Oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer in older patients: A subgroup analysis from the TOSCA trial

Treatment Adherence to Adjuvant Chemotherapy According to the New Standard 3-month CAPOX Regimen in High-risk Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer: A Population-based Evaluation in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

A 3-month adjuvant treatment regimen with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for high-risk stage II (T4N0) and stage III (node-positive) colon cancer was implemented in the Netherlands in 2017. The IDEA trial showed a clinically irrelevant difference in long-term outcomes in combination with a substantial decrease in toxicity in comparison with a 6-month regimen. A significantly increased dose intensity was observed in the 3-month arm, which might be essential to achieve optimal long-term outcomes. Hence, the aim of the present study was to evaluate if a similar dose intensity could be achieved in patients treated with adjuvant CAPOX for 3 months in daily practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients scheduled for 3 months of adjuvant CAPOX for high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The number of administered cycles and the daily cumulative dose of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were extracted from the medical files. Relative dose intensity (RDI) was determined by comparing the administered dose intensity with the standard dose intensity.

RESULTS

In total, 802 (80.0%) of the 1002 patients completed 4 cycles of CAPOX. The overall mean RDI of adjuvant treatment was 82.9% for capecitabine, and 83.8% for oxaliplatin, based on the combination of dose reductions and omitting cycles.

CONCLUSION

One out of 5 patients did not complete 4 cycles of CAPOX. The administered dose of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the first year after the update of the guideline was lower than the advised dose for the 3-month CAPOX regimen, and the administered dose in the IDEA study. The impact on long-term oncological outcomes should be awaited.

Recommendations of perioperative systemic therapies considering age or comorbidities in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and quality of cited evidence

IMPORTANCE

Perioperative therapy for cancer is offered to reduce the recurrence and improve overall long-term outcomes. Age and comorbidities of patients can influence the effectiveness and/or safety of perioperative therapy. It is important that key national guidelines, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, reflect the benefit of perioperative therapy for key subpopulations of patients. However, this has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative treatment guidance, with regards to age and comorbidities, reported in the NCCN guidelines DESIGN SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: NCCN age and comorbidity in perioperative treatment guidelines.

INTERVENTION

Age and Comorbidities MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The existence of age or comorbidity-specific guidelines for perioperative therapy, the presence of literature support for these specific guidelines, and where they exist.

RESULTS

Only 2 of the 10 cancer types studied had specific guidelines on perioperative therapy based on age, and 4/10 had guidelines on perioperative therapy considering patients' comorbidities. 5 of the 10 cancer guidelines and 4/10 had vague advice on consideration of age and comorbidities respectively. A total of 30 recommendations made across the guidelines studied. Studies that are cited to support these recommendations were often pooled analyses of RCTs or subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (33%).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study shows the lack of age and comorbidity-specific guidelines for many cancer types in the NCCN guidelines. In addition, several of these recommendations, where they exist, are also not supported by strong evidence such as RCTs. There is a need for more comprehensive guidelines that make recommendations accounting for patient-intrinsic factors.

Safety of solid oncology drugs in older patients: a narrative review

The older population represents ∼50%-60% of the population of newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Due to physiological and pathological aging and the increased presence of comorbidities and frailty factors, this population is at higher risk of serious toxicity from anticancer drugs and, consequently, often under-treated. Despite the complexity of these treatments, a good knowledge of the pharmacology of anticancer drugs and potentially risky situations can limit the emergence of potentially lethal toxicities in this population. This review focuses on optimizing systemic oncology treatments for older patients, emphasizing the unique characteristics of each therapeutic class and the necessity for a precautionary approach for this vulnerable population.

SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer (2023)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a 5-year overall survival rate of over 60%. The decrease in the rate of metastatic disease is due to screening programs and the population's awareness of healthy lifestyle. Similarly, advancements in surgical methods and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy have contributed to a decrease in the recurrence of resected disease. Before evaluating a patient's treatment, it is recommended to be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. In stage II tumors, the pathologic characteristics of poor prognosis must be known (T4, number of lymph nodes analyzed less than 12, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, obstruction or perforation, poor histologic grade, presence of tumor budding) and it is mandatory to determine the MSI/MMR status for avoiding administering fluoropyridimidines in monotherapy to patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. In stage III tumors, the standard treatment consists of a combination of fluoropyrimidine (oral or intravenous) with oxaliplatin for 6 months although the administration of CAPOX can be considered for 3 months in low-risk tumors. Neoadjuvant treatment is not consolidated yet although immunotherapy is achieving very good preliminary results in MSI-H patients. The use of ctDNA to define the treatment and monitoring of resected tumors is only recommended within studies. These guidelines are intended to help decision-making to offer the best management of patients with non-metastatic colon cancer.

Anti-Cancer Properties of Two Intravenously Administrable Curcumin Formulations as Evaluated in the 3D Patient-Derived Cancer Spheroid Model

Curcumin (Cur) is a heavily used complementary derived drug from cancer patients. Spheroid samples derived from 82 patients were prepared and treated after 48 h with two Cur formulations (CurA, CurB) in mono- and combination therapy. After 72 h, cell viability and morphology were assessed. The Cur formulations had significant inhibitory effects of -8.47% (p < 0.001), CurA of -10.01% (-50.14-23.11%, p = 0.001) and CurB of -6.30% (-33.50-19.30%, p = 0.006), compared to their solvent controls Polyethylene-glycol, β-Cyclodextrin (CurA) and Kolliphor-ELP, Citrate (CurB). Cur formulations were more effective in prostate cancer (-19.54%) and less effective in gynecological non-breast cancers (0.30%). CurA showed better responses in samples of patients <40 (-13.81%) and >70 years of age (-17.74%). CurB had stronger effects in metastasized and heavily pretreated tumors. Combinations of Cur formulations and standard therapies were superior in 20/47 samples (42.55%) and inferior in 7/47 (14.89%). CurB stimulated chemo-doublets more strongly than monotherapies (-0.53% vs. -6.51%, p = 0.022) and more effectively than CurA (-6.51% vs. 3.33%, p = 0.005). Combinations of Cur formulations with Artesunate, Resveratrol and vitamin C were superior in 35/70 (50.00%) and inferior in 16/70 (22.86%) of samples. Cur formulations were significantly enhanced by combination with Artesunate (p = 0.020). Cur formulations showed a high variance in their anti-cancer effects, suggesting a need for individual testing before administration.

Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: An ACCENT/IDEA Pooled Analysis of 12 Trials

PURPOSE

A number of studies suggest that older patients may have reduced or no benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer (CC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the prognostic impact of age, as well as treatment adherence/toxicity patterns according to age, in patients with stage III CC who received 3 or 6 months of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) on the basis of data collected from trials from the ACCENT and IDEA databases. Associations between age and time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), survival after recurrence (SAR), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed by a Cox model or a competing risk model, stratified by studies and adjusted for sex, performance status, T and N stage, and year of enrollment.

RESULTS

A total of 17,909 patients were included; 24% of patients were age older than 70 years (n = 4,340). Patients age ≥70 years had higher rates of early treatment discontinuation. Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were similar between those older and younger than 70 years, except for diarrhea and neutropenia that were more frequent in older patients treated with CAPOX (14.2% v 11.2%; P = .01 and 12.1% v 9.6%; P = .04, respectively). In multivariable analysis, TTR was not significantly different between patients <70 years and those ≥70 years, but DFS, OS, SAR, and CSS were significantly shorter in those patients ≥70 years.

CONCLUSION

In patients ≥70 years with stage III CC fit enough to be enrolled in clinical trials, oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to similar TTR compared with younger patients, suggesting similar efficacy. TTR may be a more appropriate end point for efficacy in this patient population.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence

BACKGROUND

A substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine backbone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, P < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, P < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (P < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, P < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, P < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, P = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, P = .18).

CONCLUSION

OP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.

Surgery for T4 Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients: Determinants of Outcomes

Background: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of older and younger patients with T4 colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients with T4 CRC treated surgically at Henri Mondor Hospital between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed in age subgroups (1) 50−69 years and (2) ≥70 years for overall and relative survival. The multivariable analyses were adjusted for adjusted for age, margin status, lymph node involvement, CEA level, postoperative complications (POC), synchronous metastases, and type of surgery. Results: Of 106 patients with T4 CRC, 57 patients (53.8%) were 70 years or older. The baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two age groups. Older patients underwent adjuvant therapy less commonly (42.9 vs. 57.1%; p = 0.006) and had a longer delay between surgery and chemotherapy (median 40 vs. 34 days; p < 0.001). A higher trend for POC was reported among the older patients but did not impact the survival outcomes. After adjusting for confounding factors, the overall survival was shorter among the older patients (HR = 3.322, 95% CI 1.49−7.39), but relative survival was not statistically correlated to the age group (HR = 0.873, 95% CI 0.383−1.992). Conclusions: Older patients with CRC were more prone to severe POC, but age did not impact the relative survival of patients with T4 colorectal cancer. Older patients should not be denied surgery based on age alone.

Tolerance to oral anticancer agent treatment in older adults with cancer: a secondary analysis of data from electronic health records and a pilot study of patient-reported outcomes

Background

More than 60% of cancer cases occur in older adults, and many are treated with oral anticancer agents. Yet, the treatment tolerability in older adults has not been fully understood due to their underrepresentation in oncology clinical trials, creating challenges for treatment decision-making and symptom management. The objective of this study was to investigate the tolerance of capecitabine, an example of oral chemotherapy, among older adults with cancer and explore factors associated with capecitabine-related side effects and treatment changes, to enhance supportive care.

Methods

A secondary analysis used combined data from electronic health records and a pilot study of patient-reported outcomes, with a total of 97 adult patients taking capecitabine during 2016–2017, including older adult patients aged 65 years or older (n = 43). The data extracted included patient socio-demographics, capecitabine information, side effects, and capecitabine treatment changes (dose reductions and dose interruptions). Bivariate correlations, negative binomial regression, and multiple linear regression were conducted for data analysis.

Results

Older adults were more likely to experience fatigue (86% vs. 51%, p = .001) and experienced more severe fatigue (β = 0.44, p = 0.03) and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (β = 1.15, p = 0.004) than younger adults. The severity of fatigue and HFS were associated with the number of outpatient medications (β = 0.06, p = 0.006) and the duration of treatment (β = 0.50, p = 0.009), respectively. Correlations among side effects presented different patterns between younger and older adults. Although more older adults experienced dose reductions (21% vs. 13%) and dose interruptions (33% vs. 28%) than younger adults, the differences were not statistically different. Female sex, breast cancer diagnosis, capecitabine monotherapy, and severe HFS were found to be associated with dose reductions (p-values < 0.05).

Conclusions

Older adults were less likely to tolerate capecitabine treatment and had different co-occurring side effects compared to younger adults. While dose reductions are common among older adults, age 65 years or older may not be an independent factor of treatment changes. Other socio-demographic and clinical factors may be more likely to be associated. Future studies can be conducted to further explore older adults’ tolerance to a variety of oral anticancer agents to generate more evidence to support optimal treatment decision-making and symptom management.

[Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of resectable colon cancer - Current standards and developments]

The present review focusses on perioperative diagnosis and treatment of resectable colon cancer. In UICC stages associated with a higher risk of recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor is an established standard. While initial data also indicate the benefit of Neoadjuvant, pre-operative chemotherapy, a final evaluation is still pending. The main focus of molecular testing in the perioperative setting is the analysis of microsatellite instability, which should routinely be performed in defined subgroups. In UICC stage II without risk factors, adjuvant therapy has a limited benefit and therefore is not a preferred option. In UICC stage II with risk factors, adjuvant therapy can be performed. The approach here is based on the recommendations applicable to stage III. In UICC stage III with low risk, adjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX for 3 months is preferentially recommended. In UICC stage III with high risk, adjuvant chemotherapy over 6 months is recommended, preferentially with FOLFOX. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is clearly associated with favorable prognosis in non-metastatic colon cancer. However, it cannot be considered a predictive factor for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, recent data of the IDEA study have opened the arena for shared decision making between physicians and patients allowing to define individual treatment approaches based on common assessment of risks and benefits. After completion of perioperative treatment, structured follow-up is of great importance and should be carried out according to the recommendations of the S3 guideline.