Phase III randomised clinical trial comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with high tumour load (SCORPION trial): Final analysis of peri-operative outcome

Enhancing Prognosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Interval Cytoreduction-A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Background: Advanced-stage ovarian cancer presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with interval debulking surgery (IDS) as the two main treatment modalities. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes, surgical complexity, and survival rates between these approaches and to assess the impact of molecular markers such as BRCA and HRD status. Methods: This retrospective, single-center observational study included 100 patients diagnosed with stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The patients were divided into two cohorts based on their treatment strategy: PCS followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or NACT followed by IDS. Clinical outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed, along with the impact of genetic biomarkers. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in OS and PFS between the two treatment approaches. Patients who underwent NACT followed by IDS had lower surgical complexity scores and reduced perioperative morbidity. The HRD-positive patients exhibited improved responses to PARP inhibitors, reinforcing the significance of molecular profiling in therapeutic decision-making. The KELIM scores demonstrated prognostic relevance, particularly in the patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: Both PCS and NACT-IDS are viable treatment options for advanced ovarian cancer, with similar survival outcomes. The choice between strategies should be tailored based on patient-specific factors, including tumor burden, performance status, and molecular profile. The integration of biomarkers such as BRCA mutations and HRD status into clinical practice can further refine treatment selection and improve personalized management strategies.

Failure of early interval debulking surgery after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy: May bevacizumab add something? A large retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Data are limited on the use of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant setting for High-Grade Serous ovarian Cancer (HGSC) patients. This study explores the effect of adding bevacizumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) following the failure of early Interval Debulking Surgery (eIDS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This monocentric study retrospectively enrolled FIGO stage IIIC-IV HGSC patients (2017-2021), persisting unresectable after three NACT cycles. Eligible patients had an ECOG performance status ≤2, were aged 40-75 years, and had no contraindications to bevacizumab administration. Patients were stratified whether they added bevacizumab from cycles 4 to 6 (CPB group) or not (CP group). The primary endpoint was the cytoreduction rate after six cycles (delayed IDS, dIDS).

RESULTS

Overall, 58(23 %) patients received neoadjuvant bevacizumab(CPB), and 190 (77 %) did not (CP). Delayed IDS was performed in 117(47.6 %) patients (CPB:31-53.4 %; CP:86-45.8 %; p = 0.38), with complete gross resection rates of 83.9 % and 88.5 %, respectively (p = 0.72). Severe postoperative complications were comparable (CP: 8 %, CPB: 9.7 %, p = 0.069). Median overall survival (OS) for dIDS patients showed no significant difference (CPB: not reached, CP:38 months, p = 0.55), nor did progression-free survival (PFS; CPB:14 months, CP:12 months, p = 0.830). Conversely, among 130(52 %) patients persisting unresectable, bevacizumab significantly improved OS in the CPB group (not reached vs.18 months, p = 0.015), although PFS remained similar (CPB: 6 months, CP: 7 months, p = 0.741).

CONCLUSION

While adding bevacizumab to NACT does not seem to increase the dIDS rate, it significantly extends OS in unresectable patients. Its use may be a valuable option in selected cases after eIDS' failure.

Survival after interval and delayed cytoreduction surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a Global Gynaecological Oncology Surgical Outcomes Collaborative-Led Study (GO SOAR2)

OBJECTIVE

Although trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer use 3 cycles, real world practice varies. We evaluated the effect of higher order cycles of chemotherapy, followed by cytoreduction surgery or no surgery on survival, tumor resectability, and post-operative morbidity.

METHODS

For our international, retrospective cohort study, the inclusion criteria were women with stage III to IV ovarian cancer undergoing interval (after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy) or delayed (≥5 cycles) cytoreduction surgery or no cytoreduction surgery with chemotherapy alone (≥5 cycles). Multivariate regression analyses were used to model the effect of impact variables on overall survival and tumor resectability.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 2498 patients from 22 centers across 12 countries. In total, 60.2% (n = 1504) underwent interval cytoreduction surgery, 30.4% (n = 760) underwent delayed cytoreduction surgery, and 9.4% (n = 234) did not undergo surgery. In the interval, delayed, and no-surgery groups, the mean follow-up periods were 57, 69, and 39 months, respectively. Patients undergoing interval versus delayed cytoreduction were more likely to achieve no residual tumor mass (no macroscopic residual disease [R0] = 72.2%, 1072/1484; 64.6%, 490/758). Patients who underwent interval versus delayed cytoreduction surgery had a greater proportion of minor (Clavien-Dindo 1-2, 32%, 471/1473; 28%, 212/756) and major (Clavien-Dindo 3-5, 9.6%, 141/1473; 8.6%, 65/756) morbidities. Interval cytoreduction surgery was associated with statistically significant greater overall survival than delayed cytoreduction surgery (HR 0.81, p = .01). R0 at the time of delayed cytoreduction was not equivalent to R0 at the time of cytoreductive surgery. R0 in the interval setting was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.77, p = .01). Patients who did not undergo surgery had twice as poor overall survival compared with patients who underwent delayed cytoreduction surgery (HR 2.01, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women receiving >4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles had poorer overall survival, despite achieving R0 at surgery. Early maximum effort cytoreduction surgery with R0 in high volume centers and appropriate surgical resources are critical for increasing overall survival.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its impact on survival outcomes in radical multivisceral surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: an AGO-OVAR.OP3/LION exploratory analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is a significant complication following bowel resection in cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Previous studies have highlighted the detrimental effects of anastomotic leakage on patients' postoperative course. However, there is still a lack of precise identification of the high-risk population and established strategies for preventing its occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent bowel resection within the surgical phase III trial AGO-OVAR.OP3/LION investigating the impact of systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer were included in this analysis. All patients in the AGO-OVAR.OP3/LION trial had undergone complete cytoreduction with no macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed the occurrence of anastomotic leakage regarding surgical procedure (non-lymphadenectomy vs. lymphadenectomy and non-stoma vs. stoma) using the Fisher test. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its prognostic impact on survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall rate of anastomotic leakage was 7.1%. Notably, the Non-lymphadenectomy subgroup had a lower anastomotic leakage rate of 3.0% compared to the lymphadenectomy subgroup (11.2%, P = 0.005). The use of protective stoma placement resulted in an anastomotic leakage rate of 5.5% regardless of lymphadenectomy compared to the Non-Stoma subgroup (7.5%, P = 0.78). Increased blood loss (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per 100cc, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0001-1.09) and lymphadenectomy (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.41-11.40) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage. Although anastomotic leakage demonstrated a numerical detrimental impact on median progression-free survival (PFS) (18 months with anastomotic leakage vs. 19 months with Non-anastomotic leakage, hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.4, P = 0.53) and median overall survival (OS) (31 months with anastomotic leakage vs. 58 months with Non-anastomotic leakage, HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2, P = 0.17), the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic leakage rates were lower in the Non-lymphadenectomy arm, the current standard of care. Blood loss and lymphadenectomy, as surrogate markers for extensive surgery, were associated with increased risk for anastomotic leakage. These findings highlight the importance of strategies to reduce surgical complexity and perioperative risk to improve clinical outcomes.

Bevacizumab in frontline chemotherapy improved the survival outcome for advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with poor outcomes owing to chemoresistance. Bevacizumab (Bev) is increasingly being used to treat advanced ovarian cancer; however, its efficacy in OCCC remains unclear. This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of frontline bevacizumab chemotherapy in patients with OCCC.

METHODS

This retrospective multi-institutional study included patients diagnosed with advanced OCCC at eight institutions in Japan between 2008 and 2018. Patients were categorized into pre and post-market groups based on the Bev approval dates. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Additionally, patients were classified into Bev-treated (Bev+) and non-Bev-treated (Bev-) groups, and their prognoses were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were in the pre-market group and 82 in the post-market group. The post-market group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with poor performance status and patients who underwent interval debulking surgery (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis demonstrated a better PFS in the post-market group (p=0.041). In multivariate analysis, better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.52; p=0.002) and OS (HR=0.47; p=0.002) were observed in the post-market group than in the pre-market group. Bev+ patients had significantly better PFS and OS than Bev- patients in univariate (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) and multivariate analyses (PFS: HR=0.36; p<0.001 and OS: HR=0.21; p=0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Incorporating Bev into frontline chemotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with advanced OCCC.

Morbidity and Mortality Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

Background/Objectives: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported to improve survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study aimed to investigate the morbidity and mortality rates of CRS with HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent CRS with HIPEC for ovarian cancer from January 2013 to July 2021 at two tertiary institutions. The morbidities and mortalities that occurred within 30 days after HIPEC and the clinical and operative factors related to morbidities were investigated. Results: A total of 155 procedures in 151 patients were included in this study. The median age was 55 years and the median score of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index was eight points. Morbidities of grade ≥3 within 30 days of HIPEC occurred in 18 patients (11.6%). The most common severe morbidity was wound infection (3.2%), followed by pleural effusion (1.9%) and postoperative hemorrhage (1.9%). Within the 30-day postoperative period, there were no reported mortality cases. There were statistical differences in age, length of stay, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, bowel resection, operation time, and completeness of cytoreduction between the patients and severe morbidity. However, in the multivariate logistic analysis, none of the factors showed a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of severe morbidity. Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality rates of CRS with HIPEC in gynecologic cancer patients were relatively low compared to those in previous reports. Further studies about the possible risk factors are needed.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies form the evidence base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with suspected stage III-IV EOC should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist, with cancer antigen 125, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging included. All patients with EOC should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. For patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC who are fit for surgery and have a high likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction, PCS is recommended. For patients fit for PCS but deemed unlikely to have complete cytoreduction, NACT is recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC and a high perioperative risk profile should receive NACT. Before NACT, patients should have histologic confirmation of invasive ovarian cancer. For NACT, a platinum-taxane doublet is recommended. Interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) should be performed after ≤four cycles of NACT for patients with a response to chemotherapy or stable disease. For patients with stage III disease, good performance status, and adequate renal function treated with NACT, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during ICS. After ICS, chemotherapy should continue to complete a six-cycle treatment plan with the optional addition of bevacizumab. Patients with EOC should be offered US Food and Drug Administration-approved maintenance treatments. Patients with progressive disease on NACT should have diagnosis reconfirmed via tissue biopsy. Patients without previous comprehensive genetic or molecular profiling should be offered testing. Treatment options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, clinical trials, and/or initiation of end-of-life care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gynecologic-cancer-guidelines.This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

The prognosis impact of NACT-IDS and PDS in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to explore the prognostic implications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) compared to primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer by meta-analysis. The search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database to identify pertinent studies examining the prognostic implications of NACT-IDS versus PDS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. As of September 11, 2023, a total of 29 articles were ultimately included, encompassing 12,916 patients with advanced ovarian cancer in this meta-analysis. NACT-IDS groups exhibited a higher satisfactory tumor reduction rate (odds ratio [OR]=2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.53 to 2.76; p<0.001). NACT-IDS effectively reduced the risk of adverse cardiac events (OR=0.36; 95% CI=0.17 to 0.80; p=0.012), surgical site infections (OR=0.42; 95% CI=0.29 to 0.60; p<0.001), and embolic complications (OR=0.43; 95% CI=0.24 to 0.75; p=0.003) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Compared to NACT-IDS therapy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) III-IV ovarian cancer patients (OR=1.66; 95% CI=1.24 to 2.23; p=0.009), NACT-IDS groups exhibited a higher satisfactory tumor reduction rate for FIGO IIIC-IV (OR=2.35; 95% CI=1.50 to 3.70; p<0.001). NACT-IDS effectively enhances the satisfactory tumor reduction rate, especially for patients with stage IIIC and IV, and decreases postoperative complications among patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

RATIONALE

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require a combination of surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the advantages and disadvantages of treating women with advanced EOC with chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows cytoreductive surgery (primary cytoreductive surgery (PCRS)).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 21 March 2024. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers for further studies. We contacted the principal investigators of relevant trials for further information.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

OUTCOMES

We extracted data on overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, surgically related mortality and morbidity, and quality of life outcomes.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess risk of bias in RCTs.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models (due to heterogeneity between studies) to calculate hazard ratios (HR), risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes. We assessed the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We identified a further 1022 titles and abstracts through our searches in this update (958 unique records after further de-duplication), adding to the 2227 titles and abstracts identified in previous versions of this review. A total of five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. We identified no new completed studies in this update, but we did include additional data from existing studies. The studies assessed a total of 1774 women with stage III/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICRS) or PCRS followed by chemotherapy. We included data from four studies in the meta-analyses (1692 participants).

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Survival We found little or no difference between groups in OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.08; P = 0.49; I2 = 0%; 4 studies; 1692 women; high-certainty evidence) and likely little or no difference between groups in PFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08; P = 0.62; I2 = 0%; 4 studies; 1692 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events Adverse events, surgical morbidity, and quality of life outcomes were variably and incompletely reported across studies. NACT reduces postoperative mortality (0.4% in the NACT group versus 3.3% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.52; P = 0.002; I2 = 0%; 4 studies; 1542 women; high-certainty evidence). There are probably clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PCRS in overall surgically related adverse effects (grade 3+ (G3+)) (6% in the NACT group versus 29% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.38; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%; 2 studies; 435 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Organ resection NACT probably results in a large reduction in the need for stoma formation (5.8% in the NACT group versus 20.4% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.74; P = 0.009; I2 = 70%; 2 studies; 632 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably reduces the risk of needing bowel resection at the time of surgery (13.0% in the NACT group versus 26.6% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81; P = 0.007; I2 = 84%; 4 studies; 1578 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life Global quality of life on the EORTC QLQ-C30 produced imprecise results in three studies, with high levels of heterogeneity (quality of life at six months: MD 6.62, 95% CI -2.89 to 16.13; P = 0.17; I2 = 92%; 3 studies; 559 women; low-certainty evidence). Overall, functional and symptom scores may be slightly improved for NACT at 6 months, but similar by 12 months, although the differences might not be clinically meaningful.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available high- to moderate-certainty evidence shows there is likely little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PCRS and NACT for those with advanced EOC who are suitable for either treatment option. NACT reduces the risk of postoperative mortality and likely reduces the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and the need for stoma formation. These data should inform women and clinicians (involving specialist gynaecological multidisciplinary teams) and allow treatment to be tailored to the individual patient, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage, and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review update had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

Protocol (2005): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343 Original review (2007): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub2 Review update (2012): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub3 Review update (2019): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub4 Review update (2021): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub5 Review updated (2021a): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub6.

Intra-Tumoral Lymphocytic Infiltration Is Associated with Favorable Prognosis in Suboptimal Surgery in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Background: The immunoreactive (IR) subtype is one of the subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) with intra-tumoral lymphocytic infiltration. A positive prognostic correlation between IR subtype and R0 + optimal surgery has been reported. This study investigates the prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the suboptimal surgery group of HGSOCs. Methods: After reviewing 318 malignant ovarian tumors detected in our database between 2000 and 2017, 74 HGSOCs with supplemental p53 immunostaining were selected. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups of the IR subtype and the other subtypes were investigated. Based on pathological findings, HGSOCs were divided into two groups: those with or without abundant TILs. Results: Abundant TILs were detected in 17 cases of HGSOC (22.9%). Clinicopathological characteristics including age, CA125, FIGO stage, and residual disease did not show significant differences between the two groups. Lymph node metastasis was more common in the IR subtype group (p = 0.04). In the suboptimal surgery group, the 5-year PFS and OS (Kaplan-Meier estimates) in cases with (n = 10) or without (n = 21) abundant TILs were 10% and 0% (p = 0.097) and 70% and 28.5% (p = 0.012), respectively. The median time (range) to OS in cases with or without abundant TILs were 58 (34-81) months and 39 (22-55) months, respectively. Multivariate analysis in OS showed significant differences in TILs. Conclusions: Abundant intra-tumoral lymphocytic infiltration is an independent and favorable prognostic indicator for the suboptimal surgery group in HGSOCs and is associated with treatment response via cancer immunity.

Assessment of textbook oncologic outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

AIM

To examine the prognostic impact of textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing primary chemotherapy, along with identifying the risk factors for TOO failure.

METHODS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer at a tertiary center between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. TOO was defined as complete cytoreduction, no severe complications, no prolonged hospital stay, no readmission, no delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, and no 90-day mortality. The associations between TOO and clinical characteristics (survival) were examined using logistic and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 165 patients, 65 (39.4%) achieved TOO. The most common reason for TOO failure was incomplete cytoreduction (n = 46, 27.9%). Older age (p = 0.049) and visceral obesity (p = 0.030) were independently associated with TOO failure. Patients who achieved TOO had significantly prolonged overall survival (OS; median: 52 vs. 31 months, p = 0.010) and progression-free survival (PFS; median: not reached vs. 19 months, p = 0.006) compared to those who did not achieve TOO. Multivariate analysis revealed that TOO achievement was an independent protective factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.591, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.387-0.905, p = 0.015) and PFS (HR 0.626, 95% CI 0.410-0.956, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

TOO is an effective predictor of favorable outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing interval debulking surgery. Factors such as older age and visceral obesity may hinder the achievement of TOO.

Prognostic impact of microscopic residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic impact of microscopic residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC).

METHODS

Patients affected by FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer undergoing IDS between October 2010 and April 2016 were selected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 98 patients were identified. Four patients (4.1%) were considered inoperable. Overall, 67 patients (out of 94; 71.3%) had macroscopic disease, equating Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) 1 and 2, 7 (7.4%) had microscopic residuals, equating CRS3, rare CRS2, while 20 (21.3%) had both microscopic and macroscopic disease. Median OS and PFS were, respectively, 44 and 14 months in patients with no macroscopic residual disease (RD = 0) compared to 25 and 6 months, in patients with RD > 0 (OS: p = 0.001; PFS: p = 0.002). The median PFS was 9 months compared to 14 months for patients with more or less than 3 areas of microscopic disease at final pathologic evaluation (p = 0.04). The serum Ca125 dosage after NACT was higher in patients with RD > 0 compared to those without residue (986.31 ± 2240.7 µg/mL vs 215.72 ± 349.5 µg/mL; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Even in the absence of macroscopic disease after NACT, the persistence of microscopic residuals predicts a poorer prognosis among AEOC patients undergoing IDS, with a trend towards worse PFS for patients with more than three affected areas. Removing all fibrotic residuals eventually hiding microscopic disease during IDS represents the key to improving the prognosis of these patients.

Surgical Management of Gynecologic Cancers

This article addresses the role of surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers with liver metastases. The authors review the short-term and long-term outcomes of aggressive resection through retrospective and randomized studies. Although the data supporting aggressive resection of liver metastasis are largely retrospective and case based, the randomized control data to address neoadjuvant versus chemotherapy have been widely criticized. Residual disease remains an important predictor for survival in ovarian cancer. If a patient cannot achieve near optimal cytoreduction, radical cytoreductive procedures, such as hepatic resection, should be considered for palliation only.

Pre-operative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can help predict residual disease after primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The success of surgery in ovarian cancer is based on achieving complete cytoreduction. In order to achieve the best outcomes, patients are triaged into either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Current methods using computed tomography (CT) scans have limited accuracy in predicting optimal cytoreduction outcomes. This study investigated whether pre-operative blood count markers of inflammation could predict optimal cytoreduction, aiding in the triaging decision.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with ovarian cancer stage IIIc to IV, treated at two medical centers in Israel between 2003 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those undergoing primary operation and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Pre-operative complete blood counts were used to calculate neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Statistical analyses were used to determine optimal cutoff values of hematologic markers to predict the likelihood of achieving optimal cytoreduction.

RESULTS

Overall, 282 women fit the inclusion criteria, of which 133 underwent primary surgery and 149 had interval debulking surgery. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio was the only hematologic marker found to be significantly correlated with patient designation based on CT scans. The platelet-lymphocyte ratio cutoff value of 177 was identified as the optimal threshold (area under the curve 0.628, 95% CI 0.562 to 0.693, p < .001). Patients with levels >177 had significantly lower rates of complete debulking (R0) compared to those with levels ≤177 (33.3% vs 52.9%, p = .023) CONCLUSIONS: A platelet-lymphocyte ratio of 177 may serve as an adjunct marker alongside CT imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer patients. Prospective studies are required to validate these findings and explore the integration of platelet-lymphocyte ratio into existing predictive models.

Germline BRCA1/2 status and chemotherapy response score in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) can be treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and delayed primary surgery (DPS). Histopathological response to NACT can be assessed using Böhm's chemotherapy response score (CRS). We investigated whether germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) genotype associated with omental CRS phenotype.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC prescribed NACT and tested for gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) between September 2017 and December 2022 at The Christie Hospital. The Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association between survival and key clinical factors. The chi-square test assessed the association between CRS3 (no/minimal residual tumour) and gBRCA1/2 status.

RESULTS

Of 586 eligible patients, 393 underwent DPS and had a CRS reported. Independent prognostic factors by multivariable analysis were gBRCA1/2 status (PV versus wild type [WT]), CRS (3 versus 1 + 2), surgical outcome (complete versus optimal/suboptimal) and first-line poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1/2 inhibitor maintenance therapy (yes versus no) (all P < 0.05). There was a non-significant trend for tumours with a gBRCA2 PV having CRS3 versus WT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.13, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.95-4.91; P = 0.0647). By contrast, tumours with a gBRCA1 PV were significantly less likely to have CRS3 than WT (OR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.14-0.91; P = 0.0291).

CONCLUSIONS

Germline BRCA1/2 genotype was not clearly associated with superior omental CRS. Further research is required to understand how HGSOC biology defines CRS.

Replication stress marker phospho-RPA2 predicts response to platinum and PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination-proficient ovarian cancer

Background

Ovarian cancer treatment includes cytoreductive surgery, platinum-based chemotherapy, and often poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Homologous recombination (HR)-deficiency is a well-established predictor of therapy sensitivity. However, over 50% of HR-proficient tumors also exhibit sensitivity to standard-of-care treatments. Currently, there are no biomarkers to identify which HR-proficient tumors will be sensitive to standard-of-care therapy. Replication stress may serve as a key determinant of response.

Methods

We evaluated phospho-RPA2-T21 (pRPA2) foci via immunofluorescence as a potential biomarker of replication stress in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples collected at diagnosis from patients treated with platinum chemotherapy (discovery cohort: n = 31, validation cohort: n = 244) or PARP inhibitors (n = 87). Recurrent tumors (n = 37) were also analyzed. pRPA2 scores were calculated using automated imaging analysis. Samples were defined as pRPA2-High if > 16% of cells had ≥ 2 pRPA2 foci.

Results

In the discovery cohort, HR-proficient, pRPA2-High tumors demonstrated significantly higher rates of pathologic complete response to platinum chemotherapy than HR-proficient, pRPA2-Low tumors. In the validation cohort, patients with HR-proficient, pRPA2-High tumors had significantly longer survival after platinum treatment than those with HR-proficient, pRPA2-Low tumors. Additionally, the pRPA2 assay effectively predicted survival outcomes in patients treated with PARP inhibitors and in recurrent tumor samples.

Conclusion

Our study underscores the importance of considering replication stress markers alongside HR status in therapeutic planning. Our work suggest that this assay could be used throughout a patient's treatment course to expand the number of patients receiving effective therapy while reducing unnecessary toxicity.

Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A LANCE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Despite the absence of high-quality evidence of its safety and effectiveness, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used to treat advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Objective

To assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed to compare the efficacy of MIS vs laparotomy in patients with advanced-stage EOC and a complete or partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This lead-in pilot phase of LANCE (Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), an international, open-label, noninferiority RCT, opened to enrollment in September 2020 and enrolled the 100th eligible patient in February 2023. It was conducted at 11 academic cancer centers in North America and Europe. Participants were adults with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal carcinoma who had normal cancer antigen 125 levels and at least a partial radiologic response after 3 to 4 cycles of NACT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either interval cytoreductive surgery performed using MIS or laparotomy. Data analysis was based on the evaluable population.

Interventions

The MIS arm underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery, vs laparotomy for the control arm. Resection of all visible tumor was attempted, and conversion from MIS to laparotomy was performed when necessary to attain complete resection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Trial feasibility was defined by 3 primary end points: patient accrual rate of at least 5.6 patients per month by the last month of the lead-in pilot phase, conversion from MIS to laparotomy in less than 25% of patients, and a difference in complete gross resection rates of fewer than 20 percentage points between study arms.

Results

One hundred women (median [IQR] age, 63 [39-82] years) were included, of whom 49 were randomly assigned to MIS and 51 to laparotomy; 95 were evaluable for surgical outcomes. Most patients (34 [67%] in the laparotomy arm, and 33 [67%] in the MIS arm) had stage IIIC cancer. The monthly accrual rate reached 5.9 patients per month in the final month of the study. Six of 48 evaluable patients (12.5%; 95% CI, 4.7%-25.2%) assigned to MIS underwent conversion to laparotomy. Surgeons achieved a complete gross resection rate in 42 of 48 evaluable patients (88%) assigned to MIS and in 39 of 47 patients (83%) assigned to laparotomy (difference, 4.5 [95% CI, -9.7 to 18.8] percentage points).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this lead-in pilot study indicated the feasibility of the LANCE RCT to compare the oncological outcomes of MIS vs laparotomy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04575935.

Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages III-IV, unresectable ovarian cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase Ib/II study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) whose tumors are deemed unlikely to be completely cytoreduced to no gross residual disease (R0) or who are poor surgical candidates. This Ib/II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages III-IV, unresectable OC.

METHODS

Eligible patients with stage III-IV, unresectable OC were enrolled in this phase Ib/II study. All patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2, day 1, every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1, every 3 weeks) for 3 cycles before surgery, followed by 3-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The phase Ib primary endpoint was safety; the phase II primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety (for all populations).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were enrolled and were given neoadjuvant therapy treated between October 2019 and December 2020, of whom 9 were in the phase Ib portion and 53 in the phase II portion. A total of 53 patients underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 73.6% (95% CI, 59.7-84.7%). With a median follow-up of 17.5 (range 0.7-36.7) months, for all patients, the best ORR was 83.9% (95% CI, 71.7-92.4%) with 47 partial responses, the median PFS was 18.6 (95% CI, 13.8-23.3%) months, and median OS was not reached. During the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 91.9% (57/62) of all patients. The most common hematologic TRAEs were neutropenia (55/62, 88.7%), and non-hematologic toxicity was alopecia (36/62, 58.1%). Forty-nine patients (79.0%) experienced at least one grade 3-4 TRAEs, with the most common was neutropenia (44/62, 71.0%). Besides, delays in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery due to AEs were observed in 9 (1 in phase Ib; 8 in phase II) and 7 (phase II) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated an encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile of neoadjuvant chemotherapy nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin in stage III-IV, unresectable OC. In addition, AEs resulting in chemotherapy and surgery delays should be cautiously considered in this clinical setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ChiCTR1900026893. Registered at 25 October 2019.

The Influence of Circulating Immune Cell and CA125 Dynamics on Neoadjuvant Therapy Selection for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Background and Objectives: Ovarian cancer, including tubal and peritoneal cancer, is the third most common gynecological cancer and the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancies in developed countries. This study explores the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in determining the optimal duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer. It also investigates the correlation between NLR dynamics and the KELIM score, a chemosensitivity marker, to enhance individualized therapeutic strategies. Materials and Methods: A total of 79 patients underwent NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or palliative care. The data collected included demographic information, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and laboratory parameters. The baseline NLR (NLR-T0) and post-therapeutic NLR (NLR-T1) were calculated, and their variation (NLR∆) was analyzed. The KELIM score was determined using CA-125 values. Results: Patients with a high baseline NLR (≥2.5) had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with a low NLR (<2.5). A negative NLR∆ was associated with poorer PFS and OS. The KELIM score indicated a more effective treatment response, with higher scores correlating with better outcomes. The majority of patients achieved R0 resection, and those with favorable KELIM scores showed improved survival rates. Conclusions: The NLR is a valuable prognostic marker for assessing treatment response and guiding NACT duration in advanced ovarian cancer.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma: the randomized phase II NeoPembrOV clinical trial

This open-label, non-comparative, 2:1 randomized, phase II trial (NCT03275506) in women with stage IIIC/IV high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) for whom upfront complete resection was unachievable assessed whether adding pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to standard-of-care carboplatin plus paclitaxel yielded a complete resection rate (CRR) of at least 50%. Postoperatively patients continued assigned treatment for a maximum of 2 years. Postoperative bevacizumab was optional. The primary endpoint was independently assessed CRR at interval debulking surgery. Secondary endpoints were Completeness of Cytoreduction Index (CCI) and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores, objective and best response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, postoperative morbidity, and pathological complete response. The CRR in 61 pembrolizumab-treated patients was 74% (one-sided 95% CI = 63%), exceeding the prespecified ≥50% threshold and meeting the primary objective. The CRR without pembrolizumab was 70% (one-sided 95% CI = 54%). In the remaining patients CCI scores were ≥3 in 27% of the standard-of-care group and 18% of the investigational group and CC1 in 3% of the investigational group. PCI score decreased by a mean of 9.6 in the standard-of-care group and 10.2 in the investigational group. Objective response rates were 60% and 72%, respectively, and best overall response rates were 83% and 90%, respectively. Progression-free survival was similar with the two regimens (median 20.8 versus 19.4 months in the standard-of-care versus investigational arms, respectively) but overall survival favored pembrolizumab-containing therapy (median 35.3 versus 49.8 months, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with pembrolizumab-containing therapy were anemia during neoadjuvant therapy and infection/fever postoperatively. Pembrolizumab was discontinued prematurely because of adverse events in 23% of pembrolizumab-treated patients. Combining pembrolizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible for HGSC considered not completely resectable; observed activity in some subgroups justifies further evaluation to improve understanding of the role of immunotherapy in HGSC.

The impact of Paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients - interim analysis of safety and immediate efficacy of a randomized control trial (C-HOC trial)

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the potential superiority of combining paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with sequential intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy over intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC, IVA and IVB high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube carcinoma (HGSOC). This interim analysis focuses on the safety and immediate efficacy of both regimens to determine the feasibility of the planned trial (C-HOC Trial).

METHODS

In a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial, FIGO stage IIIC, IVA, and IVB HGSOC patients (FAGOTTI score ≥ 8 during laparoscopic exploration) unsuitable for optimal cytoreduction in primary debulking surgery (PDS) were randomized 2:1 during laparoscopic exploration. The Experiment Group (HIPEC Group) received one cycle of intraperitoneal neoadjuvant laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (paclitaxel) followed by three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin), while the Control Group received only three cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Both groups subsequently underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS). The adverse effects of chemotherapy, postoperative complications, and pathological chemotherapy response scores (CRS) after IDS were compared.

RESULTS

Among 65 enrolled patients, 39 HIPEC Group and 21 Control Group patients underwent IDS. Grade 3-4 chemotherapy-related adverse effects were primarily hematological with no significant differences between the two groups. The HIPEC Group exhibited a higher proportion of CRS 3 (20.5% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.000). R0 resection rates in IDS were 69.2% (HIPEC Group) and 66.7% (Control Group). R2 resection occurred in 2.6% (HIPEC Group) and 14.3% (Control Group) cases. No reoperations or postoperative deaths were reported, and complications were managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining HIPEC with IV NACT in treating ovarian cancer demonstrated safety and feasibility, with no increased chemotherapy-related adverse effects or postoperative complications. HIPEC improved tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, potentially enhancing progression-free survival (PFS). However, the final overall survival results are pending, determining if HIPEC combined with IV NACT is superior to IV NACT alone.

Association of Chemotherapy Response Score with Multidrug Resistance 1 and CA125 ELIMination Rate Constant K in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

AIM

The relationship between chemotherapy response score (CRS), a widely used response predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery (NAC-IDS), and multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) and CA125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), is undetermined. We evaluated CRS in advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing NAC and looked for associations between CRS and MDR1 and CA125 KELIM. Our aim was to predict the therapeutic effect of NAC before interval debulking surgery (IDS) by examining its association with CRS.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent NAC-IDS (first-line treatment) at Kurume University Hospital, Japan, between 2004 and 2017. CRS association with MDR1 and CA125 KELIM was examined using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Survival curves used Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences between groups used log-rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, 55 patients were classified into CRS1 (n=22), CRS2 (n=19), and CRS3 (n=14). The CRS3 group had a significantly better prognosis than the CRS1 or CRS2 group. CRS, age, and IDS status were clinical prognostic factors for ovarian cancer. MDR1 positivity for excision repair cross-complementing group 1, β-tubulin, and Y-box binding protein-1 occurred in 15, 17, and 11 patients, respectively, but these were not associated with CRS. CA125 KELIM was <0.5 (n=8), 0.5-1.0 (n=30), and ≥ 1.0 (n=17) but not associated with CRS.

CONCLUSION

CRS is reconfirmed as a treatment response predictor for NAC-IDS, but its association with drug resistance factors remains unconfirmed.

Potential Risks of Severe Infection Following the Exploratory Laparoscopy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Case Report and a Literature Review

Although exploratory laparoscopy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer is a diagnostic tool for determining treatment strategy, its safety has not been completely investigated. We report a case involving a severe abdominal abscess following an exploratory laparoscopy. A 65-year-old woman with advanced ovarian cancer developed a large abdominal abscess following exploratory laparoscopy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Emergent laparotomy was performed; while massive bowel adhesion surrounding the abscess did not allow for genital organ resection, an incision in the left port area was made to drain the abscess. The patient's chemotherapy was delayed because she experienced sub-ileus, postoperatively. Only a limited number of studies have been conducted on the safety of these techniques. This intense infection case emphasizes the need for further investigations into the safety of exploratory laparoscopy in patients with progressive diseases under heterogeneous conditions in real-world settings.

Related Clinical Factors of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Resistance in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer is the second most common malignancy in women, but it is a fatal gynecological tumor. Although it has a standard treatment regimen, resistance to chemotherapy makes patients more prone to early recurrence, leading to poor survival rates. Therefore, this study investigated factors related to platinum resistance through a complete analysis of clinical data.

DESIGN

Clinical data of patients with ovarian cancer were collected, and the patients were categorized into platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant groups. By comparing the differences in clinical data between the groups, the key factors affecting platinum resistance were analyzed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We collected the clinical data of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who were admitted to the Department of Oncology of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses and evaluated overall survival and progression-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

We enrolled 161 patients with EOC, of whom 124 demonstrated platinum sensitivity and 37 demonstrated platinum resistance after the initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Univariate analyses revealed that the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and Fagotti score were associated with an increased risk of platinum resistance for the first recurrence. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only Fagotti score and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with an increased risk of platinum resistance (odds ratio: 0.372 and 0.328, 95% confidence interval: 0.160-0.863 and 0.141-0.762, p = 0.021 and 0.010, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

The sample size of this study was relatively small because of nonstandard treatment of some patients, the absence of clinical data, and failure of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EOC exhibiting platinum resistance had a very poor prognosis. The Fagotti score and neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared to increase the risk of platinum resistance at first recurrence.

Stratification of Homologous Recombination Deficiency-Negative High-Grade Ovarian Cancer by the Type of Peritoneal Spread into Two Groups with Distinct Survival Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has evolved into a major diagnostic marker in high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC), predicting the response to poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and also platinum-based therapy. In addition to HRD, the type of peritoneal tumor spread influences the treatment response and patient survival; miliary type tumor spread has a poorer predicted outcome than non-miliary type tumor spread.

METHODS

Known methods for HRD assessment were adapted for our technical requirements and the predictive-value integrated genomic instability score (PIGIS) for HRD assessment evolved as an outcome. PIGIS was validated in HGOC samples from 122 patients. We used PIGIS to analyze whether the type of tumor spread correlated with HRD status and whether this had an impact on survival.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that PIGIS can discriminate HRD-positive from HRD-negative samples. Tumors with a miliary tumor spread are HRD-negative and have a very bad prognosis with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 15.6 months and an overall survival (OS) of 3.9 years. However, HRD-negative non-miliary spreading tumors in our cohort had a much better prognosis (PFS 35.4 months, OS 8.9 years); similar to HRD-positive tumors (PFS 34.7 months, OS 8.9 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that in a predominantly PARPi naïve cohort, the type of tumor spread and concomitant cytoreduction efficiency is a better predictor of survival than HRD and that HRD may be an accidental surrogate marker for tumor spread and concomitant cytoreduction efficiency. It remains to be determined whether this also applies for sensitivity to PARPi.

Exploration and prognostic analysis of two types of high-risk ovarian cancers: clear cell vs. serous carcinoma: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare pathological histotype in ovarian cancer, while the survival rate of advanced OCCC (Stage III-IV) is substantially lower than that of the advanced serous ovarian cancer (OSC), which is the most common histotype. The goal of this study was to identify high-risk OCCC by comparing OSC and OCCC, with investigating potential risk and prognosis markers.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from 2009 to 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify risk and prognostic factors in high-risk OCCC patients. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Furthermore, Cox analysis was employed to build a nomogram model. The performance evaluation results were displayed using the C-index, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Immunohistochemically approach was used to identify the expression of the novel target (GPC3).

RESULTS

In the Cox analysis for advanced OCCC, age (45-65 years), tumor numbers (total number of in situ/malignant tumors for patient), T3-stage, bilateral tumors, and liver metastases could be defined as prognostic variables. Nomogram showed good predictive power and clinical practicality. Compared with OSC, liver metastases had a stronger impact on the prognosis of patients with OCCC. T3-stage, positive distant lymph nodes metastases, and lung metastases were risk factors for developing liver metastases. Chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for patient with advanced OCCC, but had no effect on CSS in patients with liver metastases (p = 0.0656), while surgery was significantly related with better CSS in these patients (p < 0.0001) (p = 0.0041). GPC3 expression was detected in all tissue sections, and GPC3 staining was predominantly found in the cytoplasm and membranes.

CONCLUSION

Advanced OCCC and OCCC with liver metastases are two types of high-risk OCCC. The constructed nomogram exhibited a satisfactory survival prediction for patients with advanced OCCC. GPC3 immunohistochemistry is expected to accumulate preclinical evidence to support the inclusion of GPC3 in OCCC targeted therapy.

Controversies in the Surgical Management of Gynecologic Cancer: Balancing the Decision to Operate or Hesitate

Cancer outcomes are largely measured in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival, which is highly dependent on timely diagnosis and access to treatment methods available within the country's existing health care system. Although cancer survival rates have markedly led in the past few decades, any improvement in the 5-year survival of gynecologic cancers has been modest, as in the case of ovarian and cervical cancers, or has declined, as in the case of endometrial cancer. The lack of effective screening options contributes to many women presenting with advanced-stage disease and the need for radical approaches to treatment. Although treatment for early-stage disease can lead to a cure, advanced-stage disease is fraught with a high potential for morbidity and mortality, and recent clinical trials have aimed to assess the noninferiority of minimally invasive options versus aggressive surgical approaches. Of particular interest is fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial and cervical cancers, which have recently been on the rise among younger women. Balancing morbidity with the risk of mortality, and loss of fertility and quality of life requires a targeted patient-centered approach to treatment. This is an ongoing area of intense research and sometimes may challenge current treatment paradigms. In this two-part review, we present an overview of current approaches to gynecologic cancer treatment and the need to de-escalate radical surgical approaches and preserve fertility. We also review the intricacies of ovarian and advanced endometrial cancer treatment, exploring the nuances in surgical debulking timing and its impact on outcomes.

Clinical value of serum tumor markers in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: single-center prospective clinical study

Objective

This study aimed to assess the clinical importance of various biomarkers, including NLR, CEA, CA199, CA125, CA153, and HE4, through dynamic testing to evaluate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer. This provides valuable information for tailoring treatment plans to individual patients, thereby leading to a more personalized and effective management of individuals facing ovarian cancer.

Methods

The levels of NLR, CA125, CA199, CEA, CA153, and HE4 were detected before chemotherapy and after 3 courses of chemotherapy. Patients were categorized into ineffective and effective groups according to the effectiveness of NACT. To evaluate the factors influencing NACT's effectiveness in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, predictive modeling, and multifactorial regression analysis were employed.

Results

In the effective group, the patients' age, maximum tumor diameter, and CEA and HE4 levels of the patients were significantly higher compared to those in the ineffective group (P <.05). Additionally, the difference in HE4 levels before and after treatment between the effective and ineffective groups was statistically significant (P<.05). Multifactorial analysis showed that age and maximum tumor diameter were independent risk factors impacting the effectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer (P<.05). The ROC curve for predicting the effectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer showed a sensitivity of 93.3% for NLR and a specificity of 92.3% for CA199. HE4 emerged as the most reliable predictor, demonstrating a specificity of 84.6% and a sensitivity of 75.3%. The area under the curve of the combined CA125 and HE4 assays for predicting the ineffectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer was 0.825, showcasing a specificity of 74.2% and a sensitivity of 84.6%.

Conclusion

The predictive capacity for the effectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer is notably high when considering the sensitivity of NLR and the specificity of CA199. Additionally, the combination of CA125 and HE4 assays can obtain a better predictive effect, which can accurately select patients suitable for NACT, determine the appropriate timing of the interval debulking surgery (IDS) surgery, and achieve a satisfactory tumor reduction effect.

Correlation between peritoneal cancer index and survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with complete resection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between the peritoneal cancer index, overall survival, and recurrence free survival, in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients treated at the Gustave-Roussy Institute between December 2004 and November 2017 for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete resection were included. The correlation between the peritoneal cancer index and survival was studied using statistical modeling. Multivariate analysis was performed with a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 351 patients included, 94 (27%) had initial surgery and 257 (73%) had interval surgery. Median follow-up was 52.7 months (range 47.6-63.9). Median peritoneal cancer index was 10 (range 0-32). The linear model best represented the relationship between peritoneal cancer index and overall survival. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a greater instantaneous risk of baseline death than those with initial surgery, as well as a more rapid increase in this risk as the peritoneal cancer index increased. Overall survival and recurrence free survival were better in the initial surgery group (103.4 months (79.1-not reached (NR)) vs 66.5 months (59.1-95.3) and 31.8 months (23.7-48.7) vs 25.9 months (23.2-29), respectively). Risk factors for death were body mass index, peritoneal cancer index, and need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The peritoneal cancer index is a prognostic indicator, but its linear relationship with survival precluded setting a unique peritoneal cancer index cut-off. Moreover, the prognostic impact of peritoneal cancer index was stronger in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Economic Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

In the absence of evidence on whether neoadjuvant (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is more beneficial for various tumor treatments, economic evaluation (EE) can assist medical decision making. There is limited evidence on their cost-effectiveness and their prospective evaluation is less likely in the future. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis about EE for NAC versus AC in solid tumor help compare these therapies from various perspectives.

METHODS

Various databases were searched for studies published from inception to 2021. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and economic-specific guidelines. The data were pooled using a random effects model when possible.

RESULTS

The retrieval identified 15 EE studies of NAC versus AC in 8 types of cancer. NAC is the dominant strategy for pancreatic, head and neck, rectal, prostate cancers and colorectal liver metastases. For ovarian cancer, NAC is cost-effective with a lower cost and higher or similar quality-adjusted life-year. There were no significant differences in cost and outcomes for lung cancer. For stage IV or high-risk patients with ovarian or prostate cancer, NAC was cost-effective but not for patients who were not high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The EEs results for NAC versus AC were inconsistent because of their different model structures, assumptions, cost inclusions, and a shortage of studies. There are multiple sources of heterogeneity across EEs evidence synthesis. More high-quality EE studies on NAC versus AC in initial cancer treatment are necessary.

A Case Report of Occult Breast Cancer Detected by Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Suspected Ovarian Cancer

Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful in the management of gynecological cancers; however, it can occasionally result in the detection of other malignancies. Occult breast cancer (OBC) is metastatic breast cancer without a recognized primary breast lesion. We report a rare case of OBC that was detected laparoscopically. A 64-year-old female presented to our hospital with back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 50 mm multicystic tumor with an internal nodule in the right ovary. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed abnormal accumulation in multiple lymph nodes, moderate accumulation in the ovarian tumor nodule, and no accumulation in the breasts. Ovarian cancer was suspected, and a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Laparoscopically, a cystic tumor in the right ovary and 10 mm nodule in the right round ligament were observed and partially resected. Immunohistopathologically, the nodules of the round ligament exhibited features consistent with those of breast cancer, but the ovarian tumor was a seromucinous borderline tumor. MRI revealed no breast lesions. Therefore, the malignancy was diagnosed as an OBC.

Splenectomy as Part of Maximal-Effort Cytoreductive Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A splenectomy is frequently performed during debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Its impact on perioperative and survival outcomes remains questionable as current evidence is conflicting. In the present study, we sought to determine the factors that affect survival rates in ovarian cancer patients that undergo a splenectomy as part of maximal-effort cytoreduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted that included all epithelial ovarian cancer patients that had surgical cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Differences among splenectomized and non splenectomized patients were evaluated as well as the impact of known risk factors on survival outcomes of splenectomized patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 245 patients were identified and 223 were included in the present series, of whom 91 had a splenectomy. Recurrence rates as well as death rates were comparable among splenectomized and non-splenectomized patients; however, both the disease-free survival (log-rank = 0.001), as well as the overall survival of splenectomized patients (log-rank = 0.006), was shorter. Thrombotic events as well as rates of pulmonary embolism were comparable. Sepsis was more common among splenectomized patients. The site of splenic metastases did not influence patients' survival. Among splenectomized patients, those offered primary debulking had longer progression-free survival (log-rank = 0.042), although their overall survival did not differ compared to patients submitted to interval debulking. Complete debulking significantly improved the overall survival compared to optimal debulking (log-rank = 0.047). Splenectomized patients that developed sepsis had worse overall survival (log-rank = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

The findings of our study support the feasibility of splenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; however, its impact on patients' survival is considerable. Therefore, every effort should be made to avoid splenic injury which will result in unintended splenectomy for non-oncological reasons.

The Cukurova score in the prediction of primary cytoreduction in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Primary debulking surgery has been the preferred surgical route and is still considered a quality indicator for advanced ovarian cancer surgery. However, a significant number of patients are not amenable to upfront surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery may be the most suitable approach for this group. This study aimed to evaluate a novel score for prediction of the cytoreduction results at primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

This observational prospective study was conducted at a tertiary gynecologic oncology center between December 2020 and August 2022. Presumed primary stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma cases were included. Borderline tumors, and metastatic or non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, were excluded. Based on imaging findings, points were assigned to each anticipated surgical procedure required for complete cytoreduction. The sum of these points was multiplied by the patient's Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and thus, the Cukurova-clinic score was established. Furthermore, the required surgical procedures based on laparoscopic evaluation were recorded, and the score was readjusted and calculated to obtain the Cukurova score.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study. Primary debulking surgery was performed in 70% of cases. Among them, complete cytoreduction (Cukurova score ≤12) was obtained in 97.3% of cases. Complete cytoreduction was not achieved in cases with Cukurova score >12. The odds ratio of 90-day mortality was 13.4 for patients with Cukurova score >12, compared with those with Cukurova score ≤12.

CONCLUSION

The Cukurova score is a model for classifying advanced ovarian cancer patients who may be candidates for primary debulking surgery.

Survival outcomes following interval versus primary debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective cohort study in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria

Background

There is conflicting evidence regarding the survival benefit of interval debulking surgery (IDS) compared to conventional treatment with primary debulking surgery (PDS) in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Objectives

We compared the survivals following PDS followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) versus IDS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in women with advanced EOC at the gynaecological oncology unit of a tertiary referral centre in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria.

Methods

The data of 126 women with advanced EOC who had standard treatment with either PDS and ACT or NACT and IDS between January 2008 and December 2017 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time stratified by the types of upfront debulking surgery were calculated and compared by employing the log-rank test statistics. Cox proportional hazard models were then used to estimate hazard ratios of the association between the type of surgical debulking and survivals while adjusting for all necessary covariates.

Results

We recorded no statistically significant differences in PFS (adjusted hazard ratio=1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.82-2.01, P=0.282) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio=1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.68-2.25, P=0.491) between IDS and PDS among women with advanced EOC.

Conclusions

There is a need for a larger prospective multicenter study to further compare the impact of upfront surgical debulking types on the survival of women with advanced EOC in our setting. In the meantime, giving interval debulking surgery after a few courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be an acceptable standard of care for women with advanced EOC.

Advanced ovarian yolk sac tumor: upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking?

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgery and survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian yolk sac tumor.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort analysis, patients with stage III to IV ovarian yolk sac tumor or mixed germ cell tumors containing yolk sac tumor elements, and who underwent surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2011 and December 2021, were identified. Patient characteristics, treatment, and survival data were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled: 19 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery, and 21 patients were treated with primary debulking surgery. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the surgical conditions of patients were improved. All patients achieved cytoreduction to R0 or R1 at interval surgery. No statistical difference was found in 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the primary debulking surgery group (log rank p=0.4 and 0.94). Patients had less blood loss (328.4 vs 1285.7 mL, p=0.029), lower transfusion volume (1044.4 vs 3066.7 mL, p=0.011), and fewer peri-operative complications (15.8% vs 47.6%, p=0.032) at the interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients who underwent primary debulking surgery.

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced-stage ovarian yolk sac tumor, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery is an alternative option, especially for those who cannot tolerate the primary debulking surgery because of high tumor burden and vulnerable status.

Microtubule-Targeting Agents: Disruption of the Cellular Cytoskeleton as a Backbone of Ovarian Cancer Therapy

Microtubules are dynamic polymers composed of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers. Microtubules are universally conserved among eukaryotes and participate in nearly every cellular process, including intracellular trafficking, replication, polarity, cytoskeletal shape, and motility. Due to their fundamental role in mitosis, they represent a classic target of anti-cancer therapy. Microtubule-stabilizing agents currently constitute a component of the most effective regimens for ovarian cancer therapy in both primary and recurrent settings. Unfortunately, the development of resistance continues to present a therapeutic challenge. An understanding of the underlying mechanisms of resistance to microtubule-active agents may facilitate the development of novel and improved approaches to this disease.

Laparoscopic versus open approach for interval cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a matched comparative study

BACKGROUND

The use of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of carcinomatosis from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of both laparoscopic and open approach for interval CRS+HIPEC in a matched cohort of patients with advanced EOC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including 254 patients treated with interval CRS-HIPEC between January 2016 and December 2021 was performed. Patients with primary disease and limited carcinomatosis (PCI ≤ 10) were selected. A comparative analysis of patients treated by either open (O-CRS-HIPEC) or the laparoscopic (L-CRS-HIPEC) approach was conducted. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and perioperative outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were finally selected and enrolled into two comparable groups in this study. Of these, 14 patients were treated by interval L-CRS-HIPEC and 39 by interval O-CRS-HIPEC. The L-CRS-HIPEC group had a shorter hospital stay (5.6 ± 1.9 vs. 9.7 ± 9.8 days; p < 0.001) and a shorter time to return to systemic chemotherapy (4.3 ± 1.9 vs. 10.3 ± 16.8 weeks; p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between both groups. The 2-year OS and DFS was 100% and 62% in the L-CRS-HIPEC group versus 92% and 60% in the O-CRS-HIPEC group, respectively (p = 0.96; p = 0.786).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of interval L-CRS-HIPEC for primary advanced EOC is associated with shorter hospital stay and return to systemic treatment while obtaining similar oncological results compared to the open approach. Further prospective research is needed to recommend this new approach for these strictly selected patients.

Imaging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: CT, MRI, Radiomic Features and Resectability Criteria

PC represents the most striking picture of the loco-regional spread of ovarian cancer, configuring stage III. In the last few years, many papers have evaluated the role of imaging and therapeutic management in patients with ovarian cancer and PC. This paper summed up the literature on traditional approaches to the imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer, presenting classification systems, most frequent patterns, routes of spread and sites that are difficult to identify. The role of imaging in diagnosis was investigated, with particular attention to the reported sensitivity and specificity data-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT)-and to the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). In addition, we explored the therapeutic possibilities and radiomics applications that can impact management of patients with ovarian cancer. Careful staging is mandatory, and patient selection is one of the most important factors influencing complete cytoreduction (CCR) outcome: an accurate pre-operative imaging may allow selection of patients that may benefit most from primary cytoreductive surgery.

"Things Have Changed"-Laparoscopic Cytoreduction for Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Experience of a Referral Center on 108 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To report the feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction surgery for primary and recurrent ovarian cancer in a select group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients with FIGO stage IIIA-IV advanced ovarian cancer who underwent laparoscopic primary debulking surgery (PDS), interval debulking surgery (IDS), or secondary debulking surgery (SDS) between June 2008 and January 2020. The primary endpoint was achieving optimal cytoreduction, defined as residual tumor less than 1 cm. Secondary endpoints included evaluating surgical complications and long-term survival, assessed at three-month intervals during the initial two years and then every six months.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 108 patients, among whom, 40 underwent PDS, 44 underwent IDS, and 24 underwent SDS. Optimal cytoreduction rates were found to be 95.0%, 97.7%, and 95.8% for the PDS, ISD, and SDS groups, respectively. Early postoperative complications (<30 days from surgery) occurred in 19.2% of cases, with 7.4% of these cases requiring reintervention. One patient died following postoperative respiratory failure. Late postoperative complications (<30 days from surgery) occurred in 9.3% of cases, and they required surgical reintervention only in one case. After laparoscopic optimal cytoreduction with a median follow-up time of 25 months, the overall recurrence rates were 45.7%, 38.5%, and 39.3% for PDS, ISD, and SDS, respectively. The three-year overall survival rates were 84%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while the three-year disease-free survival rates were 48%, 51%, and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cytoreduction surgery is feasible for advanced ovarian cancer in carefully selected patients, resulting in high rates of optimal cytoreduction, satisfactory peri-operative morbidity, and encouraging survival outcomes. Future studies should focus on establishing standardized selection criteria and conducting well-designed investigations to further refine patient selection and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Health state utility and health-related quality of life measures in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Purpose

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in ovarian cancer patients is critical to understand the impact of disease and treatment. Preference-based HRQoL measures, called health state utilities, are used specifically in health economic evaluations. Real-world patient-reported data on HRQoL and health state utilities over the long-term course of ovarian cancer are limited. This study aims to determine HRQoL and health state utilities in different health states of ovarian cancer.

Methods

This cross-sectional, multicenter study included patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer in six health states: at diagnosis, during chemotherapy, after cytoreductive surgery (CRS), after chemotherapy, in remission, and at first recurrence. HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, and the ovarian cancer-specific module OV28. Health state utilities were assessed using the EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Descriptive analyses were performed for each health state.

Results

Two hundred thirty-two patients participated, resulting in 319 questionnaires. Median age was 66 years. The lowest HRQoL was observed during chemotherapy and shortly after CRS. Physical and role functioning were most affected and the highest symptom prevalence was observed in the fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, gastrointestinal, neuropathy, attitude, and sexuality domains. Patients in remission had the best HRQoL. Mean utility values ranged from 0.709 (±0.253) at diagnosis to 0.804 (±0.185) after chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This study provides clinicians with a valuable resource to aid in patient counseling and clinical decision-making. The utilities, in particular, are crucial for researchers conducting economic analyses to inform policy decisions.

Synoptic Reporting for Pretreatment CT Examination in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Impact on Documentation of Disease Sites and Physician Satisfaction

BACKGROUND. Imaging reports that consistently document all disease sites with a potential to increase surgical complexity or morbidity can facilitate ovarian cancer treatment planning. OBJECTIVE. The aims of this study were to compare simple structured reports and synoptic reports from pretreatment CT examinations in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in terms of completeness of documenting involvement of clinically relevant anatomic sites as well as to evaluate physician satisfaction with synoptic reports. METHODS. This retrospective study included 205 patients (median age, 65 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT before primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2022. A total of 128 reports generated on or before March 31, 2020, used a simple structured report (free text organized into sections); 77 reports generated on or after April 1, 2020, used a synoptic report (a list of 45 anatomic sites relevant to ovarian cancer management, each of which was classified in terms of disease absence versus presence). Reports were reviewed for completeness of documentation of involvement of the 45 sites. For patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on diagnostic laparoscopy findings or underwent primary debulking surgery with suboptimal resection, the EMR was reviewed to identify surgically established sites of disease that were unresectable or challenging to resect. Gynecologic oncology surgeons were electronically surveyed. RESULTS. The mean report turnaround time was 29.8 minutes for simple structured reports versus 54.5 minutes for synoptic reports (p < .001). A mean of 17.6 of 45 sites (range, four to 43 sites) were mentioned by simple structured reports versus 44.5 of 45 sites (range, 39-45) for synoptic reports (p < .001). Forty-three patients had surgically established unresectable or challenging-to-resect disease; involvement of anatomic site(s) with such disease was mentioned in 37% (11/30) of simple structured reports versus 100% (13/13) of synoptic reports (p < .001). All eight surveyed gynecologic oncology surgeons completed the survey. CONCLUSION. A synoptic report improved completeness of pretreatment CT reports in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, including for established sites of unresectable or challenging-to-resect disease. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings indicate the role of disease-specific synoptic reports in facilitating referrer communication and potentially guiding clinical decision-making.

Radiation-induced lymphopenia and the survival of women with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

The current systematic analysis and meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the association between radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) and survival of women with cervical cancer (CC). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant cohort studies comparing survival between women with CC who developed versus not developed RIL after radiotherapy. We pooled the results using a random-effects model that incorporates heterogeneity. In the meta-analysis, 952 women with CC were included from eight cohort studies. Overall, 378 (39.7%) of them had RIL after radiotherapy. During a median follow-up duration of 41.8 months, pooled results showed that RIL was independently associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81 to 3.94, p < 0.001; I² = 20%) and progression-free survival (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.98, p < 0.001; I² = 0%). Predefined subgroup analyses showed similar results in patients with grade 3-4 and grade 4 RIL, in patients with RIL diagnosed during or after the radiotherapy, and in studies with quality score of seven or eight points (p values for subgroup effect all < 0.05). In conclusion, women with RIL were associated with poor survival after radiotherapy for CC.

Change of Fagotti score is associated with outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a change in the Fagotti score (ΔFagotti) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is predictive of resection to no residual disease (R0) and survival in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer between January 2012 and June 2021 at the Bern University Hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Fagotti scores before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment were assessed for a potential association with resection status at interval debulking surgery defined as no residual disease (R0), macroscopic residual disease with a diameter of 0.1-1 cm (R1) or >1 cm (R2), and survival.

RESULTS

During the study period, 130 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mainly in response to advanced ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIIC (68.5%) or IV (20.8%). 91 patients (70%) experienced a relapse and 81 (62%) died due to their disease. Median overall survival was 40 months (95% CI 30.6 to 49.4). Fagotti scores dropped from a mean of 7.8 (95% CI 7.14 to 8.42) at diagnosis to 3.9 (95% CI 3.34 to 4.46, p<0.001) after neoadjuvant therapy. This decrease was associated with resection status during interval debulking surgery (mean ΔFagotti -4.9 in R0, -2.2 in R1, -0.6 in R2, p<0.001). Women whose Fagotti score declined more than 2 points after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=51/88, 58%) survived significantly longer (median overall survival of 42 vs 32 months, p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Fagotti scores and ΔFagotti scores are associated with complete cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery and longer overall survival in women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. These markers are valuable for individualized patient treatment planning and should always be performed after neoadjuvant therapy.

Postoperative complications in women with ovarian cancer stratified by cytoreductive surgery outcome

OBJECTIVE

To compare 30-day postoperative complications for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent resection to no gross residual disease versus optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women drawn from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer between 2014 and 2019 was performed. Exposure of interest was extent of surgical resection defined as no gross residual disease; residual disease <1 cm (optimal); and residual disease >1 cm (suboptimal). Primary outcome was postoperative complication. Associations were examined with bivariable tests and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2248 women underwent cytoreductive surgery; 68.4% (n = 1538) underwent resection to no gross residual disease, 22.4% (n = 504) had an optimal, and 9.2% (n = 206) had a suboptimal cytoreduction. Optimal cytoreduction patients had the highest rates of any postoperative complication (35.5%, p < 0.001). They also had the longest operative times and procedures that were most surgically complex (203 min, 43.6 relative value units, both p < 0.05). However, patients who underwent optimal cytoreduction did not have increased odds of major complications (adjusted odds ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.58).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent optimal cytoreduction had more postoperative complications, required the most operating room time, and represented more complex surgeries compared with suboptimal cytoreduction or resection to no gross residual disease.

Critical Analysis of Advanced High-Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Women: An Experience of 100 Cases from a Regional Cancer Center in Northeast India

Debabrata BarmonOvarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. Patients with ovarian carcinoma mostly present at an advanced stage with serous type of epithelial ovarian cancers, which is the most lethal of all pelvic malignancies. This study aims to critically analyze high-grade serous epithelial ovarian carcinomas in women from the Northeastern region of India and compare our data with Western literature to modify treatment strategies and improve survival outcomes. This hospital-based retrospective analysis involved data from the records of 100 women with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer treated primarily with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in the department of gynecologic oncology at a tertiary level regional cancer institute from January 2018 to December 2019. The demographic, clinical and pathological profile, and survival outcome were evaluated using descriptive statistics. The overall survival of the study population was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves using SPSS software (version 24). The majority of women belonged to 41 to 55 years age group. At first presentation to the hospital, 89 and11% patients were in stage III and stage IV of disease, respectively. Clinically, 95% of women had ascites, and 18% had metastasis to lymph nodes. Distant metastasis to lungs and liver was present in 10 and 3% of cases, respectively. A substantial percentage (98%) of women had raised serum Ca125 > 1000 at baseline, ranging from 1,745 to 10,987 IU/mL. Almost two-thirds of the cases had partial-to-complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (78%). In most of the women (72%), there was no residual disease at interval debulking surgery (R0), though 28% women had R1& R2 resection. The median overall survival time was 36 months. High-grade serous ovarian cancer is commonly seen in older age group, but its occurrence in younger population has also been observed. Early diagnosis is crucial in decreasing morbidity and mortality among these patients. Therefore, efforts should be made to identify risk factors for malignancy. Assessing each parameter of statistical information reflecting its own profile may be important for calculating the risk for the development of ovarian cancer, which can help in implementing preventive measures in the future.

Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next?

In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk-benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data.

Robotic surgery in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) represents one of the most lethal cancers in women. The aim of surgical treatment is complete cytoreduction in advanced stages and a surgical staging in early stages. Although the guidelines still suggest laparotomy as the standard approach, in recent years minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become increasingly popular in the treatment of OC, especially in early stages, because the 5-year relative survival exceeds 90% and the patients' quality of life cannot be overshadowed. However, MIS has been demonstrated to have a role even in advanced stages, in the prediction of optimal cytoreduction, identification patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and, more recently, in the interval debulking surgery, as in selected cases of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. The aim of this review is to describe the MIS (especially robotic surgery), with its advantages and pitfalls, in the treatment of OC.

Optimal First-Line Medico-Surgical Strategy in Ovarian Cancers: Are We There Yet?

In spite of tremendous advances in advanced ovarian cancer management through the past decade, notably owing to surgical expertise and novel combination molecules (including bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors), the optimal initial sequential strategy remains a major concern. Indeed, following seminal clinical trials, primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by adjuvant systemic therapy and interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have been positioned as validated alternatives with distinct pros and cons, although a definite response is still unassessed. In clinical practice, decisions between PCS and ICS rely on multilayer parameters: the tumor itself, the patient, and the health structure. In this state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the current evidence based on clinical trials and real-world data and highlight the remaining questions, including the fittest positioning of PCS vs. ICS and the optimal number of NACT cycles; subsequently, we will discuss current axes of research such as dedicated clinical trials and more global perspectives. These ongoing strategies and perspectives could contribute to improving the patient journey through personalized medicine.

Optimal Time Interval between Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Interval Debulking Surgery in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the optimal time interval between the last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC who received NACT followed by IDS during a 15-year period (January 2003-December 2018) in our Institution.

RESULTS

Overall, 115 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC were included. The median age of diagnosis was 62.7 years (IQR: 14.0). A total of 76.5% (88/115) of patients were diagnosed with IIIC HGSC and 23.5% (27/115) with IV HGSC. Median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.5), and median OS was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.8-50.5). Patients were categorized in groups according to the time interval from NACT to IDS: <4 weeks (group A); 4-5 weeks (group B); 5-6 weeks (group C); >6 weeks (group D). Patients with a time interval IDS to NACT ≥4 weeks had significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.002). Median PFS was 26.6 months (95% CI: 24-29.2) for patients undergoing IDS <4 weeks after NACT vs. 14.4 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.2) for those undergoing IDS later (p = 0.004). Accordingly, median OS was 66.3 months (95% CI: 39.1-93.4) vs. 39.4 months (95% CI: 31.8-47.0) in the <4 week vs. >4 week time interval NACT to IDS groups (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, the short time interval (<4 weeks) from NACT to IDS was an independent factor of PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that performing IDS within four weeks after NACT may be associated with better survival outcomes. Multidisciplinary coordination among ovarian cancer patients is required to avoid any unnecessary delays.

Expression of microRNAs and their target genes in melanomas originating from gynecologic sites

Melanomas from gynecologic sites (MOGS) are rare and have poor survival. MicroRNAs (miRs) regulate gene expression and are dysregulated in cancer. We hypothesized that MOGS would display unique miR and mRNA expression profiles. The miR and mRNA expression profile in RNA from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded vaginal melanomas (relative to vaginal mucosa) and vulvar melanomas (relative to cutaneous melanoma) were measured with the Nanostring Human miRNA assay and Tumor Signaling mRNA assay. Differential patterns of expression were identified for 21 miRs in vaginal and 47 miRs in vulvar melanoma (fold change >2, p<0.01). In vaginal melanoma, miR-145-5p (tumor suppressor targeting TLR4, NRAS) was downregulated and miR-106a-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-20b-5p (members of miR-17-92 cluster) were upregulated. In vulvar melanoma, known tumor suppressors miR-200b-3p and miR-200a-3p were downregulated, and miR-20a-5p and miR-19b-3p, from the miR-17-92 cluster, were upregulated. Pathway analysis showed an enrichment of "proteoglycans in cancer". Among differentially expressed mRNAs, topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) was upregulated in both MOGS. Gene targets of dysregulated miRs were identified using publicly available databases and Pearson correlations. In vaginal melanoma, suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) was downregulated, was a validated target of miR-19b-3p and miR-20a-5p and trended toward a significant inverse Pearson correlation with miR-19b-3p (p = 0.093). In vulvar melanoma, cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A) was downregulated, was the validated target of 22 upregulated miRs, and had a significant inverse Pearson correlation with miR-503-5p, miR-130a-3p, and miR-20a-5p (0.005 < p < 0.026). These findings support microRNAs as mediators of gene expression in MOGS.