1
|
Fullerton SM, Brothers KB. Expanding Applications of Clinical Genetic Testing - Ethical Challenges. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1349-1351. [PMID: 38624028 DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2311466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Fullerton
- From the Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (S.M.F.); and the Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY (K.B.B.)
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- From the Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (S.M.F.); and the Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY (K.B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pichler T, Mumm F, Dehar N, Dickman E, Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna C, Dinkel A, Heinrich K, Hennink M, Parviainen AD, Raske V, Wicki N, Moore AC. Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6913. [PMID: 38298115 PMCID: PMC10905543 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision oncology, using comprehensive biomarker testing (cBT) to inform individual cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, includes increasingly complex technology and clinical data sets. People impacted by cancer (patients and caregivers) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) face distinct challenges in navigating the cBT and personalized treatment landscape. This review summarizes evidence regarding cBT-related communication between people impacted by cancer and HCPs and identifies important avenues for future research in precision oncology. METHODS A scoping review was conducted using records published in PubMed during January 2017-August 2022, focusing on the breadth of topics on patient-HCP communication and knowledge resources used by HCPs as guidance in cBT-related communication. Data were extracted from records meeting inclusion criteria, and findings were summarized according to main topics. RESULTS The search identified 287 unique records and data were extracted from 42 records, including nine from expert input. Most records originated from the United States included patients with different types of cancer, and oncologists were the main HCPs. Patients' motivation for undergoing cBT and receiving results was generally high in different settings. However, patients' understanding of cBT-related concepts was limited, and their knowledge and information preferences changed based on cBT implications and significance to family members. HCPs were valued by patients as a trusted source of information. Limited evidence was available on HCPs' information-seeking behavior and factors influencing cBT-related knowledge and confidence, often self-reported as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS Patient education by knowledgeable and confident HCPs, information management and a caring patient-HCP relationship communicating continuity of care regardless of cBT results are crucial to empower patients and shared decision-making in precision oncology. More data on the process and structure of cBT-related communication, distinction between and characterization of different timepoints of patient-HCP interactions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Pichler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University HospitalLMU MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University HospitalLMU MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Navdeep Dehar
- Department of Medical OncologyQueen's UniversityKingstonOntarioCanada
| | - Erin Dickman
- Oncology Nursing SocietyPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Celia Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna
- European Oncology Nursing SocietyBrusselsBelgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of NursingBarcelona UniversityBarcelonaCataloniaSpain
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and HealthTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich TUM (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich)MunichGermany
| | | | - Anndra D. Parviainen
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grauman Å, Ancillotti M, Veldwijk J, Mascalzoni D. Precision cancer medicine and the doctor-patient relationship: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:286. [PMID: 38098034 PMCID: PMC10722840 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02395-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of precision medicine is likely to have a huge impact on clinical cancer care, while the doctor-patient relationship is a crucial aspect of cancer care that needs to be preserved. This systematic review aimed to map out perceptions and concerns regarding how the implementation of precision medicine will impact the doctor-patient relationship in cancer care so that threats against the doctor-patient relationship can be addressed. METHODS Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Social Science Premium Collection) were searched for articles published from January 2010 to December 2021, including qualitative, quantitative, and theoretical methods. Two reviewers completed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction. Findings were summarized and explained using narrative synthesis. RESULTS Four themes were generated from the included articles (n = 35). Providing information addresses issues of information transmission and needs, and of complex concepts such as genetics and uncertainty. Making decisions in a trustful relationship addresses opacity issues, the role of trust, and and physicians' attitude towards the role of precision medicine tools in decision-making. Managing negative reactions of non-eligible patients addresses patients' unmet expectations of precision medicine. Conflicting roles in the blurry line between clinic and research addresses issues stemming from physicians' double role as doctors and researchers. CONCLUSIONS Many findings have previously been addressed in doctor-patient communication and clinical genetics. However, precision medicine adds complexity to these fields and further emphasizes the importance of clear communication on specific themes like the distinction between genomic and gene expression and patients' expectations about access, eligibility, effectiveness, and side effects of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Å Grauman
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
| | - M Ancillotti
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
| | - J Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karschnia P, Smits M, Reifenberger G, Le Rhun E, Ellingson BM, Galldiks N, Kim MM, Huse JT, Schnell O, Harter PN, Mohme M, von Baumgarten L, Albert NL, Huang RY, Mehta MP, van den Bent M, Weller M, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM, Berger MS, Tonn JC. A framework for standardised tissue sampling and processing during resection of diffuse intracranial glioma: joint recommendations from four RANO groups. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e438-e450. [PMID: 37922934 PMCID: PMC10849105 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00453-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection represents the standard of care for people with newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas, and the neuropathological and molecular profile of the resected tissue guides clinical management and forms the basis for research. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) consortium is an international, multidisciplinary effort that aims to standardise research practice in neuro-oncology. These recommendations represent a multidisciplinary consensus from the four RANO groups: RANO resect, RANO recurrent glioblastoma, RANO radiotherapy, and RANO/PET for a standardised workflow to achieve a representative tumour evaluation in a disease characterised by intratumoural heterogeneity, including recommendations on which tumour regions should be surgically sampled, how to define those regions on the basis of preoperative imaging, and the optimal sample volume. Practical recommendations for tissue sampling are given for people with low-grade and high-grade gliomas, as well as for people with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease. Sampling of liquid biopsies is also addressed. A standardised workflow for subsequent handling of the resected tissue is proposed to avoid information loss due to decreasing tissue quality or insufficient clinical information. The recommendations offer a framework for prospective biobanking studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Juelich, Germany
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Patrick N Harter
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany; Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malte Mohme
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Division of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hallquist MLG, Borensztein MJ, Coughlin CR, Buchanan AH, Andrew Faucett W, Peay HL, Smith ME, Tricou EP, Uhlmann WR, Wain KE, Ormond KE. Defining critical educational components of informed consent for genetic testing: views of US-based genetic counselors and medical geneticists. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1165-1174. [PMID: 37308598 PMCID: PMC10545703 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Consent and Disclosure Recommendation (CADRe) framework proposes that key components of informed consent for genetic testing can be covered with a targeted discussion for many conditions rather than a time-intensive traditional genetic counseling approach. We surveyed US genetics professionals (medical geneticists and genetic counselors) on their response to scenarios that proposed core informed consent concepts for clinical genetic testing developed in a prior expert consensus process. The anonymous online survey included responses to 3 (of 6 possible) different clinical scenarios that summarized the application of the core concepts. There was a binary (yes/no) question asking respondents whether they agreed the scenarios included the minimum necessary and critical educational concepts to allow an informed decision. Respondents then provided open-ended feedback on what concepts were missing or could be removed. At least one scenario was completed by 238 respondents. For all but one scenario, over 65% of respondents agreed that the identified concepts portrayed were sufficient for an informed decision; the exome scenario had the lowest agreement (58%). Qualitative analysis of the open-ended comments showed no consistently mentioned concepts to add or remove. The level of agreement with the example scenarios suggests that the minimum critical educational components for pre-test informed consent proposed in our prior work is a reasonable starting place for targeted pre-test discussions. This may be helpful in providing consistency to the clinical practice of both genetics and non-genetics providers, meeting patients' informational needs, tailoring consent for psychosocial support, and in future guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maia J Borensztein
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Curtis R Coughlin
- Department of Pediatrics and Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Holly L Peay
- RTI International, Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Eric P Tricou
- Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wendy R Uhlmann
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine; Department of Human Genetics; Center for Bioethics & Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fasola G, Barducci MC, Tozzi VD, Cavanna L, Cinieri S, Perrone F, Pinto C, Russo A, Sapino A, Grossi F, Aprile G. Implementation of Precision Oncology in the National Healthcare System: A Statement Proposal Endorsed by Italian Scientific Societies. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300166. [PMID: 37944071 PMCID: PMC10645411 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Precision oncology (PO) promises positive results for patients. To date, in Italy, the effort to implement PO has been made autonomously by regional health institutions in a top-down fashion. This approach is not very efficient and jeopardizes patients' equal access to PO. Similar outcomes have been recorded in other Western countries. We tested a method of collaboration among professionals, scientific societies, and government institutions to facilitate the delivery of PO innovation to patients' bedsides. METHOD We designed an organizational research project on the basis of a bottom-up approach. We started by observing PO-related activities in five health care authorities (HCAs) in one Italian region. We then compared the issues that emerged with those of three additional HCAs in other Italian regions. Using the results of the initial observation and adopting validated multiple-step consensus methods, we finally derived 14 statements that were approved by the four main scientific societies of oncology and pathology at the national level. RESULTS The 14 statements addressed the main issues linked to the implementation of PO in clinical practice. The strong professional consensus advocated for prompt adoption within the national healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS The consensus on the statements that were obtained shows the importance of a synergistic effort among professionals, scientific societies, and health care institutions in defining homogeneous solutions for innovation implementation within the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpiero Fasola
- Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, ASUFC, Udine, Italy
| | - Maria C. Barducci
- Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, ASUFC, Udine, Italy
| | - Valeria D. Tozzi
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Piacenza General Hospital, AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy
- Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici Ospedalieri (CIPOMO), Genova, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Complex Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Brindisi Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
- Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Milano, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Milano, Italy
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Carmine Pinto
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Collegio degli Oncologi Medici Universitari (COMU), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPeC), Milano, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Aprile
- Department of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bowman-Smart H, Gyngell C, Mand C, Amor DJ, Delatycki MB, Savulescu J. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for "Non-Medical" Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:3-20. [PMID: 34846986 PMCID: PMC7614328 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1996659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
The scope of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) could expand in the future to include detailed analysis of the fetal genome. This will allow for the testing for virtually any trait with a genetic contribution, including "non-medical" traits. Here we discuss the potential use of NIPT for these traits. We outline a scenario which highlights possible inconsistencies with ethical decision-making. We then discuss the case against permitting these uses. The objections include practical problems; increasing inequities; increasing the burden of choice; negative impacts on the child, family, and society; and issues with implementation. We then outline the case for permitting the use of NIPT for these traits. These include arguments for reproductive liberty and autonomy; questioning the labeling of traits as "non-medical"; and the principle of procreative beneficence. This summary of the case for and against can serve as a basis for the development of a consistent and coherent ethical framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Corresponding author: Hilary Bowman-Smart Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville Victoria Australia 3052, , (03) 8341 6200
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Cara Mand
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - David J. Amor
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Australia
| | - Martin B. Delatycki
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Witjes VM, Braspenning JCC, Hoogerbrugge N, Smolders YHCM, Hermkens DMA, Mourits MJE, Ligtenberg MJL, Ausems MGEM, de Hullu JA. Healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementation of universal tumor DNA testing in ovarian cancer patients: multidisciplinary focus groups. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:1-11. [PMID: 35570228 PMCID: PMC9829642 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00294-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Universal tumor DNA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer patients can function not only as an efficient prescreen for hereditary cancer testing, but may also guide treatment choices. This innovation, introduced as Tumor-First workflow, offers great opportunities, but ensuring optimal multidisciplinary collaboration is a challenge. We investigated factors that were relevant and important for large-scale implementation. In three multidisciplinary online focus groups, healthcare professionals (gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, clinical geneticists, and clinical laboratory specialists) were interviewed on factors critical for the implementation of the Tumor-First workflow. Recordings were transcribed for analysis in Atlas.ti according to the framework of Flottorp that categorizes seven implementation domains. Healthcare professionals from all disciplines endorse implementation of the Tumor-First workflow, but more detailed standardization and advice regarding the logistics of the workflow were needed. Healthcare professionals explored ways to stay informed about the different phases of the workflow and the results. They emphasized the importance of including all epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the workflow and monitoring this inclusion. Overall, healthcare professionals would appreciate supporting material for the implementation of the Tumor-First workflow in the daily work routine. Focus group discussions have revealed factors for developing a tailored implementation strategy for the Tumor-First workflow in order to optimize care for epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Future innovations affecting multidisciplinary oncology teams including clinical geneticists can benefit from the lessons learned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera M. Witjes
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jozé C. C. Braspenning
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne H. C. M. Smolders
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dorien M. A. Hermkens
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J. E. Mourits
- grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ,grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G. E. M. Ausems
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A. de Hullu
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shickh S, Hirjikaka D, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Reble E, Sam J, Panchal S, Aronson M, Graham T, Armel SR, Glogowski E, Elser C, Eisen A, Carroll JC, Shuman C, Seto E, Baxter NN, Scheer A, Shastri-Estrada S, Feldman G, Thorpe KE, Schrader KA, Lerner-Ellis J, Kim RH, Faghfoury H, Bombard Y. Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060899. [PMID: 35487723 PMCID: PMC9058789 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The high demand for genetic tests and limited supply of genetics professionals has created a need for alternative service delivery models. Digital tools are increasingly being used to support multiple points in the genetic testing journey; however, none are transferable across multiple clinical specialties and settings nor do they encompass the entire trajectory of the journey. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Genetics Adviser, an interactive, patient-facing, online digital health tool that delivers pre-test counselling, provides support during the waiting period for results, and returns results with post-test counselling, encompassing the entire patient genetic testing journey. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will compare the Genetics Adviser paired with a brief genetic counselling session to genetic counselling alone in a randomised controlled trial. One hundred and forty patients who previously received uninformative genetic test results for their personal and family history of cancer will be recruited from familial cancer clinics in Toronto and offered all clinically significant results from genomic sequencing. Participants randomised into the intervention arm will use the Genetics Adviser to learn about genomic sequencing, receive pre-test counselling, support during the waiting period and results, supplemented with brief counselling from a genetic counsellor. Participants in the control arm will receive standard pre-test and post-test counselling for genomic sequencing from a genetic counsellor. Our primary outcome is decisional conflict following pre-test counselling from the Genetics Adviser+genetic counsellor or counsellor alone. Secondary outcomes include: knowledge, satisfaction with decision-making, anxiety, quality of life, psychological impact of results, empowerment, acceptability and economic impact for patients and the health system. A subset of patients will be interviewed to assess user experience. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System (REB#20-035). Results will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04725565.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daena Hirjikaka
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rita Kodida
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emma Reble
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan Sam
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Zane Cohen Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy Graham
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Randall Armel
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Christine Elser
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- Ray D Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Seto
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adena Scheer
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Geoff Feldman
- Ontario Disability Coalition, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin E Thorpe
- Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanna Faghfoury
- Fred A Litwin and Family Centre in Genetic Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Letter comments on: Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action: A single-centre comparison of mainstreamed genetic testing with a specialist genetics service - Focus on consent discussions. Eur J Cancer 2021; 155:307-309. [PMID: 34400058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Response to letter entitled: Re: Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action: Discussing opt-out options during informed consent discussions in mainstream settings. Eur J Cancer 2021; 155:310-312. [PMID: 34391611 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|