Cetuximab, gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with inoperable biliary tract cancer: A phase 2 study

Perioperative and palliative systemic treatments for biliary tract cancer

Due to the fact biliary tract cancer (BTC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, thus, not eligible for resection, and due to the aggressive tumor biology, it is considered as one of the cancer types with the worst prognosis. Advances in diagnosis, surgical techniques, and molecular characterization have led to an improvement of the prognosis of BTC patients, recently. Although neoadjuvant therapy is expected to improve surgical outcomes by reducing tumor size, its routine is not well established. The application of neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced disease may be indicated, the routine use of systemic therapy prior to surgery for cholangiocarcinoma patients with an upfront resectable disease is less well established, but discussed and performed in selected cases. In advanced disease, only combination chemotherapy regimens have been demonstrated to achieve disease control in untreated patients. Molecular profiling of the tumor has demonstrated that many BTC might bear actionable targets, which might be addressed by biological treatments, thus improving the prognosis of the patients. Furthermore, the addition of the immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy might improve the prognosis in a subset of patients. This review seeks to give a comprehensive overview about the role of neoadjuvant as well as palliative systemic treatment approaches and an outlook about novel systemic treatment concept in BTC.

Combination Therapies for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a group of malignant neoplasms that have recently increased in incidence and have a poor prognosis. Surgery is the only curative therapy. However, most patients are only indicated for palliative therapy because of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis and rapid progression. The current first-line treatment for advanced BTC is gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy. Nonetheless, many patients develop resistance to this regimen. Over the years, few chemotherapy regimens have managed to improve the overall survival of patients. Accordingly, novel therapies such as targeted therapy have been introduced to treat this patient population. Extensive research on tumorigenesis and the genetic profiling of BTC have revealed the heterogenicity and potential target pathways, such as EGFR, VEGF, MEK/ERK, PI3K and mTOR. Moreover, mutational analysis has documented the presence of IDH1, FGFR2, HER2, PRKACA, PRKACB, BRAF, and KRAS gene aberrations. The emergence of immunotherapy in recent years has expanded the treatment landscape for this group of malignancies. Cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer, and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been extensively investigated in trials of BTC. Therefore, patient stratification and a combination of various therapies have become a reasonable and important clinical strategy to improve patient outcomes. This review elaborates the literature on combined treatment strategies for advanced BTC from the past few years and ongoing clinical trials to provide new inspiration for the treatment of advanced BTC.

Afatinib in combination with GEMOX chemotherapy as the adjuvant treatment in patients with ErbB pathway mutated, resectable gallbladder cancer: study protocol for a ctDNA-based, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase II trial

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive type of digestive system cancer with a dismal outcome. Given the lack of effective treatment options, the disease rapidly reoccurs and 5-year survival rate is <5%. Our team previously found that a significant percentage of GBC tissues harboured mutations of the ErbB-related pathway. Afatinib is a chemically synthesised drug specifically targeting the ErbB pathway mutations. However, its efficacy in the treatment of patients with GBC remains unknown. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) refers to a proportion of cell-free DNA in the blood which is released by apoptotic and necrotic cells from tumours in situ, metastatic foci or circulating tumour cells. ctDNA-based liquid biopsy is a non-invasive pathological detection method that offers additional value to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of antitumour drugs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We conduct a multicentre and randomised study on afatinib combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with ErbB pathway mutated GBC. Clinical and biological evaluation involving ErbB pathway ctDNA detection will be made during the 3-year follow-up after participation. The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of afatinib. Disease-free survival is the primary end point and will be correlated with plasma ctDNA of patients in the treatment with afatinib. In addition, we will evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of plasma ctDNA for monitoring tumour recurrence and progression. Finally, we will assess the safety of afatinib by keeping an eye on the safety indicators.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the medical-ethical review committee of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The clinical trials results, even inconclusive, will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04183712.

Systemic treatment options for advanced biliary tract carcinoma

Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as FGFR2 gene fusions, mutations of IDH1/2, HER2, BRAC1/2 and BRAF. Pembigatinib has become the first approved targeted therapy for BTC with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Recent immunotherapy has opened new therapy avenues in BTC with pembrolizumab approved for either microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors, including BTC. The combination of immunotherapy with other modalities is currently being evaluated in different clinical trials, since single agent immunotherapy appears to provide modest benefits in advanced BTC. In this review, we summarize the current status of treatment options, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations in advanced BTC.

The choice for the optimal therapy in advanced biliary tract cancers: Chemotherapy, targeted therapies or immunotherapy

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) represent a heterogeneous group that includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs), perihilar-CCAs or Klatskin tumors, extrahepatic-CCAs, and gallbladder adenocarcinoma. These entities have distinct demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, and molecular characteristics. In advanced BTCs, the recommendations are mainly supporting a doublet chemotherapy regimen using cisplatin/gemcitabine (CisGem) with a 5-year overall survival rate close to 5% and median overall survival (mOS) of less than a year. The lack of overall efficacy stresses the need for personalized therapies. Recently, whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing highlighted the diversity of BTCs' subtypes. Distinct genetic alterations were retrieved according to the localization, with a high rate of potentially actionable alterations. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have since then been tested for BTCs, trying to propose a more personalized treatment. This review describes the different therapeutic options, validated and in development, for patients with advanced BTCs.

Applied precision cancer medicine in metastatic biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

Advanced therapy-refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC) has poor prognosis and constitutes a major challenge for adequate treatment strategies. By mapping the molecular profiles of advanced BTC patients, precision cancer medicine may provide targeted therapies for these patients.

OBJECTIVE

In this analysis, we aimed to show the potential of PCM in metastatic BTC.

METHODS

In this single-center, real-world retrospective analysis of our PCM platform, we describe the molecular profiling of 30 patients diagnosed with different types of metastatic BTC. Tumor samples of the patients were examined using a 161-gene next-generation sequencing panel, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescence in situ hybridization for chromosomal translocations.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 35 molecular aberrations in 30 patients. The predominant mutations were KRAS (n = 8), TP53 (n = 7), IDH2 (n = 4), and IDH1 (n = 3) that accounted for the majority of all molecular alterations (62.86%). BRAF mutations were observed in two patients. Less frequent alterations were noted in ARID1A, CTNNB1, ESR1, FBXW7, FGFR2, MET, NOTCH2, PIK3CA, PTCH1, SMAD4, and SRC1, each in one case. FGFR fusion gene was detected in one patient. No mutations were detected in eight patients. IHC revealed EGFR and p-mTOR expression in 28 patients. Applying these results to our patients, targeted therapy was recommended for 60% of the patients (n = 18). One patient achieved stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

PCM is a feasible treatment approach and may provide molecular-guided therapy recommendations for metastatic BTC.

Molecular pathogenesis of gallbladder cancer: An update

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy throughout the world, with wide geographical variance. It is the subtype of biliary tract malignancy that has the poorest prognosis and lower survival among all biliary tract malignancies. Various factors are associated with GBC pathogenesis such as environmental, microbial, metabolic and molecular. Chronic inflammation of gallbladder due to presence of gallstone or microbial infection (eg. Salmonella or H. pylori) results in sustained production of inflammatory mediators in the tissue microenvironment, which can cause genomic changes linked to carcinogenesis. Genetic alterations are one of the major factors, associated with aggressiveness and prognosis. Researches have been done to explore suitable biomarker for early diagnosis and identify altered molecular pathways to develop appropriate biomarkers for early diagnosis, therapy and predicting prognosis. Different agents for targeted therapy against actionable mutations of molecules like EGFR, VEGF, mTOR, HER2, PDL-1, PD-1, MET, PI3K, N-cadherin, VEGFR, MEK1 and MEK2 are being tried. Despite these advancements, there is dismal improvement in the survival of GBC patients. Genetic aberrations other than actionable mutations and epigenetic modification including aberrant expressions of micro-RNAs, are also being studied both as diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic targets. Complex pathogenesis of GBC still needs to be unfolded. In this review we focus on the molecular pathogenesis of GBC elucidated till date along with future directions that can be explored to achieve better management of GBC patients.

Biliary tract cancers: current knowledge, clinical candidates and future challenges

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare with poor prognosis. Due to the advent of genomic sequencing, new data have emerged regarding the molecular makeup of this disease. To add to the complexity, various subtypes also harbor a varied genetic composition. The commonly mutated genes associated with this cancer are KRAS, EGFR, IDH, FGFR and BAP1. Various clinical studies are looking at targeting these genetic mutations. Another therapeutic area of note is the potential for the use of immunotherapy in patients with BTC. Although BTC may be a result of chronic inflammation, this does not necessarily translate into increased immunogenicity. This literature review discusses the diverse molecular and immune-related pathways in patients with BTC and their potential therapeutic implications.

mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), have poor prognosis so novel treatment is warranted for advanced BTC. In current review, we discuss the limitations of current treatment in BTC, the importance of mTOR signalling in BTC, and the possible role of mTOR inhibitors as a future treatment in BTC. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is still the standard of care and no targeted therapy has been established in advanced BTC. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway linking to several other pathways and networks regulates cancer proliferation and progression. Emerging evidences reveal mTOR activation is associated with tumorigenesis and drug-resistance in BTC. Rapalogs, such as sirolimus and everolimus, partially inhibit mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and exhibit anti-cancer activity in vitro and in vivo in BTC. Rapalogs in clinical trials demonstrate some activity in patients with advanced BTC. New-generation mTOR inhibitors against ATP-binding pocket inhibit both TORC1 and TORC2 and demonstrate more potent anti-tumor effects in vitro and in vivo, however, prospective clinical trials are warranted to prove its efficacy in patients with advanced BTC.

The landscape of targeted therapies for cholangiocarcinoma: current status and emerging targets

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a relatively rare malignancy that arises from the epithelial cells of the intrahepatic, perihilar and distal biliary tree. Intrahepatic CCA (ICC) represents the second most common primary liver cancer, after hepatocellular cancer. Two-thirds of the patients with ICC present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Despite standard treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin, prognosis remains dismal with a median survival of less than one year. Several biological plausibilities can account for its poor clinical outcomes. First, despite the advent of next generation and whole exome sequencing, no oncogenic addiction loops have been validated as clinically actionable targets. Second, the anatomical, pathological and molecular heterogeneity, and rarity of CCA confer an ongoing challenge of instituting adequately powered clinical trials. Last, most of the studies were not biomarker-driven, which may undermine the potential benefit of targeted therapy in distinct subpopulations carrying the unique molecular signature. Recent whole genome sequencing efforts have identified known mutations in genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (BRAF) and tumor protein p53 (TP53), novel mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) and AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A), and novel fusions such as fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1). In this review, we will discuss the evolving genetic landscape of CCA, with an in depth focus on novel fusions (e.g. FGFR2 and ROS1) and somatic mutations (e.g. IDH1/2), which are promising actionable molecular targets.

Incidence, risk and prognostic role of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-induced skin rash in biliary cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-induced skin rash is a common adverse event and is considered a prognostic factor of various cancers. However, the role of rash is rarely known in biliary cancer, possibly owing to the low incidence of this frequently fatal malignancy. We thus performed a meta-analysis to investigate the incidence, risk and prognostic significance of skin rash related to anti-EGFR treatment for biliary cancer.

METHODS

Eligible studies were enrolled after a systematic search of electronic databases. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was utilized according to the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen clinical trials published between 2006 and 2017 comprising 1,106 patients with advanced biliary cancer were included. The overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade (grade ≥3) rash was 78.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70.4-84.3] and 11.3% (7.6-16.5), respectively. Anti-EGFR treatment correlates with a significantly increased risk of all-grade [risk ratio (RR) 7.37, 95% CI 5.11-10.64, p < 0.0001] and high-grade (RR 6.94, 95% CI 1.89-25.45, p = 0.0035) rash compared with control medication. Higher grades of skin rash correlate with a higher objective response rate (RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.47-8.33, p = 0.0048), and a longer overall [hazard ratio (HR) 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71, p = 0.0003) and progression-free survival (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72, p = 0.0001) compared with lower grades or no rash in patients who received anti-EGFR treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-EGFR treatment correlates with an increased risk of skin rash in advanced biliary cancer. Stratifying patients by the severity of rash may have major implications for survival benefit regarding anti-EGFR treatment for biliary cancer.

Phase I Study of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in Patients with EGFR-Positive Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Purpose: This study is an expanded and parallel clinical trial of EGFR-specific chimeric antigen receptor-engineered autologous T (CART) cell immunotherapy (NCT01869166) to assess the safety and activity of CART-EGFR cell therapy in EGFR-positive advanced unresectable, relapsed/metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC).Experimental Design: Patients with EGFR-positive (>50%) advanced unresectable, relapsed/metastatic BTCs were enrolled. Well-produced CART-EGFR cells were infused in a manner of dose escalation after the conditioning treatment with nab-paclitaxel (100-250 mg/m²) and cyclophosphamide (15-35 mg/kg).Results: A total of 19 patients (14 cholangiocarcinomas and 5 gallbladder carcinomas) received one to three cycles of CART-EGFR cell infusion (median CART cell dose, 2.65 × 10⁶/kg; range, 0.8-4.1 × 10⁶/kg) within 6 months. The CART-EGFR cell infusion was tolerated, but 3 patients suffered grade ≥3 acute fever/chill. Grade 1/2 target-mediated toxicities including mucosal/cutaneous toxicities and acute pulmonary edema and grade ≥3 lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia related to the conditioning treatment were observed. Of 17 evaluable patients, 1 achieved complete response and 10 achieved stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 4 months (range, 2.5-22 months) from the first cycle of treatment. Analysis of data indicated that the enrichment of central memory T cells (Tcm) in the infused CART-EGFR cells improved the clinical outcome.Conclusions: The CART-EGFR cell immunotherapy was a safe and active strategy for EGFR-positive advanced BTCs. The enrichment of Tcm in the infused CART-EGFR cells could predict clinical response. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1277-86. ©2017 AACRSee related commentary by Kalos, p. 1246.

Hepatic intra-arterial and systemic chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

Aim

The aim is to report clinical outcomes of hepatic intra-arterial (IACHT) and systemic chemotherapy (SCHT), followed by gemcitabine-based maintenance therapy (maintenance), for the treatment of relapsed or unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Patients & methods

In this retrospective observational study, 145 cholangiocarcinoma patients were treated with Epirubicin-Cisplatin as IACHT associated with Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil as SCHT. Maintenance was performed with gemcitabine-based schedule. Toxicity was assessed with NCI-CTCAE and tumor response with RECIST 1.1.

Results

Tumor response was complete in 1%, partial in 20%, stable disease in 48% and progression in 31% of patients (3 months after therapy). The most frequent adverse events were: anemia (24%), nausea and vomiting (33%), alopecia (60%).

Conclusion

Cholangiocarcinoma patients may benefit from IAHCT-SCHT. Maintenance may prolong clinical benefits. ClinicalTrials.gov registry Identifier: NCT01920503.

Current biologics for treatment of biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) is a group of malignancies that arise from the epithelial cells of the biliary tree. These cancers are typically classified by anatomic site of origin: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC). To date, complete surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment especially for earlier stage disease. Unfortunately, most patients present with advanced or metastatic disease, when systemic chemotherapy is the only treatment option. Due to the paucity of effective treatments, BTCs have a dismal prognosis. There is a tremendous need to better understand the disease biology, discover new therapies, and improve clinical outcomes for this challenging disease. Next-generation sequencing has produced a more accurate and detailed picture of the molecular signatures in BTCs. The three BTC histologic subtypes are, in fact, quite molecularly distinct. IHCC commonly contain FGFR2 fusions and IDH 1 and 2 mutations, whereas EHCC and GBC tend to carry mutations in EGFR, HER2, and MAPK pathway. In light of this emerging knowledge, clinical trials have become more biomarker-driven, which allows capturing of subsets of patients that are most likely to respond to certain therapies. Many new and promising targeted therapeutics are currently in the pipeline. Here we review the genetic landscape of BTCs while focusing on new molecular targets and targeted therapeutics currently being investigated in biomarker-driven clinical trials.

New molecular and immunotherapeutic approaches in biliary cancer

Biliary tract carcinoma is a collective term for a group of rare gastrointestinal cancers. This overview outlines the key pathways and specialised therapeutics in biliary cancer and the emerging role of immunotherapy by highlighting the rationale and selected examples of studies in each area.

Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare biliary adenocarcinoma associated with poor outcomes. Cholangiocarcinoma is subdivided into extrahepatic and intrahepatic variants. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is then further differentiated into (1) peripheral mass-forming tumors and (2) central periductal infiltrating tumors. We aimed to review the currently known risk factors, diagnostic tools, and treatment options, as well as highlight the need for further clinical trials and research to improve overall survival rates.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cholangiocarcinoma has seen significant increase in incidence rates over the last several decades. Most patients do not carry the documented risk factors, which include infections and inflammatory conditions, but cholangiocarcinoma typically forms in the setting of cholestasis and chronic inflammation. Management strategies include multispecialty treatments, with consideration of surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy, and targeted radiation therapy. Surgically resectable disease is the only curable treatment option, which may involve liver transplantation in certain selected cases. Referrals to centers of excellence, along with enrollment in novel clinical trials are recommended for patients with unresectable or recurrent disease. This article provides an overview of cholangiocarcinoma and discusses the current diagnosis and treatment options. While incidence is increasing and more risk factors are being discovered, much more work remains to improve outcomes of this ominous disease.

Genomics of gallbladder cancer: the case for biomarker-driven clinical trial design

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gallbladder carcinoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy of the biliary tract associated with a poor prognosis. Despite the deployment of targeted therapies that have demonstrated marked survival benefits in many tumor types, traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy has remained the mainstay of treatment for unresectable and metastatic gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

Systematic review of ongoing and prior clinical studies shows a paucity of biomarker-driven therapeutic trials using targeted agents in gallbladder cancer. In fact, over the past 6 years, of the 38 therapeutic biliary tract protocols listed on clinicaltrials.gov, only 6 (21 %) utilized targeted therapies based upon tumor biomarkers or genomics. Now that we have entered the era of next-generation sequencing and precision medicine, we are beginning to identify common and specific genetic alterations in gallbladder carcinomas.

RESULTS

A review of the literature reveals alterations in ARID1A, BRAF, CDKN2A/B, EGFR, ERBB2-4, HKN-RAS, PIK3CA, PBRM1, and TP53. Given the widespread use of tumor genomic profiling and the fact that most of the aforementioned alterations are pharmacologically tractable, these observations suggest the potential for new therapeutic strategies in this aggressive malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, further understanding of the genomic landscape of gallbladder cancer coupled with biomarker-driven clinical trials that match therapies to targets are urgently needed.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Biliary tract cancer accounts for <1% of all cancers and affects chiefly an elderly population, with predominance in men. We distinguish cholangiocarcinoma (intrahepatic, hilar and distal) and gallbladder cancer, with different pathogenesis and prognosis. The treatment is based on surgery (whenever possible), radiotherapy in selected cases, and chemotherapy. The standard cytotoxic treatment for advanced/metastatic disease is represented by the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin, whereas fluoropyrimidines are generally administered in second line setting. At the present time, no biologic drug demonstrated a clear efficacy in this cancer, although the molecular characterisation could provide a promising basis for experimental treatments. A good supportive care and an early palliative care are warranted in most patients and should be delivered as a part of a global approach.

Cholangiocarcinoma: Current opinion on clinical practice diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms: A review of the literature and a long-standing experience of a referral center

In the oncology landscape, cholangiocarcinoma is a challenging disease in terms of both diagnosis and treatment. Besides anamnesis and clinical examination, a definitive diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma should be supported by imaging techniques (US, CT, MRI) and invasive investigations (ERC or EUS with brushing and FNA or US or CT-guided biopsy) followed by pathological confirmation. Surgery is the main curative option, so resectability of the tumour should be promptly assessed. Moreover, jaundice must be evaluated at the outset because biliary tract decompression with drainage and stent placement may be required. If the patient is resectable, pre-operative assessment of postoperative liver function is mandatory. After a curative resection, an adjuvant therapy may be administered. Otherwise, in cases with macroscopic residual disease after surgery or locally recurrent or unresectable cholangiocarcinoma at the diagnosis, first-line chemotherapy is the preferred strategy, possibly associated with radiotherapy and/or locoregional treatments. As the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for cholangiocarcinoma can be declined in different modalities, patients should be promptly referred to a multidisciplinary team in a tertiary centre, familiar with this rare but lethal disease. Hence, the aim of the present paper is to focus on diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms based on the common guidelines and also on the clinical practice of multispecialist expert groups.

[Medical management of cholangiocarcinomas in 2015]

Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy carrying a poor prognosis. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease and are then ineligible for surgical resection, which is the only potentially curative therapeutic modality. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date review of medical management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing curative-intent surgery is under evaluation. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and platinum is the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Targeted agents are not currently recommended due to limited data on use in this setting. The role of second-line chemotherapy is not established in advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Identification of predictive and prognostic markers to select patients who could benefit from second-line therapy is a major issue. A better understanding of the biological and molecular mechanisms underlying the carcinogenesis and the phenotypic heterogeneity of cholangiocarcinoma may path the way of new therapeutic strategies.

Panitumumab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin does not prolong survival in wild-type KRAS advanced biliary tract cancer: A randomized phase 2 trial (Vecti-BIL study)

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare and lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Preclinical data suggest that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway could be involved in its progression.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized phase 2 trial recruited chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced BTC displaying a wild-type (WT) KRAS status. Patients were randomized to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) ) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2) ) with (arm A) or without (arm B) panitumumab (6 mg/kg) for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) analyzed in an intention-to-treat fashion.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients (45 in arm A and 44 in arm B) were enrolled between June 2010 and September 2013. After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, the median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3.3-7.2 months) in arm A and 4.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-6.2 months) in arm B (P = .27). No survival differences were observed: the median overall survival was 9.9 months in arm A and 10.2 months in arm B (P = .42). In a subgroup analysis, no differences in PFS according to the site of the primary tumor were observed; patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with panitumumab may have had a survival benefit in comparison with the control group (15.1 vs 11.8 months, P = .13). As for safety, skin toxicity was the main adverse event in arm A (80% of the patients). A higher incidence of diarrhea (55.5% vs 31.8%), mucositis (22.2% vs 13.6%), and constipation (24.4% vs 15.9%) was seen in arm A.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the marginal role of anti-EGFR therapy even for WT KRAS-selected BTC.

Targeted Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

A paradigm shift towards molecular-based, personalized cancer therapeutics has occurred in recent years and a number of targeted drugs have emerged. Various targeted therapies like erlotinib, trastuzumab, and cetuximab have been approved in lung, breast, and colon cancers, respectively. Numerous clinical trials involving targeted drugs in biliary tract cancers are currently in progress, though none have been approved for this disease. Biliary tract cancers are divided into separate entities both anatomically and in terms of pathogenesis but are grouped together in most trials given their rarity. Combination chemotherapy involving cisplatin and gemcitabine is the current standard of care in the metastatic setting. In this review, we will discuss the various molecular pathways implicated in biliary tract cancers and potential therapeutic targets.

Prevalence of K-Ras mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma: A Turkish Oncology Group pilot study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common male-predominant type of cancer worldwide. There is no effective treatment regimen available for advanced-stage disease and chemotherapy is generally ineffective in these patients. The number of studies on the prevalence of K-Ras mutations in HCC patients is currently limited. A total of 58 patients from 6 comprehensive cancer centers in 4 metropolitan cities of Turkey were enrolled in this study. Each center committed to enroll approximately 10 random patients whose formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were available for K-Ras, exon 2 genotyping. Two methods were applied based on the availability of adequate amounts of tumor DNA. In the first method, the samples were processed using TheraScreen. The genomic DNA was further used to detect the 7 most frequent somatic mutations (35G>A; 35G>C; 35G>T; 34G>A; 34G>C; 34G>T and 38G>A) in codons 12 and 13 in exon 2 of the K-Ras oncogene by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the second method, the genomic DNA was amplified by PCR using primers specific for K-Ras exon 2 with the GML SeqFinder Sequencing System's KRAS kit. The identified DNA sequence alterations were confirmed by sequencing both DNA strands in two independent experiments with forward and reverse primers. A total of 40 samples had adequate tumor tissue for the mutation analysis. A total of 33 (82.5%) of the investigated samples harbored no mutations in exon 2. All the mutations were identified via a direct sequencing technique, whereas none were identified by TheraScreen. In conclusion, in our patients, HCC exhibited a remarkably low (<20%) K-Ras mutation rate. Patients harboring K-Ras wild-type tumors may be good candidates for treatment with epidermal growth factor inhibitors, such as cetuximab.

Progression of targeted therapy in advanced cholangiocarcinoma

It is necessary to establish an effective therapy to improve the survival of patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Recently, with the development of pathology research in CCA, a lot of special bio-markers such as EGFR, VEGF, HER2, and MEK et al. could be over expression or mutations in CCA patients. According to their changes, combinations of targeted therapy plus chemotherapy are now recognized as effective therapies for advanced CCA. The aim of this paper is to analyze recent promising studies about targeted therapy alone or combination with each other or with chemotherapies.

Capecitabine plus gemcitabine in thymic epithelial tumors: final analysis of a Phase II trial

ABSTRACT 

Background: A multi-institutional Phase II trial was initiated in 2005 to test the combination gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with thymic epithelial malignancies (TETs). Patients & methods: Patients with histologic confirmation of TET diagnosis by central review who had received >1 systemic chemotherapy treatment were included. Patients received oral capecitabine (650 mg/mq twice daily on days 1–14) and intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/mq on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). Results: Of the 30 patients included (18 men, 12 women; median age: 57 years, range: 48–61 years), the majority (73%) had thymoma, and the remaining thymic carcinoma. Eight patients developed grade 3–4 neutropenia. A total of 12 patients had a response. Median progression-free survival was 11 months (range: 6.5–16.5). Conclusion: Capecitabine and gemcitabine is highly active in TETs.

Phase II study of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin in combination with panitumumab in KRAS wild-type unresectable or metastatic biliary tract and gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Current data suggest that platinum-based combination therapy is the standard first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer. EGFR inhibition has proven beneficial across a number of gastrointestinal malignancies; and has shown specific advantages among KRAS wild-type genetic subtypes of colon cancer. We report the combination of panitumumab with gemcitabine (GEM) and oxaliplatin (OX) as first-line therapy for KRAS wild-type biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic KRAS wild-type biliary tract or gallbladder adenocarcinoma with ECOG performance status 0-2 were treated with panitumumab 6 mg kg(-1), GEM 1000 mg m(-2) (10 mg m(-2) min(-1)) and OX 85 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate by RECIST criteria v.1.1. Secondary objectives were to evaluate toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients received at least one cycle of treatment across three institutions, 28 had measurable disease. Response rate was 45% and disease control rate was 90%. Median PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI 5-24 months) and median overall survival 20.3 months (95% CI 9-25 months). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anaemia 26%, leukopenia 23%, fatigue 23%, neuropathy 16% and rash 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and panitumumab in KRAS wild type metastatic biliary tract cancer showed encouraging efficacy, additional efforts of genetic stratification and targeted therapy is warranted in biliary tract cancer.

Multimodal treatment strategies for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary malignancy of the liver arising from malignant transformation and growth of biliary ductal epithelium. Approximately 50-70 % of CCAs arise at the hilar plate of the biliary tree, which are termed hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). Various staging systems are currently employed to classify HCs and determine resectability. Depending on the pre-operative staging, the mainstays of treatment include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and photodynamic therapy. Surgical resection offers the only chance for cure of HC and achieving an R0 resection has demonstrated improved overall survival. However, obtaining longitudinal and radial surgical margins that are free of tumor can be difficult and frequently requires extensive resections, particularly for advanced HCs. Pre-operative interventions may be necessary to prepare patients for major hepatic resections, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, and portal vein embolization. Multimodal therapy that combines chemotherapy with external beam radiation, stereotactic body radiation therapy, bile duct brachytherapy, and/or photodynamic therapy are all possible strategies for advanced HC prior to resection. Orthotopic liver transplantation is another therapeutic option that can achieve complete extirpation of locally advanced HC in judiciously selected patients following standardized neoadjuvant protocols.