A phase II study of pazopanib as front-line therapy in patients with non-resectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas who are not candidates for chemotherapy

First-Line Anlotinib Treatment for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in Chemotherapy-Ineligible Patients: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (LA/M STS) is chemotherapy based on anthracyclines, but patient tolerance of chemotherapy is limited. The present trial (NCT03792542) investigated the use of anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced STS, in particular liposarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, unresectable LA/M STS cases. Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily from days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AE) occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and disease control rate (DCR). The safety profile was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled from April 2019 to June 2022 and are included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median PFS was 6.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.17-8.71] and the median OS 27.40 months (95% CI, 16.43-not evaluable); 1 patient reached partial response and 26 attained stable disease, with a DCR of 67.5% (27/40). Median PFS and OS times for liposarcoma patients were 8.71 and 16.23 months, respectively. Ten (25.0%) patients had treatment-related AEs ≥ grade 3, with in particular a higher incidence of hypertension (15.0%) and proteinuria (7.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest a potential benefit in using front-line anlotinib to treat patients with STS, who are not eligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of note, the clinical outcomes for the liposarcoma subgroup of patients were encouraging. See related commentary by Napolitano et al., p. 4257.

Targeted Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Background: Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is a heterogeneous group of sarcomas with a low incidence. The treatment of advanced disease is poor, and mortality is high. We aimed to generate an overview of the clinical experiences with targeted treatments based on a pre-specified target in patients with STS. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. The programs ENDNOTE and COVIDENCE were used for data management. The literature was screened to assess the article's eligibility for inclusion. Results: Twenty-eight targeted agents were used to treat 80 patients with advanced STS and a known pre-specified genetic alteration. MDM2 inhibitors were the most-studied drug (n = 19), followed by crizotinib (n = 9), ceritinib (n = 8), and ⁹⁰Y-OTSA (n = 8). All patients treated with the MDM2 inhibitor achieved a treatment response of stable disease (SD) or better with a treatment duration of 4 to 83 months. For the remaining drugs, a more mixed response was observed. The evidence is low because most studies were case reports or cohort studies, where only a few STS patients were included. Conclusions: Many targeted agents can precisely target specific genetic alterations in advanced STS. The MDM2 inhibitor has shown promising results.

The Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership: Bridging Academic and Community Networks in a Collaborative Approach to Sarcoma

The treatment of sarcoma necessitates a collaborative approach, given its rarity and complex management. At a single institution, multidisciplinary teams of specialists determine and execute treatment plans involving surgical, radiation, and medical management. Treatment guidelines for systemic therapies in advanced or nonresectable soft tissue sarcoma have advanced in recent years as new immunotherapies and targeted therapies become available. Collaboration between institutions is necessary to facilitate accrual to clinical trials. Here, we describe the success of the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership (MWSTP) in creating a network encompassing large academic centers and local community sites. We propose a new model utilizing online platforms to expand the reach of clinical expertise for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

A case of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib as an alterntive therapy for leiomyosarcoma

•Research surrounding treatment of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) treatment remains sparse.•Pembrolizumab/lenvatinib has been reported as a therapy for endometrial cancer, though not yet as therapy for LMS.•This report demonstrates disease regression after use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in a patient with recurrent LMS.

Analysis of treatment sequence and outcomes in patients with relapsed malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors

Background

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas originating from cellular components within the nerve sheath. The incidence of MPNST is highest in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and MPNST is the leading cause of death for these individuals. Complete surgical resection is the only curative therapeutic option, but is often unfeasible due to tumor location, size, or presence of metastases. Evidence-based choices of chemotherapy for recurrent/refractory MPNST remain elusive. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience in treating patients with relapsed MPNST in order to describe patient outcomes related to salvage regimens.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective electronic health record analysis of patients with MPNST who were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2010 to June 2021. We calculated time to progression (TTP) based on salvage chemotherapy regimens.

Results

Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. Upfront therapy included single or combined modalities of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Forty-eight patients received at least 1 line of chemotherapy, which included 23 different regimens (excluding active clinical studies). Most patients (n = 42, 87.5%) received a combination of doxorubicin, ifosfamide, or etoposide as first-line chemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens and their TTP varied greatly, with irinotecan/temozolomide-based regimens having the longest average TTP (255.5 days, among 4 patients).

Conclusions

Patients with advanced or metastatic MPNST often succumb to their disease despite multiple lines of therapy. These data may be used as comparative information in decision-making for future patients and clinical trials.

Genetic Alterations and Deregulation of Hippo Pathway as a Pathogenetic Mechanism in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The Hippo pathway is an evolutionarily conserved modulator of developmental biology with a key role in tissue and organ size regulation under homeostatic conditions. Like other signaling pathways with a significant role in embryonic development, the deregulation of Hippo signaling contributes to oncogenesis. Central to the Hippo pathway is a conserved cascade of adaptor proteins and inhibitory kinases that converge and regulate the activity of the oncoproteins YAP and TAZ, the final transducers of the pathway. Elevated levels and aberrant activation of YAP and TAZ have been described in many cancers. Though most of the studies describe their pervasive activation in epithelial neoplasms, there is increasing evidence pointing out its relevance in mesenchymal malignancies as well. Interestingly, somatic or germline mutations in genes of the Hippo pathway are scarce compared to other signaling pathways that are frequently disrupted in cancer. However, in the case of sarcomas, several examples of genetic alteration of Hippo members, including gene fusions, have been described during the last few years. Here, we review the current knowledge of Hippo pathway implication in sarcoma, describing mechanistic hints recently reported in specific histological entities and how these alterations represent an opportunity for targeted therapy in this heterogeneous group of neoplasm.

Efficacy and Safety of Treating Refractory Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Anlotinib in Different Treatment Patterns

Methods

The medical data of 47 patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma, who received anlotinib from January 2019 to December 2020, were retrospectively collected. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated according to the solid tumor response evaluation version 1.1 standard. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

A total of 44 patients, including 13 with osteosarcoma and 31 with soft tissue sarcoma, were enrolled in this study. Among patients with osteosarcoma, no patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), while seven patients (54%) had stable disease (SD). Besides, the median PFS (m-PFS) was 4.4 months, and the median OS (m-OS) was 15.7 months. Among patients with soft tissue sarcoma, the ORR and DCR were 19% and 71%, respectively. The median m-PFS was 5.4 months, and m-OS was 17.9 months. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy had a higher ORR compared with anlotinib monotherapy (6% vs. 38%, P = 0.047). The most common grade 3/4 adverse reactions were pneumothorax (5%) and pleural effusion (5%), and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Anlotinib alone showed encouraging efficacy and favorable tolerability in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with anlotinib alone. Anlotinib showed better tumor control when used as first-line drug treatment in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Metastasectomy in Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Survival Analysis

Simple Summary

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive soft tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis. Approximately 40% of patients will develop metastatic disease. The optimal treatment for patients with metastatic LMS is not well established, and there are no randomized controlled trials regarding metastasectomy. This systematic review and pooled survival analysis aims to assess the survival in patients undergoing a metastasectomy for LMS and compare the outcomes based on the site of metastasectomy. We identified that patients with LMS metastases in the lungs, liver, spine, and brain can undergo metastasectomy with acceptable survival. Two studies have compared survival outcomes between patients treated and not treated with metastasectomy; despite their low quality, these studies support a survival benefit associated with metastasectomy.

Abstract

This study assesses the survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and compares the outcomes by the site of metastasectomy. We conducted a systematic review and pooled survival analysis of patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. Survival was compared between sites of metastasectomy. We identified 23 studies including 573 patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. The pooled median survival was 59.6 months (95% CI 33.3 to 66.0). The pooled median survival was longest for lung metastasectomy (72.8 months 95% CI 63.0 to 82.5), followed by liver (34.8 months 95% CI 22.3 to 47.2), spine (14.1 months 95% CI 8.6 to 19.7), and brain (14 months 95% CI 6.7 to 21.3). Two studies compared the survival outcomes between patients who did, versus who did not undergo metastasectomy; both demonstrated a significantly improved survival with metastasectomy. We conclude that surgery is currently being utilized for LMS metastases to the lung, liver, spine, and brain with acceptable survival. Although low quality, comparative studies support a survival benefit with metastasectomy. In the absence of randomized studies, it is impossible to determine whether the survival benefit associated with metastasectomy is due to careful patient selection rather than a surgical advantage; limited data were included about patient selection.

Systemic Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas in the Geriatric Population

OPINION STATEMENT

As the population ages, there will be an increase in the incidence and prevalence of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) within the geriatric population. As this disease disproportionately affects older adults, the percentage of adults >65 years old is expected to increase in the coming years. Geriatric patients are often more vulnerable to disease-related symptoms and have more difficulty tolerating treatment-related side effects. While there are no formal existing guidelines to direct the care of this geriatric patient population, it is of utmost importance to consider each patients' fitness and co-morbidities when selecting treatment plans. This review focuses on the current state of research of older adults with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, highlighting the lack of representation of this patient population in clinical trials. Given that chronological age does not necessarily equate to physiologic age, integration of comprehensive geriatric and quality of life assessments is needed in the care of geriatric patients to help guide therapeutic decisions.

The effects of pazopanib on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in children and adults with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma: a report from Children's Oncology Group and NRG Oncology study ARST1321

PURPOSE

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment for soft tissue sarcomas is increasing given promising signals of activity in a variety of tumor types. The recently completed study in non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas, ARST1321, demonstrated that the addition of pazopanib to neoadjuvant ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and radiation improved the pathological near complete response rate compared with chemoradiotherapy alone. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of doxorubicin with pazopanib has not been previously reported. As an exploratory aim, doxorubicin PK data were collected during the dose-finding phase of the study in patients receiving chemotherapy and pazopanib to assess the effect of pazopanib on doxorubicin PK parameters.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected during cycle 2 (week 4) of chemotherapy at the following time points from doxorubicin administration: predose, 5, 30, and 60 min, and 2, 4, 8, 24 ± 3, and 48 ± 3 h after dosing. The population pharmacokinetic and individual post hoc estimates of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol were determined by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

There were 52 doxorubicin and doxorubicinol samples from 7 individuals in this study (median age: 17 years; range 14-23). The doxorubicin clearance was 26.9 (16.1, 36.4, and 33.9) L/h/m2 (post hoc median and range) and 25.8 (23.3%) L/h/m2 [population estimate and IIV (CV%)]. The doxorubicinol apparent clearance was 67.5 (18.2, 1701) L/h/m2 (post hoc median and range) and 58.7 (63.7%) L/h/m2 [population estimate and IIV (CV%)].

CONCLUSION

The PK data of seven patients treated on ARST1321 is consistent with previously reported population and post hoc doxorubicin clearance and doxorubicinol apparent clearance estimates, showing that the addition of pazopanib does not significantly alter doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. These data support the safety of administration of pazopanib with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy.

The Efficacy of Adjuvant Targeted Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The aim of this systematic evaluation and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of adjuvant targeted therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

Studies eligible for the efficacy of adjuvant targeted therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic RCC published before December 2021 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Clinical Trials Database (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were searched for (1) patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who received adjuvant postoperative targeted therapy versus those not receiving active treatment; (2) primary endpoint outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs); and (3) design: randomized controlled trial (RCT) as inclusion criteria. Data on DFS and OS were extracted or recalculated by meta-analysis as hazard ratios (HRs), and AEs were compared using a dominance ratio (OR).

Result

This systematic evaluation will provide evidence on the effectiveness and adverse effects of adjuvant targeted therapy in patients with advanced RCC. The results of meta-analysis showed that all of the three adjuvant targeted therapeutic drugs (sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib) did not benefit from the adjuvant targeted therapy for DFS and OS and even increase the incidence of AEs compared to the placebo.

Conclusions

The aim of this study was to summarize data on DFS, OS, and AEs in patients with advanced RCC treated with targeted therapies. The evidence provided by this systematic evaluation and meta-analysis will help guide clinical decision-making and provide insight into the future management of patients with advanced RCC.

Anlotinib treatment in elderly patients with unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

Palliative chemotherapy can improve outcomes in most patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but the treatment of elderly patients remains a challenge because of older age, comorbidities and poor performance status. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of the multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in elderly patients with advanced STS. Eligible patients included those of age at least 60 years, diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic STS, and treated with at least one cycle of anlotinib between June 2018 and September 2020 in our center. Clinical characteristics, treatment response, survival status and adverse events were analyzed by reviewing medical records. The median age of 35 eligible patients was 65 (range, 61-85) years, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 8 (range, 4-11). Anlotinib as first-line systemic treatment was in 24 (68.6%) patients, and as second-line or third-line treatment in the remaining 11 (31.4%) patients. The objective response rate was 8.6%. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-9.6] months and the median overall survival was 14.3 (95% CI, 9.6-19.0) months. Thirteen (37.1%) patients developed at least one grade 3/4 adverse event during anlotinib treatment. Our findings suggest that anlotinib treatment has promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with unresectable or metastatic STS. Prospective controlled trials are needed to compare the safety and efficacy of anlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced STS.

Targeted and immuno-based therapies in sarcoma: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials

Sarcomas represent a distinct group of rare malignant tumors with high heterogeneity. Limited options with clinical efficacy for the metastatic or local advanced sarcoma existed despite standard therapy. Recently, targeted therapy according to the molecular and genetic phenotype of individual sarcoma is a promising option. Among these drugs, anti-angiogenesis therapy achieved favorable efficacy in sarcomas. Inhibitors targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, mTOR, NTRK, metabolisms, and epigenetic drugs are under clinical evaluation for sarcomas bearing the corresponding signals. Immunotherapy represents a promising and favorable method in advanced solid tumors. However, most sarcomas are immune "cold" tumors, with only alveolar soft part sarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cellular therapies with TCR-engineered T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and nature killer cells transfer show therapeutic potential. Identifying tumor-specific antigens and exploring immune modulation factors arguing the efficacy of these immunotherapies are the current challenges. This review focuses on the mechanisms, advances, and potential strategies of targeted and immune-based therapies in sarcomas.

Rechallenge with Multi-Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

Chemotherapy and multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are important treatments for advanced soft tissue sarcomas, but the following treatment remains unclear after the failure of these drugs. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of multi-targeted TKI rechallenge in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after the failure of previous TKI treatment.

Patients and Methods

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation-positive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor were excluded. Eligible patients included those diagnosed with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, progressed after the initial TKI treatment, and received the same or other TKI therapies. Treatment response, adverse events, median progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-six eligible patients were included. Nineteen patients had previously received chemotherapy, and all patients had received at least 1.5 months of initial TKI treatment. During the TKI rechallenge, patients were treated with anlotinib (n =16), lenvatinib (n =3), apatinib (n =2), pazopanib (n =2), axitinib (n =2) or regorafenib (n =1). No patients achieved responses. Nine (34.6%) patients had stable disease confirmed by a second imaging scan, and 5 (19.2%) patients had stable disease that was not confirmed by a second scan. The estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.3 months and 11.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 6 (23.1%) patients and were manageable.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that multi-targeted TKI rechallenge may provide potential clinical benefits for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after their previous TKI treatment.