The association between immune checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy and uveitis in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma

VKH-like uveitis during donafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

Background

The incidence of uveitis has risen with the use of targeted therapies, particularly prevalent in the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors and MAP-kinase pathway inhibitors. We report the first case of VKH-like uveitis linked to Donafenib employed for the primary hepatocellular carcinoma, highlighting the necessity of ophthalmological follow-up in patients undergoing treatment with Donafenib.

Case presentation

A 55-year-old man developed VKH-like symptoms, including sporadic white patches, tinnitus, headache, and mild bilateral vision reduction, after 18 months of treatment with Donafenib and Sintilimab for hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on ophthalmological examinations that fundus fluorescein angiography images demonstrating multiple focal areas of pinpoint hyperfluorescence, along with pooling indicative of neurosensory detachment and disc leakage in both eyes, choroid thickening in swept-source optical coherence tomography, and "sunset-glow" fundus appearance, a tentative diagnosis of VKH-like uveitis was made. Initially, his best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/200 in the right eye and 20/80 in the left eye. Upon discontinuing Donafenib and starting a 3-month course of oral glucocorticoids, his BCVA improved to 20/30 in the right eye and 20/40 in the left eye.

Conclusion

Targeted drugs have been commonly used for cancer treatment in recent years, but challenges of ocular side effects emerged gradually. To optimize patient outcomes, regular ophthalmological follow-ups are essential for those undergoing treatment with targeted therapies like Donafenib.

Real-world incidence of incident noninfectious uveitis in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors: a nationwide clinical cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of noninfectious uveitis in skin melanoma or lung cancer patients who received BRAF inhibitors with that in those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy.

DESIGN

Nationwide population-based retrospective clinical cohort study METHODS: From the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea, we retrospectively defined 77,323 patients with skin melanoma or lung cancer who received BRAF inhibitor therapy (BRAF inhibitor-exposed group; n = 396), ICIs (ICI-exposed group; n = 22,474), or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (unexposed group; n = 54,453). We calculated the 1-year cumulative incidence of noninfectious uveitis in each group from the first day of BRAF inhibitor, ICI, or cytotoxic agent administration.

RESULTS

During the first year of treatment initiation, the cumulative incidence of uveitis was 0.33%, 0.35%, and 2.27% in the unexposed, ICI-exposed, and BRAF inhibitor-exposed groups, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) indicated a 7.52-fold and 5.68-fold increased risk of uveitis in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group compared with that in the unexposed and ICI-exposed groups (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.83-14.75, P < 0.001 and 95% CI 2.81-11.47, P < 0.001, respectively). After 1:4 propensity score matching, aHRs showed a 35.51-fold and 15.80-fold increased risk (95% CI 4.49-280.48, P = 0.001 and 95% CI 1.76-141.00, P = 0.014) of uveitis and severe uveitis, respectively, in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed versus unexposed patients. Crossover analysis within the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group showed a 3.71-fold increase in uveitis risk during 1-year post index date in comparison with 1-year prior to index date (95% CI 1.03-13.40, P = 0.046). In the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group, female sex, chronic kidney disease, and melanoma were associated with a trend of increased, albeit nonsignificant, risk of uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma or lung cancer patients treated with BRAF inhibitors showed significantly higher risk of noninfectious uveitis than patients treated with conventional cytotoxic drugs or ICIs. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment patient education on BRAF-inhibitor-associated uveitis risk to enable prompt ophthalmic evaluation and treatment if symptoms arise during drug administration.

Mimickers of anterior uveitis, scleritis and misdiagnoses- tips and tricks for the cornea specialist

BACKGROUND

Anterior uveitis, inflammation of the anterior chamber and related structures, is a cohort of diseases that can present to almost any general or sub-specialty Ophthalmology practice. Its features classically involve anterior chamber cell and flare. Below the surface of these two signs exist a panoply of diagnoses. BODY: The purpose of this review is to provide a general framework for diagnoses of anterior uveitis that are often missed as well as non-uveitic pathologies that often mimic anterior uveitis. Diagnostic deviation in either direction can have vision-threatening and rarely life-threatening consequences for patients. Using a comprehensive literature review we have collected a broad spectrum of etiologies of anterior uveitis that are easily missed and non-uveitic pathologies that can masquerade as anterior uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a focused review on specific misdiagnosed anterior uveitis pathologies and some of the conditions that can masquerade as anterior uveitis and scleritis.

VKH-like syndrome in the setting of Dabrafenib and Trametinib therapy for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma: a case report

Dabrafenib and trametinib, approved for the treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, are associated with a spectrum ophthalmic toxicity including pan-uveitis and serous retinopathy. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) is a systemic inflammatory disorder characterized by bilateral granulomatous pan-uveitis, exudative retinal detachments, and often associated with extraocular manifestations such as tinnitus, vitiligo, headaches, or encephalopathy. We present a 49-year-old woman with stage IV metastatic cutaneous melanoma developed bilateral acute pan-uveitis with multifocal serous retinal detachments, 4 months after starting combined dabrafenib and trametinib therapy. Clinical assessment, together with fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and serology led to the diagnosis of a (VKH)-like uveitis. Prompt systemic corticosteroids and modification of the dosing schedule of the suspected offending agents resulted in the resolution of intraocular inflammation and serous retinal detachments. This case underscores the importance of the prompt recognition of the association between VKH-like uveitis and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, enabling early intervention without compromising metastatic melanoma treatment.

Characteristics of Ocular Inflammatory Side Effects Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Northern California Population

PURPOSE

To characterize the ocular inflammatory side effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) treatment in a Northern California population.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients receiving CPI within an integrated healthcare delivery system.

METHODS

All patients within Kaiser Permanente Northern California receiving CPI between January 1, 2012 and November 1, 2018 were identified. Medical records of those seen in the ophthalmology clinic at least once were retrospectively reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Type and duration of ocular inflammation, indication for and exposure to CPI, time from exposure to diagnosis of ocular inflammation.

RESULTS

31 cases of ocular inflammation were identified in 5061 patients (0.61%) receiving CPI. Mean ± SD age was 67 ± 11.9 (range 38-89). Mean time from exposure to diagnosis was 6.8 ± 5.5 months (range 0.5-17). 87% of cases were bilateral, and 43% of cases were chronic. Average ophthalmology follow-up was 16 ± 18 months (range 0-71). 16/31 (52%) had anterior uveitis, 7/31 (23%) had serous retinal detachment or panuveitis resembling Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, 4/31 (13%) had papillitis, and 6/31 (19%) had diplopia or ocular motility defect. There was one case each (3.2%) of melanoma associated retinopathy, corneal edema, granulomatous lacrimal gland enlargement, and choroidal neovascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular inflammation is a rare immune associated side effect of CPI treatment, the most common manifestation of which is anterior uveitis.

Uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with malignant melanoma

The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (B/MIs) in patients with malignant melanoma. Patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma who underwent radical or local resection for malignant melanoma, regardless of clinical stage or postoperative adjuvant therapy, at Hiroshima University Hospital from January 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled in a retrospective cohort. The medical records of patients were collected to estimate the prevalence of ocular adverse events. The clinical characteristics of patients who developed uveitis were reviewed. Among 152 patients, 54 and 12 were treated with ICIs and B/MIs, respectively. Four patients developed uveitis; 1 in the ICI group and 3 in the B/MI group, while there were no uveitis cases among patients who did not receive ICIs or B/MIs. Three patients had Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease-like findings. Uveitis was improved by steroid therapy with or without oncological treatment interruption. Oncological treatment could be resumed. Patients with melanoma treated with ICIs or B/MIs had a higher risk of uveitis compared with those who did not receive them. Oncological treatment could be resumed in all patients who developed uveitis.

Ocular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important part of the treatment of multiple cancers, especially for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Some tumors are capable of escaping immunosurveillance by stimulating checkpoints on T-cells. ICIs prevent activation of these checkpoints and thereby stimulate the immune system and indirectly the anti-tumor response. However, the use of ICIs is associated with various adverse events. Ocular side effects are rare but may have a major impact on the quality of life of the patient.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the medical databases Web of Science, Embase and PubMed was performed. Articles that provided a comprehensive description of a case report containing 1) cancer patient(s) treated with (a combination of) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 2) assessed occurrence of ocular adverse events, were included. A total of 290 case reports were included.

RESULTS

Melanoma (n = 179; 61.7%) and lung cancer (n = 56; 19.3%) were the most frequent reported malignancies. The primary used ICIs were nivolumab (n = 123; 42.5%) and ipilimumab (n = 116; 40.0%). Uveitis was most the common adverse event (n = 134; 46.2%) and mainly related to melanoma. Neuro-ophthalmic disorders, including myasthenia gravis and cranial nerve disorders, were the second most common adverse events (n = 71; 24.5%), mainly related to lung cancer. Adverse events affecting the orbit and the cornea were reported in 33 (11.4%) and 30 cases (10.3%) respectively. Adverse events concerning the retina were reported in 26 cases (9.0%).

CONCLUSION

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of all reported ocular adverse events related to the use of ICIs. The insights retrieved from this review might contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these ocular adverse events. Particularly, the difference between actual immune-related adverse events and paraneoplastic syndromes might be relevant. These findings might be of great value in establishing guidelines on how to manage ocular adverse events related to ICIs.

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Current status and future directions

Since 2011, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer immunotherapy dramatically expanded, both alone and in combination with either a different cancer treatment or with two different ICIs. With this increase in use have come a myriad of adverse effects from enhanced immune activation, including ophthalmic and neurologic immune related adverse events (irAE). Neuro-ophthalmic immune related adverse events (NOirAE) associated with use of ICIs are increasingly recognized and their severity may actually limit use of potentially life-saving immunotherapy. NOirAEs comprise a wide variety of presentations involving both the central and peripheral nervous system. They cause afferent or efferent visual dysfunction, including among them optic neuropathy and edema, orbital inflammatory disease, and ocular myasthenia. While treatment for irAEs typically involves immunosuppression with corticosteroids, there is no expert consensus regarding best practices for treatment of NOirAEs and whether to stop ICI immunotherapy for the cancer or not. This state-of-the-art review explores the pathophysiologic basis for NOirAEs, provides a framework for categorizing them within neuro-ophthalmology, and discusses what is needed to close the current knowledge gaps in diagnosis and management of an increasing population of cancer patients requiring neuro-ophthalmic care.

[Induction of Uveitis by Immune-Oncologic Therapies, Namely Checkpoint Inhibitors]

BACKGROUND

The recently introduced tumor therapies including immune checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (ICI) have substantially contributed to survival and quality of life of the affected patients, but are associated with class-specific, non-toxic immune-related side effects including uveitis. This narrative review focusses to summarize the immune-related adverse event profile associated with the use of ICI.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, the publication database of the National Institute of Health in the USA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) used the search terms "uveitis" AND "drug-induced" AND/OR "immune checkpoint inhibitor". All articles published in the last five years and the for the purpose of this review relevant cross references were evaluated.

RESULTS

A class-specific phenomenon of ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors is their capability to induce systemic and ocular autoimmunity. Ocular side effects are observed in up to 3% of patients and should be differentiated from toxic side effects, since this is not dose-dependent. Melanoma as underlying disease and Pembrolizumab as ICI significantly increase the risk. If timely recognized, systemic treatment with corticosteroids allows to preserve vision without cessation of the tumor treatment in more than 90% of these potentially life-threatening instances.

CONCLUSION

Given their impact onto the survival of cancer and namely melanoma patients, ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are increasingly used alone and in combination, which enhances their inherent risk of developing drug-induced ocular autoimmunity. Favorable functional outcomes are closely linked to early recognition and aggressive treatment of these complications considering the fact that these immune-related adverse events affect multiple organ systems and have an untreated lethality of up to 3%.