, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, São Paulo CEP: 05403-900, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pollock RF, Brennan VK, Peters R, Paprottka PM. Association between objective response rate and overall survival in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with radioembolization: a systematic literature review and regression analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:997-1009. [PMID: 32930618 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1814748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of cancers arising from neuroendocrine cells. The aim was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic NETs (mNETs) treated with radioembolization (RE). METHODS Randomized controlled trials and observational studies of RE treatment of mNETs were identified by systematic literature review (SLR). Pooled ORR and OS estimates were calculated and a weighted generalized linear model (GLM) of ORR as a predictor of OS was derived, stratified by ORR assessment criteria and RE type (Yttrium-90 resin or glass microspheres). RESULTS The SLR identified 32 observational studies. Mean ORR was 41% (95% confidence interval 38-45%). The Yttrium-90 resin and glass microsphere GLMs accounted for 59% and 57% of OS deviance, respectively. ORR was a significant predictor of OS in the resin microspheres model (p < 0.001), but not the glass microspheres model (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS A weighted GLM showed a significant relationship between ORR and OS in patients with mNETs treated with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres. ORR could therefore potentially be an OS surrogate in future trials of Yttrium-90 resin microspheres. Further research is needed to confirm the relationship between ORR and OS and the difference between resin and glass microspheres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Pollock
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Covalence Research Ltd , London, UK
| | - Victoria K Brennan
- Health Economics, Pricing, Reimbursement & Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd , London, UK
| | - Ralph Peters
- Health Economics, Pricing, Reimbursement & Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd , London, UK
| | - Philipp M Paprottka
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München , Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Critical review of multidisciplinary non-surgical local interventional ablation techniques in primary or secondary liver malignancies. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11:589-600. [PMID: 31969919 PMCID: PMC6964346 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.90466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Local non-surgical interventional percutaneous ablation represents nowadays an important part of the potential treatment strategies. Although surgical ablation represents the gold standard, in the past decade there was an expansion in the use of non-surgical ablative techniques: radiofrequency, microwave, laser, cryoablation, irreversible electroporation, and interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in primary as well as secondary liver cancers. With the growing experience in the field, there was implemented a new pillar for cancer treatment, together with surgery, chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy, so-called interventional oncology (IO). To date, there are no published papers regarding a comparative interdisciplinary evaluation of all these non-surgical interventional local ablation therapies. Our paper offers a critical interdisciplinary overview of the treatments in both primary and secondary liver tumors, including from a cost-effective point of view. Furthermore, the present status of education in IO and a comparison of actual economic aspects of the treatments are also provided.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee L, Ito T, Jensen RT. Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:1029-1050. [PMID: 31738624 PMCID: PMC6923565 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1693893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1804, USA
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Tetsuhide Ito
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, 814-0001, Japan
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1804, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Frilling A, Clift AK, Braat AJAT, Alsafi A, Wasan HS, Al-Nahhas A, Thomas R, Drymousis P, Habib N, Tait PN. Radioembolisation with 90Y microspheres for neuroendocrine liver metastases: an institutional case series, systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:773-783. [PMID: 30733049 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine liver metastases are clinically challenging due to their frequent disseminated distribution. This study aims to present a British experience with an emerging modality, radioembolisation with yttrium-90 labelled microspheres, and embed this within a meta-analysis of response and survival outcomes. METHODS A retrospective case series of patients treated with SIR-Spheres (radiolabelled resin microspheres) was performed. Results were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis of published results with glass or resin microspheres. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as complete or partial response. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as complete/partial response or stable disease. RESULTS Twenty-four patients were identified. ORR and DCR in the institutional series was 14/24 and 21/24 at 3 months. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 3-years was 77.6% and 50.4%, respectively. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities post-procedure. A fixed-effects pooled estimate of ORR of 51% (95% CI: 47%-54%) was identified from meta-analysis of 27 studies. The fixed-effects weighted average DCR was 88% (95% CI: 85%-90%, 27 studies). CONCLUSION Current data demonstrate evidence of the clinical effectiveness and safety of radioembolisation for neuroendocrine liver metastases. Prospective randomised studies to compare radioembolisation with other liver directed treatment modalities are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley K Clift
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508, GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ali Alsafi
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Harpreet S Wasan
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Adil Al-Nahhas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Thomas
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Panagiotis Drymousis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Nagy Habib
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Paul N Tait
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tiwari T, Malone C, Foltz G, Akinwande O, Ramaswamy RS. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization: Current Clinical Practice and Review of the Recent Literature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2019.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
20
|
Abstract
Medical imaging technology using nanoparticles has several advantages from it varies functional properties. As we described previous chapters, mesoporous silica nanoparticles demonstrated great contribution for nanomedicine progress and it has been expected to cause an innovation in medical field. Recently we developed a novel type of silica nanoparticles, organosilica nanoparticles. Organosilica nanoparticles are both structurally and functionally different from common silica nanoparticles by including mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The organosilica nanoparticles are inherent organic-inorganic hybrid nanomaterials. The interior and exterior functionalities of organosilica nanoparticles are effective for their internal and surface functionalization. Medical imaging using organosilica nanoparticles is making a new field of nano-medical imaging. Multifunctionalizations peculiar to organosilica nanoparticles enable to construct novel medical imaging system. In this chapter we will introduce organosilica nanoparticles, and its applications on advanced medical imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michihiro Nakamura
- Department of Organ Anatomy & Nanomedicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Levy J, Zuckerman J, Garfinkle R, Acuna SA, Touchette J, Vanounou T, Pelletier JS. Intra-arterial therapies for unresectable and chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:905-915. [PMID: 29887263 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) not amenable to curative liver resection will progress on systemic therapy. Intra-arterial therapies (IAT) including conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y-90) are indicated to prolong survival and palliate symptoms. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the survival benefit and radiologic response of three intra-arterial therapies in patients with chemorefractory and unresectable CRCLM. METHODS A systematic search for eligible references in the Cochrane Library and the EMBASE, MEDLINE and TRIP databases from January 2000 to November 2016 was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the MINORS scale. One-year overall survival rates and RECIST responder rates were pooled using inverse-variance weighted random-effects models. Overall survival outcomes were collected according to transformed pooled median survivals from first IAT with a subgroup analysis of patients with extrahepatic disease. RESULTS Twenty-three prospective studies were included and analyzed: 5 cTACE (n = 746), 5 DEB-TACE (n = 222) and 13 Y-90 (n = 615). All but five were clinical trials. Eleven of 13 Y-90 studies were industry funded. Pooled RECIST response rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were: cTACE 23% (9.7, 36), DEB-TACE 36% (0, 73) and Y-90 23% (11, 34). The pooled 1-year survival rates with CI were: cTACE, 70% (49, 87), DEB-TACE, 80% (74, 86) and Y-90, 41% (28, 54). Transformed pooled median survivals from first IAT and ranges for cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y-90 were 16 months (9.0-23), 16 months (7.3-25) and 12 months (7.0-15), respectively. Significant heterogeneity in inclusion criteria and reporting of confounders, including previous therapy, tumor burden and post-IAT therapy, precluded statistical comparisons between the three therapies. CONCLUSION Methodological and statistical heterogeneity precluded consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. Given the common use and significant cost of radioembolization in this setting, a more robust prospective comparative trial is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Levy
- University of Toronto Division of General Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jesse Zuckerman
- University of Toronto Division of General Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Garfinkle
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sergio A Acuna
- University of Toronto Division of General Surgery, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacynthe Touchette
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital Health Sciences Library, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tsafrir Vanounou
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Sebastien Pelletier
- Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Correlation of radiation dose and activity with clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer after selective internal radiation therapy using yttrium-90 resin microspheres. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39:915-920. [PMID: 30124600 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Yttrium-90 (Y)-resin microspheres are prescribed using activity. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and radiographic tumor response after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with resin microspheres in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 60 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated at our institution with SIRT using Y-resin microspheres. Each patient underwent pre-SIRT MRI or computed tomography imaging of the liver with intravenous contrast. Patients underwent post-treatment imaging at 2-3-month intervals with response assessed according to unidimensional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria as well as published three-dimensional volumetric criteria. We then related the prescribed activity established by the body surface area method and the corresponding prescribed dose to radiographic treatment response and OS. RESULTS The median follow-up after the first SIRT treatment was 8.9 months. The mean prescribed activity and the prescribed dose were 26.6 mCi and 52.8 Gy, respectively. OS was not significantly associated with either prescribed activity or prescribed dose. Prescribed dose was also not related to response. However, a significant relationship was found between a higher prescribed activity and an improved radiographic response by RECIST (P=0.04) at the second follow-up. CONCLUSION The prescribed activity of Y-resin microspheres may be correlated with radiographic response by RECIST criteria at 4-6 months post-treatment. For a more accurate prediction of response, a valid dose calculation model based on post-Y PET dosimetry is likely needed given the heterogeneous dose delivery seen in SIRT.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee L, Ito T, Jensen RT. Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19:909-928. [PMID: 29757017 PMCID: PMC6064188 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Since the initial approval of everolimus in 2011, there have been a number of important changes in therapeutic/diagnostic modalities as well as classification/staging systems of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which can significantly impact the use of everolimus in patients with advanced NETs. Areas covered: The efficacy of everolimus monotherapy and combination therapy demonstrated in clinical studies involving patients with advanced NETs are reviewed. Several factors affecting everolimus use are described including: the development and routine use of NET classification/staging systems; widespread use of molecular imaging modalities; side effects; drug resistance; and the availability of other treatment options. Furthermore, the current position of everolimus in the treatment approach is discussed, taking into account the recommendations from the recent guidelines. Expert opinion: Although everolimus demonstrated its high efficacy and tolerability in the RADIANT trials and other clinical studies, there still remain a number of controversies related to everolimus treatment in the management of NETs. The synergistic anti-growth effect of other agents in combination with everolimus or its effect on overall survival have not been established. The appropriate order of the use of everolimus in the treatment of advanced NETs still remains unclear, which needs to be defined in further studies and will be addressed in the new guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1804,USA
| | - Tetsuhide Ito
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, 3-6-45 Momochihama, Sawara-Ku, Fukuoka 814-0001, Japan
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1804,USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Aktas G, Kus T, Metin T, Kervancioglu S, Elboga U. Long-term survival with transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization in a patient with cancers of unknown primary. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:1885-1889. [PMID: 29670363 PMCID: PMC5894720 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s153122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) are histologically proven metastatic malignant tumors without an identified primary site before treatment. The common characteristics are early dissemination, lower response to chemotherapy and poor prognosis with short life expectancy. Treatment was directed according to the presence of localized or disseminated disease. The most frequent site of metastasis is the liver, which is a suitable target organ for arterial-directed therapies. We report a case of 53-year-old woman who was diagnosed with CUP and suspected with intracellular cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC), presented with a very large, unresectable, chemotherapy-refractory hepatic mass and treated with transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization and surprisingly followed for 48 months with minimally progressive and stable disease. Arterial-directed therapies, an important therapeutic option in unresectable liver tumors, can provide survival benefit even for ICC and CUP which are very large in size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokmen Aktas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
| | - Tulay Kus
- Division of Medical Oncology, Adiyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
| | - Taylan Metin
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Gaziantep Oncology Hospital, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Selim Kervancioglu
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Umut Elboga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Overview of Treatment Paradigm Highlighting the Role of Ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210:883-890. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
26
|
O'Leary C, Greally M, McCaffrey J, Hughes P, Lawler LLP, O'Connell M, Geoghegan T, Farrelly C. Single-institution experience with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for the treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Ir J Med Sci 2018; 188:43-53. [PMID: 29511912 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1773-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver metastases are the commonest cause of death for patients with colorectal cancer. Growing evidence supports the use of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in combination with conventional chemotherapy regimens for liver-only or liver-dominant unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. AIMS To measure and evaluate outcomes of the first 20 consecutive patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis selected for SIRT in addition to their chemotherapy at a single Irish institution. METHODS Retrospective case series was performed. Patient charts and medical records were reviewed. RESULTS All 20 patients (100%) selected for angiographic workup were subsequently successfully treated with radioembolization. All patients were discharged 1 day post-SIRT. At initial imaging evaluation, 12 (60%) had a partial response in their liver, 2 (10%) had stable disease, and 6 (30%) had liver-specific progressive disease. Median follow up was 10 months (range 6-26). At last follow up, 14 (70%) patients were alive and 6 (30%) deceased. Most recent imaging demonstrated 2 (10%) with a complete response, 7 (35%) had a partial response, 2 (10%) had stable disease, and 9 (45%) had progressive disease within their liver. One patient was downstaged to hepatic resection, and one with a complete hepatic response had his primary sigmoid tumor resected 11 months post-SIRT. CONCLUSIONS SIRT is a safe and effective therapy for certain patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. This case series supports our opinion that selected patients should be offered SIRT in concert with their medical oncologist, concomitant with their chemotherapy. Larger multi-center studies are required to more clearly define the patient groups that will derive most benefit from SIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathal O'Leary
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - Megan Greally
- Oncology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - John McCaffrey
- Oncology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - Peter Hughes
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - Leo L P Lawler
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - Martin O'Connell
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - Tony Geoghegan
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland
| | - Cormac Farrelly
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, 7, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Mestier L, Zappa M, Hentic O, Vilgrain V, Ruszniewski P. Liver transarterial embolizations in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2017; 18:459-471. [PMID: 28975561 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-017-9431-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The management of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and non-resectable liver metastases is challenging. Liver-directed transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) have a place of choice among other treatment modalities. However, their utilization relies on a low level of proof, due to the lack of prospective data, the absence of comparative studies and considerable heterogeneity between local practices. TAE and TACE generally achieve average symptomatic, biological and radiological responses of 75%, 56% and 50%, with progression-free survival of 12-18 months, with acceptable tolerance. Although not clearly demonstrated, TACE may be more effective than TAE in pancreatic NET, but not in small-intestine NET. SIRT has been developed more recently and may achieve similar results, with improved tolerance, but decreased cost-effectiveness, although no prospective comparison has been published to date. There is currently no strong argument to choose between TAE, TACE and SIRT, and they have not been compared to other treatment modalities. The evaluation of their efficacy has mostly relied on criteria based on size variations, which do not take into account tumor viability and metabolism, and thus may not be relevant. These techniques may be especially effective when performed as first-line therapies, in patients with non-major liver involvement (<75%) and with hypervascular metastases. Finally, studies exploring their combination with systemic therapies are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis de Mestier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, DHU UNITY, ENETS Center of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP), Paris-Diderot University, 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
| | - Magaly Zappa
- Department of Radiology, DHU UNITY, ENETS Center of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP), Paris-Diderot University, Clichy, France
| | - Olivia Hentic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, DHU UNITY, ENETS Center of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP), Paris-Diderot University, 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, DHU UNITY, ENETS Center of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP), Paris-Diderot University, Clichy, France
| | - Philippe Ruszniewski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, DHU UNITY, ENETS Center of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital (APHP), Paris-Diderot University, 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Prince JF, van den Bosch MAAJ, Nijsen JFW, Smits MLJ, van den Hoven AF, Nikolakopoulos S, Wessels FJ, Bruijnen RCG, Braat MNGJA, Zonnenberg BA, Lam MGEH. Efficacy of Radioembolization with 166Ho-Microspheres in Salvage Patients with Liver Metastases: A Phase 2 Study. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:582-588. [PMID: 28916623 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization of liver malignancies with 166Ho-microspheres has been shown to be safe in a phase 1 dose-escalation study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of 166Ho radioembolization. Methods: In this prospective single-arm study, 56 patients were enrolled, all with liver metastases refractory to systemic therapy and ineligible for surgical resection. The primary outcome was a response by 2 target lesions on triphasic liver CT scans 3 mo after therapy, as assessed using RECIST, version 1.1. Secondary outcomes included overall tumor response, time to imaging progression, overall survival, toxicity, quality of life, and quantification of the microspheres on SPECT and MRI. Results: Between May 2012 and March 2015, 38 eligible patients were treated, one of whom was not evaluable. In 27 (73%) of 37 patients, the target lesions showed complete response, partial response, or stable disease (disease control) at 3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-85%). The median overall survival was 14.5 mo (95% CI, 8.6-22.8 mo). For colorectal cancer patients (n = 23), the median overall survival was 13.4 mo (95% CI, 8.2-15.7 mo). Grade 3 or 4 toxic events after treatment (according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03) included abdominal pain (in 18% of patients), nausea (8%), ascites (3%), fatigue (3%), gastric stenosis (3%), hepatic failure (3%), liver abscesses (3%), paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (3%), thoracic pain (3%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3%), and vomiting (3%). On SPECT, 166Ho could be quantified with high accuracy and precision, with a mean overestimation of 9.3% ± 7.1% in the liver. Conclusion: Radioembolization with 166Ho-microspheres induced a tumor response with an acceptable toxicity profile in salvage patients with liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jip F Prince
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Maurice A A J van den Bosch
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Johannes F W Nijsen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Maarten L J Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Andor F van den Hoven
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Stavros Nikolakopoulos
- Department of Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Wessels
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Rutger C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Manon N G J A Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Bernard A Zonnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aranda E, Aparicio J, Bilbao JI, García-Alfonso P, Maurel J, Rodríguez J, Sangro B, Vieitez JM, Feliu J. Recommendations for SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in chemotherapy-refractory/intolerant colorectal liver metastases. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2065-2082. [PMID: 28703622 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A Spanish expert panel reviewed current evidence for the use of SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in patients with chemotherapy refractory/intolerant unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Substantial evidence for its efficacy and safety is available from a randomized controlled study, retrospective comparative studies and several single arm studies. Clinical evidence data obtained from more than 1500 patients have led to the inclusion of selective internal radiation therapy in the 2016 ESMO Clinical Guidelines as third-line treatment. This publication results from an expert panel meeting, where published evidence and author's experiences were shared to position SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres in Spain for the treatment of chemotherapy refractory/intolerant unresectable colorectal liver metastases, and second, to define the patient subgroup that will benefit the most with this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Aranda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, CIBERONC, IMIBIC, UCO, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Bilbao
- Department of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Rodríguez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit & HPB Oncology Area, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra-IDISNA-CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José María Vieitez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Asturias, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as Salvage Therapy for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2017; 40:288-293. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
31
|
Management Options for Advanced Low or Intermediate Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review of Recent Literature. Int J Surg Oncol 2017; 2017:6424812. [PMID: 28593056 PMCID: PMC5448049 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6424812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Our understanding of the biology, genetics, and natural history of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas has improved considerably in the last several decades and the spectrum of available therapeutic options is rapidly expanding. The management of patients with metastatic low or intermediate grade NETs has been revolutionized by the development of new treatment strategies such as molecular targeting therapies with everolimus and sunitinib, somatostatin analogs, tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy that can be used alone or as a multimodal approach with or without surgery. To further define and clarify the utility, appropriateness, and the sequence of the growing list of available therapies for this patient population will require more high level evidence; however, data from well-designed randomized phase III clinical trials is rapidly accumulating that will further stimulate development of new management strategies. It is therefore important to thoroughly review emerging evidence and report major findings in frequent updates, which will expand our knowledge and contribute to a better understanding, characterization, and management of advanced NETs.
Collapse
|
32
|
Schippers AC, Collettini F, Steffen IG, Wieners G, Denecke T, Pavel M, Wust P, Gebauer B. Initial Experience with CT–Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Multimodality Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:672-682. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 07/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
33
|
Qian Y, Kumar KA, Dudley SA, Koong AC, Chang DT. Radiation Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-017-0368-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
34
|
Obrzut S, McCammack K, Badran KW, Balistreri A, Ou E, Nguyen BJ, Hoh CK, Rose SC. Prognostic value of post-Yttrium 90 radioembolization therapy 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with liver tumors. Clin Imaging 2017; 42:43-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
35
|
Citterio D, Pusceddu S, Facciorusso A, Coppa J, Milione M, Buzzoni R, Bongini M, deBraud F, Mazzaferro V. Primary tumour resection may improve survival in functional well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours metastatic to the liver. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2017; 43:380-387. [PMID: 27956320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) with liver metastases represent a therapeutic challenge with few alternative options in guidelines. In these patients, the role of surgical resection of the primary tumour is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a regional registry collecting somatostatin analogue (SSA)-treated tumours from 1979 to 2005, a series of 139 patients presenting with symptomatic, liver-metastatic, well-differentiated NET (G1-G2, mitoses: ≤20, Ki-67: ≤20%) was prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Surgery on either the primary tumour or liver metastases was chosen: 1) when low perioperative risk was predictable; 2) in presence of an impending risk of obstruction, bleeding, or perforation; or 3) if liver metastases were suitable of curative or subtotal (>90%) tumour removal. Impact of the most relevant clinico-pathological parameters on survival was studied. RESULTS Median follow-up was 127 months and median survival was 94 months, with 138 vs. 37 months in resected vs. non-resected primary NET (p < 0.001), respectively. In the univariate analysis, prolonged survival was significantly associated with primary tumour resection (p < 0.001), resection of liver metastases (p = 0.002), site of primary (carcinoid vs. pancreatic, p = 0.018), basal chromogranin-A (CgA) <200 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and absence of diarrhea (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that primary tumour resection was an independent positive prognostic factor (HR = 3.17; 95% CI: 1.77-5.69, p < 0.001), whereas diarrhea, basal CgA ≥200 ng/mL, and high tumour load were independent negative prognostic factors. Also, in 103 patients with non-resectable liver metastases, primary tumour resection was significantly associated with prolonged survival (median 137 vs. 32 months, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Primary tumour resection may improve survival in functional well-differentiated NET with liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Citterio
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - S Pusceddu
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - A Facciorusso
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - J Coppa
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - M Milione
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - R Buzzoni
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - M Bongini
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - F deBraud
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Italy
| | - V Mazzaferro
- Comprehensive ENETS Center, Medical and Surgical Oncology and Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (National Cancer Institute) IRCCS Foundation, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fidelman N, Kerlan RK, Hawkins RA, Pampaloni M, Taylor AG, Kohi MP, Kolli KP, Atreya CE, Bergsland EK, Kelley RK, Ko AH, Korn WM, Van Loon K, McWhirter RM, Luan J, Johanson C, Venook AP. Radioembolization with 90Y glass microspheres for the treatment of unresectable metastatic liver disease from chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers: final report of a prospective pilot study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:860-874. [PMID: 28078110 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2016.08.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective pilot single-institution study was undertaken to document the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radioembolization of liver-dominant metastatic gastrointestinal cancer using 90Y glass microspheres. METHODS Between June 2010 and October 2013, 42 adult patients (26 men, 16 women; median age 60 years) with metastatic chemotherapy-refractory unresectable colorectal (n=21), neuroendocrine (n=11), intrahepatic bile duct (n=7), pancreas (n=2), and esophageal (n=1) carcinomas underwent 60 lobar or segmental administrations of 90Y glass microspheres. Data regarding clinical and laboratory adverse events (AE) were collected prospectively for up to 5.5 years after radioembolization. Radiographic responses were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Time to maximum response, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS) (hepatic and extrahepatic), and overall survival (OS) were measured. RESULTS Median target dose and activity were 109.4 Gy and 2.6 GBq per treatment session, respectively. Majority of clinical AE were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Patients with colorectal cancer had hepatic objective response rate (ORR) of 25% and a hepatic disease control rate (DCR) of 80%. Median PFS and OS were 1.0 and 4.4 months, respectively. Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) had hepatic ORR and DCR of 73% and 100%, respectively. Median PFS was 8.9 months for this cohort. DCR and median PFS and OS for patients with cholangiocarcinoma were 86%, 1.1 months, and 6.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS 90Y glass microspheres device has a favorable safety profile, and achieved prolonged disease control of hepatic tumor burden in a subset of patients, including all patients enrolled in the neuroendocrine cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Fidelman
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert K Kerlan
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Randall A Hawkins
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Miguel Pampaloni
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew G Taylor
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maureen P Kohi
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - K Pallav Kolli
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chloe E Atreya
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - R Kate Kelley
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew H Ko
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - W Michael Korn
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ryan M McWhirter
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Luan
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Curt Johanson
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Use of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-016-0328-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
38
|
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predicts survival in patients with liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer shortly after selective internal radiation therapy. Eur Radiol 2016; 27:966-975. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4430-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Revised: 03/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
39
|
Mahnken AH. Current status of transarterial radioembolization. World J Radiol 2016; 8:449-459. [PMID: 27247711 PMCID: PMC4882402 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Unresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies present a major problem in the treatment of solid tumors. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an increasingly used technique for treating various types of malignant liver tumors. This approach is appealing, as the mechanism of action is independent from other loco-regional treatments and potentially complementary to systemic therapies. There are two commercially available products in use for TARE: 90Y-resin and 90Y-glass microspheres. Currently available data indicates TARE so be safe and effective in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic liver disease. In HCC the results compare well with chemoembolization, while the role of TARE in combination with kinase inhibitors has yet to be established. Current data on TARE in metastatic liver disease is promising, but there is a strong need for prospective randomized trials comparing TARE and modern chemotherapeutic regimen to support the growing role of TARE in metastatic liver disease.
Collapse
|
40
|
Singh S, Asa SL, Dey C, Kennecke H, Laidley D, Law C, Asmis T, Chan D, Ezzat S, Goodwin R, Mete O, Pasieka J, Rivera J, Wong R, Segelov E, Rayson D. Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An evidence-based Canadian consensus. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 47:32-45. [PMID: 27236421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The majority of neuroendocrine tumors originate in the digestive system and incidence is increasing within Canada and globally. Due to rapidly evolving evidence related to diagnosis and clinical management, updated guidance on the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) are of clinical importance. Well-differentiated GI-NETs may exhibit indolent clinical behavior and are often metastatic at diagnosis. Some NET patients will develop secretory disease requiring symptom control to optimize quality of life and clinical outcomes. Optimal management of GI-NETs is in a multidisciplinary environment and is multimodal, requiring collaboration between medical, surgical, imaging and pathology specialties. Clinical application of advances in pathological classification and diagnostic technologies, along with evolving surgical, radiotherapeutic and medical therapies are critical to the advancement of patient care. We performed a systematic literature search to update our last set of published guidelines (2010) and identified new level 1 evidence for novel therapies, including telotristat etiprate (TELESTAR), lanreotide (CLARINET), everolimus (RADIANT-2; RADIANT-4) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT; NETTER-1). Integrating these data with the clinical knowledge of 16 multi-disciplinary experts, we devised consensus recommendations to guide state of the art clinical management of GI-NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simron Singh
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave. Room T2-047, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Sylvia L Asa
- University Health Network, Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | - Chris Dey
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave. Room MG-182, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Hagen Kennecke
- BC Cancer Agency, Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E1, Canada.
| | - David Laidley
- St. Joseph's Health Care London, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada.
| | - Calvin Law
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave. Room T2-001, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Timothy Asmis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada.
| | - David Chan
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave. Room T2-047, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Shereen Ezzat
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Departments of Medicine & Oncology, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave. Room 7-327, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada.
| | - Rachel Goodwin
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H8L6, Canada.
| | - Ozgur Mete
- University Health Network, Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada.
| | - Janice Pasieka
- Tom Baker Cancer Center and Foothills Medical Centre, Departments of Surgery & Oncology, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, North Tower Floor 10, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Juan Rivera
- McGill University Health Centre - Glen Campus, Bloc C - C04.5190, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
| | - Ralph Wong
- CancerCare Manitoba, St Boniface General Hospital, 407 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - Eva Segelov
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, 438 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
| | - Daniel Rayson
- QEII Health Sciences Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University, Suite 457A Bethune Building, 1276 South Park Street, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wilson A, Ronnekliev-Kelly S, Winner M, Pawlik TM. Liver-Directed Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-016-0311-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
42
|
Tong AKT, Kao YH, Too CW, Chin KFW, Ng DCE, Chow PKH. Yttrium-90 hepatic radioembolization: clinical review and current techniques in interventional radiology and personalized dosimetry. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150943. [PMID: 26943239 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microsphere radioembolization has been establishing itself as a safe and efficacious treatment for both primary and metastatic liver cancers. This extends to both first-line therapies as well as in the salvage setting. In addition, radioembolization appears efficacious for patients with portal vein thrombosis, which is currently a contraindication for surgery, transplantation and transarterial chemoembolization. This article reviews the efficacy and expanding use of (90)Y microsphere radioembolization with an added emphasis on recent advances in personalized dosimetry and interventional radiology techniques. Directions for future research into combination therapies with radioembolization and expansion into sites other than the liver are also explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron K T Tong
- 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yung Hsiang Kao
- 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chow Wei Too
- 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - David C E Ng
- 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- 5 Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sag AA, Selcukbiricik F, Mandel NM. Evidence-based medical oncology and interventional radiology paradigms for liver-dominant colorectal cancer metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:3127-3149. [PMID: 27003990 PMCID: PMC4789988 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer metastasizes predictably, with liver predominance in most cases. Because liver involvement has been shown to be a major determinant of survival in this population, liver-directed therapies are increasingly considered even in cases where there is (limited) extrahepatic disease. Unfortunately, these patients carry a known risk of recurrence in the liver regardless of initial therapy choice. Therefore, there is a demand for minimally invasive, non-surgical, personalized cancer treatments to preserve quality of life in the induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases of cancer therapy. This report aims to review evidence-based conceptual, pharmacological, and technological paradigm shifts in parenteral and percutaneous treatment strategies as well as forthcoming evidence regarding next-generation systemic, locoregional, and local treatment approaches for this patient population.
Collapse
|
44
|
Pavel M, O'Toole D, Costa F, Capdevila J, Gross D, Kianmanesh R, Krenning E, Knigge U, Salazar R, Pape UF, Öberg K. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Distant Metastatic Disease of Intestinal, Pancreatic, Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of Unknown Primary Site. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103:172-85. [PMID: 26731013 DOI: 10.1159/000443167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 736] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Pavel
- Charite Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gabrielson A, Miller A, Banovac F, Kim A, He AR, Unger K. Outcomes and Predictors of Toxicity after Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Using Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2015; 5:292. [PMID: 26779437 PMCID: PMC4688348 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We sought to report outcomes and toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received resin yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (90Y-SIRT) and to identify factors associated with declining liver function. Methods Patients treated with 90Y-SIRT were retrospectively evaluated. Radiographic response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Median liver progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Bivariate analysis was used to examine associations between change in Child-Pugh (CP) score/class and patient characteristics and treatment parameters. Results Twenty-seven patients with unresectable HCC underwent SIRT, 52% were CP Class A, 48% were Class B, 11% were BCLC stage B, and 89% were stage C. Forty-four percent of patients had portal vein thrombus at baseline. One-third of patients received bilobar treatment. Median activity was 32.1 mCi (range 9.18–43.25) and median-absorbed dose to the liver was 39.6 Gy (range 13.54–67.70). Median LPFS and OS were 2.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Three-month disease control rate was 63 and 52% in the target lesions and whole liver, respectively. New onset or worsened from baseline clinical toxicities were confined to Grade 1–2 events. However, new or worsened Grade 3–4 laboratory toxicities occurred in 38% of patients at 3 months and 43% of patients at 6 months following SIRT (six had lymphocytopenia, three had hypoalbuminemia, and two had transaminasemia). After 3 months, six patients had worsened in CP score and five had worsened in class from baseline. After 6 months, four patients had worsened in CP score and one had worsened in class from baseline. Pretreatment bilirubinemia was associated with a 2+ increase in CP score within 3 months (P = 0.001) and 6 months (P = 0.039) of 90Y-SIRT. Pretreatment transaminasemia and bilirubinemia were associated with increased CP class within 3 months of SIRT (P = 0.021 and 0.009, respectively). Conclusion 90Y-SIRT was well-tolerated in patients with unresectable HCC, with no Grade 3–4 clinical toxicities. However, Grade 3–4 laboratory toxicities and worsened CP scores were more frequent. HCC patients with pretreatment bilirubinemia or transaminasemia may be at higher risk of experiencing a decline in liver function following 90Y-SIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Gabrielson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA
| | - Akemi Miller
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA
| | - Filip Banovac
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA
| | - Alexander Kim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA
| | - Aiwu Ruth He
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA
| | - Keith Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kennedy AS, Ball DS, Cohen SJ, Cohn M, Coldwell DM, Drooz A, Ehrenwald E, Kanani S, Nutting CW, Moeslein FM, Putnam SG, Rose SC, Savin MA, Schirm S, Sharma NK, Wang EA. Hepatic imaging response to radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres for tumor progression during systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:594-604. [PMID: 26697190 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess response and the impact of imaging artifacts following radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres ((90)Y-RE) based on the findings from a central independent review of patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS Patients with mCRC who received (90)Y-RE (SIR-Spheres(®); Sirtex Medical, Sydney, Australia) at nine US institutions between July 2002 and December 2011 were included in the analysis. Tumor response was assessed at baseline and 3 months using either the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 or 1.1. For each lesion, known artifacts affecting the interpretation of response (peri-tumoral edema and necrosis) were documented. Survivals (Kaplan-Meier analyses) were compared in responders [partial response (PR)] and non-responders [stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD)]. RESULTS Overall, 195 patients (mean age 62 years) received (90)Y-RE after a median of 2 (range, 1-6) lines of prior chemotherapy. Using RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, 7.6% and 6.9% of patients were partial responders, 47.3% and 48.1% had SD, and 55.0% and 55.0% PD, respectively. RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 showed excellent agreement {Kappa =0.915 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.856-0.975]}. Peri-tumoral edema was documented in 32.8%, necrosis in 48.1% and both in 57.3% of cases (using RECIST 1.0). Although baseline characteristics were similar in responders and non-responders (P>0.05), responders survived significantly longer in an analysis according to RECIST 1.0: PR median (95% CI) 25.2 (range, 9.2-49.4) months vs. SD 15.8 (range, 9.3-21.1) months vs. PD 7.1 (range, 6.0-9.5) months (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 imaging responses provide equivalent interpretations in the assessment of hepatic tumors following (90)Y-RE. Radiologic lesion responses at 3 months must be interpreted with caution due to the significant proportion of patients with peri-tumoral edema and necrosis, which may lead to an under-estimation of PR/SD. Nevertheless, 3-month radiologic responses were predictive of prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Kennedy
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David S Ball
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Steven J Cohen
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael Cohn
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Douglas M Coldwell
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Alain Drooz
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Eduardo Ehrenwald
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Samir Kanani
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Charles W Nutting
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Fred M Moeslein
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Samuel G Putnam
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Steven C Rose
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Michael A Savin
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Sabine Schirm
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Navesh K Sharma
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Eric A Wang
- 1 Cancer Centers of North Carolina, Cary, NC, USA ; 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA ; 3 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; 4 Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA ; 5 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA ; 6 Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA ; 7 Abbot Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA ; 8 Inova Fairfax Hospital, Annandale, VA, USA ; 9 Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA ; 10 University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 11 University of California, San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA ; 12 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA ; 13 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; 14 Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Barbier CE, Garske-Román U, Sandström M, Nyman R, Granberg D. Selective internal radiation therapy in patients with progressive neuroendocrine liver metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 43:1425-31. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3264-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
48
|
Hickey R, Lewandowski RJ, Prudhomme T, Ehrenwald E, Baigorri B, Critchfield J, Kallini J, Gabr A, Gorodetski B, Geschwind JF, Abbott A, Shridhar R, White SB, Rilling WS, Boyer B, Kauffman S, Kwan S, Padia SA, Gates VL, Mulcahy M, Kircher S, Nimeiri H, Benson AB, Salem R. 90Y Radioembolization of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Using Glass Microspheres: Safety and Survival Outcomes from a 531-Patient Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med 2015; 57:665-71. [PMID: 26635340 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma are a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Most colorectal liver metastases become refractory to chemotherapy and biologic agents, at which point the median overall survival declines to 4-5 mo. Radioembolization with (90)Y has been used in the salvage setting with favorable outcomes. This study reports the survival and safety outcomes of 531 patients treated with glass-based (90)Y microspheres at 8 institutions, making it the largest (90)Y study for patients with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS Data were retrospectively compiled from 8 institutions for all (90)Y glass microsphere treatments for colorectal liver metastases. Exposure to chemotherapeutic or biologic agents, prior liver therapies, biochemical parameters before and after treatment, radiation dosimetry, and complications were recorded. Uni- and multivariate analyses for predictors of survival were performed. Survival outcomes and clinical or biochemical adverse events were recorded. RESULTS In total, 531 patients received (90)Y radioembolization for colorectal liver metastases. The most common clinical adverse events were fatigue (55%), abdominal pain (34%), and nausea (19%). Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 13% of patients at any time. The median overall survival from the first (90)Y treatment was 10.6 mo (95% confidence interval, 8.8-12.4). Performance status, no more than 25% tumor burden, no extrahepatic metastases, albumin greater than 3 g/dL, and receipt of no more than 2 chemotherapeutic agents independently predicted better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION This multiinstitutional review of a large cohort of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with (90)Y radioembolization using glass microspheres has demonstrated promising survival outcomes with low toxicity and low side effects. The outcomes were reproducible and consistent with prior reports of radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Hickey
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Totianna Prudhomme
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Eduardo Ehrenwald
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Brian Baigorri
- Department of Radiology, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey Critchfield
- Department of Radiology, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Joseph Kallini
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ahmed Gabr
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Boris Gorodetski
- Interventional Radiology Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Andrea Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ravi Shridhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sarah B White
- Division of Vascular/Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - William S Rilling
- Division of Vascular/Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Brendan Boyer
- Department of Radiology, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio
| | | | - Sharon Kwan
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Siddarth A Padia
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Vanessa L Gates
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mary Mulcahy
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sheetal Kircher
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Halla Nimeiri
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Al B Benson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rayar M, Sulpice L, Edeline J, Garin E, Levi Sandri GB, Meunier B, Boucher E, Boudjema K. Intra-arterial yttrium-90 radioembolization combined with systemic chemotherapy is a promising method for downstaging unresectable huge intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to surgical treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:3102-3108. [PMID: 25623598 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4365-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the downstaging efficacy of yttrium-90 radioembolization (Ytt-90)-associated with chemotherapy and the results of surgery for initially unresectable huge intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS Between January 2008 and October 2013, unresectable ICC were treated with chemotherapy and Ytt-90. Patients with unique tumors localized to noncirrhotic livers and without extrahepatic metastasis were considered to be potentially resectable and were evaluated every 2 months for possible secondary resection. RESULTS Forty-five patients were treated for unresectable ICCs; ten had potentially resectable tumors, and eight underwent surgery. Initial unresectability was due to the involvement of the hepatic veins or portal vein of the future liver remnant in seven and one cases, respectively. Preoperative treatment induced significant decreases in tumor volume (295 vs. 168 ml, p = 0.02) and allowed for R0 resection in all cases. Three patients (37.5 %) had Clavien-Dindo grade three or higher complications, including two postoperative deaths. The median follow-ups were 15.6 [range 4-40.7] months after medical treatment initiation and 7.2 [0.13-36.4] months after surgery. At the end of the study period, five patients were still alive, with one patient still alive 40 months after medical treatment initiation (36.4 months after surgery); two patients experienced recurrences. CONCLUSIONS For initially unresectable huge ICCs, chemotherapy with Ytt-90 radioembolization is an effective downstaging method that allows for secondary resectability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rayar
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
de Greef M, Schubert G, Wijlemans JW, Koskela J, Bartels LW, Moonen CTW, Ries M. Intercostal high intensity focused ultrasound for liver ablation: The influence of beam shaping on sonication efficacy and near-field risks. Med Phys 2015; 42:4685-97. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4925056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
|