1
|
Geurts VCM, Balduzzi S, Steenbruggen TG, Linn SC, Siesling S, Badve SS, DeMichele A, Ignatiadis M, Leon-Ferre RA, Goetz MP, Wolff AC, Klar N, Michiels S, Loi S, Adams S, Horlings HM, Sonke GS, Salgado R, Kok M. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Stage I Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Untreated With Chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:1077-1086. [PMID: 38935352 PMCID: PMC11211993 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Importance The absolute benefit of chemotherapy for all patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear, and biomarkers are not currently available for selecting patients with an excellent outcome for whom neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy may have negligible benefit. High levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with favorable survival in TNBC, but data solely in stage I TNBC are lacking. Objective To examine the outcomes of patients of all ages with stage I TNBC solely and who received neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy, according to centrally reviewed sTIL levels at prespecified cutoffs. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used the Netherlands Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with stage I TNBC between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, who were not treated with chemotherapy. Only patients who did not receive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy were selected. The clinical data were matched with their corresponding pathology data provided by the Dutch Pathology Registry. Data analysis was performed between February and October 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years for the prespecified sTIL level cutoffs of 30%, 50%, and 75%. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were used for central review of histologic subtype, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines were used to score the sTIL levels; these levels were determined for 1041 patients. Results Of a total of 4511 females with stage I TNBC, patients who were not treated with chemotherapy were selected and tissue blocks requested; sTILs were scored in 1041 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.4 [11.1] years, median follow-up 11.4 [95% CI, 10.9-11.9] years) who were included in the analyses.. Most tumors (952 [91.5%]) were invasive carcinomas of nonspecial histologic subtype. Most patients (548 [52.6%]) had pT1cN0 tumors. Median (range) sTIL level was 5% (1%-99%). A total of 775 patients (74.4%) had sTIL levels below 30%, 266 (25.6%) had 30% or greater, 203 (19.5%) had 50% or greater, and 141 (13.5%) had 75% or greater. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a more favorable outcome vs patients with pT1cN0 tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 92% (95% CI, 89%-94%) vs 86% (95% CI, 82%-89%). In the overall cohort, sTIL levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared with sTIL levels less than 30% (96% and 87%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.77). High sTIL levels of 50% or greater were associated with a better outcome than low sTIL levels of less than 50% (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 95% increasing to 98% with sTIL levels of 75% or greater. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study showed that patients with stage I TNBC and high level of sTILs who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy had excellent 10-year BCSS. The findings further support the role of sTILs as integral biomarkers in prospective clinical trials of therapy optimization for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle C. M. Geurts
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Department of Biometrics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa G. Steenbruggen
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C. Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Health, Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Angela DeMichele
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Antonio C. Wolff
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Natalie Klar
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York
- Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York
- Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabe S. Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom (ZAS), Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yin J, Zhu C, Wang G, Gu J. Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:5901-5914. [PMID: 35795302 PMCID: PMC9252584 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s370351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In recent years, many meta-analyses of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment have been published; however, these studies still lack systematic summary. Therefore, the aim of this study is to summarize and evaluate the evidence level and efficacy of treatment for TNBC. Materials and Methods Retrospective and prospective studies on treatment of TNBC were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The literature search deadline was June 30, 2021. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted the data. In addition, the joint World Health Organization–United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization expert consultation was used to evaluate the validity of the evidence. Results A total of 28 meta-analyses were included in this study. The treatment interventions for TNBC mainly included surgery, chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, zoledronic acid, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog. Platinum improves the pathological complete response (PCR) rate of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the objective remission rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Capecitabine improves disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in patients treated with adjuvant CT. Bevacizumab was added to NACT to improve the PCR rate in patients. Immunotherapy improves the PCR rate in patients treated with NACT. The improvement in PCR rate in patients with high Ki67 expression treated with neoadjuvant therapy is highly suggestive. Other interventions had suggestive or weak evidence. Conclusion Among the strategies for treating TNBC, platinum, bevacizumab, and immunotherapy can lead to better PCR rates as part of a NACT regimen. Capecitabine as adjuvant CT and platinum in the treatment of metastatic TNBC can benefit patients’ survival. However, the effectiveness of other interventions for TNBC is not yet clear. Further research is needed in the future to obtain more reliable clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyun Yin
- Thyroid Breast Surgery, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Changtai Zhu
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Shanghai Sixth Peoples' Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaofeng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Gu
- Thyroid Breast Surgery, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|