Comparable results of autologous and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete molecular remission: An analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

A network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of different basic preconditioning regiments in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and compare the effects of basic preconditioning regimens Bu/Cy, Cy/TBI and Flu/Bu for the treatment of patients in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

It comprised exploring the published literature in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, using suitable keywords pertaining to various basic pretreatments Bu/Cy, Cy/TBI, and Flu/Bu, prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and then extracting the searched outcome indicators of Overall Survival (OS) and survival (herein represented as OS and survival). Further, the results were estimated with meta-analysis using R, where the incidence of GVHD was reported in odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 14 papers were included in this study, including 1436 cases were treated with Bu/Cy, 1816 cases with Cy/TBI, and 549 cases with Flu/Bu in the preconditioning regimen. After OS was the outcome pooled, compared with Flu/Bu in the preconditioning group, the results (Cy/TBI HR = 1.12 (95% Cl:1.04,1.61), Bu/Cy HR = 1.24 (95% Cl. 1.13,2.06)) showed that Flu/Bu preconditioning regimen significantly improved the overall survival rate of allogeneic HSCT patients. With the incidence of GVHD as the outcome summary, compared with Flu/Bu in the pretreatment group, the results (Cy/TBI HR = 1.24 (95% Cl:1.12, 1.82), Bu/Cy HR = 1.14 (95% Cl. 1.03, 2.12)) indicated that Flu/Bu in the pretreatment regimen group also significantly reduced the incidence of GVHD after allogeneic HSCT.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received the basal preconditioning regimen Flu/Bu before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had the lowest hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) development. This indicates that the use of the basal preconditioning regimen Flu/Bu for the treatment of patients was the most effective, although the quality of the studies included needs to be confirmed by high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: ten frequently asked questions

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) constitutes a distinctive cytogenetic entity associated with challenging outcomes, particularly in adult patients. Current upfront chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies include first, second and third-generation TKIs that have revolutionized patient outcomes including molecular remission and overall survival. Chemotherapy-free regimens such as blinatumomab-dasatinib or blinatumomab-ponatinib offer exciting possibilities, yet challenges arise, particularly in preventing central nervous system relapse. Monitoring measurable residual disease is now a cornerstone particularly using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-Clonoseq for accurate assessment. Controversy regarding the ability to omit consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, specifically for patients achieving early molecular remission, is related to the excellent survival achieved with novel combinations in the upfront setting, however challenged by the lower disease control when transplant is utilized beyond first remission. Post-transplant maintenance introduces new dilemmas: the optimal TKI, dosing, and duration of therapy are open questions. Meanwhile, a myriad of new combinations and cellular therapies are used for relapsed Ph+ ALL, prompting us to unravel the optimal sequencing of these promising regimen. In this review, we delve into the breakthroughs and controversies in Ph+ ALL with ten commonly asked questions.

Management of ALL in adults: 2024 ELN recommendations from a European expert panel

ABSTRACT

Experts from the European Leukemia Net (ELN) working group for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia have identified an unmet need for guidance regarding management of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from diagnosis to aftercare. The group has previously summarized their recommendations regarding diagnostic approaches, prognostic factors, and assessment of ALL. The current recommendation summarizes clinical management. It covers treatment approaches, including the use of new immunotherapies, application of minimal residual disease for treatment decisions, management of specific subgroups, and challenging treatment situations as well as late effects and supportive care. The recommendation provides guidance for physicians caring for adult patients with ALL which has to be complemented by regional expertise preferably provided by national academic study groups.

Outcomes of allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation followed by maintenance chemotherapy in adult patient with B-ALL in CR1 with no detectable minimal residual disease

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) as a treatment for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) has been rigorously debated in recent years. We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of 355 adult patients with B-ALL in first complete remission who had received auto-HSCT or allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in our centre. The treatment efficacy was evaluated from a model stratified on the risk classification and minimal residue disease (MRD) status after three chemotherapy cycles. Auto-HSCT demonstrated comparable 3-year overall survival (OS) (72.7% vs. 68.5%, p = 0.441) and leukaemia-free survival rates (62.8% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.383) compared to allo-HSCT for patients with negative MRD, while the advantage of lower non-relapse mortality (1.5% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.001) was offset by a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates (35.7% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.018), especially in high-risk patients. For patients at high risk and with positive MRD, there was a lower trend of 3-year OS (50.0% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.078) and significantly higher CIR rates (71.4% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.018) in auto-HSCT. However, no significant interaction was observed in the tests. In conclusion, auto-HSCT appears to be an attractive treatment for patients with negative MRD after three chemotherapy cycles. For MRD-positive patients, allo-HSCT may be a more effective treatment.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia is safe but poses challenges for long-term maintenance of molecular remission: Results of the Auto-Ph17 study

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not a standard treatment option for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL); however, its position has been reassessed since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We prospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of autologous peripheral blood SCT (auto-PBSCT) for Ph+ALL patients aged between 55 and 70 years who had achieved complete molecular remission. Melphalan, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and dexamethasone were used for conditioning. A total of 12 courses of maintenance therapy, including dasatinib, were performed. The required number of CD34+ cells was harvested in all five patients. No patient died within 100 days after auto-PBSCT, and no unexpected serious adverse events were observed. Although 1-year event-free survival was 100%, hematological relapse was observed in three patients at a median of 801 days (range, 389-1088 days) after auto-PBSCT. Molecular progressive disease was observed in the other two patients, although they maintained their first hematological remission at the last visit. Auto-PBSCT can be safely performed for Ph+ALL with TKIs. A limitation of auto-PBSCT was suggested, despite the increase in the intensity of a single treatment. The development of long-term therapeutic strategies by including new molecular targeted drugs is warranted to maintain long-term molecular remission.

Effects of different types of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation donors on Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia during the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Matched donor (MD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is currently the preferred choice of treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) patients who have achieved complete remission. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of allo-HSCTs from different donor types for Ph+ ALL patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

Studies in EMBASE and MEDLINE between inception and December 2020 were identified using search terms related to "Ph+ ALL" and "HSCT." Eligible studies were studies with Ph+ ALL patients who received a TKI and allo-HSCT. The primary outcomes of interest-the overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS)-needed to be reported. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to combine the effect estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of each donor type.

RESULTS

Fourteen cohort studies were identified for the meta-analysis. Haploidentical (HID)-HSCT for Ph+ ALL patients resulted in a superior RFS to MD-HSCT, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.57 (95% CI, 1.05-2.32; I2 = 0%). However, HID-HSCT and MD-HSCT had comparable OS. Furthermore, HID-HSCT group had a significantly lower relapse rate than MD-HSCT group. On the other hand, the risks of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were higher for HID-HSCT and pooled OR of chronic GvHD rate. The OS and RFS of matched sibling-HSCT, matched unrelated-HSCT, and cord blood-HSCT were comparable with those of HID-HSCT.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that HID-HSCT is as effective as MD-HSCT in Ph+ ALL patients.

Transgenic HA-1-Specific CD8+ T-Lymphocytes Selectively Target Leukemic Cells

A significant share of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT) results in the relapse of malignant disease. The T cell immune response to minor histocompatibility antigens (MiHAs) promotes a favorable graft-versus-leukemia response. The immunogenic MiHA HA-1 is a promising target for leukemia immunotherapy, as it is predominantly expressed in hematopoietic tissues and presented by the common HLA A*02:01 allele. Adoptive transfer of HA-1-specific modified CD8⁺ T cells could complement allo-HSCT from HA-1- donors to HA-1+ recipients. Using bioinformatic analysis and a reporter T cell line, we discovered 13 T cell receptors (TCRs) specific for HA-1. Their affinities were measured by the response of the TCR-transduced reporter cell lines to HA-1+ cells. The studied TCRs showed no cross-reactivity to the panel of donor peripheral mononuclear blood cells with 28 common HLA alleles. CD8⁺ T cells after endogenous TCR knock out and introduction of transgenic HA-1-specific TCR were able to lyse hematopoietic cells from HA-1+ patients with acute myeloid, T-, and B-cell lymphocytic leukemia (n = 15). No cytotoxic effect was observed on cells from HA-1- or HLA-A*02-negative donors (n = 10). The results support the use of HA-1 as a target for post-transplant T cell therapy.

Autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is an option for elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We retrospectively compared results of RIC-allo-HCT from either a matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 209) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 209) with autologous (auto, n = 142) HCT for patients aged 55 years or more treated in first complete remission (CR1) between 2000 and 2018. The probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years were 34% for RIC-allo-HCT versus 39% for auto-HCT (p = 0.11) while overall survival (OS) rates were 42% versus 45% (p = 0.23), respectively. The incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 41% versus 51% (p = 0.22) and 25% versus 10% (p = 0.001), respectively. In a multivariate model, using auto-HCT as reference, the risk of NRM was increased for MSD-HCT (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1, p = 0.02) and MUD-HCT (HR = 3.08, p < 0.001), which for MUD-HCT translated into a decreased chance of LFS (HR = 1.55, p = 0.01) and OS (HR = 1.62, p = 0.008). No significant associations were found with respect to the risk of relapse. We conclude that for patients with ALL in CR1, aged above 55 years, auto-HCT may be considered a transplant option alternative to RIC-allo-HCT, although its value requires verification in prospective trials.

Propensity score matching/reweighting analysis comparing autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We compared the outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) with those of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) from a human leukocyte antigen-matched related donor in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Newly diagnosed patients who underwent allo-SCT (n = 486) or auto-SCT (n = 99) after achieving first complete remission (CR) were included. Propensity score matching (PS) and an inverse probability of the treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were applied to compensate for imbalances in baseline characteristics. The 5 years rates of overall survival (OS) among those in the PS-matched cohorts were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46-67%] for those who received allo-SCT and 44% (95% CI 33-54%) for those who received auto-SCT. Multivariable, propensity score-matched, and IPTW analyses all revealed no statistically significant differences in OS between the two groups [hazard ratios (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.53-1.27, p = 0.36; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.78, p = 0.65; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.25-2.02, p = 0.53, respectively]. Prospective trials that include autologous transplantation as a treatment option are needed to examine the potential of autologous transplantation.

How I Use Measurable Residual Disease in the Clinical Management of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Over the last decade the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) diagnostics in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has expanded from a limited number of study groups in Europe and the United States to a world-wide application. In this review, we summarize the advantages and drawbacks of the current available techniques used for MRD monitoring. Through the use of three representative case studies, we highlight the advances in the use of MRD in clinical decision-making in the management of ALL in adults. We acknowledge discrepancies in MRD monitoring and treatment between different countries, reflecting differing availability, accessibility and affordability.

Emerging tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introduction: The broadening of targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies markedly impacted on the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) changed the history of Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL. Nowadays, almost all Ph+ ALL patients treated with TKIs achieve a complete hematologic response, and most become minimal residual disease negative. In Ph- ALL, genomic profiling studies have identified a subtype associated with a high relapse risk and a transcriptional profile similar to that of Ph+ ALL, the so-called Ph-like ALL. Given the high prevalence of kinase-activating lesions in this subset, there is compelling evidence from experimental models and clinical observations favoring TKI administration.Areas covered: We discuss the main findings exploring the efficacy of TKIs in ALL.Expert opinion: The use of more potent TKIs will further enhance the inhibitory activity on leukemia cells and increase the possibility of eradicating the disease at a molecular level. In the future, 'combined' approaches of different inhibitors may be considered to prevent/avoid resistance and/or mutations. A rapid identification of Ph-like ALL patients is needed to propose early TKI-based intervention. Several questions remain open, including the initial TKI choice in Ph+ ALL and whether Ph-like ALL patients might benefit from immunotherapy.

Busulfan-containing conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Taiwan observational study

Background

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is the ultimate cure for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Aim

This study was performed to compare the outcomes of ALL patients receiving busulfan (Bu) with cyclophosphamide (Cy)‐based or total body irradiation (TBI)‐based regimen in a Chinese population.

Methods

We enrolled 224 adult patients with ALL who received allo‐HSCT at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1997 and 2016.

Results

The median age at transplantation was 33 years. Before allo‐HSCT, 75.9% of patients attained first or late complete remission. A total of 141 patients (62.9%) received Bu/Cy‐based conditioning, either myeloablative (MA) or reduced‐intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST), and 83 patients received a TBI‐based regimen (MA‐TBI). Patients receiving the MA‐Bu regimen had longer relapse‐free survival (RFS) than those receiving the MA‐TBI regimen (median, 24.1 vs. 6.7 months, p = .044). There was no difference in overall survival (OS, MA‐Bu vs. MA‐TBI vs. RIST‐Bu: 39.4 vs. 28.2 vs. 13.1 months, p = .276), treatment‐related mortality (TRM), or incidences of grade 3–4 acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). Among patients receiving identical GvHD prophylactic regimens, there was no difference between MA‐Bu and MA‐TBI groups regarding the incidence of grade 3–4 acute GvHD, grade 2–4, and all‐grade chronic GvHD. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving oral busulfan had comparable RFS and OS to the intravenous busulfan group (p = .436 and p = .236, respectively), but a higher TRM (25% vs. 9.8%, p = .016). In the multivariable analysis, disease status before allo‐HSCT was the only risk factor impacting RFS and OS.

Conclusion

In summary, patients receiving Bu/Cy‐based or TBI‐based regimens as conditioning had similar results in terms of OS, TRM, and acute GvHD, whereas the use of myeloablative Bu/Cy resulted in a better RFS. A Bu‐based regimen could be an alternative conditioning choice for patients who are ineligible to receive TBI. Prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the long‐term outcomes.

Is stem cell transplantation still needed for adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the current mainstay treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL). However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) also play a significant role in the treatment of these patients. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of allogeneic (allo-) HSCT, autologous (auto-) HSCT, and chemotherapy (CMT) alone–all in combination with TKIs in adult Ph⁺ ALL patients.

Materials and methods

This systematic review identified studies from the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from inception to April 2021 using search terms related to “ALL” and “HSCT.” Eligible studies could be randomized controlled trials or cohort studies that included adult Ph⁺ ALL patients who received a TKI and either allo-HSCT, auto-HSCT, or CMT alone, and that reported the number of patients in each group for each of our primary outcomes of interest: overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). Point estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) from each study were combined using the Hantel-Maenszel method.

Results

After two rounds of review, 26 cohort studies were determined to be eligible for the meta-analysis. Adult Ph⁺ ALL patients who received HSCT had better survival outcomes than those who did not receive any HSCT (pooled odds ratio [OR] for OS of 1.61, 95%CI: 1.08–2.40; I² = 59%, and for DFS of 3.23, 95%CI: 2.00–5.23; I² = 62% for allo-HSCT; and, pooled OR for OS of 7.04, 95%CI: 1.97–25.15; I² = 0%, and for DFS of 5.78, 95%CI: 1.04–32.19; I² = 42% for auto-HSCT). Allo-HSCT recipients had comparable OS and DFS, but lower relapse rate compared to auto-HSCT recipients. Funnel plot generally demonstrated no presence of publication bias.

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated superior results of HSCT in Ph⁺ ALL patients compared to CMT alone. Moreover, auto-HSCT could be implemented with comparable survival outcomes to allo-HSCT in patients with no available donor or when haploidentical HSCT is not feasible.

The impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

In the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still the most potential approach for cure of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (Ph⁺ ALL). TKI plus chemotherapy has strikingly increased response rates and depth of response, and facilitated allo-HSCT, which decreases relapse and improves survival eventually. Meanwhile, for those with older age or comorbidities at diagnosis, TKI in combination with reduced-intensity chemotherapy or chemotherapy-free strategy reduces treatment-related mortality, deferred intensive chemotherapy increases molecular responses and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HSCT improves survival finally. Of note, according to minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR/ABL1 kinase domain mutation screening, prophylactic or preemptive maintenance therapy with a sensitive TKI decreases relapse further. Regarding transplantation-related mortality and impaired quality of life related to complications of allo-HSCT, autologous-HSCT (auto-HSCT) among those with early and persistent molecular remission and the most potent TKI ponatinib plus intensive chemotherapy has exhibited non-inferior survival to allo-HSCT. Even so, risk-adapted strategy isn't available now. Lastly, outcomes of relapse after allo-HSCT are dismal due to TKIs exposure, and new therapeutic interventions combined with TKIs shed light on this thorny problem.

Comparison of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Objectives: To analyze the outcomes of patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), matched sibling donor stem cell transplantation (MSD-SCT) and haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) and provide the basis for the choice of transplantation method in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Methods: We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of 119 adult patients with Ph+ ALL in our center. The overall survival (OS) rate, leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate and the impact of achievement of complete molecular response (CMR) within 3 months and sustaining CMR up to transplantation (s3CMR) on transplantation method were explored. Results: The estimated OS, LFS, CIR and NRM rates at 3 years were not significantly different among three groups (p = 0.960, 0.917, 0.375 and 0.096, respectively). For the 65 patients who achieved s3CMR, there was no significant difference in OS (84.5% vs 72.5% vs 100%, p = 0.374), LFS (75.2% vs 64.5% vs 83.3%, p = 0.668), CIR (17.2% vs 8.1% vs 16.7%, p = 0.583) and NRM (3.1% vs 23.4% vs 0%, p = 0.055) among auto-SCT group, MSD-SCT group and haplo-SCT group. However, in patients who did not achieve s3CMR, auto-SCT recipients tended to have higher CIR (60% vs 33.2% vs 24.0%, p = 0.013) than the allo-HSCT group. Conclusions: Auto-SCT with maintenance therapy after HSCT appears to be an attractive treatment option for patients with Ph+ ALL especially for those whose s3CMR was kept up to transplantation. For non-s3CMR patients, allogeneic transplantation may be more effective from lower relapse.

Early autologous and allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for adult patients with acute B and T cell precursor neoplasms: a 12-year single center experience

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of B or T cell precursor cells. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of early autologous stem cell transplantation in standard-risk patients in first complete remission (n=24) and of allogeneic transplantation in high and highest risk, and relapsed/refractory patients (n=35). The 10-year overall survival after autologous transplantation was 45%. The 10-year overall survival after allogeneic transplantation was 58%. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 29% after allogeneic and 67% after autologous transplantation. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 0% after autologous and 12% after allogeneic transplantation. This retrospective single center analysis in a limited number of standard-risk patients clearly demonstrates that early autologous transplantation in first complete remission leads to an acceptable long-term outcome with a short overall treatment duration of less than 6 months compared with more than 2 years with conventional chemotherapy. More sensitive and standardized methods to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) will further help to identify those patients more accurately who are most likely to benefit from such a short and intensive treatment strategy (i.e., MRD negative standard-risk patients) or those who require early targeted therapy (e.g., blinatumomab) in case of MRD positivity. Early allogeneic transplantation results in long-term survival/cure in nearly two-thirds of all high and highest risk, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Comparative study on allogeneic with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of TKIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is recommended as a standard approach for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) achieving complete remission (CR). However, the role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in adult patients achieving complete molecular remission (CMR) is an alternative, less toxic treatment options, especially for the patients who lack suitable donors and are unfit for allo-HSCT. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT for the treatment of adult patients with Ph+ ALL. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies published before June 2019 without language restriction. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for relapse rate (RR) and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Four prospective studies and one retrospective study were included with a total of 810 patients. We found auto-HSCT was superior to allo-HSCT in OS (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.06-1.91, P = 0.02), and there was no difference between allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT for RFS (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.86-1.40, P = 0.44) and RR (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.22-1.26, P = 0.15). The risk of TRM for patients undergoing allo-HSCT was significantly higher than that of the patients who received auto-HSCT (OR = 5.06, 95% CI: 1.03-24.75, P = 0.05). Our meta-analysis shows that auto-HSCT may be an attractive and alternative treatment option for adult Ph+ ALL patients achieving CMR, with similar or better outcomes than allo-HSCT in the era of TKIs.

[Comparison of autologous versus matched sibling donor stem cell transplantation for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia]

目的

比较自体造血干细胞移植（auto-HSCT）和同胞全相合造血干细胞移植（MSD-HSCT）治疗费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病（Ph⁺ ALL）的疗效，为患者移植方式的选择提供依据。

方法

回顾性总结2008年1月至2017年12月于中国医学科学院血液病医院行auto-HSCT（31例）及MSD-HSCT（47例）的78例Ph⁺ ALL患者的临床特征，比较不同移植方式患者的总生存（OS）率、无白血病生存（LFS）率、累积复发率（CIR）及非复发死亡率（NRM），并观察是否3个月内实现完全分子学缓解并持续至移植（s3CMR）条件下不同移植方式对预后的影响。

结果

auto-HSCT组、MSD-HSCT组粒细胞植入的中位时间分别为12（10～29）d、14（11～24）d（P＝0.006），血小板植入的中位时间分别为17.5（10～62）d、17（10～33）d（P＝0.794）。MSD-HSCT组中，Ⅱ～Ⅳ度和Ⅲ～Ⅳ度急性移植物抗宿主病（GVHD）的发生率分别为27.7%（13/47）和8.5%（4/47），局限型和广泛型慢性GVHD的发生率为17.0%（8/47）和12.8%（6/47）。auto-HSCT组、MSD-HSCT组3年CIR、NRM、LFS率差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。在达到s3CMR的44例患者中，auto-HSCT组和MSD-HSCT组的3年OS率［（84.0±8.6）%对（78.0±8.7）%，P＝0.612］、LFS率［（70.3±10.3）%对（68.2±10.1）%，P＝0.970］、CIR［（24.9±10.0）%对（14.4±8.0）%，P＝0.286］和NRM［（4.7±4.7）%对（17.4±8.1）%，P＝0.209］差异均无统计学意义；未达到s3CMR的34例患者中，auto-HSCT组与MSD-HSCT组相比，3年CIR明显升高［（80.0±14.7）%对（39.6±10.9）%，P＝0.057］。

结论

对于化疗后达s3CMR的Ph⁺ ALL患者，auto-HSCT是一种有效的巩固治疗选择，与MSD-HSCT疗效相当；对于未达到s3CMR的患者，MSD-HSCT复发率更低。

The Role of Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies Focusing on Acute Leukemia

The significance of measurable residual disease (MRD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is well recognized in different hematological malignancies, but the evidence indicate that pre-transplant MRD status is of particular importance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In ALL, inadequate response at the level of MRD is a commonly accepted risk factor for relapse and thus an indication for allogeneic HSCT. Similarly, growing evidence from the literature strongly suggest that MRD detected by multiparameter flow cytometry or molecular techniques should be also used for risk stratification in AML at the time of HSCT. Despite the well-defined association of MRD and outcomes of HSCT in acute leukemias, there are still many open issues such as the role of additional pre-transplant consolidation for MRD eradication, the ability of HSCT to overcome negative influence of MRD positivity on survival, the impact of conditioning regimen intensity on MRD clearance post HSCT, and transplantation outcomes or the selection of optimal donor with regards to MRD status. In addition, the role of MRD assessment in guiding post-transplant maintenance treatment should also be addressed in prospective trials. These open issues mostly awaiting further clinical studies will be discussed in our current review.

Survival in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL): A report from the Swedish ALL Registry

OBJECTIVES

As new, effective therapies emerge for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), the results of clinical trials need to relate to standard of care.

METHODS

We used the population-based Swedish ALL Registry to evaluate characteristics, treatment and long-term outcome in 933 patients with diagnosis between 1997 and 2015.

RESULTS

The median age was 53 years. The frequency of Philadelphia (Ph)-positive leukaemia was 34% of examined B-ALL with a peak incidence at 50-59 years. Five-year overall survival (OS) improved between 1997-2006 and 2007-2015; in patients 18-45 years from 50% (95% CI 43-57) to 65% (95% CI 58-72), 46-65 years from 25% (95% CI 18-32) to 46% (95% CI 37-55) and >65 years from 7% (95% CI 2.6-11) to 11% (95% CI 5.9-16) (P < 0.05). Men with Ph-neg B-ALL 46-65 years had inferior OS compared with women (P < 0.01). Standardised mortality ratio was 5.7 (95% CI 5.0-6.3) for patients who survived 5 years from diagnosis. In multivariable analysis, Ph-positive disease was not associated with impaired prognosis but with lower risk of death in 2007-2015.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based cohort, OS has improved in adult ALL, especially for Ph-positive disease but for middle-aged men with Ph-negative B-ALL outcome was poor. Cure without late toxicity or relapse is still desired.

Treatment and monitoring of Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia patients: recent advances and remaining challenges

The Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, resulting from the t(9;22)(q34;q11) translocation, can be found in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) as well as in a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL). The deregulated BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase encoded by the fusion gene resulting from the translocation is considered the pathogenetic driver and can be therapeutically targeted. In both CML and Ph-positive (Ph+) ALL, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved outcomes. In the TKI era, testing for BCR-ABL1 transcript levels by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) has become the gold standard to monitor patient response, anticipate relapse, and guide therapeutic decisions. In CML, key molecular response milestones have been defined that draw the ideal trajectory towards optimal long-term outcomes. Treatment discontinuation (treatment-free remission, TFR) has proven feasible in a proportion of patients, and clinical efforts are now focused on how to increase this proportion and how to best select TFR candidates. In Ph+ ALL, results of trials with second- and third-generation TKIs are challenging the role of intensive chemotherapy and even that of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Additional weapons are offered by the recently introduced monoclonal antibodies. In patients harboring mutations in the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain, prompt therapeutic reassessment and individualization based on mutation status are important to regain response and prevent disease progression. Next-generation sequencing is likely to become a precious tool for mutation testing because of the greater sensitivity and the possibility to discriminate between compound and polyclonal mutations. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in treatment and monitoring of CML and Ph+ ALL and the issues that still need to be addressed to make the best use of the therapeutic armamentarium and molecular testing technologies currently at our disposal.

[The prognostic significance of minimal residual disease detection after first induction treatment in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of detection of minimal residual disease after first induction treatment (MRD(1)) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Methods: The clinical data of 87 ALL patients who underwent auto-HSCT during February 2006 to April 2017 with MRD(1) detection data by flow cytometry were analyzed retrospectively. The relationship between MRD(1) and relapse and survival of ALL patients after auto-HSCT was studied. Results: Of 87 patients, 26 (29.9%) were MRD(1) positive. The proportion of high-risk immunophenotype (pro-B, pro-T, pre-T, mature T) was significantly higher in MRD(1)-positive patients than that in MRD(1) negative patients (34.6% vs 14.5%, P=0.038). There was no significant difference between positive and negative MRD(1) patients at age, sex, lineage (T/B), immunophenotype (standard risk/high risk), high white blood cell count (B-ALL>30×10(9)/L or T-ALL>100×10(9)/L), high-risk chromosome/gene ratio, the time from first complete remission to transplantation and pre-treatment regimen. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in MRD(1) negative and positive patients were 72.7% vs 47.3% (P=0.004) and 75.7% vs 29.6% (P<0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that positive MRD(1) was an independent risk factor for OS (HR=3.007, 95% CI 1.256-7.200, P=0.013) , and positive MRD(1) and high-risk immunophenotype were risk factors for LFS (HR=3.986, 95% CI 1.813-8.764, P=0.001; HR=2.981, 95% CI 1.373-6.473, P=0.006) . Conclusions: Auto-HSCT could not reverse the poor prognosis of MRD(1) positive patients. Auto-HSCT treatment is optional for patients with MRD(1) negative and maintaining MRD(1) negative status during intensive therapy.

Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

With the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), the prognosis of patients has improved dramatically. Currently, the standard of care in the frontline setting for fit patients is TKI in combination with chemotherapy. Age-adjusted chemotherapy or corticosteroids alone have been used with TKIs in elderly patients with comorbidities with modest long-term benefit. The primary goal of treatment is the achievement of early deep molecular remission as the achievement of complete molecular remission (CMR) at 3 months has been demonstrated to be predictive of higher long-term survival. The probability of attaining this goal by a more potent TKIs like dasatinib or ponatinib is higher, thus we recommend the use of second- or third-generation TKIs over imatinib. Clinicians should be aware of possible fatal cardiovascular events mainly related to ponatinib. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) should still be considered in first remission, especially for younger patients treated with imatinib combination therapy. A subset of patients achieving CMR at 3 months may be able to continue consolidation and maintenance with chemotherapy and TKI without the need for alloHSCT. Because of higher risk of relapses in the central nervous system, intrathecal chemoprophylaxis is mandatory for all patients. New strategies incorporating novel agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, potent TKIs, and CAR T cells are under investigation.

The role of stem cell transplantation in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The concurrent administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with standard chemotherapy together with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has improved the outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Although to date, no study has shown alloHSCT to be inferior to chemotherapy plus TKIs in any subgroup of adult Ph+ ALL, there is some evidence suggesting no additional benefit of alloHSCT in patients with deep molecular responses to intensive chemotherapy with a second-generation, and especially, third-generation TKI. As none of these positive and negative studies are controlled, randomized trials are needed to fully define the role of alloHSCT in Ph+ ALL, especially in those with deep molecular response. However, if studies combining TKIs with new approaches such as immunotherapy lead to durable responses, alloHSCT in the first complete remission could be avoided in the near future in the majority of patients with Ph+ ALL.